ObjectiveTo systematically review the relationship between T309G polymorphism of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene and susceptibility of prostate cancer. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, WanFang Data, CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect case-control studies related to the objectives from inception to May, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 14.0 software. ResultsA total of 10 studies involving 5 781 patients and 5 477 healthy controls were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the MDM2 gene T309G polymorphism was not associated with preeclampsia (allele model G vs. T: OR=0.89, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.04, P=0.13; homozygote model GG vs. TT: OR=0.86, 95%CI 0.64 to 1.16, P=0.32; heterozygote model TG vs. TT: OR=1.04, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.26, P=0.12; dominant model GG+TG vs. TT: OR=0.96, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.04, P=0.36; recessive model GG vs. TG+TT: OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.14, P=0.27). The results of subgroup analysis based on ethnicity and source of control were similar to the overall results. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Conclusion Current evidence shows that the MDM2 gene T309G polymorphism is not associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Prostate cancer is the most common malignant tumor in male urinary system, and the morbidity and mortality rate are increasing year by year. Traditional imaging examinations have some limitations in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, and the advent of molecular imaging probes and imaging technology have provided new ideas for the integration of diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. In recent years, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has attracted much attention as a target for imaging and treatment of prostate cancer. PSMA ligand positron emission tomography (PET) has important reference value in the diagnosis, initial staging, detection of biochemical recurrence and metastasis, clinical decision-making guidance and efficacy evaluation of prostate cancer. This article briefly reviews the clinical research and application progress on PSMA ligand PET imaging in prostate cancer in recent years, so as to raise the efficiency of clinical applications.
Objective To systemically review the efficacy and safety of strontium chloride for bone metastases from prostate cancer. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, VIP, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about strontium chloride for bone metastases from prostate cancer from inception to November 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 7 RCTs involving 1 532 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that strontium chloride was superior to placebo in the rate of pain relief (RR=1.79, 95%CI 1.35 to 2.37, P<0.000 1), but more likely to cause slight leucopenia (Peto OR=5.02, 95%CI 1.49 to 16.95,P=0.009). However, no significant difference was found in overall survival time between two groups (RR=0.87, 95%CI 0.58 to 1.30, P=0.49). In addition, strontium chloride was superior to radiotherapy in rate of bone pain relief (RR=1.28, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.47, P=0.0004), but it would cause thrombocy (Peto OR=2.61, 95%CI 1.04 to 6.57, P=0.04). Conclusion Current evidence shows that the strontium chloride is superior to placebo in the rate of pain relief, but it will cause slight leucopenia. The strontium chloride is superior to radiotherapy in rate of bone pain relief. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To comprehensively evaluate the association between TNF-α gene −308 G/A polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer. Methods A meta-analysis was performed to analyze the association between −308 G/A polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer risk. Results A total of 11 case-control studies (4 919 cases and 5 210 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. The result showed no statistically significant differences in all genotype distribution between prostate cancer cases and controls: dominant model (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.36, P=0.33), recessive model (OR=0.91, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.18, P=0.47), GA versus GG (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.37, P=0.33), AA versus GG (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.20, P=0.55), A versus G (OR=1.07, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.26, P=0.39). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no statistically differences were found between prostate cancer cases and controls. Conclusion This results of meta-analysis suggests that TNF-α gene –308G/A polymorphism may not be a risk factor of prostate cancer. Due to the limited quantity of the includied studies, further studies are needed to validate the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in prostate cancer tissue and explore its relations with tumor angiogenesis. MethodsThe expression of TNF-α and CD105 were detected with two-step immunohistochemical staining technique in 20 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia and 50 cases of prostate cancer between January 2010 and January 2012, and microvessel density (MVD) marked with CD105 was also measured. ResultsThe expressions of TNF-α and CD105 were higher in prostate cancer (41.72±8.67, 20.15±2.67) than those in benign prostatic hyperplasia (21.01±3.85, 4.34±1.67) (t'=13.990, P<0.001; t'=29.771, P<0.001). TNF-α and MVD were not correlated with age and size of tumor, but were positively correlated with tumor differentiation degree (rs=0.847, P<0.001; rs=0.776, P<0.001) and negatively correlated with clinical grades (rs=-0.769, P<0.001; rs=-0.842, P<0.001). ConclusionThe result indicates that over expression of TNF-α exists in prostate cancer. It may play an important role in the anginogenesis and carcinogenesis of prostate cancer.
Prostate cancer ranks second among the causes of death of malignant tumors in middle-aged and elderly men. A considerable number of patients are not easily detected in early-stage prostate cancer. Although traditional imaging examinations are of high value in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer, they also have certain limitations. With the development of nuclear medicine instruments and molecular probes, molecular imaging is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as a probe has gained increasing recognition. This article will review the latest progress in the application of PET/CT using probes for targeting PSMA to imaging and treatment of prostate cancer, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the application of probes for targeting PSMA in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.
Image fusion currently plays an important role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Selecting and developing a good image fusion algorithm is the core task of achieving image fusion, which determines whether the fusion image obtained is of good quality and can meet the actual needs of clinical application. In recent years, it has become one of the research hotspots of medical image fusion. In order to make a comprehensive study on the methods of medical image fusion, this paper reviewed the relevant literature published at home and abroad in recent years. Image fusion technologies were classified, and image fusion algorithms were divided into traditional fusion algorithms and deep learning (DL) fusion algorithms. The principles and workflow of some algorithms were analyzed and compared, their advantages and disadvantages were summarized, and relevant medical image data sets were introduced. Finally, the future development trend of medical image fusion algorithm was prospected, and the development direction of medical image fusion technology for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and other major diseases was pointed out.
The incidence of prostate cancer ranks the second in malignant tumors among elderly males. Multi-parametric MRI (Mp-MRI) is an important mean for detection, staging, and grading of prostate cancer. In order to standardize the collection, interpretation, and reporting of prostate MRI data, the European Urogenital Radiology Society launched the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in 2012. Due to some limitations in the application process, the Joint Committee of the American Society of Radiology and the European Society of Radiology issued an updated version of PI-PADS V2 in 2014. In recent years, some studies have been carried out on the effectiveness, accuracy, and consistency of the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This article will review the application and research status of PI-RADS V2 system in the diagnosis of Mp-MRI for prostate cancer.
Prostate cancer is a common disease in the USA and Europe, with a gradually increasing incidence in China, and presents a significant health burden for older men. The lack of modifiable risk factors has made early detection as a strategy to reduce mortality. Current methods of screening involve the measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination followed by biopsy. With PSA screening evidence of level I absent, the evidence on the use of PSA as a screening test is still highly controversial. Furthermore, there is controversy over whether screen-detected lesions will become clinically significant. There are three major treatment options for localized disease: radical prostatectomy, radical radiotherapy and monitoring with treatment if required. There is no evidence of randomized controlled trial (RCT) to suggest a survival advantage of any of these treatments. Opinions about the related benefits and risks of screening vary widely. In the absence of RCT of benefit for screening, many now suggest “informed consensus” screening, which encourages a discussion between the patient and his physician with both sides informed of all of the issues.