Objective To review the advances of livingrelated liver transplantation for children. MethodsOn the basis of the data in Kyoto university, the center of livingrelated liver transplantation in the world, the current situation of livingrelated liver transplantation for children were investigated. ResultsEighty percent of patients who underwent the livingrelated liver transplantation were children with cholestatic liver disease. From the data of 462 cases, the patients’survival rate for 1, 3 and 5 years after livingrelated liver transplantation (79.8%, 77.0% and 77.0% respectively) preceded the survival rate of 129 patients who underwent the whole liver transplantation (76.0%, 70.0% and 65.0% respectively). To the livingrelated liver transplantation, the survival rate was higher for patients who underwent selective operation (85.0%) than emergency surgery (67.0%). The principal causes of death were rejection and infection. Furthermore, a partial orthotopic liver transplantation and livingrelated liver replantation were performed for children. Conclusion Strict indication, optimal health status and perfect postoperative management are the keys to keep patients longterm healthy survival. The curative effect of livingrelated liver transplantation precedes the whole liver transplantation. For children, livingrelated liver transplantation is better than for adults.
ObjectiveTo study the development of methods assessing donor liver viability in liver transplantation.MethodsThe literature in the recent years on the methods of assessing donor liver viability was reviewed.ResultsFrom donor liver morphology to function,there have being developed many methods which assess donor liver viability,including:①donor liver appearance; ②intraoperative biopsies; ③donor liver microcirculation; ④portal pressure; ⑤enzymes levels in liver; ⑥lidocainemetabolizing activity; ⑦energy metabolism of donor liver; ⑧fat content in donor liver.ConclusionThere are many methods to assess the viability of donor liver. Each has its supericrity and defect respectively. Intraoperative biopsies, 31Pmagnetic resonance spectroscopy and portal pressure have more importance in clinical application.
Liver cancer is one of the world’s most prevalent malignancies, and is also the third leading cause of cancer death in China. Hepatitis and cirrhosis background is a major feature of liver cancer patients in China, which makes specific requirements that suits the national conditions in many aspects of prevention and control like screening diagnosis, treatment options, and prognosis follow-up. The Specifications for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2017 Edition), which is based on China’s practice, proposes liver cancer staging in line with China’s national conditions and forms a multi-disciplinary joint diagnosis and treatment model based on surgical treatment. Liver transplantation is included in liver cancer as one of the surgical treatments option. It also emphasizes the support of evidence-based medicine. The Specifications for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2017 Edition) may have laid a solid foundation for future diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer in China.
Objective To investigate the risk factors of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following C-Ⅱ donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation. Methods The data of 46 donors and recipients of C-ⅡDCD liver transplantation between March 2012 and August 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline data such as democracy, death cause, donor warm ischemic time (DWIT) and cold ischemic time (CIT) in EAD group and the non-EAD group (control group) was compared, and whether these factors were risk factors of EAD was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Statistical cut-off values for significant factors of the unfavorable analysis were defined by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. The 6-month and 1-year graft survival rate were compared. Results The EAD group had a longer DWIT compared with the group [(17.6±4.7) and (12.7±6.2) minutes, P=0.009]; meanwhile, the EAD group had a longer CIT compared with the control group [(13.7±4.7) and (11.0±3.5) hours, P=0.020]. The other factors in both groups showed no statistical significance (P>0.05). The ROC curve revealed the cut-off values of DWIT and CIT were 17.50 minutes [area under the curve (AUC)=0.713, P=0.020] and 9.85 hours (AUC=0.723, P=0.015), respectively. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the DWIT [odds ratios (OR)=1.340, 95% confidence interval (CI)(1.042, 1.654), P=0.008] and CIT [OR=1.396, 95% CI (1.075, 1.698), P=0.015] were all independent risk factors of EAD. The 6-month and 1-year graft survival rate of the EAD group and the control group was 85.7% vs. 92.3% (P=0.607) and 71.4% vs. 84.6% (P=0.587), respectively. Conclusions EAD may occured in C-Ⅱ donors with DWIT≥17.50 minutes or CIT≥9.85 hours in DCD liver transplantation. The livers can be used as a resource for clinical use and also have a good outcome.
Objective To investigate the indication and possibility of orthotopic liver transplantation for patient with alveolar hydatid disease. Methods An orthotopic liver transplantaion was successfully performed on two cases with unresectable alveolar hydatid disease using the new approach of venovenous bypass first.Results The recovery of liver graft function was good after the operation in these patients. Following up for nine and three months, the patients returned to his work without any complications. Conclusion It suggests that the case with advanced alveolar hydatid disease are an indication for liver transplantation. The new technique of venovenous bypass prior to mobilization of liver is feasible and safe.
ObjectiveTo investigate pathological changes of liver and risk factors for hepatic injury after trauma, in order to provide the instructions for clinical liver transplantation and accumulate the pathological data. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 142 patients who died after trauma between January 2010 and December 2014. Based on whether the patients had acute liver damage before dying, they were divided into two groups. The observation group had liver damage before dying, while the control group had not. Combined with the details of trauma, clinical data and autopsy results, we statistically analyzed the pathological changes of liver and risk factors for acute liver damage, including age, gender, trauma kind, trauma site, interval between trauma and hospitalization, damage degree, length of hypotension, the use of more than two vasopressors, large amount of blood transfusion, and complication of shock, infection, or underlying diseases. According to injury severity score (ISS) system, the damage degree was divided into mild damage (ISS<16), moderate damage (ISS≥16 and<25), and severe damage (ISS≥25). ResultsAmong the 142 patients, there were 45 in the observation group with varying degrees of liver cell necrosis, among whom there were 8 mild cases, 14 moderate and 23 severe. There were 97 patients in the control group without acute liver damage, and no significant changes were found in their hepatic tissue. Liver damage was not correlated with age, gender, damage kind, damage site, or pre-hospital time (P>0.05), while it was corrected with the degree of damage, time of hypotension (≥0.5 hour), the use of more than two vasopressors, large amount of blood transfusion (2 000 mL/24 hours), and combination of shock, infection, and other disease except for cardiac and pulmonary diseases (P<0.05). ConclusionWhen using donor livers from patients dying from trauma for transplantation, physicians should be alert to the factors discussed previously which can increase the risk of hepatic injury. Biopsy is useful to assess the suitability of donor livers prior to transplantation.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo analyse the current situation and advance in perioperative therapy of liver transplantation for primary hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).MethodsThe published papers on current situation and advance in the perioperative therapy of liver transplantation for HCC were reviewed.ResultsThe survival rate of liver transplantation for HCC in early stage has been the same as that for benign liver diseases up to now. However, it is still a difficult problem to improve the survival rate of liver transplantation for advanced HCC. The ideal perioperative therapies of liver transplantation for HCC should be helpful to suppress the growth of tumor while the HCC patients are waiting for donated livers, to diminish or eliminate the intraoperative spread or implantation of tumor cells and to repress the micrometastasis postoperatively. The current perioperative therapies of liver transplantation for HCC include hepatic arterial chemoembolization, systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, percutaneous ethanol injection into HCC and radiofrequency ablation etc. ConclusionThe perioperative assistant therapy of HCC can not only save time for patients before liver transplantation but also improve the survival rate after operation.
Objective To observe the expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in human liver after hepatic transplantation, and to study its correlation with the occurrence and progression of acute allograft rejection.Methods Fifteen biopsy specimen of allograft liver after transplantation were collected and divided into three groups according to their pathological changes: control group (no rejection), mild acute rejection group, and moderate/serious acute rejection group. The expressions of HSP70 in grafts were detected by using immunohistochemical method and imaging analysis. Results HSP70 was expressed in all 3 groups, and appeared mainly in hepatocellular cytoplasm. The immunohistochemical imaging analysis of HSP70 showed: integral optical density (IOD) which was 30.99±11.14 in the control group was lower than that in the mild acute rejection group (68.84±21.37) and that in the moderate/serious acute rejection group (71.82±19.99), P＜0.01； and the IOD in the moderate/serious acute rejection group was higher than that in the mild acute rejection group (P＜0.05). Conclusion HSP70 plays a role in cellular protection for allograft liver, and the continuously increasing expression of HSP70 in graft maybe closely relates to the occurrence and progression of acute allograft rejection.
Objective To observe the effects of Thymosin α1 （Tα1） on acute rejection after liver transplantation and immune function of T cells. Methods Twenty recipients of liver transplantation due to primary hepatic carcinoma were divided into two groups: Tα1 group (n=10) and control group (n=10). Tα1 group received subcutaneous injection of Tα1 1.6 mg on the first day after liver transplantation and then twice a week for at least one month. Both Tα1 group and control group took same immunodepressants. Core biopsies were carried to compare the incidence rate of acute rejection between Tα1 group and control group. Peripheral T cellular immune function in these two groups was detected on 1 d before, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after transplantation. Results There was not significant difference of incidence rate of acute rejection between Tα1 group and control group (Pgt;0.05). In the Tα1 group, CD4+, CD8+ lymphocyte cell counts and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio were significantly higher than those in the control group in 2 weeks and 1 month after transplantation (P＜0.05). Conclusion Use of Tα1 in recipients who also takes rountine immunosuppressants dose not increase the risk of occurring acute rejection after liver transplantation. Tα1 can significantly increase CD4+, CD8+ counts and CD4+/CD8+ ratio, which shows that Tα1 may improve recipients’ cellular immune function.
Objective To summarize the clinical experience of liver retransplantation. Methods Six liver retransplantations were performed. The indications consisted of primary non-function (PNF, 2 cases), acute or chronic rejection (2 cases), stomas stenosis of biliary tract (1 case) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (1 case). The immunosuppressive protocols included tacrolimus, methylprednisolone (MP) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Results Five patients were cured. One patient died on day 4 after liver retransplantation because of multiple organ failure. Postoperative complications included deep fungal infection and wound infection. Conclusions Liver retransplantation is an effective method for graft failure after liver transplantation. Proper indication and optimum operative time, intensive perioperative supervision and proper treatment are very important to improv effect of liver retransplantation.