ObjectiveTo observe the medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior release internal distraction in treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis. MethodsBetween March 2009 and March 2012, 26 patients with severe and rigid scoliosis were treated with anterior release, posterior internal distraction, and two stage posterior spinal fusion. There were 11 males and 15 females with an average age of 19.6 years (range, 14-25 years). The average disease duration was 13.6 years (range, 3-24 years). All cases were idiopathic scoliosis. Of 26 cases, 2 cases were rated as Lenke type I, 8 as type Ⅱ, 13 as type IV, 1 as type V, and 2 as type VI. The apical vertebrae located at T6 in 1 case, at T7 in 3 cases, at T8 in 7 cases, at T9 in 13 cases, and at T10 in 2 cases. The average 4 vertebral bodies were released by anterior approach, and average 14 vertebral bodies were fused after posterior surgery. Fourteen patients received 2 times distraction. Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire was used to access health-related quality of life. The radiological parameters were measured, including coronal plane Cobb angel of major curve, apical vertebral translation (AVT), C7 plumb line-center sacral vertical line (C7PL-CSVL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and thoracic kyphosis (TK) at pre-and post-operation. ResultsThe average total operation time was 592.7 minutes; the average total blood loss volume was 1 311.2 mL; and total hospitalization cost was (14.7±1.4)×104 yuan RMB. The coronal plane Cobb angle of major curve was (55.7±16.5)°, and the TK was (43.2±16.2)° after first distraction. The patients were followed up 2-5 years (mean, 3.8 years). Temporary dyspnea and pleural effusion occurred in 1 case respectively after distraction, and symptoms disappeared after symptomatic treatment. Screw loosening and pseudoarthrosis formation was observed in 1 case at 6 months after fusion, good recovery was achieved after revision. No infection or neurological complication was found. The coronal plane Cobb angel of major curve, TK, and AVT after fusion and at last follow-up were significantly lower than preoperative ones (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between at post-fusion and last follow-up (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in C7PL-CSVL and SVA between at pre-and post-operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, SRS-22 questionnaire scores were 4.32±0.42 for active degree, 4.54±0.58 for mental health, 3.97±0.76 for self-image, 4.09±0.64 for pain, and 4.03±0.83 for satisfaction degree. ConclusionAnterior release internal distraction can provide satisfactory correction results for severe and rigid scoliosis with higher safety and lower incidence of complication.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of proximal fixation of one vertebra above to the upper end vertebra and the upper end vertebra in the treatment of Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with preoperative right higher shoulder.MethodsThe clinical data of 37 Lenke type 1 AIS patients treated with posterior correction between January 2010 and December 2015 were retrospectively analysed. According to proximal fixation vertebra, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (n=17), proximal fixation of one vertebra above to the upper end vertebra; group B (n=20), proximal fixation of the upper end vertebra. There was no significant difference in gender, age, Risser stage, radiographic shoulder height (RSH), flexibility of proximal thoracic curve, flexibility of main thoracic curve, flexibility of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve between 2 groups (P>0.05). The main thoracic curve Cobb angle, proximal thoracic curve Cobb angle, thoracolumbar/lumbar curve Cobb angle, apical vertebral translation (AVT), clavicle angle (CA), RSH, coronal trunk shift, sagittal trunk shift, thoracic kyphosis (TK), and lumbar lordosis (LL) were measured by X-ray film before operation, and at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after operation. The correction indexes of main thoracic curve were evaluated, including the correction degree and correction rate of main thoracic curve and AVT correction at 1 month after operation, the loss degree and the loss rate of the correction of main thoracic curve at 2 years after operation.ResultsThe operation time and intraoperation blood loss in group A were significantly greater than those in group B (P<0.05). All the patients were followed up, and the follow-up time was 2-4 years (mean, 2.8 years) in group A and 2-3.5 years (mean, 2.6 years) in group B. No serious complication such as nerve damage occurred during perioperative period and follow-up period. No complication such as failure of fusion, loosening and rupture of internal fixator, adjacent segment degeneration, and proximal junctional kyphosis occurred. