ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of unexposed ulnar nerve medial elbow incision, open reduction and internal fixation of anatomical locking compression plate (LCP) for distal humerus fractures.MethodsFourteen patients with distal humerus fracture were treated between January 2014 and June 2017. There were 5 males and 9 females, aged 18-85 years (mean, 65.5 years). The causes of injury included falling from height in 12 cases and traffic accident in 2 cases, all were closed fractures. Fractures were classified according to the AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF): 3 cases of type A2, 2 cases of type A3, 4 cases of type B2, 2 cases of type C1, 2 cases of type C2, and 1 case of type C3; without ulnar nerve damage. The time from injury to operation was 4-15 days, with an average of 7 days. The type B2 fractures were treated with unexposed ulnar nerve elbow medial incision and anatomic LCP internal fixation, the rest patients were all treated with unexposed ulnar nerve medial plus conventional lateral approach and bilateral LCP internal fixation.ResultsThe operation time was 50-140 minutes (mean, 80 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 20-200 mL (mean, 70 mL). There was no blood vessels or nerve damage during operation. All incisions healed by first intension, and no incision infection occurred. All the 14 cases were followed up 9-24 months (mean, 13 months). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed within 4 months without complications such as nonunion and osteomyelitis. No ulnar nerve injury, cubitus varus deformity, and ossifying myositis occurred during follow-up. At last follow-up, the elbow function was assessed by Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), the results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case (type C3 fracture), with the excellent and good rate of 85.7%.ConclusionThe unexposed ulnar nerve medial elbow incision can be used effectively to reduct the fracture, and it is not prone to ulnar nerve injury. Combined with the lateral approach to treat the distal humerus fracture, which has the advantages of short operation time, few trauma, little bleeding, and reliable effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) with preservation of triceps brachii insertion approach.MethodsBetween January 2012 and September 2017, 17 patients with elbow disease were treated with TEA with preservation of triceps brachii insertion approach. There were 3 males and 14 females, with an average age of 65.2 years (range, 48-85 years). The injuries located on left elbow in 5 cases and on right elbow in 12 cases. There were 11 cases of distal humerus fracture (AO type C1 in 2 cases and type C3 in 9 cases); the interval between fracture and operation was 3-10 days (mean, 4.1 days). There were 3 cases of osteoarthritis and 3 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, with the disease duration of 2-26 years (mean, 8.7 years). The postoperative elbow function and pain was assessed by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score, respectively. The prosthesis position, heterotopic ossification, and periprosthetic fracture were observed by X-ray films.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. Sixteen patients were followed up 18-69 months (mean, 40.6 months). Intraoperative ulnar nerve injury occurred in 2 cases, and healed after symptomatic treatment. At last follow-up, the MEPS score was 55-100 (mean, 90.3). The results were excellent in 11 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 81.3%. The VAS score was 0-2 (mean, 0.4). X-ray reexamination showed that no polyethylene wear, prosthesis loosening and fracture, abnormal prosthesis position, periprosthetic fracture occurred during the follow-up period, and the prosthesis survival rate was 100%. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 2 and 3 months after operation in 2 cases, respectively.ConclusionThe triceps on approach for TEA are satisfactory for distal humerus fracture, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis.
Objective To investigate the difference of effectiveness between medial-lateral approach and posteromedian approach in the release of elbow stiffness after distal humeral fracture surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 41 patients with elbow stiffness following medial and lateral plate fixation for distal humerus fractures, admitted between January 2021 and June 2023 and meeting selection criteria. Patients were divided into the combined medial-lateral approach release group (study group, 20 cases) and the posterior midline approach release group (control group, 21 cases) based on surgical approach. Baseline characteristics including age, gender, affected side, body mass index, disease duration, and preoperative extension angle, flexion angle, range of motion, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, Mayo elbow performance score, ulnar nerve symptoms, and heterotopic ossification showed no significant differences between groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication incidence were recorded and compared between groups. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using pre- and postoperative Mayo score, VAS score, elbow extension/flexion angles, and range of motion on the affected side. Statistical analysis focused on changes in these indicators relative to preoperative values. Results There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 15-36 months, with a mean of 23.8 months; there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (t=−1.542, P=0.131). In the control group, 1 patient had obvious subcutaneous hematoma and 5 patients had poor wound healing within 2 months after operation, all of which were cured by symptomatic treatment, while no related complications occurred in the study group, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). At last follow-up, 2 patients in the study group and 3 patients in the control group had mild symptoms of ulnar nerve numbness, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of ulnar nerve symptoms (P>0.05). All patients had no recurrence or new onset of heterotopic ossification, no skin necrosis or reoperation due to complications. At last follow-up, elbow extension angle, flexion angle, flexion-extension range of motion, VAS score, and Mayo score significantly improved in both groups when compared with the preoperative ones (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the change values in elbow extension angle and VAS score between the two groups (P>0.05); the change values in flexion angle and Mayo score in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The medial-lateral approach can release the elbow stiffness and concurrently remove the medial, lateral, or posterior lateral steel plates. The incision minimizes disruption to rehabilitation exercises and reduces complications like inadequate wound healing, ultimately leading to improved treatment outcomes.