ObjectiveTo observe the safety of 2-port non-vitrectomized subretinal injection (SRI) for the treatment of Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD). MethodsA exploratory clinical study. From February to May 2023, 6 BCD patients with 6 eyes who were confirmed by examination in Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University and were treated with SRI adeno-associated virus vector transgenic drugs were included in the study. Among them, 2 males had 2 eyes and 4 females had 4 eyes. Age were 34-60 years old. The study eye underwent adeno associated virus gene therapy via 2-port non-vitrectomized SRI. Two scleral ports were created using 25G vitrectomy trocar to place the light pipe and injection cannula. Anterior chamber paracentesis was performed to lower intraocular pressure. Under the silicone oil infusion mode of the vitrectomy machine, a 38G injection cannula penetrated the retina to reach the subretinal space. The injection speed was controlled by the foot pedal of the vitrectomy machine, and the drug was slowly injected into the subretinal space to create a subretinal bleb. if intra-ocular pressure assessed by finger palpation was high at the end of injection, drainage of the aqueous humor can be made by compressing the cornea incision until the intraocular pressure was normal. Patients were followed for 9-12 months and be examined using the same equipment and methods as before. ResultsRetinal pigment epithelium and choroidal atrophy were observed in all 6 eyes of 6 patients were graded as stage Ⅲ by the fundus examination revealing atrophy of retinal pigmented epithelium and choroid, with or without yellow-white crystals and/or complex lipid. The range were operation time 9-14 minutes. No vitreous prolapse, retinal hemorrhage, or retinal tear was observed during surgery. After 24 hours, optical coherence tomogrophy examination showed absorption of subretinal fluid and retinal reattachment. None of the six patients showed corneal keratic precipitates, anterior chamber cells, vitreous cells, inflammation, high intraocular pressure, or retinal tear within the 9-month follow-up. ConclusionSubretinal injection without vitrectomy using two ports is a safe and feasible alternative for adult gene therapy, and it shortens the surgical time.
ObjectiveTo observe the effectiveness and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with inner limiting membrane (ILM) removal and 41G microneedle subretinal injection of balanced salt solution (BSS) in the treatment of refractory macular hole. MethodsA prospective clinical study. From January to June 2023, 20 cases (20 eyes) of refractory macular hole patients diagnosed through examination at The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University were included in the study. The basal diameter of the affected eye's basal diameter (BD) was ＞1 000 μm. Macular hole index (MHI) was ＜0.5. The affected eye received treatment with 23G PPV combined with ILM removal and 41G microneedle subretinal injection of BSS. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetry, and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after surgery for the affected eye. BCVA examination was performed using standard logarithmic visual acuity chart, and convert it to logarithmic minimum resolution angle (logMAR) visual acuity for statistical purposes. MP-3 microperimetry was used for micro view examination, record the mean sensitivity (MS) of the retinal within a 12° range of the fovea. OCTA was used to measure the area of the avascular zone of the macula (FAZ), perimeter of the FAZ (PERIM), retinal vascular length density (VLD), and vascular perfusion density (VPD). The changes in BCVA, MS, FAZ area, PERIM, VLD, VPD before and after surgery were compared and analyzed. After the same time, the closure of macular hole and the occurrence of complications after surgery were observed. Single factor analysis of variance was used to compare the observation indicators at different times before and after surgery. The correlation between various observation indicators and preoperative minimum diameter (MD), BD, and hiatus height at 6 months after surgery were analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. ResultsAmong the 20 cases with 20 eyes, there were 2 males with 2 eyes and 18 females with 18 eyes. Age was (61.45±8.56) years old. The logMAR BCVA, MS, FAZ area, PERIM, VLD, and VPD of the affected eye were 1.46±0.21, (16.20±5.81) dB、(0.40±0.17) mm2, (2.89±0.99) mm, (6.23±3.59) mm−1, (0.17±0.10)%, respectively. Six months after surgery, out of 20 eyes, macular hole closure and incomplete closure were 18 (90.0%, 18 /20) and 2 (10.0%, 2 /20) eyes, respectively. The logMAR BCVA, MS, FAZ area, PERIM, VLD, and VPD were 0.80±0.20, (22.20±4.60) dB, (0.18±0.10) mm2, (1.83±0.80) mm, (9.54±2.88) mm−1, (0.31±0.14)%. Compared with before surgery, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The correlation analysis results showed a positive correlation (P＜0.05) between preoperative BD and postoperative 6-month PERIM and VPD. There was a negative correlation between preoperative MD and postoperative VLD at 6 months (P＜0.05). There was a negative correlation between preoperative MHI and logMAR BCVA and VPD at 6 months after surgery (P＜0.05). No complications such as elevated or decreased intraocular pressure, damage to retinal pigment epithelium, retinal hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, or retinal detachment occurred after surgery in all affected eyes. ConclusionMinimally invasive PPV combined with ILM removal and 41G microneedle subretinal injection of BSS can effectively improve the closure rate of refractory macular hole patients in the short term, improve vision, and have good safety.