【 Abstract 】 Objective To discuss incidence of the complications in the rectal cancer patients ’ early postoperative being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgical intervention. Methods The rectal cancer patients under surgical therapy being diagnosed definitely, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy under multi-disciplinary team (MDT) or without and firstly being discovered from April to October of 2007 were studied. The complication conditions of these patients 1 month after operation were studied and observed, and the differences between MDT group and non-MDT group were compared. Results According to the condition, 189 rectal cancer patients were internalized. Among all the patients, the distance of tumor to the dentate line were lt;3 cm 38 cases, 3 ～ 7 cm 86 cases, ≥ 7 cm 65 cases; pathological stage were Ⅰ stage 5 cases ， Ⅱstage 122 cases， Ⅲstage 50 cases， Ⅳstage 12 cases. There were 181 cases laparotomy, 8 cases laparoscopic operation; 33 cases stoma operation, 156 cases non-stoma operation. The total incidence of postoperative complication was 27.0% （51/189）. Of all, incision bleeding was 1 case, abdominal (deep) bleeding were 4 cases, anastomosis bleeding were 5 cases, pulmonary infection was 1 case, wound infection were 7 cases, urinary tract infection were 3 cases, abdominal (deep) infection was 1 case, unknown fever were 19 cases, superficial layer wound dehiscence was 1 case, wound co-liquation were 15 cases, anastomosis leakage were 3 cases, rectovaginal fistula were 2 cases; intestinal obstruction were 7 cases, urinary retention were 7 cases, stress ulcer were 2 cases. Follow-up in 2-10 months after operation, there was no death case. The baseline between MDT group and non-MDT group was equal. The ratio of postoperative blood transfusion of MDT group was obviously less than that of non-MDT group （P＜0.05）. Moreover, the operation time of MDT group was obviously shorter than that of non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. But the ratio of laparotomy and laparoscopic operation, of stoma operation and non-stoma operation, as well as the types of radical excision operation of rectal cancer didn’t show any statistical difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The postoperative venting time, defecation time, intake time didn’t show any statistical difference between two groups too. But the postoperative out-of-bed activity time and the postoperative in-hospital days of MDT group was obviously shorter than that of non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. In MDT group the postoperative total complication rate was less than non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. Among all the complications, the MDT group had a lower rate of wound infection, wound co-liquation and urinary retention （P＜0.05）. Using multifactorial logistic regression analysis, the risk factor which influenced the postoperative complication rate in MDT group were: postoperative intake time and postoperative hospitalization time. But the risk factor in non-MDT group was only according to postoperative hospitalization time. Conclusion The patients who were treated by MDT, definite operative method combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not didn’t increase the postoperative complication rate and risk. So it could be believed that such a composite treatment was feasible and safe in early postoperative stage. But it needs further studies to evaluate the medium- and long-term clinical effect.
Objective To investigate the impacts of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and on operation procedure and the significance of prognosis. Methods The expression of IGF-1R in 40 patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was measured by immunohistochemistry. The diagnosis was proved by core biopsy. All the patients took the TAC chemotherapy regimen. Modified radical operation was performed after two chemotherapy cycles and the IGF-1R expression was measured again. The clinical effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed according to WHO criterion by measuring the size of tumor by physical examination and B type ultrasound. Results After neoadjuvant chemotherapy the tumor size shrank in 29 patients, there was no CR (complete response) or PD (progressed disease) to be documented. IGF-1R expression could be downregulated in 25 patients. Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can inhibit the tumor growth by downregulation of the expression of IGF-1R.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical application of oncoplastic surgery in breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsFrom May 2016 to May 2018, 32 breast cancer patients (cT2–3N0–3M0) who were scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and agreed to accept breast-conserving surgery after NAC in the Henan Tumor Hospital were enrolled into the retrospective study. These patients were originally unable to perform traditional breast conserving surgery because of the size or location of the tumor. We observed the success rate, safety and cosmetic effects of breast-conserving therapy, which were applicated of tumor down-staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with oncoplastic surgery.ResultsIn this study, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 31 patients achieved CR or PR, and 1 patient had SD. All 32 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery successfully, 3 patients underwent breast-conserving combined with volume replacement, and 29 patients underwent breast-conserving combined with volume displacement. One patient was not satisfied with the cosmetic effects, the other patients were satisfied or basically satisfied with the cosmetic effects. The median follow-up was 18 months (5–24 months), and no local recurrence or distant metastasis was found in 32 patients.ConclusionsBy tumor down-staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with oncoplastic surgery, we can make some patients who are originally not suitable for breast conserving due to tumor size and tumor location succeed in breast-conserving therapy, and the safety and cosmetic effect are basically satisfied.
