Objective To deeply explore the consultation model of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) reconstruction. Methods After analyzing early consultation model of CRC-MDT, some unreasonable factors were discovered and more suitable model was found. Results With analyzing the problems of members, time and management in early consultation model, reconstructing consultative joints and links, and optimizing flow-sheet were choosed. Finally, the MDT project was set up inter-project clinical round and network consultation. Conclusion The feedback from patients after consultation model reconstruction shows good results. Total consultative system in CRC-MDT will be completely finished step by step. However, advanced researches are still needed.
Objective To evaluate the risk of management decision combined neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with operation for colorectal cancer by means of the colorectal cancer model of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI-CCM). Methods One hundred and eighty-one eligible patients (102 male, 79 female, mean age 58.78 years), which were pathologically proved colorectal cancer in our ward from July to November 2007, involved 62 colonic and 119 rectal cancer. The enrollment were assigned into multi-disciplinary team (MDT) group (n=65) or non-MDT group (n=116), according to whether the MDT was adopted, and the operative risk was analyzed by ACPGBI-CCM. Results The baseline characteristics of MDT and non-MDT group were coherent. The watershed of lower risk group (LRG) and higher risk group (HRG) was set as predictive mortality=2.07%. The time involving extraction of gastric, urethral and drainage tube, feeding, out-of-bed activity after operation in MDT group, whatever in LRG or HRG, were statistically earlier than those in non-MDT group (P＜0.05). The resectable rate in LRG was statistically higher than that in HRG (P＜0.05), and the proportion of Dukes staging was significantly different (P＜0.05) between two groups; Moreover, predictive mortality in HRG was statistically higher than that in LRG (P＜0.05), while actually there was no death in both groups. Conclusion Dukes staging which is included as an indispensable option by ACPGBI-CCM is responsible for the lower predictive mortality in LRG.Hence, the value of ACPGBI-CCM used to asses the morbidity of complications within 30 days postoperatively would be warranted by further research. The postoperative risk evaluation can serve as a novel routine to comprehensively analyze the short-term safe in the MDT.
Objective To compare the clinical effect between neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with operation and simple operation under multi-disciplinary team in rectal cancer. Methods A survey of 72 patients with rectal cancer from Nov. 2007 to Mar. 2008 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups using a simple random method: 33 cases in combined therapy group were treated with single period neo-adjuvant chemotherapy as well as operation and 39 cases in control group received operation only. To compare the differences of perioperative period indexes between two groups. Results During the differences of indexes of age, gender, differentiation degree, clinicopathologic stage as well as the distance to dentate line of tumor, there was no statistical significance between combined therapy group and control group (Pgt;0.05). And at the same time, the operative type, operative time and bleeding quantity in operation had no statistically significant difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). As for the postoperative rehabilitation indexes, the time of vent to normal in combined therapy group was earlier than that in control group, but the intake time was later than that in control group （Plt;0.05）. Falling range from preoperative CEA to postoperative CEA was larger in combined therapy group than that in control group （Plt;0.05）; and the falling range from preoperative WBC to postoperative WBC had no significant difference between two groups （Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of combined therapy is obviously superior to simple operation, suggesting that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with operation is feasible and safe.
Objective To observe the clinical application of multidisciplinary team (MDT) treatment in the management of geriatric hip fractures and evaluate its effectiveness. Methods The clinical data of 76 elderly patients with hip fracture managed by MDT approach between August 2016 and February 2018 (MDT group) were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 102 patients managed by traditional orthopedics approach between January 2014 and December 2015 (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture type, surgical procedure, and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the number of comorbidities in the MDT group was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (t=6.295, P=0.000), and the proportion of the number of comorbidities between the two groups was also significantly different (χ2=28.442, P=0.000). The consultation rate and transfer rate, time to surgery, rate of surgery within 2 or 3 days, operation time, postoperative hospitalization stay, length of hospitalization stay, hospitalization expense, rate of loss to follow-up, and mortality during hospitalization, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and 1-year mortality after operation were compared between the two groups. Results The rates of total consultations of the conventional group and the MDT group were 56.86% (58/102) and 56.58% (43/76), respectively, and the rates of total transferred patients were 15.69% (16/102) and 15.79% (12/76), respectively, with no significant differences (P>0.05). Among them, the proportion of patients who transferred into intensive care unit (ICU) in conventional group was significantly higher than that in MDT group and the rates of patients who received geriatric consultation or transferred into geriatric department in MDT group were both significantly higher than those in conventional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in rates of other department consultation or transfer between the two groups (P>0.05). The time to surgery, operation time, postoperative hospitalization stay, and length of hospitalization stay in MDT group were significantly less than those in conventional group, but the proportion of patients who received surgery within 3 days in MDT group was significantly higher than that in conventional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who received surgery within 2 days (χ2=2.027, P=0.155). The hospitalization expenses of total patients, femoral neck fracture, and intertrochanteric fracture subgroups in MDT group were all significantly higher than those in conventional group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in hospitalization expense of subtrochanteric fracture subgroup between the two groups (Z=−1.715, P=0.086). The rate of loss to follow-up in conventional group and MDT group was 6.86% (7/102) and 3.95% (3/76), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.698, P=0.403). The mortalities at hospitalization, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after operation in conventional group were 0, 1.05% (1/95), 3.16% (3/95), and 7.37% (7/95), respectively, and in MDT group were 0, 0, 2.74% (2/73), 6.85% (5/73), respectively, showing no significant differences in mortalities between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion MDT model in the management of geriatric hip fractures has been shown to reduce time to surgery, postoperative hospitalization stay, length of hospitalization stay, operation time, and the proportion of patients who received ICU consultation or transferred into ICU. Furthermore, MDT can improve the capacity for developing operations for patients with complex medical conditions and make medical resources used more rationally.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of multidisciplinary team (MDT) co-management models in the clinical treatment of geriatric hip fractures.MethodsThe literature about types and characteristics of MDT for geriatric hip fracture treatment were extensively reviewed, and the advantages of its clinical application were analysed and summarised. Finally, the MDT model and characteristics of geriatric hip fracture in the Zhongda Hospital affiliated to Southeast University were introduced in detail.ResultsClinical models of MDT are diverse and have their own characteristics, and MDT can shorten the length of stay and waiting time before operation, reduce the incidence of internal complications, save labor costs, and reduce patient mortality.ConclusionThe application of MDT in the treatment of geriatric hip fracture has achieved remarkable results, which provides an optimal scheme for the treatment of geriatric hip fracture.
