ObjectiveTo explore risk factors for pancreatic fistula and severe pancreatic fistula (grade B and C) after distal pancreatectomy. MethodsOne hundred and fifty patients underwent distal pancreatectomy were collected and analyzed from January 2012 to December 2014 in this retrospective study,among which 61 cases were male,89 cases were female,age from 18 to 78 years old.The risk factors for pancreatic fistula and severe pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. ResultsIn these patients,136 cases were underwent laparotomy,8 cases were underwent total laparoscopic surgery,6 cases were underwent hand assisted laparoscopic surgery;39 cases were preserved spleen,111 cases were combined splenectomy.Technique for closure of the pancreas remnant,15 cases were used cut stapler (Echelon 60,EC60),77 cases were used cut stapler (Echelon 60,EC60) combined with manual suture,52 cases were underwent manual cut and suture,and 6 cases were underwent pancreatic stump jejunum anastomosis.The total incidence of complications was 36.0%(54/150),the postoperative hospitalization time was (9.1±6.2) d,the reoperation rate was 2.7%(4/150),the perioperative mortality was 0,the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was 34.7%(grade B and C was 10.0%).In these patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula,the postoperative hospitalization time was (12.6±9.3) d,the reoperation rate was 7.7%(4/52).The results of the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the hypoproteinemia (OR=4.919,P<0.05) was the risk factor for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy,the malignancy (OR=4.125,P<0.05) was the risk factor for severe pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. ConclusionsIncidence of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy is related to hypoproteinemia before operation,it is needed to improve the nutritional status by nutrition treatment for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula.If patient with malignancy has postoperative pancreatic fistula,it is likely to be severe pancreatic fistula.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsEighty-five cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from May 2014 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 78 cases were investigated. They were divided into pancreatic duct-to-jejunum mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy group as controlled group (n=42) and imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy (technique of duct-to-mucosa PJ with transpancreatic interlocking mattress sutures) group as modified group (n=36). The rates of pancreatic fistula, abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, and incision infection were investigated as well as hospital stays and pancreaticojejunostomy time in two groups were compared. ResultsThe rate of pancreatic fistula especially B to C grade pancreatic fistula in the modified group was obviously lower compared with which in the controlled group (8.3% vs. 31.0%, P < 0.05), pancreaticojejunostomy time ofmodified group was significantly shortened [(35.6±12.4) min vs. (52.8±24.6) min, P < 0.05] and total operative time also shortened [(322.4±23.6) min vs. (384.2±30.2) min, P < 0.05). There were no significant difference of the rates of abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, ?incision infection, and hospital stays (P > 0.05)]. Conciusions The type of pancreaticojejunostomy has a significant impact on the rate of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy can decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after operation, and shorten the pancreaticojejunostomy time and total operative time.
Objective To analyze the effect of inner diameter of pancreatic duct following pancreaticoduodenectomy on pancreatic fistula. Methods From January 1995 to December 2008, 256 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were divided into four groups based on the types of pancreaticojejunostomy: end-to-side “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis group (n=115), end-to-end “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis group (n=71), end-to-end invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy group (n=43) and pancreaticogastrostomy group (n=27). Alternatively, 238 patients were divided into two groups according to drainage ways: stenting tube for internal drainage group (n=132) and stenting tube for external drainage group (n=106). Furthermore, 233 cases were divided into three groups on the basis of inner diameter of pancreatic duct: ≤0.2 cm group (n=54), 0.2-0.4 cm group (n=93) and ≥0.4 cm group (n=76). Then, the incidence rate of pancreatic fistula of each group was