ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical presentations and radiological characteristics of pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation. MethodsClinical and radiological data of 2 patients with pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation were retrospectively analyzed and literatures were reviewed. ResultsBoth patients had undergone circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. The symptoms appeared approximately 2 months after the operation. The major symptoms were cough, hemoptysis, exacerbation of dyspnea and chest pain. Both patients were misdiagnosed as other diseases such as pneumonia in other hospitals, and the anti-infection therapy was invalid. Both CT scans showed parenchymal exudative consolidation with varying degrees of interstitial septal thickening and small nodules. Both patients were confirmed as pulmonary vein stenosis by CT angiography. Literature review identified 21 cases of pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. The main clinical features are hemoptysis, chest pain, shortness of breath and cough. The most common features of thoracic radiological imaging are consolidation, groud-glass attenuation, pleural effusion and interstitial septal thickening. ConclusionsIf a patient presents with hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain or other clinical manifestations after ablation therapy and image findings show parenchymal exudative consolidation with interstitial septal thickening and multiple small nodules, the possibility of pulmonary vein stenosis should be considered. Contrast-enhanced CT combined with pulmonary vein imaging technology can clearly show the opening diameter of each pulmonary vein and its branches, so it is an important non-invasive examination method for the evaluation and diagnosis of pulmonary vein stenosis.
ObjectiveTo summarize clinical advantages and outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve replacement (MVR) combined with atrial fibrillation (AF) radiofrequency ablation via right minithoracotomy. MethodsEight patients with mitral valve disease and AF who received surgical therapy in the First Hospital of China Medical University between October 2009 and October 2012 were included in the study. There were 4 males and 4 females with their age of 34-67 (52.4±17.5) years. All the patients underwent minimally invasive MVR combined with AF radiofrequency ablation via right minithoracotomy. Clinical outcomes were summarized. ResultsThere was no in-hospital death or conversion to conventional sternotomy in this group. Two patients received biological valve replacement and 6 patients received mechanical prosthesis. Operation time was 207.9±18.1 minutes, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 81.7±23.9 minutes, and chest drainage amount was 126.7±34.5 ml. AF recurred in 1 patient on the 3rd postoperative day. All the patients were in sinus rhythm at discharge. These patients were followed up for 18.3±7.4 months. During follow-up, 1 patient had AF recurrence. Seven patients were in NYHA class Ⅰ, and 1 patients was in NYHA class Ⅱ. ConclusionMinimally invasive MVR combined with AF radiofrequency ablation via right minithoracotomy can achieve satisfactory clinical results and esthetic appearance, and is a good choice for patients with mitral valve disease and AF.
Objective To compare short-term clinical outcomes of bipolar/unipolar radiofrequency （RF） ablation for the treatment of permanent atrial fibrillation（AF） of patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease. Methods Clinicaldata of 124 patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease and permanent AF who underwent heart valve replacement and concomitant bipolar/unipolar RF ablation in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital from February 2011 to December 2011 were retros- pectively analyzed. According to different RF ablation methods，all the 124 patients were divided into bipolar group and unipolar group. There were 62 patients in the bipolar group including 29 males and 33 females with their age of 44.20±8.61 years，and 62 patients in the unipolar group including 33 males and 29 females with their age of 46.40±9.48 years. Electrocardiogram examinations were performed at the time of intraoperative heart re-beating，the very postoperative day，7 days，1 month，3 months and 6 months postoperatively to detect restoration of sinus rhythm. Results There was no in-hospital death or ablation-related complication in either group. Aortic cross-clamp time（70.05±22.02 min vs. 54.47±20.65 min，P=0.025） and RF ablation time（25.12±3.00 min vs. 15.70±3.02 min，P=0.000）of the bipolar group were significantly longer than those of the unipolar group. At the time of intraoperative heart re-beating，the lst and 7th day after operation， sinus rhythm restoration rates were 88.71%，87.10%，80.65% respectively in the bipolar group，85.48%，77.42%，72.58% respectively in the unipolar group，and there was no statistical difference between the two groups （P＞0.05）. In the 1st，3rd and 6th postoperative month，sinus rhythm restoration rates of the bipolar group （79.03%，75.81%，72.58% respectively） were significantly higher than those of the unipolar group （59.68%，50.00%，48.38% respectively，P＜0.05）. Conclusion Clinical outcomes of RF ablation for the treatment of permanent AF of patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease are satisfactory. Unipolar RF ablation has the advantage of being time-saving and easier technique，while short-term sinus rhythm restoration rate of bipolar RF ablation is higher than that of unipolar RF ablation for the treatment of permanent AF.