Objective To explore the intervention effect on colorectal cancer operation by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in multi-disciplinary team. Methods To analyze retrospectively the data of patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2007 to December 2007, and the planned and actual operative strategy were compared between MDT group and non-MDT group. Results According to the inclusion criteria, 251 colorectal cancer patients were included which had 183 rectal cancer and 68 colon cancer. The baseline between MDT group and non-MDT group was equal, and there was no difference of planned operative strategy between two groups. For patients planned undergoing standard ano-saving radical procedure, the ratio of actual procedure same to the planned and the ratio of radical procedure changed to expansive ano-saving radical procedure showed no significant differences between MDT group and non-MDT group (Pgt;0.05), whereas the difference of the ratio of radical procedure changed to local radical procedure between two groups was statistically significant (Plt;0.01). And the constituent ratio of actual procedure between two groups for patients which planned accepted non-ano-saving procedure didn’t have any significant difference (Pgt;0.05). For the cancer focus, the relief differences of complete remission and partial remission were statistically significant between two groups (P＜0.01), but the difference of the constituent ratio of T staging change was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The value of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy should not be limited to decrease the stage of cancer, and it is important to pay more attention to the high quality of combined therapy. Further research should be carried out to find the contribution of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy to mini-invasive surgery.
Objective To study the long-term effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on advanced breast cancer. Methods The CAF neoadjuvant chemotherapy 〔CTX 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), 5-FU 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), and ADM 30 mg/m2 (1st day) every 3 weeks〕 was carried out in 31 breast cancer patients (stageⅢ,Ⅳ) for 2 cycles before operation, compared with 30 patients (stage Ⅲa) whose therapies were never done and operations could be feasible. Results The overall response rate was 87.1%(27/31). The stages of 19 patients among 31 (61.3%) declined (6 patients to stage Ⅲa, 8 to stageⅡb, 4 to stageⅡa, 1 to stage 0, 1 to complete response and none to pathological complete response). The diseasefree survival time of the patients was 56.3 months which was obviously longer than that of the patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (43.5 months, P＜0.05). The 5-year diseasefree survival rate of the patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.7% which was a little higher than that (33.3%) of the patients without the chemotherapy, and the two groups had no significant difference. Conclusion The neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the stages of patients with advanced breast cancer, obviously prolong the diseasefree survival time of patients, and reduce or delay recurrence or metastasis.
Objective To explore the clinical value of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) with multiple surgical approaches in the treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer. Methods The clinicopathologic data of 35 patients with critical resectable pancreatic head carcinoma admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University and the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2017 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received NAC before operation (AG protocol). At the end of the course of treatment, according to the type of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) [venous invasion type (BRPC-V type) and arterial invasion type (BRPC-A type)], take the individualized surgical approach for LPD (BRPC-V type: inferior mesenteric vein approach; BRPC-A type: left posterior approach, medial uncinate process approach, anterior approach, or lower mesocolon approach). The intraoperative condition, R0/R1 resection rate, lymph node dissection, postoperative complications, average hospital stay, recovery, follow-up and survival were recorded. Results① Efficacy evaluation of NAC: 13 patients were partially relieved , 17 patients were stable and 5 patients were progressive after 4 weeks of treatment. Five progressive patients continued to receive comprehensive internal medicine treatment, and the remaining 30 patients underwent LPD. ② Intraoperative situation: LPD were successfully completed in 30 patients, 2 patients underwent extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein (or) portal vein reconstruction among them. Among the 30 patients with LPD, there were 10 cases of inferior mesenteric vein approach, 10 cases of left posterior approach, 6 cases of medial uncinate process approach, 1 case of left posterior approach+medial