compared. Results The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 8.20% (21/256). The incidence of pancreatic fistula for different types of pancreaticojejunostomy was as follow: end-to-side “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis group (7.83%， 9/115), end-to-end “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis group (7.04%, 5/71), end-to-end pancreaticogastrostomy invaginated group (13.95%, 6/43) and pancreaticogastrostomy group (3.70%, 1/27), in which there wasn’t significant difference in 4 groups （χ2=2.763，P=0.430）. There was no significant difference of the incidence of pancreatic fistula between stenting tube for internal drainage group (9.10%, 12/132) and stenting tube for external drainage group (8.49%, 9/106), χ2=0.126, P=0.722. The incidence of pancreatic fistula in ≥0.4 cm group, 0.2-0.4 cm group and ≤0.2 cm group was respectively 0, 15.05% (14/93) and 11.11%(6/54), and the difference was significant (χ2=12.009, P=0.002). No correlation was found between the incidence of pancreatic fistula of different inner diameter of pancreatic duct and the types of pancreaticojejunostomy (χ2=1.878， P=0.598). Conclusion The inner diameter of pancreatic duct is an important factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula. No relationship is found between the types of pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreatic fistula in this study.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors of intraabdominal complications (IACs), pancreatic fistula (PF), and operative death after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and to provide a theoretical basis in reducing the rates of them. MethodsClinical data of 78 patients who underwent standard PD surgery in The Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from Jun. 2003 to Nov. 2011 were collected to analyze the influence factors of IACs, PF, and operative death. ResultsThere were 29 cases suffered IACs (13 cases of PF included), and 6 case died during 1 month after operation. Univariate analysis results showed that IACs and PF occurred more often in patients with soft friable pancreas, diameter of main pancreatic duct less than 3 mm, preoperative biliary drainage, no pancreatic duct stenting, and without employment of somatostatin (P < 0.05), no influence factor was found to be related to operative death. Multivariate analysis results showed that patients with no pancreatic duct stenting (OR=1.867, P=0.000), soft texture of remnant stump (OR=1.356, P=0.046), and diameter of main pancreatic duct less than 3 mm (OR=2.874, P=0.015) suffered more IACs; PF was more frequent in patient with no pancreatic duct stenting (OR=1.672, P=0.030), soft texture of remnant stump (OR=1.946, P=0.042), and diameter of main pancreatic duct less than 3 mm (OR=1.782, P=0.002);no independent factor was found to have relationship with operative death. ConclusionsSoft texture of remnant stump, diameter of main pancreatic duct less than 3 mm, and no pancreatic duct stenting are independent risk factors that should be considered in indications for PD surgery.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical characteristics of traumatic pancreatitis (TP) after pancreatic trauma and illustrate the experience of specialized treatment. MethodsClinical data of 73 patients with TP treated in our hospital from January 2008 to June 2014 were collected. The pancreatic injury location, grade, and TP pathogenic factors were analyzed, summarized the common problem and the regularity in TP course, and summarized the treatment strategy, methods of surgical intervention, operation key points and difficulties of TP. ResultsThe grade of pancreatic trauma in the all of patients was mainly to levels of 2, 3, and 4, the head of the pancreas injury accounted for 31.5% (23/73), cervical pancreatic body and tail injuries accounted for 68.5% (50/73). Fifty-nine patients were from other hospitals referral. The occurrence of TP peak period was 4-7 days after pancreatic trauma. Pancreatic fistula and uncontrolled peritoneal infection were the treatment difficulty of TP. It's the effective minimally invasive treatment methods for TP that percutaneous catheter drainage, pancreatic duct stent placement, and endoscopic abscess debridement. Forty-two patients with TP needed reoperations, and 19 cases underwent more than 2 times operation. ConclusionsBecause of the condition of TP is complex and changeable, and difficulty to treat, so the early definitive diagnosis and appropriate surgical strategy play a crucial role in the treatment of TP. Besides, professional team of pancreatic surgery has advantages in estimating patients' conditions, selecting and performing surgical interventions.
