ObjectiveTo explore feasibility and safety of π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG).MethodThe clinical data of 20 patients who underwent TLTG, admitted in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsTLTG with π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis was successfully carried out in all 20 patients. The operative time was (236.0±55.5) min, the π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis time was (25.7±4.8) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (192.0±148.9) mL, the operative incision length was (3.7±0.8) cm. The postoperative pain score was 2.4±1.1, the first flatus time was (3.1±0.9) d, the first postoperative ambulation time was (1.8±0.7) d, the removal time of nasoenteral nutrution tube was (7.4±2.4) d, the liquid diet time was (6.2±1.4) d, the removal time of intraoabdominal drainage tube was (7.8±2.8) d, the postoperative hospital stay was (10.8±3.0) d. There was no death related to the anastomosis in all patients. Two patients developed a little pleural effusion and 1 patient developed lymphatic leakage were cured with conservative treatment. One patient with intraabdominal encapsulated effusion was cured by puncture and drainage treating. There was no postive incisal margin. The length of upper segment of resection form gastric cancer was (2.3±1.7) cm, the maximum tumor diameter was (4.9±2.8) cm, the number of dissected lymph nodes was 27.9±5.6. All patients were followed up 3–15 months. Eight patients underwent endoscopic examination had no obvious anastomosis stenosis and esophageal reflux. Two patients died of tumor recurrence and metastasis witnin one year after operation, and the rest had disease-free survival until the end of follow-up.ConclusionFrom preliminary results of limited cases in this study, π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in TLTG is a technically safe and feasible surgical procedure in treatment of gastric cancer.
Objective To investigate the effect on motility function of remnant esophagus and intrathoracic stomach after esophagectomy for esophageal and cardiac carcinoma. Methods Thirty nine patients with esophageal and cardiac carcinoma were divided into two groups according to surgical procedure. Group of anastomosis above aortic arch （n = 21）： esophagogastrostomy was performed above the aortic arch in patients with esophageal carcinoma of the middle third; group of anastomosis below aortic arch（n= 18）： esophagogastrostomy was performed below the aortic arch in patients with esophageal carcinoma of the low third and cardiac carcinoma. Six health volunteers without gastroesophageal reflux were recruited as control group. Esophageal manometry and upper alimentary tract roentgenography were performed in all patients. Results There was a high pressure zone at the anastomotic orifice in parts of patients of both anastomosis groups. The resting pressure of remnant esophagus was higher than that in control group （P〈0. 05）, and similar to the resting pressure of intrathoracic stomach （P〉0. 05）. There was no significant difference in resting pressure of remnant esophagus and intrathoracic stomach between two anastomosis groups （P〉0.05）. The amplitude and number of primary peristalsis in remnant esophagus of group of anastomosis above aortic arch were significantly reduced in comparison with control group. The number of primary peristalsis in remnant esophagus of group of anastomosis above aortic arch was significantly lower than that of group of anastomosis below aortic arch （P〈0. 05）. The motility in the body of intrathoracic stomach was not observed. Weak motor activity of the gastric antrum was observed with upper alimentary tract roentgenography after surgery and evidently recovered 1 year after surgery. Conclusions The resting pressure of remnant esophagus and intrathoracic stomach is not influenced by the site of anastomosis. Esophagogastric anastomosis at the upper thorax is likely to result in poor motility of remnant esophagus. The motor activity of intrathoracic stomach becomes weak after esophagectomy and then recovers gradually over time, hut still fail to return to normal level.
Objective To compare short-term quality of life and postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with different routes reconstruction after McKeown esophagectomy. Methods The clinical data of 144 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received McKeown esophagectomy in Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2016 to October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them 93 patients accepted retrosternal approach (a RR group, 71 males and 22 females at an average age of 63.5±7.7 years) and 51 patients accepted posterior mediastinal approach (a PR group, 39 males and 12 females at an average age of 62.3±8.0 years). Short-term surgical outcomes were compared and a Quality of Life Questionnaire of Patients Underwent Esophagectomy 1.0 was performed at postoperative 1st and 3rd month. Results There was no difference in two groups in sex, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), and location and clinical stage of tumors (P>0.05). The neoadjuvant therapy was more performed in the RR group (16.1%vs. 5.9%, P=0.075). There were more robot-assisted esophagecctomy operations performed in the PR group (52.9% vs. 45.2%, P=0.020). No significant difference was noted in operation duration, intraoperative blood loss or length of ICU stay between the RR and PR groups (251.3±59.1 min vs. 253.1±27.7 min, P=0.862; 223.7±75.1 ml vs. 240.0±75.1 ml, P=0.276; 3.7±6.6 d vs. 2.3±2.1 d, P=0.139). The patients in the PR group had more lymph nodes dissected and shorter hospital stay (P<0.001). Rate of R1/2 resection was higher in the RR group (12.9%vs. 5.9%, P=0.187). No surgery-related mortality was observed in both groups. The anastomotic leak and the anastomotic stricture was higher in the RR group than that in the PR group (25.8% vs. 5.9%, P=0.003). No significant difference was found between the two groups in the quality of life at postoperative 1st and 3rd month. However, the quality of life at postoperative 3rd month significantly improved in both groups (P<0.001). Compared with the PR group, the dysphagia was more severe in the RR group at postoperative 1st month (3.3±1.5 vs. 2.6±1.1, P=0.007), while the reflux symptom was lighter at postoperative 3rd month (3.0±1.8 vs. 3.6±1.6, P=0.045). Conclusion The two different routes reconstruction after McKeown esophagectomy are both safe and feasible. The anterior mediastinal approach increases the risk of anastomotic leak, but with low incidence of reflux symptom.