uncinate process approach, 2 cases of anterior approach, and 1 case of inferior mesocolon approach. The mean operative time was (379.4±77.3) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (436.9±95.1) mL. ③ Postoperative situation: The incidence rate of postoperative surgery-related complications was 33.3% (10/30), including 4 cases of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ [biliary fistula in 1 case (3.3%), A-grade pancreatic fistula in 1 case (3.3%), gastric draining dysfunction in 1 case (3.3%), diarrhea in 1 case (3.3%)], 5 cases of grade Ⅱ [pulmonary infection in 2 cases (6.6%), B-grade pancreatic fistula in 2 cases (6.6%), abdominal infection in 1 case (3.3%)], and 1 case of grade Ⅲ [gastroduodenal artery stump bleeding (3.3%)]. Among the 10 patients with complications, 9 cases recovered after symptomatic treatment, and 1 case died, with a fatality rate of 3.3% (1/30). The mean postoperative hospital stay was (17.3±5.5) days. ④ Excision rate and pathological results: R0 resection rate was 90.0% (9/10) in 10 patients with BR-PV type LPD, and R1 resection was performed in 1 patient. R0 resection rate was 75.0% (15/20) in 20 patients with BR-A type, and R1 resection was performed in 5 patients (2 patients with medial uncinate process approach; Left posterior approach in 2 cases; Submesocolon approach was used in 1 case). In 30 patients with LPD, the total R0 removal rate was 80.0% (24/30), the number of lymph nodes dissected was (11±5). Pathological type: There were 26 cases (86.7%) of ductal adenocarcinoma in 30 patients, 1 case of adeno-squamous carcinoma (3.3%), 1 case of mucinous carcinoma (3.3%), 2 cases of acinocytic cell carcinoma (6.7%). 23 cases (76.7%) of medium-high differentiation and 5 cases (16.6%) of low differentiation, two cases (6.7%) were undifferentiated. ⑤ Postoperative follow-up and survival: 30 patients were completely followed-up for 6-39 months, with a median follow-up time of 17 months. The median survival time of BRPC-V and BRPC-A patients was 24.0 months and 17.0 months, respectively. The overall survival rates of 30 patients at 1, 2 and 3 years after operation were 77.3%、46.5% and 13.7%, respectively. Conclusion The selection of preoperative NAC combined with individualized surgical approach for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer is beneficial to improve the radical resection rate and clinical therapeutic effect, and has good clinical application value.
ObjectiveTo compare the prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with T1-2N1-2M0 luminal breast cancer, and to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis. MethodsPatients with luminal breast cancer who met the inclusion criteria and had complete follow-up data from January 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively collected. Patients received either neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), both based on anthracycline-containing regimens. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify risk factors affecting 5-year cumulative overall survival rate. The significance level was set at α=0.05. ResultsA total of 206 patients (99 receiving NAC and 107 receiving AC) who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The cohort comprised 101 patients with luminal A (57 AC, 44 NAC) and 105 with luminal B (50 AC, 55 NAC). At a median follow-up of 72.5 months, no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative overall survival rate was observed between AC and NAC patients (89.7% vs. 88.9%, P=0.571); However, the 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the AC group as compared with the NAC group (85.0% vs. 73.5%, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that no significant differences in the 5-year cumulative overall survival rates between AC and NAC patients within either luminal A (94.7% vs. 86.4%, P=0.727) or luminal B (84.0% vs. 89.3%, P=0.864). However, for patients with luminal A, the 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the AC subgroup than in the NAC subgroup (93.0% vs. 77.3%, P<0.001). In contrast, no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rate between AC and NAC patients was observed in patients with luminal B (74.0% vs. 71.4%, P=0.201). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model identified the following independent risk factors for lower 5-year cumulative overall survival rate in patients with T1-2N1-2M0 luminal breast cancer: N2 stage [HR (95%CI)=2.290 (1.249, 4.196)], lymphovascular invasion [HR (95%CI)=2.181 (1.182, 4.026)], omission of endocrine therapy [HR (95%CI)=6.013 (2.590, 13.965)], and absence of pathological complete response after NAC [HR (95%CI)=2.403 (1.284, 4.496)]. ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that patients with T1-2N1-2M0 luminal breast cancer can achieve higher disease-free survival from AC. But it is still necessary to comprehensively consider the patient’s condition such as lymph node metastasis, vascular cancer thrombus to formulate an individualized treatment plan to increase the overall survival rate of patients.