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of thoracoscopy-assisted epicardial radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE).MethodsThe clinical data of 12 patients with solitary AF admitted to Beijing Tiantan Hospital from November 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 7 males and 5 females, with an average age of 65.2±5.3 years. Of them, 2 had paroxysmal AF, 1 had persistent AF and 9 had permanent AF.ResultsNo patient died during hospitalization, 5 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation for AF and LAAE, and 6 received LAAE alone. The operation time was 293±70 min in radiofrequency ablation for AF+LAAE patients and 71±14 min in LAAE patients. Two patients restored sinus rhythm, two restored after electric cardioversion, and one remained AF in AF+LAAE patients. Postoperatively, 1 patient had pleural effusion and 1 had subcutaneous emphysema. No stroke was observed.ConclusionThoracoscopy-assisted radiofrequency ablation for AF and/or LAAE reduce the risk of procedure, and provide alternative approach to treat AF-associated diseases. However, large sample size studies using prospective cohort designs are required to corroborate the present findings.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the radical cure for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodThe recent literatures about RFA in the treatment for HCC were retrieved and reviewed. ResultsThe liver transplantation, liver resection, and RFA were the three effective treatments in curative intent for early HCC.RFA was more frequently used in downsize therapy prior to liver transplantation in recent years because of its excellent local tumor control.Preoperative RFA extended the average waiting time without increasing the risk of dropout.Even though the controversy about effectiveness of RFA and hepatectomy was not been settled, the liver resection com-bined with RFA extended the operation indication of HCC and improved the effectiveness. ConclusionsRFA plays more and more important roles among the various treatment strategies in HCC.RFA, liver transplantation, and hepatectomy could be complementary to each other in the treatment for HCC and benefit numerous patients.Among these strategies, the key to improve the effectiveness is that minimum reduces residual tumors and suppresses their growth.
The treatment of liver cancer is still a challenge in the world, and it is mainly refers to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There are many factors affecting the overall survival rate of HCC; the recurrence of HCC is the main risk factor affecting the survival of patients, hence, it is urgent to explore the clinical treatment of recurrent HCC to obtain long-term survival of the patients. Up to now, surgical treatment is a radical treatment for HCC. Similarly, liver resection and liver transplantation are still the main therapy methods for recurrent HCC. In addition, radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and other local treatments still play an irresistible role. Therefore, emphasizing the postoperative follow-up of patients, diagnosing recurrent HCC in early stage, paying attention to the risk factors of HCC recurrence and selecting a suitable treatment plan for individuals are critical ways to prolong the survival of patients.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the pharmacoeconomic value of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), and to provide reference for treatment scheme selection, drug selection and the formulation of drug policy. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI and CBM from 2000 to 2014 to collect pharmacoeconomic studies on RFA versus Amiodarone for treating AF. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. The cost-effectiveness of RFA and Amiodarone for AF was compared according to the cost, effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). ResultsA total of three studies were included. The results of pharmacoeconomic evaluation showed that the ICERs for each study were $7 976 to $29 068, ￡7 763 to ￡27 745, and $59 194, respectively. According to country-specific willingness to pay thresholds, the ICER of each included study was acceptable. ConclusionCompared to Amiodarone, RFA is a cost-effective therapy for AF.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between biatrial ablation and right atrial ablation in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF)for adult patients with atrial septal defect (ASD). MethodsClinical data of 47 patients with ASD and AF who underwent surgical ASD repair and radiofrequency ablation from January 2007 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 male and 27 female patients with their age of 35-76 years. AF duration ranged from 3 months to 15 years. There were 18 patients with persistent AF and 29 patients with long-standing persistent AF. There were 10 patients with mild-to-moderate or more severe mitral regurgitation (MR), and 28 patients with mild-to-moderate or more severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). According to different surgical strategies, all the 47 patients were divided into 2 groups. In right atrial ablation group, there were 19 patients who received ASD repair and right atrial ablation. In biatrial ablation group, there were 28 patients who received ASD repair and biatrial ablation. For patients with mild-to-moderate or more severe MR or TR, concomitant mitral or tricuspid valvuloplasty was performed. All the patients received 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge, and were intermittently followed up