ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of long and short proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of type A2.3 intertrochanteric fracture of femur (IFF). Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with type A2.3 IFF admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the length of PFNA nail used in the operation, they were divided into long nail group (PFNA nail length>240 mm, 24 cases) and short nail group (PFNA nail length≤240 mm, 30 cases). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, fracture side, body mass index, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative reduction quality score, fracture healing, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function of patients at 1 year after operation. According to the relationship between the fracture line of type A2.3 IFF and the lesser trochanter, the two groups of patients were divided into type Ⅰ(the fracture line extends to the level of the lesser trochanter), type Ⅱ(the fracture line extends to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and type Ⅲ (the fracture line extends to more than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter), and the postoperative stability and internal fixator loosening of each subtype were evaluated. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in short nail group were significantly less than those in long nail group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative reduction quality score between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 13.5 months. The postoperative stability score of short nail group was significantly lower than that of long nail group (P<0.05). The Harris score in the long nail group was significantly higher than that in the short nail group at 1 year after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in Harris score grading between the two groups (P>0.05). Complications occurred in 3 cases of the long nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 2 cases of loose internal fixator), and 7 cases of the short nail group (including 1 case of coxa varus caused by external nail entry point and 6 cases of loose internal fixator). Neither group had any anterior femoral arch damage, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of type Ⅲ patients was relatively small and not included in the statistics; there was no significant difference in the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixator loosening between the long and short nail groups in type Ⅰ patients (P>0.05). In type Ⅱ patients, the postoperative stability score and the incidence of internal fixation loosening in the long nail group were significantly better than those in the short nail group (P<0.05).Conclusion Long PFNA fixation for type A2.3 IFF has longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss, but the overall stability of fracture is better after operation. For type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to less than 2 cm below the lesser trochanter, long PFNA is used for fixation, although the surgical trauma is large, but the postoperative stability is better than that of short PFNA; for type A2.3 IFF with fracture line extending to the lesser trochanter, there is no significant difference in postoperative stability between long and short PFNAs.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) assisted by mesh locator in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.MethodsNinety-four elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures admitted between August 2014 and July 2017 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into trial group (48 cases) and control group (46 cases). In trial group, PFNA was implanted assisted by mesh locator after closed reduction; while in control group, PFNA was implanted by conventional method. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to admission, fracture side and classification, and medical complications (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, hospital stay, incision length, and complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain at 3 days after operation, and Harris score was used to evaluate hip function before operation and at 3, 6, and 9 months after operation.ResultsCompared with control group, the operation time and incision length of trial group shortened, the blood loss and fluoroscopy times reduced, the pain after operation alleviated obviously; the differences between the two groups were significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up 9-12 months, with an average of 10.6 months. X-ray films showed that the fractures healed in both groups, and the healing time in control group was (11.2±3.2) weeks, while that in trial group was (11.6±2.9) weeks, showing no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.262, P=0.120). There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups before operation and at 3, 6, and 9 months after operation (P>0.05). There was 1 case of incision infection, 2 cases of coxa vara, and 1 case of pressure ulcer in trial group, and the incidence of complications was 8.3%. There was 1 case of coxa vara, 2 cases of pressure ulcer, and 1 case of internal fixation loss in control group, and the incidence of complications was 8.7%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0.783, P=0.112).ConclusionIt is feasible to implant PFNA assisted by mesh locator in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Compared with the traditional operation, it can shorten the operation time, shorten the incision, and relieve the pain after operation.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of precise-guided temporary fixation assistive devices in assisting the main nail guide pin placement and precise temporary fixation in proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 60 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures over 65 years old who met the selection criteria between January 2020 and June 2022 and were treated with PFNA internal fixation. The patients were randomly divided into the trial group (auxiliary device guided main nail guide pin placement and temporary fixation) and the control group (conventional treatment), with 30 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, fracture side, AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, and combined medical diseases between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, times of main nail guide pin placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative blood transfusion were recorded and compared between the two groups. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by CHANG Shimin et al criteria. Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function at 1 year after operation. Results In the trial group, 2 temporary fixation needles were successfully placed 2-5 times, including 2 times in 13 cases (43.3%), 3 times in 8 cases (26.7%), 4 times in 7 cases (23.3%), and 5 times in 2 cases (6.7%). The operation time, times of main nail guide pin placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and intraoperative blood loss in the trial group were significantly less than those in the control group, and the reduction quality score was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative blood transfusion between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 15 months). There was no complication such as incision infection, deep vein thrombosis, or internal fixation loosening. At 1 year after operation, the Harris score of the affected hip joint in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The technique of main nail guide pin placement and temporary fixation under the guidance of auxiliary devices in PFNA internal fixation can achieve faster insertion of the main nail guide pin, accurate temporary fixation to maintain reduction, and avoid the subsequent operation space, so as to improve the effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo compare the predictive value of the two concepts for complications by comparing the incidences of surgical complications associated with different tip-apex distance (TAD) and calcar referenced tip-apex distance (Cal-TAD) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with Asian type proximal femoral nail (APFN) fixation. MethodsA total of 188 cases of femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated with APFN fixation between January 2014 and December 2018 were collected according to inclusion criteria. TAD and Cal-TAD were measured on the X-ray film at immediate after operation; the patients were divided into two groups according to the measurement results: <25 mm and ≥25 mm. Gender, age, and fracture side and AO type were recorded. The patients in each group were reviewed whether there was delayed fracture union or nonunion, whether the screw blade moved axially, whether the femoral neck collapsed or even screw blade cut out, whether the internal fixator became loose or broken within 12 months after operation. Then statistical analysis was performed. ResultsThere were 119 patients with TAD<25 mm and 69 patients with TAD≥25 mm, and 142 patients with Cal-TAD<25 mm and 46 patients with Cal-TAD≥25 mm. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or fracture side and AO type between groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up, 6 patients (5.04%) with TAD<25 mm, 10 patients (14.49%) with TAD≥25 mm had complications, and 1 patient (0.70%) with Cal-TAD<25 mm and 15 patients (32.61%) with Cal-TAD≥25 mm had complications. There were significant differences in the incidence of complication between the patients with different TAD, between the patients with different Cal-TAD, and between patients with TAD<25 mm and Cal-TAD<25 mm (P<0.05). ConclusionIn the operation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with APFN fixation, surgical complications can be significantly reduced when TAD or Cal-TAD was controlled within 25 mm, Cal-TAD is more significant in the prediction of postoperative complications.
ObjectiveTo analyze the reasons and the influence of internal fixation about the guide pin eccentricity of helical blade during proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) internal fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the intraoperative imaging data of 175 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures, who underwent closed reduction and PFNA internal fixation between January 2018 and January 2020, was performed. There were 76 males and 99 females with an average age of 79.8 years (mean, 61-103 years). The internal between admission and operation was 12-141 hours (median, 32 hours). According to AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, the fractures were rated as type 31-A1 in 64 cases and type 31-A2 in 111 cases. In the intraoperative fluoroscopy image by C-arm X-ray machine, the caputcollum-diaphysis (CCD) was measured after closed reduction and internal fixation, respectively; the angles between the center line of the head nail hole and the axis of proximal nail and between the axis of guide pin and proximal nail were measured, and the difference between the two angles was evaluated; the quality of fracture reduction was evaluated according to the alignment of the medial cortex, anterior cortex of the head and neck bone block, and femoral shaft cortex; the position of the helical blade in the femoral head was evaluated according to the Cleveland method.ResultsThe CCDs of proximal femur were (134.6±6.8)° after closed reduction and (134.9±4.3)° after internal fixation. There was no significant difference between pre- and post-internal fixation (t=0.432, P=0.766). The angles between the center line of the head nail hole and the axis of proximal nail and between the axis of guide pin and proximal nail were (125.4±2.44)° and (126.3±2.3)°, respectively, showing significant difference (t=2.809, P=0.044). The difference between the two angles was (0.8±2.2)°. The guide pin eccentricity of helical blade occurred in 47 cases. After tapping the helical blade along the eccentric guide pin, 10 cases had fracture reduction loss, and 5 cases had a poor position of the helical blade in the femoral head. ConclusionDuring PFNA internal fixation, a variety of reasons can lead to the eccentric position of the guide pin of helical blade, including unstable fracture, soft tissue inserted, severe osteoporosis, mismatched tool, and fluoroscopic imaging factors. It is possible that the fracture end would be displaced again and the helical blade position may be poor when knocking into the helical blade along the eccentric guide pin. During operation, it should be judged whether the direction of the guide pin needs to be adjusted according to the eccentric angle.