Objective To investigate the new method of pancreaticoenterostomy and decrease the probability of complications like pancreatic fistula etc. Methods By using the absorbable bandage and ear-brain glue, modified sutureless pancreaticoenteromy was made in 10 swines. Experimental data includes： routine analysis of blood, levels of amylase in blood and abdominal drainage and lipase in blood and abdominal drainage. The tissues in anastomosis were taken for pathology examination in 1 month after operation. Results The average operative time was （35±10） min.Nine of ten animals had no pancreatic fistula and survived. The levels of amylase and lipase in abdominal drainage were both normal. One swine had a evident abdominal distensile on 2 days after operation, the level of amylase was 10 000u/L,then died on 10 days after operation. Pancreatic fistula and infection were found because of the loss of stent in pancreatic duct. Conclusions Comparison with traditional operation, the modified sutureless pancreaticoenteromy can also control the probability of pancreatic fistula. And this method can be hoped to be one of the routine operations of pancreaticoenterostomy because of its simplicity and practicality.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness measured using preoperative CT imaging on pancreatic fistula(PF)following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). MethodsOne hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent PD consecutively from January 2013 to April 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Associations between the gender, age and the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness from preoperative CT imaging and PF were analyzed. The diagnostic values of the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness in patients with PF were evaluate by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The reliability analysis was done for the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Spearman rank correlation analysis was done between the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness. Results①PF occurred in 46 cases (30.1%).②The gender and age were not associated with PF (Gender: χ2=1.698, P=0.193; Age: χ2=0.016, P=0.900). The pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness were associated with PF (Pancreatic duct diameter: OR=0.275, 95% CI 0.164-0.461, P=0.000; Pancreatic gland thickness: OR=1.319, 95% CI 1.163-1.496, P=0.000).③There was no correlation between the pancreatic duct diameter and the pancreatic gland thickness (rs=-0.120, P=0.145).④The area under curve of ROC was 0.814 (95% CI 0.745-0.883, P < 0.001) for the pancreatic duct diameter in predicting the PF, the sensitivity and specificity was 68.6% and 78.3% respectively when the best critical value was 3.5 mm. The area under curve of ROC was 0.762 (95% CI 0.674-0.849, P < 0.001) for the pancreatic gland thickness in predicting PF, the sensitivity and specificity was 63.0% and 85.7% respectively when the best critical value was 31 mm.⑤The ICC of the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness was 0.984 and 0.992 respectively by two medical diagnostic measurement. ConclusionPancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness measured using preoperative CT imaging might be useful in predicting PF following PD.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the various methods in prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe literatures over the years related to prevention of pancreatic fistula were reviewed.ResultsManagement of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy played the most important role in preventing pancreatic fistula. None of the methods of pancreatic stump had proved to be perfect in preventing pancreatic fistula, though pancreaticojejunostomy was the most widely practiced reconstruct strategy in varieties of option. For pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy, the rate of this complication was 12.3% and 11.1%,respectively. In recent years, a new procedure, bindingup pancreaticoduodenectomy, had shown a promise and excellent results in prevention of pancreatic fistula, the rate of fistula was 0 for consecutive 100 cases after pancreaticoduodenectomy.ConclusionBindingup pancreaticojejunostomy have a definite effect to avoid pancreatic fistula and be worthy of being recommended
Pancreatic and biliary duct fistula are the most severe and common complication following pancreatoduodenectomy. To prevent this complication, anastomosis should be appropriately performed and drainage of the pancreatic and bile duct is crucial. For proper drainage, the authers designed a cross-shaped tube for both the pancreatic and bile duct drainage, which has been practised on 16 patients with no pancreatic and biliary fistula happened. This new model combines the internal and external pancreatic drainages with biliary T-tube drainage and gives better drainage in practice so that the leakage might be lessened.
ObjectiveTo summarize the prevention method for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenec-tomy. MethodLiteratures related to the prevention methods for postoperative pancreatic fistula at home and abroad in recent years were retrieved and summarized. ResultsThe pancreatic fistula was a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy. It was mainly caused by preoperative continuous high jaundice, selection of intraoperative anastomosis, and early postoperative pancreatic juice secretion. Trypsinogen was activated by alkaline intestinal juice and then the nearby tissue was digested. Pancreatic juice flowed into abdominal cavity to digest the tissue, then caused serious complications or even death. Through the prevention of drugs, preoperative biliary drainage and intraoperative anastomosis, etc., the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was slightly decreased. ConclusionThe prevention for postoperative pancreatic fistula is an integrated process, and it needs to be ran through the whole perioperative period.