ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of different nucleosides (acids) in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients. MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different nucleosides (acids) to prevent HBV reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients from inception to June 7th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 43 RCTs involving 3 269 patients were included. There were 7 interventions, namely entecavir (ETV), lamivudine (LAM), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), telbivudine (LdT), tenofovir dipivoxil (TDF), lamivudine combined with entecavir (LAM+ETV), and lamivudine combined with adefovir dipivoxil (LAM+ADV). The results of network meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of reducing the reactivation rate of ETV, LAM, ADV, LdT, TDF, LAM+ETV, LAM+ADV were superior than the control group. The ETV, LAM and ADV were not as effective as LAM+ETV. The leading drug combinations were LAM+ETV (94.8%), LdT (81.5%) and LA+ADV (58.0%). ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that LAM+ETV, LdT, and LA+ADV are more effective in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of six cognitive interventions on cognitive function of patients with mild cognitive impairment after stroke. Methods The PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials on the effects of non-drug interventions on the cognitive function of patients with mild cognitive impairment after stroke from inception to March 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed using Openbugs 3.2.3 and Stata 16.0 software. Results A total of 72 studies involving 4 962 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the following five cognitive interventions improved the cognitive function of stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment: cognitive control intervention (SMD=−1.28, 95%CI −1.686 to −0.90, P<0.05) had the most significant effect on the improvement of cognitive function, followed by computer cognitive training (SMD=−1.02, 95%CI −1.51 to −0.53, P<0.05), virtual reality cognitive training (SMD=−1.20, 95%CI −1.78 to −0.62, P<0.05), non-invasive neural regulation (SMD=−1.09, 95%CI −1.58 to −0.60, P<0.05), and cognitive stimulation (SMD=−0.94, 95%CI −1.82 to −0.07, P<0.05). Conclusion Five cognitive interventions are effective in improving cognitive function for stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment, among which cognitive control intervention is the most effective. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of non-ergoline dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine) and α2δ ligands (pregabalin and gabapentin-enacarbil) in the treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS). Methods The PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, and CNKI databases were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing different medications for RLS from 2000 to 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The network meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software and R 4.1.0 software. Results A total of 36 RCTs involving 7 666 patients were included. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that gabapentin-enacarbil decreased IRLS scores to the greatest extent among all drugs (MD=−6.42, 95%CI −8.8 to −4.16), was superior to pramipexole (MD=−3.27, 95%CI −6.54 to −0.15), and was associated with the highest CGI-I response rates (RR=1.73, 95%CI 1.52 to 2.00). In terms of tolerance and safety, patients receiving rotigotine presented an increased incidence of withdrawal due to adverse events. Ropinirole had the highest incidence of nausea. Headache was most common side effect in rotigotine, while the incidences of somnolence and dizziness were higher in gabapentin-enacarbil than other treatments. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that gabapentin-enacarbil may be the best treatment for RLS. Rotigotine is associated with the worst tolerance. For safety, nausea is most common in ropinirole, headache is most common for rotigotine, and patients receiving gabapentin-enacarbil show increased incidences of somnolence and dizziness.
Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical technique that integrates data from multiple clinical studies and compares the efficacy and safety of multiple interventions, which can provide pro and con ranking results for all intervention options in the evidence network and provide direct evidence support for clinical decision-making. At present, NMA is usually based on the aggregation of the same type of data set, and there are still methodological and software difficulties in achieving cross-study design and cross-data format data set merging. The crossnma package of R programming language is based on Bayesian framework and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, extending the three-level hierarchical model to the standard NMA data model to achieve differential merging of varied data types. The crossnma package fully considers the impact of risk bias caused by the combination of different types of data on the results by introducing model variables. In addition, the package provides functions such as result output and easy graphing, which makes it possible to combine NMA across study designs and evidence across data formats. In this study, the model based on crossnma package method and software operation will be demonstrated and explained through the examples of four individual participant datasets and two aggregate datasets.
ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy and safety of various treatment strategies for patients with refractory/recurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r-DLBCL) by network meta-analysis. MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase and Cochrane Library databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials related to the objectives of the study from inception to November 16th, 2022. After two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies, a network meta-analysis was performed using R 4.2.2 software. ResultsA total of 8 RCTs and 11 non-randomized controlled trials were included, involving 2 559 cases. The treatment regimen included chemotherapy, immunochemotherapy, chemotherapy combined with ADC, immunochemotherapy combined with ADC, ASCT based regimen, CAR-T based regimen, ASCT combined with CAR-T, immunomodulators, small molecule inhibitors, and rituximab combined with small molecule inhibitors. The ranking probability results showed that the top three complete remission (CR) rates among all schemes were ASCT combined with CAR-T, chemotherapy combined with ADC, and immune modulators; The top three overall response rates (ORR) were chemotherapy combined with ADC, ASCT combined with CAR-T, and ASCT. The CAR-T regimen had a higher rate of severe neutropenia; The severe thrombocytopenia rate of ASCT regimen was relatively high; There was no significant difference in the incidence of SAEs among the other options. ConclusionASCT combined with CAR-T and chemotherapy combined with ADC have the best therapeutic effects on r/r-DLBCL. However, the specific protocol to be adopted requires clinical doctors to combine actual conditions, comprehensively consider the efficacy and side effects, and develop personalized treatment strategies for r/r-DLBCL patients.