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the correction degree and correction rate of main thoracic curve and AVT correction at 1 month after operation, the loss degree and the loss rate of the correction of main thoracic curve at 2 years after operation (P>0.05). Comparison within the two groups: except for LL had no significant difference between pre- and post-operation (P>0.05), the other indicators were significantly improved after operation (P<0.05) in the two groups. There were significant differences in RSH, CA, proximal thoracic curve Cobb angle, and thoracolumbar/lumbar curve Cobb angle at each time point after operation (P<0.05), and there were spontaneous correction during follow-up; however, there was no significant difference in main thoracic curve Cobb angle, AVT, TK, LL, trunk shift at each time point after operation (P>0.05), and there was no significant loss during follow-up. Comparison between the two groups: there was no significant difference in all the radiographic indexes at pre- and post-operation (P>0.05).ConclusionFor Lenke type 1 AIS patients with preoperative right high shoulder, proximal fixation vertebra be fixed to the upper end vertebral can obtain satisfactory short-term orthopedic effectiveness and reduce blood loss and operation time.
Objective Degenerative lumbar scol iosis and spinal stenosis are more common in elderly patients. Because of many factors, treatment choices are more complex. To investigate the step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbarscol iosis and spinal stenosis. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2009, 117 patients with degenerative lumbar scol iosis and spinal stenosis were treated with step treatment methods, including conservative therapy (43 cases), posterior decompression alone (18 cases), posterior short segment fusion (1-2 segments, 41 cases), and posterior long segment fusion ( ≥ 3 segments, 15 cases). Step treatment options were made according to patient’s will, the medical compl ications, the degree of the symptoms of low back and lower extremity pain, the size of three-dimensional lumbar scol iosis kyphosis rotating deformity, lumbar spine stabil ity (lateral sl ip, degenerative spondylolysis), and the overall balance of the spine. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back and lower extremity pain, Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI), lumbar lordosis angle, and scol iosis Cobb angle were measured and compared before and after treatments. Results Seventy-two cases were followed up more than 12 months, and there was no death or internal fixation failure in all patients. Of them, 19 patients underwent conservative treatment; the mean follow-up period was 19.3 months (range, 1-5 years); no symptom deterioration was observed; VAS score of low back and lower extremity and ODI were significantly decreased at last follow-up (P lt; 0.05); and lordosis angle was decreased and scol iosis Cobb angle was increased, but there was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Twelve cases underwentposterior decompression alone; the average follow-up was 36 months (range, 1-5 years); VAS score of lower extremity and ODI were significantly decreased at last follow-up (P lt; 0.05); and scol iosis Cobb angle was increased and lordosis angle was decreased, but there was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Thirty-one patients underwent posterior short segment fusion; the mean follow-up period was 21.3 months (range, 1-3 years); postoperative hematoma, poor wound heal ing, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and superficial infection occurred in 1 case, respectively, and were cured after symptomatic treatment; VAS score of low back and lower extremity and ODI were significantly decreased (P lt; 0.05); and postoperative lumbar scol iosis Cobb angle and lordosis angle were significantly improved at last follow-up (P lt; 0.05). Ten patients underwent posterior long segment fusion; the mean follow-up period was 17.1 months (range, 1-3 years); postoperative symptoms worsened in 1 case and was cured after physical therapy and drug treatment for 3 months, and deep infection occurred in 1 case and was cured after debridement and continuous irrigation drainage; VAS score and ODI were significantly decreased (P lt; 0.05); and postoperative scol iosis Cobb angle and lordosis angle were improved significantly at last follow-up (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of degenerative lumbar scol iosis and spinal stenosis should be individual and step. Surgery treatment should be rely on decompression while deformity correction subsidiary. Accurate judgment of the responsible segment of symptoms, scol iosis and lordosis can prevent the operation expansion and increase safety of surgery with active control bleeding.