thereafter. ResultsCardio-pulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time and postoperative hospital stay of biatrial ablation group were significantly longer than those of right atrial ablation group. But there was no statistical difference in postoperative morbidity or recovery between the 2 groups. After heart rebeating, there were 25 patients (89.3%)with sinus rhythm (SR)and 3 patients with junc-tional rhythm (JR), and none of the patients had AF in biatrial ablation group. There were 14 patients (73.7%)with SR, 2 patients with JR and 3 patients with AF in right atrial ablation group. At discharge, 28 patients (100%)in biatrial ablation group had SR, and in right atrial ablation group there were 15 patients (78.9%)with SR and 4 patients with AF relapse (P=0.045). All the patients were followed up for 3-75 months, and there was no death or residual ASD shunt during follow-up. Two patients had mild-to-moderate or more severe MR, and 4 patients had mild-to-moderate or more severe TR. Cumulative SR maintenance rate of biatrial ablation group (87.7%±6.7%)was significantly higher than that of right atrial ablation group (47.4%±11.5%, P=0.003)at 2 years after discharge. ConclusionFor adult patients with ASD and AF, biatrial ablation can produce better clinical outcomes than right atrial ablation without increasing surgical risks.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of bipolar radiofrequency ablation for left ventricular aneurysm-related ventricular arrhythmia associated with mural thrombus. MethodsFifteen patients with left ventricular aneurysm-related frequent premature ventricular contractions associated with mural thrombus were enrolled in Beijing Anzhen Hospital between June 2013 and June 2015. There were 11 male and 4 female patients with their age of 63.5±4.8 years. All patients had a history of myocardial infarction, but no cerebral infarction. All patients received bipolar radiofrequency ablation combined with coronary artery bypass grafting, ventricular aneurysm plasty and thrombectomy. Holter monitoring and echocardiography were measured before discharge and 3 months following the operation. ResultsThere was no death during the operation. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 92.7±38.3 min. The aortic clamping time was 52.4±17.8 min.The number of bypass grafts was 3.9±0.4. All the patients were discharged 7-10 days postoperatively. None of the patients had low cardiac output syndrome, malignant arrhythmias, perioperative myocardial infarction, or cerebral infarction in this study. Echocardiography conducted before discharge showed that left ventricular end diastolic diameter was decreased (54.87±5.21 cm vs. 60.73±6.24 cm, P=0.013). While there was no significant improvement in ejection fraction (45.20%±3.78% vs. 44.47%±6.12%, P=1.00) compared with those before the surgery. The number of premature ventricular contractions[4 021.00 (2 462.00, 5 496.00)beats vs. 11 097.00 (9 327.00, 13 478.00)beats, P < 0.001] and the percentage of premature ventricular contractions[2.94% (2.12%, 4.87%) vs. 8.11% (7.51%, 10.30%), P < 0.001] in 24 hours revealed by Holter monitoring were all significantly decreased than those before the surgery. At the end of 3-month follow-up, all the patients were angina and dizziness free. Echocardiography documented that there was no statistical difference in left ventricular end diastolic diameter (55.00±4.41 mm vs. 54.87±5.21 mm, P=1.00). But there were significant improvements in ejection fraction (49.93%±4.42% vs. 45.20%±3.78%, P=0.04) in contrast to those before discharge. Holter monitoring revealed that the frequency of premature ventricular contractions[2 043.00 (983.00, 3 297.00)beats vs. 4 021.00 (2 462.00, 5 496.00)beats, P=0.03] were further lessened than those before discharge, and the percentage of premature ventricular contractions[2.62% (1.44%, 3.49%)vs. 8.11% (7.51%, 10.30%), P < 0.001] was significantly decreased than those before the surgery, but no significant difference in contrast to those before discharge. ConclusionThe recoveries of cardiac function benefit from integrated improvements in myocardial ischemia, ventricular geometry, pump function, and myocardial electrophysiology. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation can correct the electrophysiological abnormality, significantly decrease the frequency of premature ventricular contractions, and further improve the heart function.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation versus amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, so as to provide reference for the chosen of clinical treatment options. MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2014), CNKI, VIP and WanFang data from inception to October 2014 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing radiofrequency ablation versus amiodarone for atrial fibrillation. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 511 atrial fibrillation patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with amiodarone, radiofrequency ablation could reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.55, P<0.000 01). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.17 to 5.61, P=0.97) between both groups. The incidence of adverse events in the radiofrequency ablation group was 7.7%, and was lower than 12.7% of the amiodarone group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with amiodarona, radiofrequency ablation is related to lower recurrence rate and higher efficacy, but there is no difference in the safety between the two interventions. However, due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, higher quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.