Objective To systematically review the effect of different nutrient interventions on the physical function of elderly people with frailty through network meta-analysis. Methods The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase and Web of Science were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials of different nutrient interventions on physical function of the elderly with frailty, from database inception to June 30, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed using ADDIS 1.16.8, GeMTC 14.3, and Stata 15.0 software. Results A total of 13 studies involving 1 144 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in handgrip strength, time up to go test, gait speed, and short physical performance battery (SPPB) among different nutrient interventions. Significant differences were not found in vitamin D+ whey protein (VDWP) vs. placebo and Leu vs. placebo in handgrip strength, or VDWP vs. placebo in SPPB. The probability ranking diagram showed that the most effective of handgrip strength, time up to go test, gait speed, and SPPB were milk protein concentrate (MPC80), L-carnitime (L-Car), leucine (Leu), and MPC80, respectively. Conclusion The current evidence suggests that nutritional intervention did not significantly improve physical function in the frail elderly. MPC80, Leu, L-Car, and VDVEWP may play a role in improving the physical function of frail elderly people. Nutritional support programs that increase the above nutrients, combined with exercise training may become a better way to improve the physical function of frail elderly.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of 3-month sustained releasing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) (GnRHa 3M) and 1-month sustained releasing GnRHa (GnRHa 1M) in the treatment of pre-menopausal females with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Methods Databases including CNKI, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase and Web of Science were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of GnRHa in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer from inception to May 18th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The gemtc software package in R 3.6.1 software and Stata 15.0 software were used for network meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 RCTs including 7 484 patients were included. The network meta-analysis results showed that there was no significant difference between GnRHa 3M and GnRHa 1M in E2 level (MD=−1.3, 95%CI −13 to 9.6), DFS (HR=1.2, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.7) and OS (HR=2.0, 95%CI 0.75 to 4.9). For safety, there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR=1.0, 95%CI 0.25 to 4.2). Conclusion Current evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of GnRHa 3M is similar to that of GnRHa 1M. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of different psychological intervention methods on depressive symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on psychological interventions on depression of patients with inflammatory bowel disease from inception to January 12, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then conducted by using software Stata and GeMTC. ResultsA total of 18 articles, 1 567 patients and 6 psychological intervention methods were included. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that, compared with conventional nursing, music therapy, mindfulness therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy had statistically significant differences in the intervention effect of depression in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (P<0.05); Among the six psychological intervention methods included, there was a statistically significant difference in relaxation therapy compared with music therapy, writing expression and mindfulness therapy (P<0.05); The difference between cognitive behavioral therapy and music therapy and mindfulness therapy was statistically significant (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in other interventions (P>0.05). The SUCRA ranking probability chart showed that music therapy was the best intervention method for depression in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, followed by mindfulness therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. ConclusionThe current evidence suggests that music therapy has an advantage in relieving depression in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, followed by mindfulness therapy or cognitive behavioral therapy. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of different SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of heart failure. Methods The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed and EMbase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure from inception to July 2, 2021. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software. Results A total of 16 randomized controlled trials, including 15 312 patients, involving 5 interventions, namely dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, canagliflozin, sotagliflozin and ertugliflozin were included. Results of network meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the compound outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, all-cause mortality, risk of cardiovascular mortality and serious adverse reactions among patients with heart failure among 5 different SGLT2 inhibitors (P>0.05). Compared with placebo, both selective and non-selective SGLT2 inhibitors improved the risk of hospitalization for heart failure, hospitalization for heart failure, or compound cardiovascular mortality (P<0.05), while only selective SGLT2 inhibitors improved the risk of cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and serious adverse events (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between them (P>0.05). The area under the cumulative ordering probability curve of selective and non-selective SGLT2 inhibitors ranked first and second, except for the combined outcome of heart failure or cardiovascular death. Conclusion The current evidence indicates that there is no significant difference in the efficacy and safety of the 5 different SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of heart failure, and there is no significant difference between selective SGLT2 inhibitors and non-selective SGLT2 inhibitors. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of different non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment by the network meta-analysis. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objectives from inception to November 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The network meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 16.0 and Open BUGS 3.2.3 software. ResultsA total of 43 RCTs involving 2 986 patients were included, which involved 8 non-drug intervention methods. The best probability ranking results of the network meta-analysis showed that on the simple mental state scale (MMSE) scores: rTMS > acupressure > acupuncture therapy > exercise therapy > cognitive training > multicomponent intervention > VR > conventional care > health education, and on the Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA) scores: VR > exercise therapy > rTMS > acupuncture therapy > acupressure > cognitive training > health education > conventional care. Conclusion Current evidence shows that rTMS, acupressure, VR, exercise therapy and acupuncture may be effective interventions to improve cognitive function in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.