Patients with severe aortic stenosis will gradually develop symptoms of heart failure. Aortic valve replacement is an effective treatment at present, while transcatheter aortic valve replacement is suitable for high-risk elderly patients. This article reports a patient with severe aortic valve stenosis and severe scoliosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Detailed preoperative evaluation and avoidance of peripheral vascular injury were the characteristics of this case. The patient was an elderly male with severe scoliosis. After fully evaluating the risks and benefits of surgery, a surgical strategy was formulated. The patient was in the supine position to complete the preoperative CT, and then the long sheath was used to pass through the thoracoabdominal aortic angle during the operation. After angiography-assisted adjustment and determination of the optimal release angle, the valve was accurately released, and the operation went smoothly without serious peripheral vascular damage.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 (n-HA/PA66) Cage in interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.MethodsA retrospective analysis was designed and conducted for 43 patients, who underwent posterior decompression and n-HA/PA66 Cage interbody fusion with correction of deformity between January 2013 and June 2016. Eighteen cases were single-level fusion (single-level group) and 25 cases were double-level fusion (double-level group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, direction of convex, degree of apical rotation, fusion level, the number of osteoporotic patients, pre-operative intervertebral height of fusion segments, coronal Cobb angle, visual analogue score (VAS), and modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, hospital stay, and complications of the operation were recorded. Modified ODI, VAS score, and MacNab criteria were adopted to assess clinical outcomes. Radiographic indexes, including intervertebral height of fusion segments, coronal Cobb angle, disc insertion depth, and the bone graft fusion rate, were also evaluated.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay between 2 groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 18-62 months (mean, 30.9 months). Wound complications, postoperative delirium, and Cage retropulsion occurred in 4 cases (2 cases in single-level group, 2 cases in double-level group), 1 case of single-level group, and 1 case of double-level group, respectively. The intervertebral height of fusion segments after operation significantly improved compared with preoperative ones in both groups (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the intervertebral height in double-level group was superior to which in single-level group (P<0.05). The coronal Cobb angles after operation significantly improved compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), and no significant difference was found between 2 groups at each time point (P>0.05). The disc insertion depth showed no significant difference between different time points after operation in 2 groups (P>0.05) and between 2 groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). Bony fusion was obtained in all patients at last follow-up. The VAS score and modified ODI after operation in both groups were superior to those before operation (P<0.05). The VAS score in double-level group was higher than that in single-level group (P<0.05) at last follow-up, and no significant difference was found in VAS score and modified ODI between 2 groups at other time points (P>0.05). According to the MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rates at last follow-up were 94.4% and 84.0% in single-level group and double-level group, respectively.ConclusionThe n-HA/PA66 Cage can effectively restore and maintain the disc height of fusion segment, normal sequence, and biomechanical stability of the spine, and gain favorable effectivenss for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. And double-level fusion is superior to single-level fusion in maintaining disc height of fusion segment.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of multilevel Ponte osteotomies on maintenance and restoration of thoracic kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis (IS) surgery. Methods Between March 2008 and February 2010, 42 patients with thoracic IS (Lenke type 1 curves) were corrected with posterior pedicle screw system. Multilevel Ponte osteostomies for posterior release was performed in 17 cases (group A), and the 3 segments near the apical vertebrae were selected as the osteotomy site; simple posterior soft tissue release was given in 25 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in sex, age, disease duration, lesion segments, coronary Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, Risser index, and bending flexibility between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The anteroposterior and lateral standing radiographs of the spine were taken to compare the effectiveness between 2 groups. Results Operation was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time and blood loss in group A were significantly greater than those in group B (P lt; 0.05). Spine dural injury and leakage of cerebrospinal fluid occurred in 1 case of group A, which was cured after compression on local area of the wound; the other patients had no intraoperative complications. The patients were followed up 2-4 years (mean, 2.8 years); no nerve injury, infection, or internal fixation failure occurred. No obvious correction loss was observed and the appearance and trunk balance were significantly improved. The coronal Cobb angles at 1 week and 2 years after operation were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the coronal Cobb angle and correction rate between 2 groups at 1 week and 2 years after operation (P gt; 0.05). Group A was significantly better than group B in the thoracic kyphotic angle and angle changes at 1 week and 2 years after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The posterior approach surgery with multilevel Ponte osteotomies can restore the thoracic kyphosis in IS, but it has no effect on coronal correction in Lenke type 1 curves.
