ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of TEC and CEF regimen in preoperative chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer. MethodsA total of one hundred breast cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy were divided into TEC group (n=50) and CEF group (n=50) by the pairgroup method and received surgical therapy after three courses of chemotherapy. The efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy of patients in two groups were analyzed. ResultsFour patients with stage ⅢB breast cancer quit from CEF group after two courses of treatment because of the worse satisfaction. Clinical complete remission (cCR) was 7 cases, clinic partial remission (cPR) was 34 cases, stable disease (SD) was 9 cases, therefore, the remission rate (RR) was 82.0% (41/50), and reduction rate of tumor was 64.0% (32/50) in TEC group. cCR was 2 cases, cPR was 32 cases, SD was 12 cases, thus the RR was 680% (34/50), and reduction rate of tumor was 40.0% (20/50) in CEF group. The clinical efficacy and reduction rate of tumor of patients in TEC group were significantly superior than those in CEF group (Plt;0.05). The negative conversion ratio of lymph nodes were 54.1% (20/37) and 57.1% (20/35) in TEC group and CEF group, which was not statistically different (Plt;0.05). The occurrence of hair loss and leukopenia of patients in TEC group were significantly higher than those in CEF group (Plt;0.05), while the differences in thrombocytopenia, low concentration of hemoglobin, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, cardiac toxicity, and neurotoxicity were not significant (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionTEC regimen is better than CEF regimen in the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuant therapy for patients with breast cancer, and well tolerated.
Objective To investigate the effect of radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and modified radical surgery on breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) of patients with stage cT1–2N1M0 breast cancer. Methods A total of 917 cT1–2N1M0 stage breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and modified radical surgery from 2010 to 2017 were extracted from the The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Of them 720 matched patients were divided into radiotherapy group (n=360) and non-radiotherapy group (n=360) by using propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to explore the factors affecting BCSS. Results Patients were all interviewed for a median follow-up of 65 months, and the 5-year BCSS was 91.9% in the radiotherapy group and 93.2% in the non-radiotherapy group, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=0.292, P=0.589). The results were the same in patients with no axillary lymph node metastasis, one axillary lymphnode metastasis, two axillary lymph node metastasis and 3 axillary lymph node metastasis group (χ2=0.139, P=0.709; χ2=0.578, P=0.447; χ2=2.617, P=0.106; χ2=0.062, P=0.803). The result of Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that, after controlling for Grade grade, time from diagnosis to treatment, efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, number of positive axillary lymph nodes, molecular typing, and tumor diameter at first diagnosis, radiotherapy had no statistically significant effect on BCSS [HR=1.048, 95%CI (0.704, 1.561), P=0.817]. Conclusions The effect of radiotherapy on the BCSS of patients with stage cT1–2N1M0 breast cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and modified radical surgery with 0 to 3 axillary lymph nodes metastases is limited, but whether to undergo radiotherapy should still be determined according to the comprehensive risk of individual tumor patients.
ObjectiveTo study the latest progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. MethodsLiteratures of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, involving with theoretical basis, clinical significance, indications, drugs, predictors, and its relationship of breastconserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy were reviewed. ResultsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy could reduce the clinical stage, increase opportunity of breast-conserving surgery, learn the sensitivity of drugs, prevent distant metastases, but the impact of the sentinel lymph node biopsy was still in dispute. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important part of a systemic treatment for breast cancer, but how to select sensitive drugs, develop individualized treatment programs and forecast the outcome needs further study.
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stage ⅠB2-ⅡB cervical cancer. Methods From June 2012 to December 2014, 66 patients with stage ⅠB2-ⅡB cervical cancer were selected and treated by PT (cisplatin/ carboplatin and taxol/docetaxel) as neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy response and toxicity were collected and analyzed. Results The extinctive condition of tumor by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy: the complete remission rate was 10.6% (7/66), partial remission rate was 59.1% (39/66), and the total effective rate was 69.7%. The main toxicities were myelosuppression (59.1%, 39/66) and gastrointestinal reactions (33.3%, 22/66). The toxicities could be tolerated or relieved by prevention and treatment. The effective rate of chemotherapy for cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma was 72.6%, 33.3% and 0%, respectively, with significant differences among the three types (P<0.05). The effective rate of chemotherapy for high, medium and low differentiated cervical cancer was 100.0%, 77.3% and 55.9%, respectively, with significant differences among the three degrees (P<0.05). Conclusions Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is proved to be a safe and effective complementary treatment for most patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Due to the limitation of sample size, the correlations between therapeutic effect and tumor differentiation degree and between therapeutic effect and pathological type need further study.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and find the mechanism of multidrug resistance. MethodsTwenty patients with gastric cancer and 31 patients with colorectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then operations. The preoperative specimens were stained by immunohistochemical techniques for testing p53,multidrug resistanceassociated protein (MRP), glutathione S transferase（GST）, telomerase. Resection specimens were evaluated for chemotherapy effect by routine histology; at the same time, the postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed. ResultsIn 51 patients, the response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 27.45%(14/51),so multidrug resistance was a kind of common phenomena in gastrointestinal carcinomas. The postoperative morbidity was 15.69%(8/15), the main operation complication was infection,the mortality was 1.96%(1/51),only one person died from severe infection.The expression rate of p53, MRP, GST, telomerase was 58.0%,51.0%,66.7%,74.0%respectively, the location of p53 was at cell nucleus,location of MRP,GST was at cell memberane and cytoplasm,location of telomerase was at cytoplasm.The response rate had nothing to do with age, sex and metastasis. But it was related with p53 and telomerase expression. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an effective, safe therapy. But the rate of drug resistance is high in gastrointestinal carcinomas, and the response rate is related to p53, telomerase expression.
