ObjectiveTo explore the safety and feasibility of the uncinate-process-first superior mesenteric artery (SMA) right posterior approach in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). MethodsThe clinical data of 5 patients admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from December 2022 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, all patients underwent uncinate-process-first SMA right posterior approach during LPD. ResultsAll 5 cases of LPD with uncinate-process-first SMA right posterior approach were successfully completed. The operative time was (366±51) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (140±42) mL, and the postoperative hospital stay was (11±2) days. All the postoperative pathological findings reached R0 resection. None of the 5 patients suffered from biliary leakage, bleeding, or gastrointestinal empties, and 2 patients suffered from biochemical fistula, the postoperative follow-up time was (7±2) months, and there was no recurrence during the follow-up period. ConclusionThe uncinate-process-first SMA right posterior approach is a safe and feasible surgical approach, especially for tumors with no obvious vascular invasion and diameter ≤2 cm.
ObjectiveTo summarize the application status and prospect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodThe relevant literatures about studies of LPD at home and abroad were reviewed.ResultsLPD was a difficult operation, mainly suitable for pancreatic head and periampullary benign and malignant tumors. With the development of laparoscopic techniques in recent years, LPD combined the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein resection and reconstruction, or combined multi-visceral resection was feasible, but the survival benefit of LPD with arterial resection and reconstruction and extended lymph node dissection remained to be discussed. At present, there was no clear requirement on the way to reconstruct the pancreatic fluid outflow tract, but the pancreaticojejunostomy for digestive tract reconstruction was chose by the most surgeons. The most studies had confirmed that LPD was minimally invasive and had a short-term prognosis that was not inferior to that of open pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the results of large sample analysis about long-term survival rate and oncology results were lacking, so it was difficult to judge the advantages and disadvantages of long-term prognosis of the two methods.ConclusionsLPD is a safe, feasible, reasonable, and effective surgical method. With improvement of laparoscopic technology, LPD is expected to become a standard operation method for treatment of pancreatic head cancer and periampullary carcinoma, and oncology benefits of LPD will be further confirmed in future by large-sample clinical randomized control trials and studies of long-term prognosis follow-up.
ObjectiveTo evaluate efficacy and safety of early anticoagulation therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).MethodsThe patients who received PD in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were collected retrospectively, then were divided into the anticoagulant group and the non-anticoagulant group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, tumor property, coagulation function indexes such as prothrombin time (PT), PT activity (PTA), fibrinogen (FIB), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and D-dimer (DD), platelet (PLT), VTE, bleeding related complications etc. were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 103 patients underwent PD were included in this study, including 52 patients in the anticoagulant group and 51 patients in the non-anticoagulant group. There were no significant differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, and preoperative coagulation function indexes, etc. between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of VTE in the anticoagulant group was lower than that in the non-anticoagulant group (13.5% versus 47.1%, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of bleeding between the anticoagulant group and the non-anticoagulant group (9.6% versus 7.8%, P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the coagulation indexes between the two groups before operation and day 1 after operation (P>0.05). On day 8 after operation, the FIB and DD values of the anticoagulant group were significantly lower than those of the non-anticoagulant group (P values were 0.040 and 0.002, respectively). A comparison of different phases in the same group on coagulation indexes between day 8 and day 1 after surgery showed that there were statistically significant differences (P<0.05), the changes of all indexes were within the normal range.ConclusionThe results of this study indicate that LMWH administered at 24 h after PD could decrease incidence of VTE and don’t increase risk of bleeding.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for postoperative overall and severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of the elderly (65 years old or more) patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD were retrospectively collected, who were admitted to the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2017 to October 2021. The incidences of postoperative overall and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ–Ⅴ was defined as severe complications) were summarized. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze whether GNRI was a risk factor for overall and severe complications after PD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of GNRI to distinguish whether overall or severe complications occurred after PD and to confirm the optimal threshold. Then the patients were assigned into a high nutritional risk group (greater than the optimal threshold) and low nutritional risk group (the optimal threshold or less) based on this. Simultaneously, the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsIn this study, 190 elderly patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled, 95(50.0%) of whom developed complications, including 28(29.5%) cases of serious complications. The results of multivariate logistic regression model analysis showed that the decreased GNRI was a risk factor for the occurrence of overall and severe complications after PD for the elderly patients [OR(95%CI)=0.361(0.154, 0.848), P=0.019; OR(95%CI)=0.906(0.834, 0.983), P=0.018]. The AUC of GNRI for assessing the occurrence of overall and severe complications was 0.765 and 0.715, respectively, with the optimal critical values of 98 and 96, respectively. Compared with the low nutritional risk group, the high nutritional risk group had higher postoperative total hospitalization costs (Z=–2.37, P=0.019), higher occurrences of overall complications (χ2=44.61, P<0.001) and severe complications (χ2=29.39, P＜0.001). ConclusionsIn elderly patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD, incidence of serious complications is not lower. GNRI has a good discriminative value in terms of postoperative overall and severe complications. When preoperative GNRI is 98 or less and GNRI is 96 or less, patients should be given early preoperative nutritional support treatment in time.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between total enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods A total of 70 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from July 2012 to July 2015 were collected prospectively, and all patients were divided into 2 groups randomly: enteral nutrition group and combined nutrition group. Patients in enteral nutrition group received total enteral nutrition, and patients in combined nutrition group received enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition. Compared the nutritional indicators, other related indexes, and morbidity between the 2 groups. Results ① The nutritional indexes. Compared with before treatment, the body mass index (BMI), white blood cell count, serum albumin level, serum albumin level, and total lymphocyte count at 1 week and 2 weeks after treatment improved (P<0.05). At the same time point (before treatment, 1 week after treatment, and 2 weeks after treatment), there was no significant in the BMI, white blood cell count, serum albumin level, serum albumin level, and total lymphocyte count between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ② Other related indexes. The anal exhaust time, defecation time, and hospital stay of the patients in the combined nutrition group were shorter than those of enteral nutrition group, and the cost of treatment in combined nutrition group was less than that of the enteral nutrition group (P<0.05). ③ Morbidity. There was no significant difference in the total morbidity between the combined nutrition group〔11.4% (4/35)〕 and enteral nutrition group 〔20.0% (7/35)〕,P>0.05. Conclusion Total enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy both can obtain well curative effect, but enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition can make the patients recover faster with lower cost, which is suitable for promotion.
ObjectiveTo review the recent research progress on prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy and explore the potential application of prediction models in personalized treatment, aiming to provide useful reference information for clinical doctors to improve patient’s treatment outcomes and quality of life. MethodWe systematically searched and reviewed the literature on various prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy in recent years domestically and internationally. ResultsSpecifically, the fistula risk score (FRS) and the alternative FRS (a-FRS), as widely used tools, possessed a certain degree of subjectivity due to the lack of an objective evaluation standard for pancreatic texture. The updated a-FRS (ua-FRS) had demonstrated superior predictive efficacy in minimally invasive surgery compared to the original FRS and a-FRS. The NCCH (National Cancer Center Hospital) prediction system, based on preoperative indicators, showed high predictive accuracy. Prediction models based on CT imaging informatics had improved the accuracy and reliability of predictions. Prediction models based on elastography had provided new perspectives for the assessment of pancreatic texture and the prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. The Stacking ensemble machine learning model contributed to the individualization and localization of prediction models. The existing pancreatic fistula prediction models showed satisfactory predictive efficacy, but there were still limitations in identifying high-risk patients for pancreatic fistula.ConclusionsAfter pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic fistula remains a major complication that is difficult to overcome. The prevention of pancreatic fistula is crucial for improving postoperative recovery and reducing mortality rates. Future research should focus on the development and validation of pancreatic fistula prediction models, thereby enhancing their predictive power and increasing their predictive efficacy in different regional patients, providing a scientific basis for medical decision-making.