Objective Risk factors for real-word immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer were analyzed by systematic analysis. Methods Computerized retrieval of PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library , WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases was carried out. Studies were collected from the database establishment to March 2023. Three researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4.1software. Results A total of 18 studies were included with a total of 4 990 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that, interstitial pneumonia [odds ratio (OR)=9.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.66 - 18.67, P<0.01], smoking history (OR=2.39, 95%CI 1.29 - 4.45, P<0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR=5.54, 95%CI 2.96 - 10.36, P<0.01), chest radiotherapy (OR=2.74, 95%CI 1.80 - 4.19, P<0.01), pulmonary fibrosis (OR=7.46, 95%CI 4.25 - 13.09, P<0.01), high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (OR=2.98, 95%CI 1.71 - 5.22, P<0.01), high absolute eosinophil count (AEC) (OR=3.92, 95%CI 2.17 - 7.08, P<0.01) and pembrolizumab (OR=2.90, 95%CI 1.56 - 5.37, P<0.01) were independent risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in lung cancer patients. Conclusions Interstitial pneumonia, smoking history, COPD, Chest radiotherapy, pulmonary fibrosis, high PD-L1expression, high AEC and pembrolizumab are independent risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in lung cancer patients. Due to insufficient evidence on the risk factors of low albumin, more studies are needed to further identify it.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide. Although surgery remains the key approach for achieving long-term survival, the majority of patients are ineligible for surgery at the time of initial diagnosis, resulting in suboptimal overall treatment outcomes. This paper reviews the current treatment strategies for HCC, with a particular focus on comprehensive treatment plans centered around surgery. It explores the status and advancements in multidisciplinary treatment approaches, including preoperative conversion therapy, minimally invasive surgery, and postoperative adjuvant therapies. Through the adoption of rational comprehensive treatment strategies, it is anticipated that the therapeutic outcomes and quality of life for HCC patients can be improved.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy, safety, and problems of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their combination with other therapies in treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodThe relevant literatures on the clinical trials of ICIs and their combination therapy in patients with advanced HCC in recent years were collected and reviewed.ResultsThe therapeutic effects of programmed death receptor 1 and its ligands and cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials of patients with advanced HCC were better, but the therapeutic effect of single drug was limited. Double immunotherapy and its combination with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors, molecular targeted drugs, and local therapy might make patients achieve more remarkable therapeutic effects, especially in combination with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors.ConclusionICIs could remarkably improve survival prognosis of patients with advanced HCC, combined immunotherapy has better survival benefits.
Objective To investigate the prediction of baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on the prognosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) + lenvatinib + camrelizumab. Method The clinical data of 58 patients treated with TACE + lenvatinib + camrelizumab in the Department of Liver Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2020 to May 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Among the 58 cases included, 7 cases were complete response (CR), 37 cases were partial response (PR), 11 cases were stable disease (SD), and 3 cases were progressive disease (PD). All cases had different degrees of adverse events, including 58 cases of grade 1, 36 cases of grade 2, 35 cases of grade 3, and 1 case of grade 4. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) were 75.9% (44/58) and 94.8% (55/58), respectively. The hepatectomy rate was 31.0% (18/58) and the conversion success rate was 37.9% (22/58). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NLR was an independent risk factor for ORR (OR=0.093, P=0.008). All cases were followed up for 16–60 weeks, with a median follow-up of 34 weeks. Overall survival situation (χ2=4.163, P=0.041) and progression free survival situation (χ2=10.626, P=0.001) in the low NLR group were better than those of the high NLR group. Conclusion NLR has clinical significance in predicting the prognosis of uHCC cases underwent TACE + lenvatinib + camrelizumab, which is worthy of further study.
Objective To summarize the research progress of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors before liver transplantation of liver cancer. Method The literatures on the application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors before liver transplantation of liver cancer were collected and reviewed. Results PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors preoperatively treated liver transplantation recipients had a low incidence of postoperative rejection, and routine usage of hormone and immune tolerance induction therapy in liver transplantation recipients might reduce the incidence of rejection caused by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Conclusion Preoperative usage of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have more benefits than risks for patients with advanced liver cancer.
Most immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) resulted from excessive immune response against normal organs. The severity, timing, and organs affected by these events were often unpredictable. Adverse reactions could cause treatment delays or interruptions, in rare cases, pose a life-threatening risk. The mechanisms underlying irAE involved immune cell dysregulation, imbalances in inflammatory factor expression, alterations in autoantibodies and complement activation, even dysbiosis of intestinal microorganisms. However, the mechanisms of irAE occurrence might differ slightly among organs due to variations in their structures and the functions of resident immune cells. Future research should focus on the development of targeted drugs for the prevention or treatment of irAE based on the mechanisms by which irAE occurs in different organs. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying irAE occurrence would aid clinicians in effectively utilizing ICIs and provide valuable guidance for their clinical application.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly malignant tumor of the digestive system and has a concealed onset with rapid progression. The majority of PC patients are diagnosed in the middle to late stages, and the effectiveness of traditional treatment methods for advanced pancreatic cancer is limited, which results in a poor prognosis. Immunotherapy, as a novel treatment strategy, aims to suppress tumor growth and metastasis by modulating and enhancing the human immune system. It has become a hot point in current cancer prevention and treatment. This article will elaborate on the newest advancements in immunotherapy for PC. Furthermore, we point out the major challenges of PC immunotherapy.
Surgery remains as the primary definitive therapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) currently. However, quite a few NSCLC patients, especially in the later stage, suffered tumor recurrence after resection. Safer and more effective perioperative treatment is urgently needed to reduce the recurrence risk after NSCLC surgery. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can effectively prevent tumor immune evasion and have been shown to be a feasible, safe and effective neoadjuvant therapy for resectable NSCLC. Nevertheless, certain crucial problems, including the final effect on NSCLC recurrence, the selection of beneficial group and optimal treatment protocol are yet unsolved. Fortunately, several phase Ⅲ randomized controlled trials are ongoing to answer these questions and will hopefully provide stronger evidence.
In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, China. The lung imaging finding is like that of the lung cancer immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) associated pneumonia. Therefore, we speculated that they may have similar pathogenesis and treatment strategies, which is reviewed in this article in order to provide some reference to timely and effectively reduce the fatality rate of COVID-19.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical characteristics, potential molecular mechanisms, and predictive biomarkers of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) associated with the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with immune checkpoint inhibitors and to explore its clinical implications. MethodsThe relevant domestic and international literature was reviewed to analyze the definition, mechanisms, and predictive factors of HPD. Particular attention was given to key factors affecting HPD development, including clinical characteristics, tumor microenvironment, genetic mutations, and inflammatory factors. ResultsHPD significantly decreased the survival of HCC patients. Its occurrence might be associated with individual variability, dysregulation of the tumor microenvironment, tumor-related genetic mutations, and elevated level of inflammatory factors. Clinical features such as female, advanced age, elevated Child-Pugh score, portal vein tumor thrombus could identify high-risk populations for HPD. Blood-based biomarkers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, and alpha-fetoprotein showed potential value in predicting HPD. ConclusionsSystematic investigation of the molecular mechanisms and predictive biomarkers of HPD are crucial for optimizing immunotherapy strategies and improving patient’s outcomes. Large-scale, multi-center studies are needed to achieve precise prediction and personalized intervention in the future.