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of 41G ultramicroneedle subretinal injection of balanced salt solution (BSS) in the treatment of large diameter macular holes (MH). MethodsA prospective clinical intervention study. A total of 22 eyes of 22 large-diameter full-layer MH patients diagnosed by examination in Tianjin Eye Hospital from March to June 2024 were included in the study. The minimum diameter of MH in the affected eyes was all greater than 400 μm. The affected eyes received 25G pars plana vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling and 41G ultramicroneedle subretinal injection of BSS. The affected eyes underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetry, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations before and 1 and 3 months after surgery. BCVA was measured using the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity for statistical analysis. The minimum and base diameter of MH were measured using OCT. Microperimetry was performed using a macular integrity assessment device, recording the macular integrity index (MII) and macular threshold (MT) within 10° of the macular. The changes in BCVA, MII, MT, and the closure of MH and the occurrence of complications were compared and analyzed before and after surgery. For the comparison of the same continuous indicators before and after surgery, Student's t-test was used if the data were normally distributed and had equal variances, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used if the data were not normally distributed; the correlation between different indicators was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. ResultsAmong the 22 cases (22 eyes), there were 4 males and 18 females; all were unilaterally affected. The age was 66 (60, 71) years. The duration of the disease was 5 (2.5, 12.0) months. The logMAR BCVA of the affected eyes was 1.24±0.57, and the MII and MT were 100.0 (99.53, 100.00) and 19.0 (13.23, 21.78) dB, respectively. One month after surgery, all MH were closed, with 20 (90.91%, 20/22) and 2 (9.09%, 2/22) eyes classified as typeⅠand Ⅱ closure, respectively. At the last follow-up, the logMAR BCVA was 0.62±0.58, and the MII and MT were 99.9 (59.45, 100.00) and 23.6 (19.33, 26.25) dB, respectively; compared with before surgery, the BCVA (t=3.579), MII (Z=－2.374), and MT (Z=－2.997) were significantly improved, and the differences were all statistically significant (P＜0.05). Correlation analysis showed that postoperative BCVA was significantly positively correlated with preoperative BCVA (r=0.41), the minimum and base diameter of MH (r=0.64, 0.58), disease duration (r=0.63), and age (r=0.50) (P＜0.05). No surgery-related complications occurred in all affected eyes during the follow-up period. Conclusion41G ultramicroneedle subretinal injection of BSS can effectively improve the hole closure rate of large diameter MH-affected eyes in the short term, improve visual function, and has good safety.
Objective To observe the clinical effect of vitrectomy, inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, subretinal injection of compound electrolyte intraocular irrigation solution (CEIIS) and conbercept in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with hard exudate (HE) (DME-HE). MethodsA prospective clinical study. Thirty-three patients with DME-HE diagnosed by examination in Weifang Eye Hospital from June 2020 to February 2022 were included in the study. Among them, there were 15 males (16 eyes) and 18 females (20 eyes), with the mean age of (62.00±6.54) years. All patients underwent the examinations of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), scanning laser ophthalmoscope, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and multifocal electroretinography (mf-ERG). Snellen visual acuity chart was used for BCVA examination, which was converted into logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA for statistic analysis. Macular foveal retinal thickness (CMT) and macular volume (MV) were measured by OCT. The 1 ring P1 wave amplitude density was measured by mf-ERG. The patients were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 17 patients (18 eyes) and 16 patients (18 eyes), respectively. There were no significant differences in age, logMAR BCVA, HE area, CMT, MV, and 1 ring P1 wave amplitude density between the two groups (t=0.403, 0.972, 0.291, 0.023, －0.268, －0.206; P＞0.05). Group A was treated with vitrectomy, ILM peeling, and subretinal injection of CEIIS and conbercept (combined therapy). Group B was treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC). Follow-up