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous combined with topical administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing blood loss after intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures by a prospective controlled trial.MethodsPatients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures, who were admitted for intramedullary fixation between June 2015 and July 2019, were selected as the study subjects, 120 of whom met the selection criteria. The patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: intravenous administration group (group A, 41 cases), topical administration group (group B, 40 cases), and combined administrations group (group C, 39 cases). In group A, 4 patients occurred deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity before operation, 1 patient died of myocardial infarction on the 5th day after operation, and 1 patient developed severe pulmonary infection after operation. In group B, 2 patients occurred deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity before operation and 1 patient had iatrogenic fracture during operation. In group C, 3 patients occurred deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity before operation and 1 patient developed pulmonary infection before operation and gave up surgical treatment. All the above patients were excluded from the study, and the remaining 107 cases were included in the analysis, including 35, 37, and 35 cases in groups A, B, and C, respectively. There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, body mass, injury cause, fracture side and type, the interval between injury and operation, and preoperative hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit between groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative TXA (15 mg/kg) was injected intravenously in group A at 30 minutes before operation, and 1 g of TXA was injected into the medullary cavity in group B after the proximal femur was grooted and before the intramedullary nail implantation, respectively. TXA was given in group C before and during operation according to the administration methods and dosage of groups A and B. Total blood loss, maximum Hb decrease, blood transfusion rate, operation time, fracture healing time, and the incidence of complications were recorded and compared between groups. The hip joint function were evaluated by Harris score. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between groups (P>0.05). The total blood loss, the maximum Hb decrease, and the blood transfusion rate in group B were the highest, followed by group A and group C, and the differences between groups were significant (P<0.05). No incision infection or pulmonary embolism occurred in the 3 groups after operation. The incidence of anemia in group C was significantly lower than that in groups A and B, the difference was significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of subcutaneous hematoma, aseptic exudation, and deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity between groups (P>0.05). All patients in the 3 groups were followed up 8-35 months, with an average of 16.2 months. The fracture healing time of groups A, B, and C was (6.12±1.78), (5.89±1.63), and (5.94±1.69) months, respectively, and there was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the Harris scores of the hip joints in groups A, B, and C were 83.18±7.76, 84.23±8.01, and 85.43±8.34, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05). ConclusionPreoperative intravenous injection combined with intraoperative topical application of TXA can effectively reduce blood loss and blood transfusion after intramedullary fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture, without increasing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, and the efficacy is better than that of intravenous injection or topical administration.
Objective To introduce a novel comprehensive classification for femoral intertrochanteric fractures, and to accommodate the clinical requirement for the world-wide outbreak of geriatric hip fractures and surgical operations. Methods On the basis of reviewing the history of classification of femoral intertrochanteric fractures and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification in different periods, combined with the current situation of extensive preoperative CT scan and three-dimensional reconstruction and widespread use of intramedullary nail fixation in China, the “Elderly Hip Fracture” Research Group of the Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery Committee of the Chinese Rehabilitation Medical Association proposed a novel comprehensive classification for femoral intertrochanteric fractures, focusing on the structure of fracture stability reconstruction during internal fixation. Results The novel comprehensive classification of femoral intertrochanteric fractures incorporates multiple indicators of fracture classification, including the orientation of the fracture line, the degree of fracture fragmentation, the lesser trochanteric bone fragment and its distal extension length (>2 cm), the posterior coronal bone fragment and its anterior extension width (involving the lateral cortex of the head and neck implant entry point), transverse fracture of the lateral and anterior wall and its relationship with the implant entry point in the head and neck, and whether the cortex of the anteromedial inferior corner can be directly reduced to contact, etc. The femoral intertrochanteric fractures are divided into 4 types (type A1 is simple two-part fractures, type A2 is characterized by lesser trochanter fragment and posterior coronal fractures, type A3 is reverse obliquity and transverse fractures, type A4 is medial comminution which lacks anteromedial cortex transmission of compression force), each of which is subdivided into 4 subtypes and further subdivide into finer subgroups. In a review of 550 trochanteric hip fracture cases by three-dimensional CT, type A1 accounted for 20.0%, type A2 for 62.5%, type A3 for 15.5%, and type A4 for 2.0%, respectively. For subtypes, A2.2 is with a “banana-like” posterior coronal fragment, A2.4 is with distal cortex extension >2 cm of the lesser trochanter and anterior cortical expansion of the posterior coronal fragment to the entry portal of head-neck implants, A3.4 is a primary pantrochanteric fracture, and A4.4 is a concomitant ipsilateral segmental fracture of the neck and trochanter region. ConclusionThe novel comprehensive classification of femoral intertrochanteric fractures can describe the morphological characteristics of fractures in more detail, include more rare and complex types, provide more personalized subtype selection, and adapt to the clinical needs of both fractures and surgeries.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) following femoral intertrochanteric fractures in adults.MethodsRelevant literature at home and abroad was extensively reviewed to summarize the pathogenesis, high-risk factors, and treatment of ONFH after femoral intertrochanteric fracture in adults.ResultsONFH after femoral intertrochanteric fracture mostly occurs within 2 years after operation, with a lower incidence. At present, it is believed that comminuted and large displacement fractures caused by high-energy injuries, fracture line close to the base of neck, excessive external rotation deformity, improper intramedullary nail entry points, and rough intraoperative manipulating may injury the deep branch of the medial circumflex femoral artery, causing ONFH. Hip replacement is the main treatment for necrosis, which can achieve good results.ConclusionAddressing the above risks, excessive external rotation, overstretching, and rough manipulating should be avoided. Anatomical reduction should be performed during the operation, the nail entry point should be accurate and avoid repeated drilling and thermally bone necrosis.
