ObjectiveTo discuss the value of CT in the diagnosis of ureteral tumor. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the CT features of 52 patients with ureteral tumor confirmed by operation, pathology and immunohistochemistry between August 2011 and July 2013. All patients underwent CT plain scan followed by enhanced scan, and 13 patients underwent CT Urography imaging. ResultsUreteral tumors occurred mainly in the lower ureter (20 cases), and 5 cases occurred in the upper ureter, 8 cases in the mid-upper ureter, 11 cases in the middle ureter, and 8 cases in the mid-lower segment. The lesions showed a lump or thickening of the wall, and the indirect signs included renal pelvis, ureter, bladder and ureter angle changes. ConclusionCT is valuable in the diagnosis of ureteral tumor. CT Urography can be very intuitive, multi-dimensionally displaying the wall and conditions outside the cavity, which has a great significance in guiding clinical operation.
Objective To assess the efficacy of medical expulsive therapy for ureteral calculi with tamsulosin. Methods We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) Database, The Cochrane Library and Chinese Journal Full-text Database from 1995 to September 2006, as well as the proceedings of urological scientific conferences from 2000 to 2006. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing tamsulosin and other therapies for ureteral calculi among adults were included. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently and synthesized by STATA 9.0 software. Results A total of 16 studies involving 1521 patients with distal or juxtavesical ureteral calculi were included. Compared with conservative therapy, tamsulosin showed higher expulsion rate [RR 1.50, 95%CI (1.20 to 1.87), Plt;0.0001], shorter expulsion time [SMD –1.29, 95%CI (–2.27, –0.31)] and fewer patients requiring ESWL or ureteroscopy [RR 0.40, 95%CI (0.27, 0.59), Plt;0.05]. Compared with conservative therapy, the combination of tamsulosin plus deflazacort also showed higher expulsion rate [RR 1.59, 95%CI (1.31, 1.93)], shorter expulsion time [SMD –0.8, 95%CI (–1.18, –0.42)] and fewer patients requiring ESWL or ureteroscopy [RR 0.13, 95%CI (0.06, 0.31), Plt;0.05]. Compared with deflazacort alone, the combination of tamsulosin plus deflazacort demonstrated similar expulsion rate [RR 1.31, 95%CI (0.78, 2.23), P=0.31], but significantly reduced the dosage of analgesics [SMD 15.20, 95%CI (14.98, 15.52)] and decreased the proportion of patients requiring ESWL or ureteroscopy [RR 0.09,, 95%CI (0.02, 0.47), Plt;0.05]. Compared with deflazacort plus nifedipine, the combination of tamsulosin plus deflazacort showed higher expulsion rate [RR 1.20, 95%CI (1.07, 1.35), P=0.002], but similar expulsion time [SMD –1.34, 95%CI (–3.47, 0.79)] and proportion of patients requiring ESWL or ureteroscopy [RR 0.34, 95%CI (0.05, 2.22), Pgt;0.05]. As for side effects, tamsulosin-based treatment and conservative therapy were comparable (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions Tamsulosin has a beneficial effect on the expulsion of ureteral calculi, especially for distal and juxtavesical ureteral calculi. Tamsulosin-based medical expulsive therapy at the dosage of 0.4mg daily is effective and safe for patients with distal ureteral calculi. More large-scale studies are required to define the efficacy of combination therapy of tamsulosin plus deflazacort.
Objective To investigate the diagnosis and treatment strategy of urosepsis caused by ureteral calculi in solitary kidney. Methods The clinical data of patients with urosepsis caused by ureteral calculi in solitary kidney in the Department of Urology of Chengdu 363 Hospital Affiliated to Southwest Medical University from March 2015 to March 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Results A total of 23 patients were included. One patient received ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy, after which urosepsis and renal function deteriorated, then got better after anti-infection and hemodialysis treatment in intensive care unit; 17 patients received implantation of ureteral stent by cystoscopy, and 5 patients received percutaneous nephrostomy by ultrasound guiding, the 22 patients received ureteroscopic lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy electively. One patients had subcapsular renal hematoma postoperatively and worse renal insufficiency, the rest 22 patients had improved renal function. All patients were cured clinically. Conclusions For solitary kidney patients who have urosepsis caused by ureteral calculi, emergency treatment is necessary. The relief of urinary obstruction must be based on effective anti-infection. Choosing cystoscopic ureteral stent implantation or percutaneous nephrostomy depends on patients’ individualization. Ureterscopic lithotripsy simultaneously is not recommended. Ureteral intubation before cystoscopic ureteral stent implantation is important, which can increase the success rate of ureteral stent implantation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the necessity of indwelling ureteral stent before flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi. MethodsEighty-five patients with upper urinary tract calculi treated between June 2013 and December 2014 were divided into two groups:group A (without indwelling stent, n=42) and group B (with indwelling stent, n=43).Incidence of stent-related urinary tract symptoms, operation time, one-time success rate of placement for ureteral access sheath, and stone clearance rate were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe operation time and stone clearance rate had no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05).The incidence of stent-related urinary tract symptoms and one-time success rate of placement for ureteral access sheath in group B were significantly better than those in group A (P < 0.05). ConclusionFor one-phase operation success, we suggest that indwelling ureteral stent is necessary before flexible ureteroscopyic lithotripsy for treating upper urinary tract calculi.