Robotic gastric cancer surgery had developed rapidly in recent years, and its clinical application had come a long way. More and more studies had demonstrated that the robotic gastric cancer surgery was a safe and feasible procedure, and showed the technical advantages in the lymph node dissection, bleeding control, precise surgery, and postoperative recovery over laparoscopic surgery. However, some limitations such as the high surgical costs, lack of high-quality evidence, insufficient intelligence limited the development of robotic gastric cancer surgery. In the future, with more high-quality evidence-based medicine research and the development of intelligent surgical robots, the robotic gastric cancer surgery will be further standardized and promoted. We believe that robotic gastric cancer surgery will become the mainstream of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo summarize the experience in the treatment of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy.MethodThe clinicopathologic data of 11 patients with anastomotic leakage after the laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy in the Nanchong Central Hospital from May 2016 to January 2018 were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsAmong the 11 patients with anastomotic leakage, 3 were grade Ⅱ leakages and 8 were grade Ⅲa leakages. There were no symptoms in the 3 cases of anastomotic leakage, which were confirmed only by the gastrointestinal radiography and were healed after 7 d of conservative treatment. Among the 8 patients with the clinical symptoms, 5 cases were treated by the endoscopic drainage and negative pressure suction for 60–90 d, 3 cases were treated by the endoscopic covered stent, 2 cases were cured after 30–60 d, and 1 case died of massive bleeding after 45 d.ConclusionsDue to differences of location, time, limitation, and size of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy, individualized treatment should be performed according to specific situation of patients in local treatment. Endoluminal covered stent has certain clinical application value.
ObjectiveTo summarize the procedure of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) with conventional laparoscopic instruments for different tumor diameter and different site of gastric stromal tumor. MethodThe clinical data, intraoperative procedure, and postoperative recovery of 34 patients with gastric stromal tumor from December 2009 to February 2014 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThe transumbilical SILS was performed successfully in all the 34 patients.Among these patients, the wedge resection of stomach was perfor-med in 27 patients, distal subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 6 patients, distal subtotal gastrectomy complicated with multivisceral resection was performed in 1 patient.The pathology confirmed that the diameter of tumors was from 0.6 cm to 10.0 cm (average 3.4 cm).The resection margins were tumor free.The risk assessment showed that tumors with extremely low risk were in 9 cases, low risk were in 17 cases, intermediate risk were in 6 cases, high risk were in 2 cases.During surgery, 9 tumors were located on the fundus of stomach, 6 tumors on the gastric greater curvature, 7 tumors on the gastric lesser curvature, 2 tumors on the anterior and posterior wall of the stomach respectively, 3 tumors on the cardia below, 4 tumors on the gastric antrum, tumor invaded the surrounding organs in 1 case.There was no conversion to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery.no intraoperative or postoperative complications were experi-enced in all the patients except one was postoperative intraperitoneal bleeding and one was incision infection.All the patients were followed for an average of 25 months (range 3-49 months), there was no evident recurrence of disease. ConclusionsThe transumbilical SILS for gastric stromal tumor is a feasible and safe technique when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.The suitable procedure of SILS should be selected for gastric stromal tumor according their different size and location.
Objective To investigate the changes of gastrointestinal hormone and body composition in patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy. Methods Thirty-eight patients with gastric cancer were divided into three groups: distal gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group and 9 volunteers as control group. The nutrition status and gastrointestinal function were evaluated by four times. The time of postoperative first anal exsufflation and defacation, hospital stay and complications were recorded, and the pre-meal and the post-meal level of gastrointestinal hormones 1 month after operation were detected. Results Compared with control group, the basic levels of somatostatin (SS), cholecystokinin (CCK) and motilin (MTL) of distal gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group significantly increased (Plt;0.01). The post-meal level of gastrointestinal hormones significantly increased as compared with the pre-meal level in each group (Plt;0.01). The CCK in proximal gastrectomy group was lower than that of distal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group (Plt;0.01). The postoperative body weight and body composition in each group decreased. One month after operation, patients of total gastrectomy group got the lowest body weight (Plt;0.01). The decreasing level of fat free mass (FFM) was listed by total gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and distal gastrectomy group. The edema index had significant difference in distal gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group (Plt;0.01), and total gastrectomy group was the most obvious. The postoperative passing flatus and defecation time and average hospital stay in total gastrectomy group were significantly prolonged (Plt;0.05). The gastrointestinal symptoms score among three groups was significantly different (Plt;0.05). Conclusion There are different changes of gastrointestinal hormone and body composition in patients with gastric cancer after different gastrectomy, the basic levels of SS, CCK and MTL of distal gastrectomy group, proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group are higher than those of control group. The CCK of proximal gastrectomy group is lower than that of distal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group. Patients received total gastrectomy lose much body weight and FFM and get higher edema index.