摘要:目的:探讨老年人股骨粗隆间骨折不同手术方式的选择。方法:我院2004年1月至2007年12月间应用不同术式治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折110例,其中动力髋螺钉(DHS)25例, 股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)41例,人工股骨头置换44例。术后所有患者均获随访,平均12.6个月。对术后并发症和按照Kuderna 改良 Merli D’Aubigne标准得到的髋关节功能恢复优良数(率)进行评价。结果:术后出现并发症3例,其中PFN术式2例;人工股骨头置换术式1例。围手术期内无伤口感染,无死亡病例。三种术式总体优良数(率)为:107(97.3%)。结论:三种手术方式各有其优缺点,没有一种术式能普遍适用于各种类型粗隆间骨折,临床上,为了最大限度降低手术风险,我们没有必要专注或偏好于某一种手术方式,要根据患者的个体差异及每种术式的优缺点,灵活地为每例股骨粗隆间骨折患者制定出其最适宜的手术方式,大都能取得满意的疗效。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the chosen of 3 different surgical methods in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. Methods:From January, 2004 to December, 2007, 110 cases with the femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly were treated with the followed 3 kinds of operations respectively:dynamic hip screw (25 cases), proximal femoral nail (41 cases), hip hemiarthroplasty (44 cases). After surgery all patients were followed up; Followedup period range from 6 months to 18 months(average 12.6 months). The good and excellent number (rate) of 3 surgical methods with Merli D’Aubigne evaluation criteria were evaluated, and compared in the postoperative complications. Results: 3 complications occurred postoperatively ( 2 with PFN,1 with hip hemiarthroplasty), none wound infection or died in Perioperatie. The total good successful number (rate) was 107(97.3%). Conclusion:Each has its advantages and its disadvantages. None of three kinds of surgical methods can be used generally all kinds of the femoral intertrochanter fracture. In clinical work, we don not need to focus on or prefer to the only one of them in order to minimize the risk. The good response to treatment will be get if we can choose the appropriate method according to the individual differences of the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
ObjectiveTo compare the biomechanical properties between the proximal femoral locking plate and Gamma3 for fixing stable intertrochanteric fracture so as to provide a theoretical basis for selecting internal fixation in the clinical application. MethodsFive pairs of antiseptic femur specimens were selected. Specimens of each pair of matching were randomly divided into groups A and B (n=5). All specimens were made the intertrochanteric fracture of 31A1.1 type according to AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) classification. Fracture was fixed with Gamma3 in group A and with proximal femoral locking plate in group B. The axial compression, destruction, and torsion tests were carried out on the mechanical testing machine. ResultsAxial compression test:The load-displacement curve of groups A and B was basically a straight line; axial stiffness of groups A and B was (621.00±36.48) N/mm and (542.55±46.94) N/mm respectively, showing significant difference (t=3.648, P=0.036). Destruction test:The maximum yield load of groups A and B was (4 394.82±450.37) N and (2 987.54±112.14) N respectively, showing significant difference (t=5.433, P=0.032). After loading maximum yield load, femoral fracture occurred again, and internal fixation and bone interface loosening were observed in group A; bending and breaking of proximal locking screw for internal fixation were found in group B, but loosening of internal fixation and bone interface was more obvious in group A than in group B. Torsion test:The torque of specimens in 2 groups increased with the increase of torsion angle (P < 0.05), the torque corresponding to the torsion angle in group B was larger than that in group A, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). The torsional stiffness of groups A and B was (1.78±0.16) N·mm/deg and (2.01±0.08) N·mm/deg respectively, showing no significant difference (t=-3.833, P=0.162). ConclusionProximal femoral locking plate and Gamma3 in the treatment of stable intertrochanteric fracture have good biomechanical properties, which can meet the requirements of minimal invasion, strong internal fixation, and early activity.