Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a kind of demyelinating disease of central nervous system which mainly affect optic nerve and spinal cord. Because of its serious blindness and disability, how to effectively prevent relapse has become the focus of ophthalmologists. With the deep understanding of the pathogenesis and the progress of scientific and technological means, more and more monoclonal antibodies(mAb) continue to enter clinical trials. B cell surface antigen CD20 blocker, rituximab, has become a first-line drug for the treatment of NMOSD. CD19 blocker, inebilizumab, can reduce the recurrence and disability of NMOSD patients. The addition of interleukin 6 receptor blocker, satralizumab, and complement C5 inhibitor, eculizumab, reduce the recurrence. Some mAbs such as natalizumab and alemtuzumab may not be effective for the treatment of NMOSD. The expansion of mAb treatment indications and the launch of new drugs still require more clinical trials which are large-scale and international cooperation. At the same time, its potential adverse events and cost issues cannot be ignored.
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare debilitating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Three monoclonal antibodies were recently approved as maintenance therapies for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) seropositive NMOSD (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab). Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm published international Delphi consensus on the management of AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD in May 31, 2023. Twenty-five statements reached consensus after two voting rounds by 24 Delphi panel experts. Inebilizumab and satralizumab have been listed in China, and off-label immunosuppressants and biologics are also used in clinical practice. However, there are no standard treatment recommendations in use of these biologics and maintenance therapy of NMOSD. Therefore, the interpretation of this consensus, focusing on the initial use of monoclonal drugs, the conversion between monoclonal drugs and immunosuppressants, as well as the application and safety of special populations, is conducive to improving the normative and effective use of of monoclonal drugs in NMOSD y ophthalmologists and neurologists
The first edition of “The Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of optic neuritis” have been published in Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology in 2014. Seven years later, more evidence-based medicine has been accumulated in the treatment of optic neuritis. It is necessary to update or formulate guidelines to guide clinical practice. Based on the methods and procedures for developing evidence -based guidelines, Neuro-Ophthalmology Group of Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Medical Association and Evidence-based Medicine Centre of Lanzhou University/World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation created the first “An evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of demyelinating optic neuritis in China (2021)”, which aimed to improve the level of clinical diagnosis and treatments of demyelinating optic neuritis. This guideline proposes a new subtype classification of demyelinating optic neuritis to guide precision treatment. It also gives new suggestions about clinical treatment hotspots in the acute and chronic phases, including the application of immunosuppressants and rituximab and other biological agents.
Objective To observe the clinical features and visual function of recurrent neuromyelitis optica (NMO). Methods Thirty-four patients with NMO were enrolled in this retrospective case series study. The patients included two males and 32 females. The average first onset age was (35.03plusmn;14.56) years old and the average recurrent rate were (4.24plusmn;2.45) times. The recurrent rate of optic neuritis (ON) ranged from two to 12 times. The recurrent rate of ON was two times in 15 eyes of 10 patients, ge;three times in 37 eyes of 24 patients. Vision acuity, direct ophthalmoscope, fundus pre-set lens examination, visual field and visual evoked potential (VEP) were evaluated. Clinical features were observed. The abnormal rate of optic nerve including optic edema and atrophy; abnormal rate of visual field including decreasing retinal sensitivity, central and paracentral scotoma, ring scotoma, half field defects, tunnel visual field, visual field centrality constriction; abnormal rate of VEP including Prolonged latent phase and/or decreasing amplitude of P100 wave from patients of first episode or recurrence was analyzed. Serum NMO-IgG was detected from 28 patients by indirect immunofluorescence technique to observe its positive rate. Results All patients were characterized by repeated episodes of ON and myelitis. The main clinical feature of ON was visual loss, and the main clinical features of myelitis included sensory disability, dyskinesia and vesicorectal disorder. Blindness rate was 41.67% after the first attack of ON, 33.33% after two relapses, and 64.86% after ge; three relapses. The difference of blindness rate between first attack and two episodes was not significant (chi;2=0.270,P=0.603). However, the blindness rate in patients having ge; three episodes was significantly higher than those having two episodes (chi;2=4.300,P=0.038). With recurrence rate increasing, the abnormal rate of the optic nerve (chi;2=6.750,P=0.034）and VEP（chi;2=6.990,P=0.030）increased. But the abnormal rate of visual field did not increase along with recurrent rate (chi;2=0.660,P=0.718). Seropositive rate of NMO-IgG did not differ significantly between patients with first attack ON and that with recurrent ON (chi;2=1.510,P=0.470). But the seropositive patients had significantly higher bilateral blindness rate than seronegative patients (chi;2=5.063,P=0.027). Conclusions NMO are characterized by recurrent ON and myelitis. Visual loss, sensory disability, dyskinesia and vesicorectal disorder are the main clinical features. With recurrence rate increasing, the blindness rate, abnormalities the optic nerve and the abnormity rate of VEP increase. Seropositive recurrent NMO patients have higher bilateral blindness rate than seronegative patients.
