ObjectiveTo systematically review the research progress in the selection of metabolic bariatric procedures, efficacy, safety, complication prevention, and long-term management for elderly patients, so as to provide references for surgical decision-making and perioperative management in future metabolic and bariatric surgery for elderly obese patients. MethodA review of recent domestic and international literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery in elderly patients was conducted. ResultsWith the intensification of societal aging, the incidence of obesity and related metabolic diseases among the elderly population has significantly increased. Metabolic and bariatric surgery has been proven to effectively reduce weight and improve obesity-related metabolic diseases in elderly patients. Current guidelines no longer consider age an absolute contraindication for surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly used procedures internationally. SG is superior to RYGB in terms of surgical safety, while RYGB has greater advantages in improving metabolic diseases. Although the postoperative mortality and complications risks in elderly obese patients are higher than those in younger obese patients, strict preoperative assessment and individualized procedure selection can significantly reduce these risks. ConclusionsMetabolic and bariatric surgery can serve as an effective treatment for elderly obese patients, offering comprehensive benefits in weight loss and metabolic improvement. Procedure selection requires individualized assessment, balancing the patient’s baseline condition and metabolic needs. Postoperative success hinges on systematic long-term follow-up and management to ensure sustained benefits and safety. Future efforts should focus on clarifying the definitions or standards of “elderly” and “obesity,” followed by more large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled studies to validate the safety and efficacy of metabolic and bariatric surgery.
Objective To explore the influencing factors for early complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted for the clinical data of 306 obese patients undergoing LSG at the Weight Reduction and Metabolism Center of Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital of Lianyungang from January 2020 to September 2022. Early postoperative complications (≤30 d) of LSG were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and the influencing factors of early postoperative complications were explored. Results There were 27 cases (8.8%) suffered from early complications, including 8 cases of grade Ⅰ (2.6%), 15 cases of grade Ⅱ (4.9%), 4 cases of grade Ⅲ (1.3%), there were no grade Ⅳ and grade Ⅴ complications. The multivariate results showed that BMI≥45 kg/m2 [OR=3.63, 95%CI (1.10, 11.92)], high cholesterol [OR=7.12, 95%CI (2.42, 20.95)], and preoperative GERD [OR=3.69, 95%CI (1.11, 12.23)] were influencing factors for early complications. Conclusions LSG is a safe diagnostic and therapeutic method for treating obesity. Attention should be paid to the impact of BMI, high cholesterol, and preoperative GERD on the occurrence of complications after LSG.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on obesity and its comorbidities.MethodThe literatures about LSG in the treatment of obesity and its comorbidities were collected and summarized.ResultsLSG could not only effectively reduce the weight of patients with obesity, but also obviously alleviate comorbidities related to obesity, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and so on.ConclusionsLSG has a definite and effective long-term weight loss effect, which is equal to other common weight loss methods. It has been recognized by more and more patients and clinicians because it has advantages of simple operation, safety, high efficiency and fewer complications. However, therapeutic effects of some comorbidities, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, are still controversial and need further tobe studied.
ObjectiveTo compare the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI), and to explore the risk factors for PONV. MethodA total of 220 patients at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from June 2022 to December 2022 were prospectively collected, and were randomly divided into the LSG group and the SASI group; the general condition of the patients was recorded. PONV was assessed on the POD0, POD1, POD2, POD30, POD60, POD90, using the Rhodes index score.ResultsThe total Rhodes index score in the LSG group was higher than that in the SASI group [(25.56±13.54) vs. (16.06±11.28), P＜0.05]. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that female (P=0.014), LSG (P＜0.001), young age (P=0.050), and low BMI (P=0.019) were risk factors for PONV. ConclusionsCompared with LSG, the Rhodes index score after SASI is low. For young women with low BMI, special attention should be paid to the prevention and treatment of PONV after LSG.
Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG-TB) was a novel bariatric and metabolic surgery that had received preliminary approval for its effectiveness and safety in reducing weight, improving diabetes, and other metabolic diseases. It showed promising prospects in clinical applications. However, SG-TB also faced some challenges including a small number of cases, insufficient clinical evidence, issues with anastomotic stoma and common channel design, bile reflux, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and malnutrition. Further research is needed to enhance the standardization of SG-TB procedures and provides reference for its wider implementation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the treatment of obesity with different degrees of obesity.MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients received LSG in this hospital from October 2016 to October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The effect of LSG on postoperative weight loss in patients with different degrees of obesity were analyzed too.Results① A total of 161 patients with simple obesity were included in this study, including 40 cases of degree Ⅰ obesity, 41 cases of degree Ⅱ obesity, 61 cases of degree Ⅲ obesity, and 19 cases of super obesity. All operations were successfully completed, there was no conversion to laparotomy or mortality. The postoperative bleeding occurred in 4 (2.5%) cases, nausea and vomiting occurred in 97 (60.2%) cases during hospitalization, and 143, 130, and 122 cases were followed up in 1-, 2-, and 3-year after operation. The body mass indexes (BMIs) were decreased significantly in postoperative 1-, 2-, and 3-year (P<0.05) as compared with their preoperative values, respectively. The excess BMI loss percentage(EBMIL%) in postoperative 1-, 2-, and 3-year were (87.4±25.7)%, (84.6±30.5)%, and (88.8±20.4)%, respectively. The rates of weight regaining were 3.8% (5/130) and 4.9% (6/122) in 2- and 3-year following-up, respectively. ② There were no remarkable changes in the trend of BMI in patients with degree Ⅰ and Ⅱ obesity [the EBMIL% changes from postoperative year-1 to year-3 were (–2.3±1.1)% and (3.3±1.5)%, respectively]. Conversely, there were remarkable changes in the trend of BMI in patients with degree Ⅲ obesity and super obesity [the EBMIL% changes from postoperative year-1 to year-3 were (–7.1±1.9)% and (–11.6±5.3)%, respectively].ConclusionsFrom the results of this study, LSG has a good effect on weight loss in the treatment of patients withdegree Ⅰ and Ⅱ obesity. The long-term efficacy of LSG in patients with degree Ⅲ and super obesity, whether to take other bariatric procedures, whether to perform the second operation, and the timing of the second operation need to be further explored.