Radical surgical resection is still the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic cancer. With the update of minimally invasive concepts, the laparoscopic and robotic platform has been introduced to pancreatic surgery practice. The recent studies have demonstrated that minimally invasive procedure achieved similar or improved perioperative outcomes compared to the standard open approach. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being applied in pancreatic surgery, making surgical resection more challenging. Numbers of patients undergoing minimally invasive resection following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy remain low. The author consulted the latest literatures at home and abroad and described the current situation of minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic cancer after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
ObjectiveTo study value of long noncoding RNA H19 and HOTTIP in plasma in predicting efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer. MethodsForty patients with T3–4aN+M0 gastric cancer and 40 patients with benign gastric diseases treated in the Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University from August 2020 to May 2021 were prospectively included. The expressions of H19 and HOTTIP in the plasma of gastric cancer and benign gastric diseases patients without any treatment after admission were detected before treatment (CAPEOX regimen was used in the patients with gastric cancer), then which were detected after 2 NAC courses for patients with gastric cancer. Meanwhile, some clinical items were detected and the efficacy of NAC was evaluated. The complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) were classified as objective remission, CR, PR, and disease stability were classified as disease control. The expressions of H19 and HOTTIP between the different patients were compared and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate their values in the diagnosis of resectable locally advanced gastric cancer. ResultsThere were 13 cases of T downstaging and 27 cases of T non-downstaging and 25 cases of objective remission and 35 disease control after NAC. The median relative expression levels of H19 and HOTTIP before NAC in the patients with gastric cancer were higher than those in the patients with benign gastric diseases (H19: 1.42 versus 0.98, Z=–3.835, P<0.001; HOTTIP: 2.15 versus 1.04, Z=–5.062, P<0.001), and which were in the patients with T downstaging and disease control were lower than those in the patients with T non-downstaging and 5 cases of disease progression (For T staging, H19: 1.12 versus 1.54, Z=–2.960, P=0.002; HOTTIP: 1.49 versus 2.30, Z=–2.310, P=0.019. For efficacy of NAC, H19: 1.39 versus 2.48, Z=–3.211, P<0.001; HOTTIP: 1.96 versus 3.25, Z=–2.393, P=0.014). The median relative expressions of H19 and HOTTIP after NAC were lower than those before NAC in the patients with gastric cancer (H19: 1.12 versus 1.42, Z=–3.965, P<0.001; HOTTIP: 1.30 versus 2.15, Z=–4.839, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in the changes of H19 and HOTTIP before and after NAC between the patients with T downstaging and T non-downstaging, and between disease control and disease progression (P>0.05). The areas of ROC curve of H19, HOTTIP, and combination of H19 and HOTTIP in diagnosis of resectable locally advanced gastric cancer were higher than 0.7. ConclusionsLncRNA H19 and HOTTIP might be potential tumor markers in gastric cancer, and their diagnostic values for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer are higher. Gastric cancer patients with low expressions of H19 and HOTTIP in plasma might be more sensitive to NAC.
Objective To investigate whether postoperative therapy can bring survival benefits to patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP regimen. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 115 patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP regimen and underwent esophagectomy in our hospital from January 2007 through December 2016. Patients were divided into two groups including a non-receiving treatment group (54 patients with 47 males and 7 females) and a receiving treatment group (61 patients with 52 males and 9 females). There were 31 patients with postoperative chemotherapy, 14 with postoperative radiotherapy, and 16 with postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the receiving treatment group. Results In the non-receiving treatment group, the 5-year median disease free survival (DFS) rate was 54.7%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 55.3%. In the receiving treatment group, the median DFS was 46.0 months (95% CI 22.9–69.1), the 5-year DFS rate was 42.3%; and the median OS was 68.0 months (95% CI 33.0–103.0), the 5-year OS rate was 51.3%. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the two groups with regards to DFS (P=0.641) or OS (P=0.757) using Kaplan-Meier method. Besides, in each subgroup, the results of Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed postoperative treatment did not improve survival (P>0.05, respectively). Conclusion Postoperative treatment does not bring survival benefits to patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP regimen.