Objective To evaluate the ambulatory surgery mode by using health economical mothods and provide reference for optimization and decision of surgical operation mode. Methods The patients who underwent unilateral flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotriphy for ureteral calculi in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between January 1st to December 31th, 2015 were selected in this study, including 59 with ambulatory surgery mode (the ambulatory group) and 65 with special in-hospital surgery mode (the special group). The differences in average bed occupancy time, cost, therapeutic effect, and satisfaction between the two operation modes were compared. Results The average bed occupancy time in the ambulatory group and the special group was (1.03±0.18) and (6.35±0.74) days, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up for one month after the operation, and the incidence of complications was 6.8% (4/59) in the ambulatory group and 6.2% (4/65) in the special group, without significant difference (P>0.05). The satisfaction score in the ambulatory group and the special group was 96.48±0.23vs. 96.53±0.18 without significant difference (P>0.05). The differences in direct medical cost [(17 738.28±1 027.85)vs. (21 307.67±554.41) yuan], direct non-medical cost [(103.39±18.25) vs. (630.76±78.90) yuan], indirect cost[ (266.93±47.12) vs. (1 640.44±190.55) yuan], and total cost [(18 128.10±1 037.76) vs. (23 558.29±619.20) yuan] between the ambulatory group and the special group were all statistically significant (P<0.05). The treatment effect index in the ambulatory group and the special group was 0.96 and 1.05, respectively; the cost-effect ratio was 18 883.44 and 22 436.47, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that the adjusted cost-effect ratio in the ambulatory group (16 629.64) was still lower than that in the special group (20 534.91). Conclusions The cost-effect ratio of ambulatory surgery mode is superior than that of special in-hospital surgery mode, and there is no obvious difference in patients satisfaction between the two modes. Ambulatory surgery mode can be recommended to patients who meet the indications of day surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of modified Politano-Leadbetter reimplantation for the treatment of congenital malformation of the vesicoureteral junction in children. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 53 patients with congenital malformation of the vesicoureteral junction treated with modified Politano-Leadbetter reimplantation between June 2000 and October 2014. Of 53 cases, there were 24 boys and 29 girls, aged from 8 months to 7 years (mean, 2.1 years); 23 had congenital vesicoureteral junction obstruction (14 left, 5 right, and 4 bilateral), and 30 had vesicoureteral reflux (12 unilateral, 18 bilateral), which were verified by voiding cystourethrography. The disease duration was from 1 month to 1 year (mean, 5 months). ResultsAll of the patients underwent modified Politano-Leadbetter reimplantation successfully. The mean operation time was 74 minutes (range, 65-85 minutes) for unilateral cases and 105 minutes (range, 98-130 minutes) for bilateral cases. There was no dysuria, infection of incision, or incision dehiscence after urinary catheter removal. The follow-up time was 6 months to 14 years (median, 28 months); all patients were free from complications of fistula, vesicoureteral reflux, vesicoureteral junction obstruction, or hypertension. The new ureteral orifices had good appearance at 1 month after operation. Urologic ultrasound showed that hydronephrosis relieved at 3 months after operation. Urinary tract infection rate was 13.2% (7/53) during 6 months after operation, which was cured by antibiotics. Voiding cystourethrography showed no vesicoureteral reflux in 32 cases at 6 months after operation. ConclusionThe modified Politano-Leadbetter reimplantation simplifies the operation course, which has the longitudinal ureter after operation and is similar to physiological state. It is a safe and effective option for congenital malformation of vesicoureteral junction in children with few complications, especially for patients with unilateral megaloureter.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of doxazosin for ureterolithiasis.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of comparing doxazosin with conservative treatment or tamsulosin for ureterolithiasis from inception to October, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involving 1 062 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with conservative treatment, doxazosin significantly facilitated ureteral stone expulsion (RR=1.62, 95%CI 1.45 to 1.81, P<0.000 01). No statistical significant difference was found in stone-free rate (RR=0.96, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.11, P=0.57), stone expulsion time (SMD=−0.17, 95%CI −0.52 to 0.19, P=0.35) or pain episode frequency (SMD=0.21, 95%CI −0.15 to 0.56, P=0.25) between doxazosin and tamsulosin. Treatment-associated serious side effects were rarely reported.ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that doxazosin is an efficient and safe medical expulsion agent for ureterolithiasis management. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty on ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Methods From November 2010 to September 2015, a total of 28 cases (21 males and 7 females) with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. All the 28 patients had a previous history of different degrees of lumbar pain, which was confirmed as typical UPJO by imaging examination. Operation method: following complete renal pelvis and upper ureter isolation, the renal pelvis was clipped into a trumpet-shaped mouth, 1/3 of the upper renal pelvis was temporarily kept without section. In the inferior margin of renal pelvis, longitudinal cut procedure was operated in the ureter and across the stenotic segment in about 1–2 cm; and then, anastomosis of the ureter and the renal pelvis at the lowest was performed, to maintain the continuity of the renal pelvis and ureter. Subsequently, the stenosed segment of ureter and the dilatant renal pelvis were removed, the posterior ureteropelvic anastomosis was made with an interrupted suture, and antegrade stenting of double J tube was further performed, followed by a continuous suture of the anterior wall. Results The procedure was successfully accomplished in all patients whithout conversion to open surgery. The operating time was 90-240 minutes with the median time of 160 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 20-70 mL with the median of 50 mL. No severe surgical complication occurred in perioperative period. The 3-24 -month follow up showed that symptoms of lumbar pain were relieved or disappeared in all the incorporated patients. Postoperative radiographic examination showed no stomal stenosis at the ureteropelvic junction, and the hydronephrosis was alleviated. Conclusions Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for UPJO is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive surgical technique. The key to the success of the operation is to the accurate renal pelvis clipping, tension- and torsion-free anastomosis of the lowest position of the renal pelvis and the ureter, and the reconstruction of a new funnel-shaped ureteropelvic junction.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones>1 cm. MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, WanFang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP database (by the end of July 2015) to collect randomized controlled trials involving PCNL vs. URL for the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones> 1 cm. The quality of those trials were assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsSix randomized controlled trials were finally obtained after screening. A total of 487 patients were included for a Meta-analysis. The results showed that, as compared with the control group (URL), the patients in the trial group (PCNL) had the following features: ① There was a remarkable improvement of stone clearance rate [RR=1.20, 95% CI (1.09, 1.33), P=0.000 3].② There was no statistical difference in postoperative fever rates, urinary tract perforation rates [RR=1.73, 95%CI (0.43, 7.00), P=0.45; RR=1.02, 95%CI (0.11, 9.37), P=0.99], but the incidence of hematuria was higher [RR=1.99, 95%CI (1.09, 3.62), P=0.03], and the mean operative duration was longer [WMD=30.03 minutes, 95%CI (10.04, 50.02) minuntes, P=0.003].③ The mean hospitalization stay was delayed by an average of 3.73 days [WMD=3.73 days, 95%CI (3.02, 4.44) days, P<0.000 01]. ConclusionPCNL is better than URL in the stone clearance rate, while patients in the PCNL group have to stay in the hospital much longer, and should bear longer mean operative duration.
Objective To assess the necessity and safety of ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of middle and distal ureteral calculi. Methods We electronically searched MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP and CNKI to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving men with or without ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy from 2000 to March 2010. The quality of included trials was assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed with RevMan5.0 software. Results Six RCTs involving 543 patients were identified. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) There was no statistical difference between two groups in stone clearance rate (RR=0.45, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01, P=0.15), dysuria rate (RR=1.35, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.84, P=0.06), and hematuria rate (RR=2.12, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.49, P=0.05); b) There was statistical difference between two groups in frequent micturition rate (RR=2.17, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.17, P=0.02), the mean visual analog score 3 days postoperatively (WMD=0.94, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.42, P=0.000?1), and the operation time (WMD=3.57, 95% CI 1.40 to 5.72, P=0.001). Without postoperative ureteral stenting can shorten the operation time, decrease the irritation signs of bladder, and can improve quality of postoperative life without influence on stone clearance. Couclusions The routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy may be not necessary in order to keep patients from unsafety. More reasonable randomized double blind controlled trails with large sample are required to provide proofs with high quality because the methodology quality of included studies is lower.