ObjectiveTo explore value of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion in comprehensive downstaging treatment of liver cancer.MethodThe clinical data of 2 patients with liver cancer who could not undergo the radical surgery admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsCase 1 was diagnosed as the liver cancer with extensive double lung metastasis at admission. The clinical stage was stage Ⅲb; After MDT discussion, the patient was treated with chemotherapy and embolization via hepatic artery and bronchial artery; At the same time, the patient was treated with apatinib; At present, the metastasis of both lungs disappeared completely; The clinical stage was stage ⅡB, and the radical resection was proposed. Case 2 was diagnosed as the right liver cancer at admission. The clinical stage was stage Ⅰ b. The preoperative examination showed that the hepatic reserve function was poor and the patient could not tolerate the half hepatectomy; After MDT discussion, the patient was treated with the combination of chemotherapy and embolization via the hepatic artery and apatinib in the same period; At the same time, the patient was treated with liver protection. The clinical stage was reduced to stage Ⅰ a. The hepatic reserve function improved and the laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy was performed, no recurrence or metastasis was found after 3 months follow-up.ConclusionComprehensive downstaging treatment based on MDT model could bring better clinical outcomes for patients with liver cancer who are unable to undergo one-stage radical surgery.
Objective To explore the research progress of the multimodal clinical support system (CSS). Methods With recognized development and operation of the multi-model CSS, and compared to the traditional CSS, to explore the research progress of the multimodal CSS. Results Based on the realization of the concept, purpose and characteristics of the multimodal CSS, it has been known that the international research progress of the multimodal CSS. Conclusion The developing and evolving of the CSS model have offered a new assist to the multi-disciplinary treatment model, and have enhanced the improving system associated with the practice of evidence-based medicine. However, the application of clinical support system program (CSSP) in our country still needs more research.
ObjectiveTo explore effect of rapid rehabilitation management measures by multidisciplinary cooperation on hospital stay and complications after liver transplantation. MethodsThe convenience sampling method was used to collect the liver transplant patients in the Department of Liver Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The patients underwent the rapid rehabilitation management measures by multidisciplinary cooperation from January 2017 to December 2017 as the study group and the patients underwent the routine management measures from January 2015 to December 2016 as the control group. The postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay time and postoperative hospitalization time were recorded and the postoperative complications were observed. ResultsA total of 175 patients with liver transplantation were included, including 78 cases in the study group and 97 cases in the control group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, hemoglobin, leukocyte count, platelet count, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, albumin, prothrombin time, acute liver failure, model for end-stage liver disease score, liver transplantation mode, operation time, and intraoperative bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative ICU stay time and postoperative hospitalization time were shorter and the incidences of total postoperative complications and gade of complications were lower in the study group as compared with the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionFrom preliminary results of this study, rapid rehabilitation management measures by multidisciplinary cooperation could shorten postoperative ICU stay time and postoperative hospitalization time, reduce incidence of postoperative complications, and be more conducive to postoperative rehabilitation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnosis and treatment value of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) model in patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with liver metastasis.MethodThe experiences of MDT model in treating huge (>10 cm) GIST with liver metastasis in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College on August 2018 were summarized.ResultsThe 46 years old female patient diagnosed with intestinal stromal tumor with liver metastasis at the initial visit. There was no chance of surgery. After the neoadjuvant therapy, the tumor was shrunk. After 2 MDT discussions, the R0 resection of the primary tumor or metastases was successfully performed. And then the patient continued to receive the oral imatinib 600 mg/d. The current overall survival was 31 months till now. No recurrence of the tumor was observed and the follow-up was still continued.ConclusionsTyrosine kinase inhibitors combined metastasectomy may be the most appropriate treatment for patient diagnosed with GIST with liver metastasis, which can improve the survival. In clinical work, MDT model could be used reasonably and carried out during the whole treatment process to provide the best treatment option for patient with GIST with liver metastasis.
Objective The article explained how to build the data system and its running strategy in the mode of multi-disciplinary team （MDT） for colorectal carcinoma. Methods It illuminated the cause of the data system building, also described the essential composition of the data system and how to support the running of the data system, and it discussed the value feedback of the data system, lastly the author proposed the prospect of the data system building. Results The data system could work normally through consultation of doctors, follow-up, clinical support and appropriate implement of construction of information flow-sheet in colorectal carcinoma MDT mode. Conclusion As the foundation of colorectal carcinoma MDT, data system could show both medical and social value through change of medical mode.