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2014), CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to December 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LRYGB vs. LSG for obesity and T2DM. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 8 RCTs including 828 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:There were no significant differences between the LRYGB group and the LSG group in body mass index (MD=-1.02, 95%CI -2.90 to 0.86, P=0.29), remission rate of T2DM (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.73, P=0.64), reoperation rate (OR=2.74, 95%CI 1.01 to 7.42, P=0.05), level of fasting plasma glucose (MD=2.71, 95%CI -0.80 to 6.21, P=0.13), and level of serum low density lipoprotein (MD=-23.85, 95%CI -47.20 to -0.50, P=0.05). However, the LSG group had lower postoperative complication rate (OR=2.28, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.62, P=0.000 5) than that of the LRYGB group. ConclusionIn short term, both LRYGB and LSG were equally efficient in the treatment of obesity and T2DM, but LSG has lower postoperative complication rate than LRYGB. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo analyze why sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB), despite being the second most common bariatric procedure in China, has not been recommended in national and international guidelines nor endorsed by expert consensus; to investigate the primary obstacles to its standardization and widespread adoption; and to propose strategies leveraging China’s extensive clinical experience to refine the technique, establish standardized protocols, and address existing challenges, thereby defining its future role in metabolic surgery. MethodsBy systematically reviewing the evolution, current evidence profile, and distinctive features of SG-JJB compared to other SG-Plus procedures, this study aimed to identify constraints hindering its adoption. Concurrently, considering the characteristics of domestic healthcare resources, we explored the feasibility of procedural refinements, key steps for standardization, and solutions to potential challenges, thereby facilitating the optimization and standardization of SG-JJB. ResultsThe three key constraints hindering SG-JJB development were: risks of blind loop syndrome, uncertainty regarding optimal bypass limb length, and limited evidence on long-term efficacy. To address these issues, this study proposed leveraging China’s clinical and multi-center collaboration strengths to: conduct high-quality studies defining the impact of bypass length on outcomes, establish unified diagnostic and monitoring protocols for blind loop syndrome, and systematically collect longitudinal data to evaluate long-term efficacy, thereby informing evidence-based surgical standardization. ConclusionsSG-JJB holds significant potential in Chinese bariatric-metabolic practice, yet its standardization faces persistent challenges. Addressing concerns about blind loop syndrome, defining optimal bypass limb length, and accumulating robust long-term efficacy data are pivotal for advancing SG-JJB standardization and adoption. Leveraging domestic clinical resources through multi-center collaborations, high-quality research, and evidence-based protocol development is the essential pathway to overcoming these barriers, achieving standardized implementation, and securing recognition in authoritative guidelines.
ObjectiveTo explore the necessity of staple-line reinforcement (SLR) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) through evaluating its potential benefit and safety. MethodsA historical cohort study was conducted in the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The consecutive patients underwent LSG for morbid obesity by the same operative team from June 2022 to August 2023 were included, which were assigned into SLR group and un-SLR group according to the SLR or not. Both groups were assessed in terms of the operating time, postoperative hospital stay, total hospital stay, surgical costs, and complications. ResultsA total of 87 patients underwent the LSG from June 2022 to August 2023, all of whom were successfully completed without any conversion to open surgery. Among them, there were 34 cases in the SLR group and 53 cases in the un-SLR group. There were no statistical differences in the age, gender, body mass index, and so on between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no postoperative complications such as gastric leakage, bleeding, or gastrointestinal stenosis, and no perioperative death, as well as no case of reoperation within 30 d after surgery in all patients of the two groups. And there were no statistical differences in the postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). However, it was found that the operative time was shorter (P<0.05), the surgical costs and total hospital stay costs were also less (P<0.05) in the un-SLR group as compared with the SLR group. ConclusionsBased on the analysis of cases data in this study, there is no added benefit in terms of reducing staple-line leak, bleeding, etc. in adopting SLR during LSG, and the operating time is prolonged and the cost is increased. So the necessity of the SLR or not during LSG needs to be further researched.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the weight loss outcomes, metabolic disease remission, and complications profiles of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) based on a large single-center cohort experience. MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted. Clinical data of patients who underwent LSG at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from June 2021 to June 2024 were collected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The outcomes including percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), metabolic disease remission, and the incidence of postoperative complications were assessed. ResultsA total of 1 568 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally included, including 304 males and 1 264 females. The age at surgery was (31.51±8.01）years old, and the body mass index was (37.26±4.18) kg/m2. At 1 year after surgery, the %TWL was (32.84±6.38)%, and the complete remission rate of diabetes was 96.2% (304/316). Complications within 1 year after surgery: 1 (0.06%) case of postoperative bleeding, 2 (0.13%) cases of gastric leakage, 1 (0.06%) case of vitamin B1 deficiency, and 1 (0.06%) case of unilateral common peroneal nerve entrapment injury. The total complications rate was 0.32% (5/1 568). No mortality was observed. ConclusionsLSG has significant short-term efficacy and higher safety in treatment of obesity and related metabolic diseases. In particular, experiences in aspects such as complications prevention and multidisciplinary follow-up management could provide references for centers in the early stage of development.