was 12 months after treatment. The changes of BCVA, HE area, CMT, MV, 1 ring P1 wave amplitude density were compared between groups and groups after treatment. The times of injection and complications after treatment were observed. Independent sample t test was used for comparison between the two groups. ResultsAt 12 months after treatment, compared to before treatment, there were significant differences in logMAR BCVA (F=14.837), HE area (χ2=94.522), CMT (χ2=199.212), MV (χ2=81.914) and 1 ring P1 wave amplitude density (F=8.933) in group A (P＜0.05); there were significant differences in CMT (F=5.540) and MV (F=7.836) in group B (P＜0.05). Compared between the two groups, logMAR BCVA: 1 week and 6 and 12 months after treatment, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.231, －2.122, －3.196; P＜0.05); HE area: except 1 week after treatment, there were statistically significant differences at other times after treatment (t=－2.422, －3.107, －3.540, －4.119; P＜0.05). CMT, MV, 1 ring P1 wave amplitude density: 12 months after treatment, the differences were statistically significant (t=－2.653, －2.455, 2.204; P＜0.05). During the follow-up period, the injection times of group A and group B were (3.06±1.89) and (5.56±2.04), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (t=－3.815, P＜0.05). Macular hole and vitreous hematoma were found in 1 eye in group A and 1 eye in group B. ConclusionVitrectomy, ILM peeling, subretinal injection of CEIIS and conbercept to treat DME-HE can effectively remove HE, alleviate macular edema, improve BCVA, and reduce CMT and MV. Combination therapy can reduce the number of IVC re-treatments.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and subretinal injection of balance salt solution (BSS) for refractory diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsA retrospective case series study. From November 2017 to August 2018, 24 eyes of 19 patients affected with DME resistant to anti-VEGF therapy [central macualar thickness (CMT) more than 275 μm despite undergoing anti-VEGF therapy at least 3 times] in Ophtalmology Department of Central Theater Command General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army were enrolled in this study. All the patients underwent 25G pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling and subretinal injection of BSS. The BCVA was measured using the international standard visual acuity chart, and the results were converted to the logMAR visual acuity. The CMT and the macular volume (MV) were assessed with swept-source optical coherence tomography at baseline and each month postoperatively. The differences in BCVA, CMT and MV before and after surgery were analyzed.ResultsThe mean BCVA was 0.74±0.29 at baseline, which increased significantly to 0.62±0.28, 0.56±0.25, 0.47±0.26, 0.46±0.23 at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment respectively (F=4.828, P=0.001). At 6 months, BCVA improved by more than 0.3 logMAR units in 16 eyes (66.7%). The mean CMT was 554.58±102.86 μm at baseline, which reduced to 338.17±58.09 μm, 299.42±52.66 μm, 275.75±41.24 μm and 270.96±38.33 μm at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment respectively (F=84.867, P＜0.001). The mean MV was 13.01±0.88 mm3 at baseline, which decreased to 11.50±0.73 mm3, 11.00±0.74 mm3, 10.68±0.61 mm3 and 10.52±0.56 mm3 at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment respectively (F=47.364, P＜0.001). Macular edema recurred in 5 eyes (20.8%) 6 months after surgery. No severe systemic or ocular side effect was reported during the follow-up.Conclusions25G vitrectomy with ILM peeling and subretinal injection of BSS for refractory DME can improve the visual acuity, facilitate a rapid resolution of macular edema.
Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with subretinal injection of dexamethasone in treating refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). MethodsA prospective case study. From January 2024 to March 2024, 9 cases with 10 eyes of refractory DME diagnosed at Tianjin Eye Hospital were included in the study. All eyes had a central macular thickness (CMT) of greater than 275 μm despite receiving intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug at least 5 times. All eyes underwent 25G PPV combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and subretinal injection of dexamethasone sodium phosphate. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetry, and optical coherence tomography examinations were performed on all eyes before and 1 and 3 months after surgery. BCVA was assessed using an international standard visual acuity chart and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. Paired t-tests were used to compare changes in BCVA, mean macular sensitivity (MS), and CMT before and after surgery. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. ResultsAmong the 9 cases with 10 eyes, there were 4 males with 5 eyes and 5 females with 5 eyes. Age ranged from 43 to 79 (65.3±10.8) years. Preoperative and postoperative logMAR BCVA at 1 and 3 months were 0.84±0.25, 0.72±0.31, and 0.63±0.22, respectively. MS was (16.48±5.03), (16.6±6.31), and (18.0±5.33) dB, respectively. CMT was (437.5±90.4), (306.9±87.4), and (288.7±87.3) μm, respectively. Compared with data before surgery, BCVA: the difference was not statistically significant at 1 month (t=2.025, P=0.074), but was statistically significant at 3 months (t=5.161, P=0.001), MS: the differences at 1 and 3 months were not statistically significant (t=－0.078, －1.022, P=0.940, 0.334), CMT: the differences were of statistical significance at both 1 and 3 months (t=2.892, 3.175, P=0.018, 0.011), and the difference between 1 and 3 months post-surgery was also statistically significant (t=2.427, P=0.038). No complications such as macular hole, vitreous hemorrhage, or retinal detachment occurred during or after surgery in any eyes. No cases of increased intraocular pressure or cataracts were reported during the follow-up period. ConclusionPPV combined with ILM peeling and subretinal injection of dexamethasone can effectively reduce CMT in refractory DME eyes and improve visual acuity, with good safety.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with subretinal or intravitreal injection of Conbercept for the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). MethodsA retrospective case control study. From June 2022 to March 2024, 32 eyes of 32 patients with refractory DME diagnosed at The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University were included in the study. There were 17 male cases with 17 eyes and 15 female cases with 15 eyes. Age was (57.44±8.99) years old; The duration of diabetes was (12.72±6.11) years. All patients had received regular treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs or corticosteroid drugs for at least 5 times, and had undergone focal retinal laser photocoagulation or panretinal laser photocoagulation, the central macular thickness (CMT) persisted or decreased by less than 50 μm. All affected eyes underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, optical coherence tomography (OCT), microperimetry, and laboratory glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing. BCVA was measured using a standard logarithmic visual acuity chart, and converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. CMT was measured using an OCT device. Microperimetry was performed using an MP-3 microperimeter, recording the mean sensitivity (MS) of the retina within a 12° range of the fovea. The affected eyes were treated with 23G PPV combined with internal limiting membrane peeling and either macular subretinal or intravitreal injection of Conbercept, and were divided into subretinal injection group and the intravitreal injection group, each consisting of 16 cases and 16 eyes. The same equipment and methods as before surgery were used for related examinations at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery. Changes in BCVA, CMT, and MS were observed and compared, as well as the number of additional anti-VEGF treatments required within 6 months after surgery. Intergroup comparisons were made using independent samples t tests, and repeated measures data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. ResultsThe age (t=－0.271), gender composition (χ2=0.001), duration of diabetes (Z=－0.868), HbA1c (t=－0.789), intraocular pressure (t=1.689), logMAR BCVA (t=1.393), CMT (t=－0.613), MS (Z=－0.132), and the number of anti-VEGF injections (t=－0.752) between the subretinal injection group and the intravitreal injection group showed no statistically significant differences (P＞0.05). The within-subject effects comparison of BCVA, CMT, and MS at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery compared to pre-surgery for all affected eyes showed statistically significant differences (F=8.060, 125.722, 39.054; P＜0.05). The overall comparison of logMAR BCVA between the subretinal and intravitreal injection groups post-surgery showed no statistically significant difference (F=0.662, P=0.422), however, comparisons of CMT (F=4.540) and MS (F=6.066) showed statistically significant differences (P＜0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery, comparisons of logMAR BCVA between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences (t=－0.123, 0.239, 1.087; P＞0.05), comparisons of CMT showed statistically significant differences (t=－3.474, －4.832, －2.482; P＜0.05), comparisons of MS showed statistically significant differences at 1 and 3 months (t=－2.940, －2.545; P＜0.05), but not at 6 months (t=－1.527, P＞0.05). At 6 months post-surgery, the number of additional intravitreal anti-VEGF injections required in the subretinal and intravitreal injection groups showed a statistically significant difference (Z=－2.033, P=0.042). During the follow-up period and at the final follow-up, no complications such as injection site bleeding, retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, macular hole, or retinal pigment epithelial tear or atrophy occurred in all affected eyes. ConclusionCompared with intravitreal injection, subretinal injection of Conbercept for the treatment of refractory DME has more advantages in reducing macular edema and improving visual function in the macular area, and also reduces the number of postoperative anti-VEGF drug treatments.