Objective To explore some operative problems of correcting paralytic scoliosis(PS) by using vertebral pedicle screwsrods system. Methods From May 2000 to May 2005, 18 patients with PS were corrected by screwsrods system which were made of titanium alloy.There were 10 males and 8 females, aging from 11 to 26 years. The primary disease included poliomyelitis in 13 patients and myelodysplasia (MS) in 5 patients (2 cases for second correction) with scoliosis of an average 85° Cobb angle (55-125°). The pelvic obliquity was found in all patients with an average 24° angle (355°).Of the 18 patients,3 cases were given perioperative halo-pelvic traction, 2 cases were given vertebral wedge osteotomy and correction and fixation, the other patients were purely underwent the treatment of pedicle screwrods system implants. Fusion segment at operation ranged from 6 to 15 sections, applied screws the most was 16,the fewest was 6. Results There were no wound infections and neurologic complications, all wounds healed by the first intention. Allscoliosis obtained obvious correction (P＜0.001), the correction rate averaged 52.95% (44%-81%); the majority of lumbar kyphosis and pelvic obliquity were apparently corrected. The average clinical follow-up (16 cases) was 21 months(6-36 months),there was no implants failure. One patient with MS had a worse Cobb magnitude, the other patients had no curve progression (P＞0.05). Conclusion The use of vertebral pedicle screwsrods fixation to multiple vertebral bodys and short segment fusion for PS, the treatment method is reliable and the outcome is satisfactory. While performing the correcting operative procedures, the spinal, pelvic and lower extremity deformities and functions should be all considered as a whole.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of decompression and short fusion or long fusion for degenerative scoliosis (DS) with a Cobb angle of 20-40° combined with spinal stenosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 50 patients with DS who were treated with decompression combined with short fusion or long fusion between January 2015 and May 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into long fusion group (fixed segments>3, 23 cases) and short fusion group (fixed segments≤3, 27 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic title (PT), and sacral slope (SS) between the two groups (P>0.05); however, the VAS score of low back pain, Cobb angle, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in long fusion group were significantly higher than those in short fusion group (P<0.05), and the lumbar lordosis (LL) was significantly lower than that in short fusion group (t=2.427, P=0.019). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, hospital stay, and complications were recorded and compared. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes before operation and at last follow-up. X-ray films of the whole spine in standard standing position were taken before operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the spino-pelvic parameters were measured.ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy times in the short fusion group were significantly less than those in the long fusion group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (t=0.933, P=0.355). The patients were followed up 12-46 months with an average of 22.3 months. At last follow-up, the VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Except for the improvement of VAS score of low back pain (t=8.332, P=0.000), the differences of the improvements of the other scores between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). The Cobb angle, SVA, TLK, and PT significantly decreased, while SS and LL significantly increased in the long fusion group (P<0.05), while the Cobb angle and PT significantly decreased and SS significantly increased in the short fusion group at last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in spino-pelvic parameters between the two groups at 6 months after operation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The improvements of Cobb angle, SVA, LL, PT, and SS in the long fusion group were significantly higher than those in the short fusion group at last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no perioperative death in both groups. The incidence of complications in the long fusion group was 34.8% (8/23), which was significantly higher than that in the short fusion group [11.1% (3/27)] (χ2=4.056, P=0.034).ConclusionThe DS patients with the Cobb angle of 20-40°can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes and improve the spino-pelvic parameters by choosing appropriate fixation levels. Short fusion has less surgical trauma and fewer complications, whereas long fusion has more advantages in enhancing spino-pelvic parameters and relieving low back pain.