ObjectiveTo preliminary investigate the impact of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) payment method reform on the diagnosis and treatment of inpatient medical insurance patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and to propose potential improvement strategies. MethodsA single-center, retrospective study. From October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2022, 44 hospitalized medical insurance patients with acute-phase NMOSD diagnosed and treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University (Xi'an First Hospital) were included in the study. Among them, there were 11 males and 33 females, with an average age of (40.8±20.2) years. According to the implementation time of DRG payment, patients were divided into two groups: group A, which consists of cases one year before the implementation of DRG payment from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021, and group B, which consists of cases one year after the implementation of DRG payment from October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022, with 20 and 24 cases, respectively. Detailed information such as hospitalization duration, treatment methods, and hospitalization costs of the two groups of patients was collected. Comparative analysis was conducted on hospitalization costs and treatment methods between the two groups. For intergroup comparison, t-test was used for normally distributed data, and Mann-Whitney U test was used for skewed distributed data. ResultsAmong the 44 patients, 5 cases (5/24, 20.8%) received plasma exchange (PE) treatment, all of whom were in group B. The numbers of patients who received and did not receive intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment were 9 and 11 in group A, respectively, and 7 and 12 in group B (except for 5 cases who received PE treatment), respectively. Compared with group A, there was no significant decrease in hospitalization duration (t=0.004) and total hospitalization costs (Z=0.036), as well as costs for western medicine (Z=0.036), examinations (Z=0.011), laboratory tests (Z=0.040), treatments (Z=0.017), and nursing (Z=3.131) in group B, and the differences were not statistically significant (P＞0.05). For patients receiving PE treatment, except for the cost of western medicine (Z=0.062, P=0.804), the other costs (Z=8.288, 5.013, 11.400, 10.925, 9.126) were significantly higher than those of patients not receiving PE treatment, and the hospitalization duration (t=20.474) was significantly prolonged, with statistically significant differences (P＜0.05). The total hospitalization costs of patients receiving IVIG treatment were significantly higher than those not receiving IVIG treatment in both group A and group B, with statistically significant differences (Z=7.690, 10.314; P＜0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of total hospitalization costs between patients receiving IVIG treatment in group A and group B (Z=0.137, P＞0.05). ConclusionsThere is no significant decrease in various hospitalization costs of NMOSD medical insurance patients in Xi'an after the implementation of DRG payment, especially for patients receiving PE treatment. It is suggested to optimize the rate stratification of NMOSD patients when implementing DRG payment methods.
