According to a guideline on promoting the high-quality development of public hospitals issued by the General Office of the State Council and a guideline on accelerating the development of medical rehabilitation, a high-quality and efficient rehabilitation system should be established, and efforts should be made to promote the high-quality development of rehabilitation services in public hospitals. We propose an action guideline for promoting the high-quality development of rehabilitation services in public hospitals, which is based on a Delphi method questionnaire on the opinions of front-line clinical rehabilitation experts, and integrated with relevant literature and evidences. This guideline introduces 31 specific action plans from 7 dimensions, including standardization of basic rehabilitation settings, standardization of clinical rehabilitation techniques, improvement of the tertiary rehabilitation system, standardization of emergency rehabilitation, standardization of rehabilitation education, standardization of rehabilitation management, and promotion of scientific and technological innovation in rehabilitation medicine.
Objective To establish a short-term mortality risk scoring standard for sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (sARDS) and provide a reference tool for clinicians to evaluate the severity of sARDS patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on sARDS patients admitted to the adult intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China from January 1, 2013 to August 31, 2020. They were divided into a death group and a survival group according to whether they died within 28 days after admission to ICU. Clinical data of the patients was collected within 24 hours admitted to ICU. Related risk factors for mortality within 28 days after admission to ICU were screened out through univariate logistic regression analysis. A risk prediction model for mortality within 28 days after admission to ICU was established by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 test and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the model’s goodness-fit and accuracy in predicting 28-day mortality of the sARDS patients, respectively. Finally, the clinical prognosis scoring criteria 28-day mortality of the sARDS patients were established according to the weight coefficients of each independent risk factor in the model. Results A total of 150 patients were recruited in this study. There were 67 patients in the survival group and 83 patients in the death group with a 28-day mortality rate of 55.3%. Four independent risk factors for 28-day mortality of the sARDS patients, including invasive mechanical ventilation, the number of dysfunctional organs≥3, serum lactic acid≥4.3 mmol/L and the severity of ARDS. A risk prediction model for mortality within 28 days of the sARDS patients was established. The area under the ROC curve and 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity and specificity of the risk prediction model for 28-day mortality for the sARDS patients were 0.896 (95%CI 0.846 - 0.945), 80.7% and 82.1%, respectively, while that for acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score were 0.865 (95%CI 0.805 - 0.925), 71.1% and 89.6%; for sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score were 0.841 (95%CI 0.7799 - 0.904), 68.7%, and 82.1%; for the prediction scores of lung injury were 0.855 (95%CI 0.789 - 0.921), 81.9% and 82.1%, respectively. It was indicated that the prediction accuracy of this risk prediction model of 28-day mortality maybe was better than that of APACHE-Ⅱ score, SOFA score and prediction score of lung injury. In addition, four risk factors were assigned as invasive mechanical ventilation (12 points), serum lactic acid≥4.3mmol /L (1 point), number of organs involved≥3 (3 points), and severity of ARDS (mild for 13 points, moderate for 26 points, severe for 39 points). Further more, the score of each patient was 13 - 55 points according to the scoring criteria, and the score grade was made according to the percentile method: 13 - 23 points for the low-risk group for 28-day mortality, 24 - 34 points for the medium-risk group for 28-day mortality, 35 - 45 points for the high-risk group for 28-day mortality, and over 45 points for the extremely high-risk group for 28-day mortality. According to the scoring criteria, the prognosis of the patients in this study was analyzed. The mortality probability of each group was 0.0% in the low-risk group, 13.8% in the medium-risk group, 51.9% in the high-risk group, and 89.7% in the extremely high-risk group, respectively. Conclusions The invasive mechanical ventilation, the number of involved organs≥3, serum lactic acid≥4.3 mmol /L and the severity of sARDS are independent risk factors for 28-day mortality of the sARDS patients. The scoring criteria may predict the risk of 28-day mortality for the sARDS patients.
摘要:目的: 探讨临床护理安全规范化管理的有效方法和效果。 方法 :成立病房护理安全管理小组;完善护理安全管理制度,培养质量管理意识;改善重点环节工作流程,强化质量监控;构建护理安全文化氛围。 结果 : 患者满意度明显提高,用药错误、管道脱落、压疮、投诉等发生率明显降低(〖WTBX〗P lt;0005)。 结论 : 规范化的护理安全管理提高了护理质量,保障了患者的安全,有效降低了护理风险的发生。Abstract: Objective: To discuss a effective way and effect of standardardized management of clinical nursing safety.Methods :Setted up nursing safety management team; Improved the nursing safety management system and trained awareness of quality management; Improved workflow of key links,and strengthened the quality control; Built a nursing safety culture. Results : Patients satisfaction improved obviously, and the medication errors、 pipe off、pressure sores、the incidence of complaints such as decreased obviously(P lt;0005).Conclusion : Standardized management of nursing safety improved the nursing quality, protected patients safety, and effectively reduced the risk of the occurrence of nursing.
Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics of prepapillary and preretinal vascular loops. Methods The clinical manifestation, results of the fundus fluorescein angiography, and the prognosis of 20 cases(24 eyes) with prepapillary and preretinal vascual loops were analyzed retrospectively. Results 66.7% of prepapillary and preretinal vascular loops were involved in one eye, and 95.8% of vascular loops were located within one optic disc diameter. There were different configuration types of the vascular loops. Among 20 cases(24 eyes) of the vascular loops, 70.8%(17 eyes) were arterial, 12.5%(3 eyes) were venous, and 16.7%(4 eyes) were both arterial and venous. 62.5% of eyes with prepapillary and preretinal vascular loops were associated with other congenital and developmental anomalies of retinal vascular vessels. Conclusion Most PRVL are arterial and superior to the optic disc. The serious distortion of the vascular loops may result in disturbance of blood flow in artery and retinal hemorrhage, which cause visual loss. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 1999, 15: 9-11)
This paper presents a unit free-form deformation (FFD) method applied to rapid three-dimensioanl (3D) bone reconstruction, which was based on traditional FFD. With the femur as an example, we reconstructed a 3D model of femur from two X-ray images and a standardized model by taking advantage of unit FFD algorithm. The X-ray images and its parameters were taken by C-arm device. Those parameters and X-ray contour are contributed to 3D reconstruction. The out contours of X-ray image and standard model were connected by point matching algorithm. The unit-FFD lattice was built to reconstruct standard model and finally made the contour of X-ray image and standard model exactly the same. Experiments on shape accuracy, robustness and time consuming, carried out by 35 specimen from cadaver, showed that mean error of shape (0.52 mm) and mean construction time (112 s) were lower than those using traditional method (0.7-2.6 mm, 8-20 min). The method proposed in this paper shows a good prospect in clinical application and related research.
ObjectiveTo construct the terminology standard of hospital quality and safety. MethodsThe draft terminology standard was constructed through group discussions, and the final draft terminology standard was formed after one round of Delphi expert consultation and two rounds of expert consensus meetings. ResultsThe recovery rate of the questionnaire was 100%, and the authority coefficient of experts was 0.87. A total of 15 experts were invited to two rounds of expert consensus meetings. The terminology standard for hospital quality and safety (TCHAS 10-1-1-4—2022) was finally released, including 4 first-level categories, 20 second-level categories, and 370 terms in total. ConclusionThe terminology standard of hospital quality and safety developed in this study is scientific and reliable, which can be used as a tool to assist medical institutions in carrying out standardized management.
Objective To study the USA government’s administrative system about medical device standards as well as the standard making. Methods The relevant documents, regulations, website that USA Food and Drug Administration announced were extensively reviewed, knowing the USA medical device standards synthetically. Results The USA standards system of medical device included regulatory requirements and voluntary consensus standards. This article simply introduced the laws, regulations, performance standards and consensus standards. Conclusion The USA’s administrative system about medical device standards as well as many standards can be referenced.
The ideological and political education in standardized residency training plays an important role in cultivating medical talents with noble medical ethics and exquisite medical skills. Teaching evaluation is an important method to promote teaching improvement and optimization. However, there are still some problems and challenges in the evaluation of ideological and political education for standardized residency training. This article proposes the ideological and political education of standardized residency training can be comprehensively evaluated by the context-input-process-product evaluation model from four aspects: background, input, process, and result evaluation. The aim is to provide solid support and guidance for the ideological and political education route in standardized residency training.
ObjectiveTo compare the short- and long-term efficacy of artery-first approach pancreatico-duodenectomy (AF-PD) and standard approach pancreaticoduodenectomy (S-PD).MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang, and CNKI databases were searched, relevant literatures were included, and relevant data were extracted for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 30 articles were included, including 2 750 cases underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The results of meta-analysis showed that in terms of short-term efficacy when compared with S-PD group, the AF-PD group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=–175.87, P<0.001), lower intraoperative blood transfusion rate (OR=0.36, P=0.002), higher R0 resection rate (OR=1.83, P<0.001), lower postoperative pancreatic leakage rate (OR=0.71, P=0.005), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD=–2.69, P=0.007). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the operation time and overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of long-term efficacy when compared with S-PD group, the AF-PD group had lower tumor local recurrence rate (OR=0.43, P=0.004) and tumor liver metastasis rate (OR=0.60, P=0.010), but had higher 1-year (OR=1.95, P=0.007), 2-year (OR=2.04, P<0.001), 3-year (OR=2.09, P=0.001), and 5-year (OR=2.06, P=0.003) overall survival rates, and there were no significant differences in the rates of lung metastasis and peritoneal metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsAF-PD is better than S-PD in some short-term and long-term outcome indicators such as R0 resection rate, pancreatic leakage rate, overall survival rate, and so on. However, due to the limited quality of the included literatures, more high-quality studies are still needed to verify in the future.
Diagnosis is the critical component of health care and the studies of diagnostic test can provide important evidence for clinical decisions. Studies of diagnostic test are subject to different sources of bias in design, performance and reporting of studies. Therefore, researchers who understand various sources of bias can reasonably perform the diagnostic test and evaluate its quality, and will provide scientific evidences for clinical practice.