Objective This study was conducted to evaluate and analyze the clinical effect between subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), especially compare the incidences of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) between them. Methods The documents about SSPPD and PPPD were searched in Cochrane Library, PubMed database, Embase database, Web of Science, Chinese biomedicine database, CNKI database, VIP database, and WanFang database. The quality of included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane systematic review methods, and statistical analysis of data was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Firstly, comparison of incidence of DGE and other effective indexes between SSPPD group and PPPD group was performed by enrolling all included studies, whether met the DGE standards of International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) or not, and then comparison of incidence of DGE and clinical DGE was performed by enrolling included studies that met the DGE standards of ISGPS. Results Ten studies were included, with a total of 804 patients, in which, 433 cases underwent SSPPD and 371 cases underwent PPPD. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, in all the included studies, the total incidence of DGE〔OR = 0.33, 95%CI is (0.17, 0.63),P = 0.000 9〕, and the time of nasogastric tube〔MD = –2.65，95%CI is (–4.49, –0.80),P = 0.005〕, and time of stared liquid diet〔MD = –4.13, 95%CI is (–7.35, –0.91),P = 0.01〕 showed significant differences. The total incidence of DGE, the time of nasogastric tube, and time of stared liquid diet were less in SSPPD group. But there was no significant difference between the SSPPD group and PPPD group in operating time, intraoperative blood loss, time of started solid diet, hospital stay, and incidences of reinsertion of nasogastric tube, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, reoperation, wound infection, postoperative hemorrhage, and mortality (P>0.05). In the 8 studies adopted DGE standard of ISGPS, the total incidence of DGE〔OR = 0.31, 95%CI is (0.15, 0.65)，P = 0.002〕 and incidence of clinical DGE 〔OR = 0.13，95%CI is (0.05, 0.40),P = 0.000 3〕showed significant differences. The total incidence of DGE and incidence of clinical DGE were both lower in SSPPD group. Conclusions Compared with PPPD group, SSPPD group was associated with significantly less incidence of DGE. Meanwhile, the time of the nasogastric tube and started liquid diet are shorter than those of SSPPD. And there is no significant difference in the other aspects.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of tubular stomach and whole stomach reconstruction in the treatment of esophageal cancer.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP and CBM databases to collect the randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies on the efficacy comparison between tubular stomach and total gastric reconstruction of esophagus in esophagectomy from their date of inception to May 2019. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of Twenty-nine RCTs were included, and 3 012 patients were involved. The results of meta-analysis showed that the postoperative complications such as anastomotic fistula [RR=0.64, 95%CI (0.50, 0.83), P=0.000 6], anastomotic stenosis [RR=0.65, 95%CI (0.50, 0.86), P=0.002], thoracic gastric syndrome [RR=0.19, 95%CI (0.13, 0.27), P<0.001], reflux esophagitis [RR=0.23, 95%CI (0.19, 0.30), P<0.001], gastric emptying disorder [RR=0.39, 95%CI (0.27, 0.57), P<0.001] and pulmonary infection [RR=0.44, 95%CI (0.31, 0.62), P<0.001] were significantly reduced, and the postoperative quality of life score and satisfaction were higher at 6 months and 1 year in the tubular stomach group (P<0.05). In terms of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, they were better in the tubular stomach group than those in the whole stomach group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time, postoperative gastrointestinal decompression time, postoperative closed drainage time, postoperative 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rate, postoperative quality of life score at 3 weeks and 3 months, and postoperative life satisfaction at 3 weeks.ConclusionThe tubular stomach is more advantageous than the whole stomach in the reconstruction of esophagus after esophagectomy.
Objective To discuss the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Methods By summarizing the multi-disciplinary team results of 1 patient with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach, who underwent surgery in West China Hospital in October 2017, as well as reviewing the related literatures, to explore the clinicopathological features of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Results The clinical features of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach were often accompanied by early liver metastasis and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) significantly increased, which were easily misdiagnosed as primary hepatocellular carcinoma. The histopathological features of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach were characterized by two structures: hepatocellular carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Conclusion Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach is a special type of gastric adenocarcinoma, and radical operation is the main treatment, but the prognosis of it is poor.