ObjectiveTo observe and analyze the subtype-specific prognostic factors for visual recovery in patients with demyelinating optic neuritis (DON) after glucocorticoid pulse therapy. MethodsA retrospective cohort study. A total of 195 patients (249 eyes) with DON diagnosed by ophthalmology examination at Department of Ophthalmology, Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an Fourth Hospital) from January 2021 to December 2024 were included in the study. According to the results of serum antibody detection and clinical diagnostic criteria, the patients were divided into the neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)-associated optic neuritis (ON) (NMOSD-ON) group, the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antitide-associated ON (MOG-ON) group, and the double antibody negative ON group. They were 51 cases (58 eyes), 72 cases (103 eyes), and 72 cases (88 eyes) respectively. Baseline clinical data, imaging characteristics, and treatment protocols were collected. The primary endpoints were complete visual recovery [best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥1.0] and moderate recovery (BCVA ≥0.5) at 3 months post-onset. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors for visual outcomes within each subtype. ResultsAt 3 months post-onset, complete recovery rates were 9 (15.5%, 9/58) in the NMOSD-ON group, 64 (62.1%, 64/103) in the MOG-ON group, and 31 (35.2%, 31/88) in the double-seronegative ON group. The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that age [odds ratio (OR) =0.901, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.854-0.950, P＜0.001] and peak visual acuity (OR=0.311, 95%CI 0.147-0.660, P=0.002) and the involvement of optic nerve length ≥1/2 (OR=3.849, 95%CI 1.083-13.682, P=0.037) were the influencing factors for the complete recovery of visual acuity in the affected eyes of the double antibody negative ON group. Age (OR=0.958, 95%CI 0.933-0.983, P=0.001) was the only influencing factor for the complete recovery of visual acuity in the affected eyes of the MOG-ON group. Peak visual acuity (OR=0.288, 95%CI 0.090-0.927, P=0.037) and optic nerve involvement length ≥1/2 (OR=19.974, 95%CI 1.905-209.559, P=0.013) were the influencing factors for the complete recovery of visual acuity in the affected eyes of the NMOSD-ON group. Age (OR=0.936, 95%CI 0.890-0.983, P=0.009), time from onset to intravenous infusion of methylprednisolone sodium succinate intervention (OR=0.854, 95%CI 0.759-0.961, P=0.009), optic disc edema (OR=4.405, 95%CI 1.108-17.512, P=0.035) and peak visual acuity (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.046-0.365, P＜0.001) were the influencing factors for the moderate recovery of visual acuity in the affected eyes of the double antibody negative ON group. Peak visual acuity was the only influencing factor for the moderate recovery of visual acuity in the MOG-ON group (OR=0.060, 95%CI 0.010-0.352, P=0.002) and the NMOSD-ON group (OR=0.163, 95%CI 0.053-0.500, P=0.001). ConclusionsThe prognostic factors for visual recovery in patients with DON after glucocorticoid pulse therapy are subtype-specific. Peak visual acuity is a common predictor for all subtypes. For NMOSD-ON and double antibody-negative ON, attention should be paid to the length of optic nerve lesions. MOG-ON is age-related. Early intravenous infusion of methylprednisolone sodium succinate for double antiantibody negative ON is more likely to achieve moderate vision recovery.
Neuromyelitis optica-related optic neuritis (NMO-ON) is a kind of severe optic nerve disease, which always leads to replase, poor prognosis, and even blindness. Aquaporin 4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) is the main diagnostic biomarker for neuromyelitis optica with high specificity. Serum myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-IgG) is helpful for the diagnosis of AQP4-IgG negative patients. The study of biomarkers is helpful to deeply understand the pathogenesis of NMO-ON, help the diagnosis of the disease, and finally make precise treatment. Orbital MRI can help to differentiate MOG-IgG positive from AQP4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica and optic neuritis, which is very important for the diagnosis of NMO-ON. At present, the standardized treatment of NMO-ON can be divided into two clinical stages: acute stage and remission stage. Corticosteroids and plasma exchange are the main treatments in acute stage, aiming at alleviating acute inflammatory reaction and improving prognosis. Immunosuppressive agents and biological agents are the main treatments in remission stage, aiming at preventing or reducing recurrence. With the development of the diagnosis and treatment of NMO-ON, we find that it is more and more important to strengthen the construction of neuro-ophthalmology team in China, establish clinical epidemiological database of NMO-ON, and carry out multi-centre, large-sample, prospective clinical control studies in China to provide evidence-based medicine for Chinese people. In addition, we need to strengthen efforts to establish and improve the diagnostic criteria for NMO-ON and the promotion of diagnostic and therapeutic criteria, and strive to improve the clinical diagnosis and treatment level of NMO-ON in China.