ObjectiveTo develop a simple and effective subretinal injection pipeline system to enhance the accuracy and precision of subretinal injection volume control. MethodA retrospective case series study. From May to October 2023, 18 patients (18 eyes) with submacular hemorrhage (SMH) who continuously received modified subretinal injection treatment in Department of Ophthalmology of Peking Union Medical College Hospital were included in the study. Among them, there were 10 males and 8 females. Age were (60.00±7.41) years old. The primary causes included polypoid choroidal vasculopathy (14 cases), retinal macroaneurysm (2 cases), traumatic retinopathy (1 case), and Valsalva retinopathy (1 case). Hemorrhage affected 14 eyes of the fovea centralis. All affected eyes underwent standard three-channel 25G vitrectomy via the flat part of the ciliary body combined with modified subretinal injection of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. The improved injection system consisted of a 1 ml syringe, a Q-SyteTM connector, a 41G subretinal microinjection needle, a converter and a viscoelastic substance control pipeline. The drug preparation time for subretinal injection (i.e., the time consumed by the system connection step), the injection time, whether bubbles occur during the injection process, and the perioperative complications were recorded and analyzed. ResultThe preparation time prior to drug injection ranged from 231 to 335 seconds, while the injection completion time varied between 45 and 75 seconds. Both times decreased progressively as operator proficiency improved. Among the treated eyes, five received a target injection dose of 0.05 mL and thirteen received 0.10 mL, with all eyes achieving the preset dose accurately. No subretinal bubbles were observed during the injection procedure. Additionally, no intraoperative complications such as retinal hemorrhage or tear secondary to mechanical trauma at the injection site were recorded. Postoperatively, one eye developed anterior chamber hemorrhage, which resolved following intraocular pressure-lowering treatment. No other postoperative complications, including hemorrhage, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, or infection, were observed in the remaining eyes. ConclusionThe retinal drug injection system developed in this study has a simple structure, safe and stable operation, can achieve precise drug injection, and effectively avoid the formation of bubbles.
Gene therapy is designed to introduce genetic material into the cells of a patient via virus to enhance, inhibit, edit or add a genetic sequence, results in a therapeutic or prophylactic effect. Gene therapy has brought positive influence and great potential for the treatment of retinal diseases including genetic retinal diseases and acquired retinal diseases. In addition to the constant optimization of gene vectors, the exploration of different drug delivery techniques has brought different therapeutic effects for gene therapy of retinal diseases. The main delivery methods include subretinal injection, intravitreal injection, suprachoroidal injection. Considering the transfection efficiency and safety of delivery methods, emerging sub-inner limiting membrane injection and noninvasive gene delivery are under investigation. The selection of gene delivery method is very important for the safety and effectiveness of gene therapy for retinal diseases. It is not only related to the development of equipment and technology, but also related to the modification of adeno-associated virus, the selection of promoter and the specific retinal cells that the target gene wants to be transfected. Therefore, the most appropriate method of gene delivery should be selected according to the final gene therapy agent and the specific transfected cells after taking all these factors into consideration.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy and safety of vitrectomy combined with subretinal injection of alteplase (tPA) and intravitreal injection of Conbercept in the treatment of large area submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From January to September 2021, 32 eyes of 32 patients with massive SMH secondary to PCV diagnosed in the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University were included in the study. Large SMH was defined as hemorrhage diameter ≥4 optic disc diameter (DD). There were 32 patients (32 eyes), 20 males and 12 females. The mean age was (72.36±8.62) years. All patients had unilateral disease.The duration from onset of symptoms to treatment was (7.21±3.36) days. All patients underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination. BCVA examination was performed using the international standard visual acuity chart, which was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity during statistics. The central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by spectral domain-OCT. The average size of SMH was (6.82±1.53) DD. The logMAR BCVA 1.73±0.44; CMT was (727.96±236.40) μm. All patients were treated with 23G pars plana vitrectomy combined with subretinal injection of tPA and intravitreal injection of Conbercept. At 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, the same equipment and methods were used for relevant examinations before treatment. The changes of BCVA and CMT, the clearance rate of macular hemorrhage, and the complications during and after surgery were observed. BCVA and CMT before and after treatment were compared by repeated measures analysis of variance. ResultsCompared with before treatment, BCVA gradually increased at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (F=77.402, P＜0.001). There was no significant difference in BCVA between any two groups at different time points after treatment (P＞0.05). Correlation analysis showed that BCVA at 12 months after treatment was negatively correlated with the course of disease (r=－0.053, P=0.774). One week after treatment, macular hemorrhage was completely cleared in 30 eyes (93.75%, 30/32). The CMT was (458.56±246.21), (356.18±261.46), (345.82±212.38) and (334.64±165.54) μm at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, respectively. Compared with before treatment, CMT decreased gradually after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (F=112.480, P＜0.001). There were statistically significant differences in different follow-up time before and after treatment (P＜0.001). The number of treatments combined with Conbercept during and after surgery was (4.2±1.8) times. At the last follow-up, there was no recurrence of SMH, retinal interlamellar effusion and other complications. Conclusion Subretinal injection of tPA combined with intravitreal injection of Conbercept is safe and effective in the treatment of large SMH secondary to PCV, and it can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients.