ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach combined with anterolateral mini-incision for lumbar spine tuberculosis. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the cl inical data of 22 patients with lumbar spine tuberculosis undergoing focus clearance, fusion, and internal fixation by retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach combined with anterolateral mini-incision between June 2006 and June 2012. There were 14 males and 8 females, with an average age of 42.6 years (range, 26-57 years) and with a mean disease duration of 7.3 months (range, 3-10 months). There were 17 patients with single-level spinal tuberculosis (L1, 2 in 3, L2, 3 in 6, L3, 4 in 4, L4, 5 in 2, and L5 in 2) and 5 patients with double-level spinal tuberculosis (L1-3 in 2 and L2-4 in 3). The preoperative Cobb's angle of lumbar spine was 5-28° (mean, 20°). In 6 patients having compression symptom, 4 cases were rated as grade D and 2 as grade C according to Frankel classification. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded. At last follow-up, the neurologic function was assessed according to Frankel grade, the Cobb's angle after operation was measured on lumbar lateral X-ray film; the efficacy was evaluated according to Nakai criteria, and the fusion was evaluated according to Suk criteria. ResultsAll operations were successfully completed. The operation time was 110-250 minutes (mean, 140 minutes), and intraoperative blood loss was 120-280 mL (mean, 180 mL). The symptoms of femoral nerve injury and sympathetic nerve injury occurred in 1 case respectively and was relieved at 1-3 weeks after operation. All incisions healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 16-50 months (mean, 21 months). During the follow-up period, no loosening or breakage of implants and no tuberculosis recurrence were found. At last follow-up, the nerve function was recovered to grade E in the others except 1 case at grade D. The Cobb's angle was 2-16° (mean, 7.8°). According to Nakai criteria for efficacy evaluation, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 10 cases, and fair in 3 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 86.4%. The bony fusion rate was 95.5% (21/22) according to Suk criteria. ConclusionRetroperitoneal laparoscopic approach combined with anterolateral mini-incision for lumbar spine tuberculosis is a safe and effective approach with minimal invasion and less complications.
ObjectiveTo analyze the postoperative drainage volume and its influencing factors in lumbar posterior surgery.MethodsA total of 158 patients undergoing lumbar posterior surgery in West China Hospital, Sichuan University between October 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The data about general information and perioperative drainage were collected retrospectively according to recording tables and analyzed by SPSS (version 22) software. The drainage volume was presented with median (lower quartile, upper quartile).ResultsThe final average drainage volume was 360 (200, 650) mL, and the length of time for drainage tube placement was from 9 to187 hours with the median (lower quartile, upper quartile) of 61 (40, 86) hours. The result of multiple linear regression showed that immediate drainage volume when returning to the ward [non-standardized partial regression coefficient (b)=0.268, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.191, 0.345), P<0.001], length of time for drainage tube placement [b=0.554, 95%CI (0.338, 0.769), P<0.001], intra-operative bleeding volume [b=0.161, 95%CI (0.044, 0.277), P=0.007], and surgical methods [Method 3 as the reference, Method 1: b=0.599, 95%CI (0.369, 0.828), P<0.001; Method 2: b=0.574, 95%CI (0.336, 0.812), P<0.001] were the main factors affecting the final drainage volume.ConclusionsThe final drainage volume of lumbar posterior surgery is so large that it should be paid attention to. It is also necessary to take effective interventions according to different surgical methods, intraoperative bleeding, immediate drainage when returning to the ward, length of time for drainage tube placement, and other different circumstances to reduce the drainage to achieve enhanced recovery after surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To observe the early clinical results with degenerative lumbar instability treated with transpedical screw fixation and intertransverse process autogenous bone grafting. METHODS: From September 2000 to February 2002, 19 patients (5 males and 14 females) of degenerative lumbar spine instability were treated with decompression for spinal canal stenosis, transpedical screw fixation and intertransverse process autogenous bone grafting. The locations of degenerative lumbar spine instability were between L4 and L5 in 10 patients, between L3, L4 and L5 in 4 cases, between L3 and L4 in 3 cases, between L5 and S1 in 2 cases. The results were evaluated after operation. The preoperative clinical symptoms disappeared completely as excellent results, relieved obviously as good results, improved as fair results and unrelieved or worsened as poor results. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were followed up for 4-18 months with an average of 8.1 months. The results of the treatment were excellent in 12 patients, good in 4 patients and fair in 1 patient. The excellent and good rate was 94.1%. Intertransverse process arthrodesis was obtained after 6 months of operation in all cases. No loosened and broken instruments occurred. CONCLUSION: The advantages of degenerative lumbar spine instability treated with transpedical screw fixation and intertransverse are reliable fixation, high successful rate of fusion and less influence on spinal canal. The above results show satisfactory clinical outcome.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the outcome of posterior 360° fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative diseases. MethodsA retrospective study was carried on 302 cases of singlelevel lumbar degenerative diseases treated with posterior 360° fusion between September 2009 and September 2013. All patients were divided into 3 groups according to BMI: normal weight (BMI<24 kg/m2) in 105 cases (group A), overweight (24 kg/m2≤BMI< 28 kg/m2) in 108 cases (group B), and obese (BMI≥28 kg/m2) in 89 cases (group C). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, disease patterns, affected segments, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) among 3 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The lumbar function was assessed by JOA score and ODI at pre- and post-operation (at 3, 6, and 24 months). ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay of group C were significantly more than those of groups A and B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between group A and group B (P>0.05). The patients were followed up 24-45 months. Postoperative JOA score and ODI showed significant improvements in each group when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference among groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications among 3 groups (χ2=3.288, P=0.193). The incidence of incision-related complications (infection and poor healing) in group C was significantly higher than that of groups A and B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was shown between group A and group B (P>0.05). However, there was no significant difference in cerebrospinal fluid leak, pseudarthrosis formation, and revision among 3 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionPosterior 360° fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative diseases can obtain good effectiveness in patients with different BMI, but patients whose BMI was ≥28 kg/m2 have longer operation time, more intraoperative blood loss, longer hospital stay, and higher incidence of postoperative incision-related complications.
Objective To elucidate the new development, structural features and appl ication of the lumbar interspinous process non-fusion techniques. Methods With the review of the development course and important research works in the field of the lumbar inter-spinous process non-fusion techniques, the regularity summary, science induction, and prospect were carried out. Results The lumbar inter-spinous process non-fusion technique was a part of non-fusion insertof spinal division posterior surface. According to the design, it could be divided into two major categories: dynamic and static systems. The dynamic system included Coflex and device for intervertebral assisted motion; the static system included X-STOP, ExtenSure and Wall is. The lumbar inter-spinous process non-fusion technique was a new technique of spinal division, it could reserve the integrated function of intervertebral disc and zygapophysial joint, maintain or recover the segmental movement to a normal level, and have no adverse effect on the neighboring segments. A lot of basic and cl inical researches indicated that lumbar inter-spinous process insert had extensive appl ication to curatio retrogression lumbar spinal stenosis, discogenic low back pain, articular process syndrome, lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion and lumbar instabil ity and so on. Conclusion With the matures of lumbar inter-spinous process non-fusion techniques and the increased study of various types of internal fixation devices, it will greatly facil itate the development of treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. But long-term follow-up is needed to investigating the long-term efficacy and perfect operation indication.
The lumbar intervertebral disc exhibits a complex physiological structure with interactions between various segments, and its components are extremely complex. The material properties of different components in the lumbar intervertebral disc, especially the water content (undergoing dynamic change as influenced by age, degeneration, mechanical loading, and proteoglycan content) - critically determine its mechanical properties. When the lumbar intervertebral disc is under continuous pressure, water seeps out, and after the pressure is removed, water re-infiltrates. This dynamic fluid exchange process directly affects the mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral disc, while previous isotropic modeling methods have been unable to accurately reflect such solid-liquid phase behaviors. To explore the load-bearing mechanism of the lumbar intervertebral disc and establish a more realistic mechanical model of the lumbar intervertebral disc, this study developed a solid-liquid biphasic, fiber-reinforced finite element model. This model was used to simulate the four movements of the human lumbar spine in daily life, namely flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. The fluid pressure, effective solid stress, and liquid pressure-bearing ratio of the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus of different lumbar intervertebral discs were compared and analyzed under the movements. Under all the movements, the fluid pressure distribution was closer to the nucleus pulposus, while the effective solid stress distribution was more concentrated in the outer annulus fibrosus. In terms of fluid pressure, the maximum fluid pressure of the lumbar intervertebral disc during lateral bending was 1.95 MPa, significantly higher than the maximum fluid pressure under other movements. Meanwhile, the maximum effective solid stress of the lumbar intervertebral disc during flexion was 2.43 MPa, markedly higher than the maximum effective solid stress under other movements. Overall, the liquid pressure-bearing ratio under axial rotation was smaller than that under other movements. Based on the solid-liquid biphasic modeling method, this study more accurately revealed the dominant role of the liquid phase in the daily load-bearing process of the lumbar intervertebral disc and the solid-phase mechanical mechanism of the annulus fibrosus load-bearing, and more effectively predicted the solid-liquid phase co-load-bearing mechanism of the lumbar intervertebral disc in daily life.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of posterior approach discectomy with and without fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1950 to June 2007), OVID (1950 to April 2007), PUBMED, the China Biological Medicine Database (1978 to June 2007) and Wanfang Database (1981 to February 2007). We also handsearched several relevant journals for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) comparing posterior approach discectomy with and without fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. The quality of the included trials was assessed. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Nine eligible trials involving 1911 patients were included. The meta-analyses found no statistically significant differences between the two operative procedures in the incidence of postoperative leg pain [RR 0.94, 95%CI (0.69, 1.28)], the proportion of patients requiring re-operation [RR 0.77, 95% CI (0.57, 1.04)], the incidence of post-operative lumbar canal stenosis [RR 1.23, 95%CI (0.26, 5.86)], and the relapse rate at other intervertebral spaces [RR 1.05, 95%CI (0.49, 2.26)] (Pgt;0.05).There is statistically significant differences between the two group in the incidence of peri-operative complications [RR 1.46, 95%CI (1.06, 2.00)]. Discectomy plus fusion was superior to discectomy alone in incidence of postoperative back pain [RR 0.70, 95%CI (0.53, 0.94)], relapse rate at either intervertebral space [RR 0.30, 95%CI (0.18, 0.48)] and at the same intervertebral space [RR 0.12, 95%CI (0.04, 0.37)]. Conclusions Since all the included studies were controlled trials with a great potential for biases, high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of artificial total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease compared with lumbar fusion and other treatment. Methods We conducted electronic searching on The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004) and Specialized Trials Register of Cochrane Back Group, MEDLINE (1966 to 2004)，EMBASE (1980 to 2004) and CBMdisk (2003), some Chinese Journals were handsearched, and researchers in the field were contacted. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The quality evaluation of studies and data analysis followed the methods of The Cochrane Collaboration. Results Three studies including 152 patients met the inclusion criteria. Two studies used ProDisc Ⅱ, while the other one used SB-Ⅲ. The patients who received the disc replacement reported reduced pain and improved function in early postoperative period, better satisfaction rates at month 6 post operation; complications of operation were reported in two randomized controlled trials. Conclusions The quality of the included trials is inadequate to draw any conclusion about the efficacy of artificial total disc replacement. More trials with high quality on methodology are needed. Artificial discs could preserve motion of diseased level in the short term. Protection of adjacent levels can only be assessed when large studies with long term follow-up are conducted.
Objective To analyze the cl inical effects of modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Methods From October 2003 to December 2006, 33 patients with lumbar degenerative disease (L3-S1) were treated by modified TLIF. There were 14 males and 19 females with an average age of 52.2 years(33 to 70 years). The median disease course was 1.8 years (4 months to 15 years). A total of 42 levels were fused, including 24 cases of single level and 9 cases of double levels. The results of preoperative diagnosis were lumbar degenerative spondylol isthesis with stenosis (8 cases), isthmic spondylol isthesis (5 cases), degenerative lumbar stenosis (16 cases), huge herniated disc with segmental instabil ity (3 cases) and failed back surgery syndrome (1 case). During the modified TLIF procedure, total inferior facet process and inner half summit of superior facet process of TLIF side were resected to make the posterior wall of foramen opened partly. After the bone graft (3 to 5 mL) was placed into the interbody space, a single rectangle Cage was inserted obl iquely from 30° to 40° toward the midl ine. Combined with pedicle screw instrumentation, TLIF was accompl ished. Middle canal and opposite side nerve root decompression were performed simultaneously when necessary. Results Intraoperative dura mater rupture, postoperative cerebral spinal fluid leakage, deep wound infection and transient nerve root stimulation occurredin 1 case respectively, and were all recovered after treatment. No patients had permanent neurologic deficit or aggravation. All patients were followed up for 20 to 58 months (mean 27.2 months). At the follow-up after 1 year postoperatively, all the operated segments achieved fusion standard and no broken screw or Cage dislocation occurred. All 13 cases of spondylol isthesis were reduced thoroughly and maintained satisfactorily. Nineteen patients remained sl ight chronic back pain. There was significant difference (P lt; 0.05) in JOA score between preoperation (14.9 ± 5.1) and postoperation (25.9 ± 3.0). The rate of cl inical improvement was 80.5% (excellent in 24 cases, good in 7 cases, and fair in 2 cases). Conclusion The modified TLIF carries out the less invasive principles in opening operations, simpl ifies the manipulation and expands the indication of TLIF to some extent, and the cl inical results for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease is satisfactory.
Objective To review the research progress of Modic changes and its influence on lumbar interbody fusion. Methods The domestic and foreign literature related to Modic changes and its influence on lumbar interbody fusion was extensively reviewed. The etiology of Modic changes was summarized, and the treatment measures of Modic changes on lumbar interbody fusion were discussed. Results The etiology of Modic changes is not clear, which may be related to mechanical factors, autoimmune factors, low toxic infection factors, and genetic factors. Modic changes may lead to fusion failure and cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion. Preoperative evaluation of endplate sclerosis, reduction of iatrogenic endplate injury, fine operating of intervertebral space, management of osteoporosis, and selection of appropriate cage can prevent or reduce fusion failure or cage subsidence. Conclusion Modic changes may lead to fusion failure and cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion, and active perioperative intervention of Modic changes is helpful to improve the clinical prognosis.