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsEighty-five cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from May 2014 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 78 cases were investigated. They were divided into pancreatic duct-to-jejunum mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy group as controlled group (n=42) and imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy (technique of duct-to-mucosa PJ with transpancreatic interlocking mattress sutures) group as modified group (n=36). The rates of pancreatic fistula, abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, and incision infection were investigated as well as hospital stays and pancreaticojejunostomy time in two groups were compared. ResultsThe rate of pancreatic fistula especially B to C grade pancreatic fistula in the modified group was obviously lower compared with which in the controlled group (8.3% vs. 31.0%, P < 0.05), pancreaticojejunostomy time ofmodified group was significantly shortened [(35.6±12.4) min vs. (52.8±24.6) min, P < 0.05] and total operative time also shortened [(322.4±23.6) min vs. (384.2±30.2) min, P < 0.05). There were no significant difference of the rates of abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, ?incision infection, and hospital stays (P > 0.05)]. Conciusions The type of pancreaticojejunostomy has a significant impact on the rate of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy can decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after operation, and shorten the pancreaticojejunostomy time and total operative time.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and security of laparoscopic Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD)or laparoscopic pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPPPD)for the patients with periampullary diseases, estimate the ratio of postoperative complications between LPD and LPPPD. MethodsFourty-five patients who underwent the LPD or LPPPD from January 2010 to March 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. These patients were divided into LPD group and LPPPD group basing on the Whipple or polyrus preservation. ResultsAmong these 45 patients, 25 patients were performed the LPD, the other 20 patients were performed the LPPPD. There were 25(55.56%)complications after operation, including 10 cases of pancreatic fistula, 1 case of bile leakage, 6 cases of delayed gastric emptying, 3 cases of infection, 2 cases of stomach intestine stomatorrhagia, 1 case of mesenteric venous thrombosis, 1 case of ascites, 1 case of chylous fistula. The complication rate had no significant difference between two groups. One patient died after operation in the LPPPD group. ConclusionLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible in the treatment of periampullary diseases, the LPPPD could partly prevent the occurrence of reflux of the digestive juice following the resection of pylorus and improve the quality of life.
ObjectiveTo investigate how to shorten the learning curve of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). MethodsClinical data of 5 patients who underwent the LPD in our hospital from May 2015 to November 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe mean age of 58.8 years old. There were four patients who were diagnosed with periampullary tumor, one patient was distal bile duct carcinoma. The median operative time was 588 min, the average blood loss was 290 mL, the time of feeding was 5 days, the mean hospital stay was 25 days. One case died of cardiovascular event on postoperative day 1. One patient had postoperative bleeding after LPD, who recovered smoothly after reoperation for hemostasis laparoscopiclly. Conciusions LPD needs basic learning curve. The key of this procedure are appropriate treatment of pancreatic head and digestive tract reconstruction. Rich operative experience of surgeon in pancreaticoduodenectomy, optimization of the operation process, skilled in laparoscopic procedures, appropriate cases, appropriate perioperative management, and steady surgical team are also important factor for the success of LPD and shorten learning curve.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of different enteral nutrition timing on patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsPubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were searched to collect RCTs for nutritional support in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. The search time was established until March 1 2019. After two independent investigators conducted literature screening, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias in the included studies, a meta-metabolic analysis was performed using the R 3.5.3 software gemtc package, JAGS 3.4.0, and Revman software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs were included, for a total of 825 patients. The results of reticular meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the duration of hospitalization for patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy, between the enteral nutrition supported at different timing. The results of the ranking probability map suggested that preoperative enteral nutrition was a better option for supporting nutrition in patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy, secondly, timing to give was 24–48 hours after operation.ConclusionsAccording to the results of mesh meta-analysis and probabilistic ranking, the nutritional status of patients is corrected before surgery, and the effect of enteral nutrition is better than other nutritional support methods. Secondly, enteral nutrition should be given at 24–48 hours after operation in combination with ESPEN and ERAS recommendations.