Objective To investigate the safety and effectiveness of using the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) based on the Ilizarov tension-stress principle for treatment of post-burn foot and ankle deformities in adults. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 6 patients with foot and ankle deformities treated between April 2019 and November 2023. There was 1 male and 5 females with an average age of 28.7 years (range, 20-49 years). There were 3 cases of simple ankle equinus, 2 cases of ankle equinus, midfoot rocker-bottom foot, and forefoot pronation, and 1 case of calcaneus foot combined with fore-midfoot pronation deformity. Preoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 45.3±18.2, SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) was 34.3±7.3 and Mental Component Summary (MCS) was 50.4±8.8. Imaging examination showed tibial-calcaneal angle of (79.8±31.5)°, calcaneus-first metatarsal angle of (154.5±45.3)°, talus-first metatarsal angle of (-19.3±35.0)°. Except for 1 case with severe deformity that could not be measured, the remaining 5 cases had talus-second metatarsal angle of (40.6±16.4)°. The deformities were fixed with TSF after soft tissue release and osteotomy. Then, the residual deformities were gradually corrected according to software-calculated prescriptions. TSF was removed after maximum deformity correction and osteotomy healing. External fixation time, brace wearing time after removing the TSF, and pin tract infection occurrence were recorded. Infection severity was evaluated based on Checketts-Otterburns grading. Joint function was evaluated using AOFAS score and SF-12 PCS and MCS scores. Patient satisfaction was assessed using Likert score. Imaging follow-up measured relevant indicators to evaluate the degree of deformity correction. Deformity recurrence was observed during follow-up. Results The external fixation time was 103-298 days (mean, 193.5 days). The mild pin tract infections occurred during external fixation in all patients, which healed after pin tract care and oral antibiotics. No serious complications such as osteomyelitis, fractures, neurovascular injury, or skin necrosis occurred. After external fixation removal, 3 cases did not wear braces, while the remaining 3 cases wore braces continuously for 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and 3 years, respectively. All patients were followed up 13.9-70.0 months, with an average of 41.7 months. During follow-up, none of the 6 patients had recurrence of foot deformity. At 1 year after operation, the AOFAS score was 70.0±18.1, SF-12 PCS and MCS were 48.9±4.5 and 58.8±6.4, respectively, all showing improvement compared to preoperative values (P<0.05). Imaging follow-up showed that all osteotomies healed, and all distraction cases achieved bony union at 6 months after stopping stretching. At 1 year after operation, tibial-calcaneal angle was (117.5±12.8)° and talus-first metatarsal angle was (-3.3±19.3)°, both showing improvement compared to preoperative values (P<0.05). Calcaneus-first metatarsal angle was (132.0±14.4)°, which also improved compared to preoperative values but without statistical significance (P>0.05). Except for 1 case with severe deformity that could not be measured, the remaining 5 cases had talus-second metatarsal angle of (18.0±6.4)°. And there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between pre-and post-operative data of 4 patients with complete data. At 1 year after operation, 1 patient was satisfied witheffectiveness and 5 patients were very satisfied. Conclusion The TSF, by applying the Ilizarov tension-stress principle for gradual distraction and multi-planar adjustment, combined with soft tissue release and osteotomy, can effectively correct foot and ankle deformities after burns, especially equinus deformity with contracture of the posterior soft tissues of the lower leg. There are still limitations in treating cases with tight, adherent scars on the dorsum of the foot that require long-distance distraction. If necessary, a multidisciplinary approach combined with microsurgical techniques can be utilized.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and advantages of modified Bacon one-time operation in laparoscopic radical resection for ultra-low rectal cancer.MethodsThe medical records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic modified Bacon procedure for ultra-low rectal cancer treated by Professor SONG Junmin Medical Group of our department from August 2018 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different methods during the operation, the patients were divided into a modified Bacon one-time operation group (modified Bacon group, n=26) and a Bacon secondary operation group (traditional Bacon group, n=33). The perioperative period data and follow-up results were observed and compared.ResultsA total of 59 ptients were collected, including 26 cases in the modified Bacon group and 33 cases in the traditional Bacon group. There were no significant differences in gender composition, age, etc. baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). All surgery were successfully completed. There were no conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative or postoperative massive bleeding, severe infection and other serious complications and perioperative period death. The incidence of anastomotic leakage in the modified Bacon group was lower than that of the traditional Bacon group [0.0% (0/26) versus 18.2% (6/33), P=0.030]. There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic stricture, rectal irritation, and external intestinal necrosis between the two groups (P>0.05). And the number of dissected lymph nodes, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the first exhaust time, and postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the severity degree and total score of low anterior rectectomy syndrome (LARS) between the two groups at 3 and 6 months after operation (P>0.05). However, the total LARS score at 6 months after operation was lower than that at 3 months in the same group (P<0.001). By the end of the last follow-up (January 2021), there was no obvious difference in the anal shape between the two kinds of surgery. There was no recurrence or death during the follow-up period.ConclusionModified Bacon one-time operation for ultra-low rectal cancer is safe and feasible, which could achieve natural orififice specimen extraction surgery and ultra-low limit sphincter preservation, reduce occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and external intestinal necrosis, times of operation, and shorten total length of stay and reduce total cost of hospitalization.
ObjectiveTo compare and analyze the therapeutic effect of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer for obese patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. MethodsThe retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathologic data of 217 obese patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2017 to January 2020 were collected, 104 patients received radical resection of rectal cancer assisted by Da Vinci robotic surgical system and were assigned to the robot group, 113 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer and were assigned to the laparoscope group. The perioperative indexes, pathological examination, and postoperative recovery of urogenital function were compared. ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in the gender, age, body mass index, distance from lower edge of tumor to anal edge, tumor diameter, American Association of Anesthesiologists classification, preoperative complications, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor differentiation, and TNM stage (P>0.05). The operations were successfully completed in all patients and there was no conversion to laparotomy and perioperative death. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the operation time, first exhaust time, first eating liquid food time, first getting out of bed activity time, drainage tube placement time, prophylactic stoma rate, and postoperative complications (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss and total hospital stay in the robot group were less than those of the laparoscope group (P<0.05). The International Prostate Symptom Score of the robot group was lower than that of the laparoscope group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). The International Index of Erectile Function-15 score of male patients and Female Sexual Function Index-19 score of female patients in the robot group were higher than those in the laparoscope group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). ConclusionsRobotic surgery is safe and effective in treatment of obese patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Compared with laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery could benefit patients more in protecting postoperative genitourinary function.