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated treatments with low-dose rituximab for relapsing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Methods A perspective study. 21 patients who were diagnosed with NMOSD one year ago were recruited for rituximab treatment. Of 21 patients, one was male, 20 were females. Onset age was 10 - 51 years, the mean onset age was (26.2±12.0) years. Duration of disease was 2.3 - 25.8 years, the mean duration was (9.2±5.9) years. Best corrected vision activity (BCVA), expanded disability status scale (EDSS), annualized relapsing rate (ARR) were valued to investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated treatments with low-dose rituximab. The BCVA was examined using Snellen chart, and converted to logMAR. The mean BCVA was 1.13±1.09, the mean BCVA in better eyes was 0.4±0.68, the mean BCVA in latter eyes was 1.87±0.90. The mean EDSS was 3.09±0.70. The mean ARR was 1.04±0.65. All patients underwent two cycles of RTX treatment. The annually induction treatment was RTX 100 mg per week for 4 weeks. Of 21 patients, 12 patients had treatment within one month after attack. The mean follow-up period was (28.4±4.9) months. The side effects were recorded, BCVA, EDSS, ARR were valued to investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated treatments with low-dose rituximab. Paired t test, independent sample t test and Chi-squared test were used. Results The mean BCVA at last follow-up was 0.62±0.91, the mean BCVA in better eye was 0.62±0.91, the BCVA in latter eye was 1.0±1.01. The mean EDSS was 2.26±1.07. The mean ARR was 0.21 ± 0.3. After the treatment, patient had significant improvement on BCVA in worst eye (t=4.256), ARR (t=2.900), EDSS (t=4.620) with the significant differences (P＜0.05).Thirteen relapses in 9 patients were observed. B lymph cells were more than 0.01% in all relapses. There was no significant difference on the BCVA in better eye (t=1.840, P＞0.05). There were 9 patients had relapse, 13 times in total. Of 13 relapses, B lymph cell count was performed in 12 relapses, and the counts were 0.01% - 0.14%. There were no significant difference between relapsed patients and non-relapsed patients on onset age (t=0.67, P=0.51), whether underwent plasma exchange treatment (χ2=1.61, P＞0.05), with/without auto-immune antibody ratio (χ2=1.61, P＞0.05). Of 21 patients, 8 patients had side effects, including 5 patients with infection, 4 patients with chest congestion, 3 patients with hair losing, 2 patients with skin rashes, headache and short of breath, 1 patient with tinnitus, palpitation and fatigue. Four patients had more than one symptom. Of all patients who had side effects, slowing down the infusion speed of RTX or infusing 5 mg of dexamethasone could relieve the discomfort. Conclusion Lose-dose rituximab reduces the frequency of NMOSD relapses and is well tolerated.
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, characterized by high recurrence and disability rates. Preventing relapses is crucial in the treatment of this condition. Monoclonal antibodies have emerged as a novel and rapidly evolving clinical therapeutic strategy targeting NMOSD in recent years. An increasing number of studies and clinical trials have also confirmed the effectiveness and safety of monoclonal antibodies. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the B-cell surface antigen CD20, has been widely used in the treatment of NMOSD. Currently, in China, the only approved monoclonal antibody for treating NMOSD is Inebilizumab, which targets the B-cell surface antigen CD19. Additionally, various monoclonal antibodies, such as interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors and complement C5 inhibitors, have been used in the treatment of NMOSD. With the deepening of the research on the pathogenesis of NMOSD, the molecular mechanism of disease-related immune network is further clarified, and multi-center clinical trials are widely carried out. More accurate monoclonal antibody treatment strategies for NMOSD will be applied to clinical practice, benefiting more patients.
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that primarily affects the optic nerves and spinal cord. Most patients have positive serum antibody of aquaporin-4 (AQP4), which targets the AQP4 protein expressed on the end-feet of astrocytes. Although the prevalence of NMOSD is limited, the recurrence rate is high. Repeated and severe immune-mediated attacks can quickly lead to blindness and paralysis if undiagnosed and untreated. While high-dose methylprednisolone and plasma exchange are used in the acute phase, the treatment for recurrent prevention is limited. In recent years, researchers developed several kinds of monoclonal antibodies targeting different nodes of immune pathogenic process, including satralizumab (an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor), inebilizumab (an antibody against CD19+ B cells), and eculizumab (an antibody blocking the C5 component of complement). In several randomized controlled clinical trials, these monoclonal antibodies decreased the relapse rate significantly in NMOSD. These emerging treatments have greatly changed the treatment of NMOSD.