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and non-osteotomy techniques in treatment of medium-to-severe kyphoscoliosis by retrospective studies. Methods Between January 2005 and January 2009, 99 patients with medium-to-severe kyphoscoliosis were treated by PSO (PSO group, n=46) and non-osteotomytechnique (non-osteotomy group, n=53) separately. There was no significant difference in sex, age, Cobb angle of scol iosis on coronal plane, and Cobb angle of kyphosis on saggital plane between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time and blood loss were recorded; the Cobb angle of scol iosis on coronal plane and kyphosis on sagittal plane were measured at pre- and postoperation to caculate the rates of correction on both planes. Results The operation was successfully completed in all the patients. The operation time and blood loss of the patients in PSO group were significantly greater than those of the patients in non-osteotomy group (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-56 months (mean, 22.4 months); no spinal cord injury occurred, and bone fusion was achieved at last follow-up. The Cobb angles of scol iosis and kyphosis at 2 weeks and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative angles in the patients of 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in Cobb angle of scol iosis and the rate of correction between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but the correction loss of PSO group was significantly smaller than that of non-osteotomy group (P lt; 0.05) at last follow-up. At 2 weeks and last follow-up, the Cobb angle of kyphosis, the rate of correction, and correction loss were significantly better in PSO group than in non-osteotomy group (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion There is no signifcant difference in scol iosis correction between PSO and non-osteotomy techniques.PSO can get better corrective effect in kyphosis correction than non-osteotomy technique, but the operation time and blood losswould increase greatly.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors of coronal imbalance after posterior long-level fixation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.MethodsRetrospectivly analyzed the clinical records of 41 patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis who had received posterior long-level fixation and fusion with selective transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) accompanied by Ponte osteotomy between August 2011 and July 2016. Patients were divided into imbalance group (group A, 11 cases) and balance group (group B, 30 cases) according to state of coronal imbalance measured at last follow-up. The radiographic parameters at preoperation and last follow-up were measured, and the variance of preoperative and last follow-up parameters were calculated. The radiographic parameters included coronal Cobb angle, coronal balance distance (CBD), apical vertebral translation (AVT), apical vertebral rotation (AVR), Cobb angle of lumbar sacral curve (LSC), and L5 tilt angle (L5TA). Univariate analysis was performed for the factors including gender, age, preoperative T value of bone mineral density, number of instrumented vertebra, upper and lower instrumented vertebra, segments of TLIF, decompression, and Ponte osteotomy, as well as the continuous variables of preoperative imaging parameters with significant difference were converted into two-category variables, obtained the influence factors of postoperative coronal imbalance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to verify the risk factors from the preliminary screened influence factors and the variance of imaging parameters with significant difference between the two groups.ResultsThe follow-up time of groups A and B was (3.76±1.02) years and (3.56±1.03) years respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.547, P=0.587). The coronal Cobb angle, AVT, LSC Cobb angle, and L5TA in group A were significantly higher than those in group B before operation (P<0.05), and all the imaging parameters in group A were significantly higher than those in group B at last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in parameters including the variance of coronal Cobb angle, AVT, and LSC Cobb angle before and after operation (P>0.05), and there were significant differences between the two groups in parameters including the variance of CBD, L5TA, and AVR (P<0.05). Univariate analysis showed that preoperative L5TA was the influencing factor of postoperative coronal imbalance (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative L5TA≥15° was an independent risk factor of postoperative coronal imbalance, and variance of pre- and post-operative AVR was a protective factor.ConclusionPreoperative L5TA≥15° is an independent risk factor for coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis after posterior long-level fixation and fusion.