Objective To study the long-term effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on advanced breast cancer. Methods The CAF neoadjuvant chemotherapy 〔CTX 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), 5-FU 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), and ADM 30 mg/m2 (1st day) every 3 weeks〕 was carried out in 31 breast cancer patients (stageⅢ,Ⅳ) for 2 cycles before operation, compared with 30 patients (stage Ⅲa) whose therapies were never done and operations could be feasible. Results The overall response rate was 87.1%(27/31). The stages of 19 patients among 31 (61.3%) declined (6 patients to stage Ⅲa, 8 to stageⅡb, 4 to stageⅡa, 1 to stage 0, 1 to complete response and none to pathological complete response). The diseasefree survival time of the patients was 56.3 months which was obviously longer than that of the patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (43.5 months, P＜0.05). The 5-year diseasefree survival rate of the patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.7% which was a little higher than that (33.3%) of the patients without the chemotherapy, and the two groups had no significant difference. Conclusion The neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the stages of patients with advanced breast cancer, obviously prolong the diseasefree survival time of patients, and reduce or delay recurrence or metastasis.
ObjectiveTo describe the research progress of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) and gastric cancer in recent years, and to make reasonable prospect for future research direction.MethodWe collected a large amount of literatures on lncRNA and gastric cancer at home and abroad, and sort out various kinds of lncRNA, to make an in-depth interpretation of the relationship between lncRNA and gastric cancer and the mechanism of action, and then clarified the latest research progress.ResultsAt present, the molecular mechanism of the occurrence and development of gastric cancer had not been fully elucidated, but current studies had shown that lncRNA (H19, HOTTIP, UCA1, MEG3, MALAT1, HULC, HOTAIR, GAPLINC, and so on) had regulatory effects at multiple levels such as epigenetics, transcription, translation, chemoresistance, and more and more lncRNA had been discovered closely related to gastric cancer.ConclusionlncRNA is closely related to the occurrence and development of gastric cancer and may be a key target for the treatment of gastric cancer in the future.
ObjectiveTo investigate the differences between indocyanine green (ICG) plus methylene blue and radioactive nuclide plus methylene blue for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. Methods A total of 77 breast cancer patients who accepted SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after NAC from June 2017 to February 2019 were involved, among them, 46 breast cancer patients accepted SLNB by ICG plus methylene blue and 31 breast cancer patients accepted SLNB by radioactive nuclide plus methylene blue, pathological and clinical data were collected and analyzed.ResultsThere were 43 patients in the ICG plus methylene blue group and 30 patients in radioactive nuclide plus methylene blue group, which totally 73 patients were detected at least one sentinel lymph node in all the 77 patients, and the detection rate was 94.80%. The SLN detected rate, SLN detected numbers, sensitivity, false negative rate, and accuracy of the ICG plus methylene blue group were 93.48% (43/46), 2.32 per case, 82.61% (19/23), 17.39% (4/23), and 90.70% (39/43) respectively, as well as 96.77% (30/31), 2.6 per case, 83.33% (10/12), 16.67% (2/10), and 93.33% (28/30) in the radioactive nuclide plus methylene blue group. There was no significant difference between the ICG plus methylene blue group and radioactive nuclide plus methylene blue group in terms of SLN detected rate, SLN detected numbers, sensitivity, false negative rate, and accuracy (P>0.05).ConclusionICG plus methylene blue showed similar SLN detection rate, SLN detected numbers, sensitivity, false negative rate, and accuracy as radioactive nuclide plus methylene blue for SLNB in breast cancer patients after NAC, and both of them can be performed easily and conveniently.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of different strategies for surgical treatment of cancer of rectum combined with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy under multi-disciplinary team. Methods From January 2007 to December 2007, the patients diagnosed definitely as rectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively, of whom accept surgery combined with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were included. The clinical effects were studied and observed, the differences among the strategies for different surgical treatment 〔high anterior resection (HAR), low anterior resection (LAR), out-pouching with colo-anal anastomosis (OCAA), radical resection with non-saving anus (RNSA), and palliation colostomy (PCO)〕 in the multi modality therapy were compared. Results Comparing the constituent ratio of gross type of tumor in five groups, the difference between PCO group and the other 4 groups had mainly statistical significance （P＜0.05）. The difference of constituent ratio of Dukes staging had statistical significance between HAR group and OCAA group, HAR group and PCO group, LAR group and PCO group （P＜0.05）. According to the duration of operation, the persisting time of PCO group was obviously shorter than that of the other 4 groups （P＜0.05）, meanwhile, the persisting time of LAR group was shorter than that of OCAA group and RNSA group （P＜0.05）. According to the volume of ascites discovered in operation, mainly between HAR group and LAR group, between HAR group and RNSA group, the incidence of a seroperitoneum more than 200 ml in the former was less than the latter （P＜0.05）. Regarding to indexes of laboratory, CEA value in PCO group was higher than the other 4 groups, serum amyloid A value in RNSA group was higher than the other 4 groups, and the differences had statistical significances （P＜0.05）. Conclusion Mini-invasive surgery may have certain significance in clinical effect of the comprehensive treatment for advanced rectal cancer when different operative methods were combined with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. And by the way, better clinical effect will take place when the anus-retained operation is possibly performed.
Objective To investigate the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods Literatures on the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer were reviewed and analyzed. The agreement between computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) and the results of histopathology and survival was analyzed.Results CT and EUS were the method of efficacy evaluation commonly used at present, but the evaluation indexes and criteria were controversial, and the criteria for solid tumors seemed to be not feasible for gastric cancer. Diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) method needed more investigation, while PET held advantage in early selection of patients without response accurately.Conclusion There is no uniform standard for clinical efficacy evaluation yet, so an integration of diverse imaging methods may be the best choice to improve the accuracy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.