ObjectiveTo systematically review the postoperative complications between robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) in children with hirschsprung's disease (HSCR). MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect non-randomized controlled studies related to the objective from inception to May 10, 2025. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 7 studies involving 901 children were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the RAS group had a lower incidence of postoperative enterocolitis than the LAS group (OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.42 to 0.98, P=0.04) and a higher rate of complication-free outcomes (OR=2.16, 95%CI 1.26 to 3.72, P<0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in intraoperative duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anastomotic complications, fecal soiling, adhesive intestinal obstruction, wound infection, incisional hernia, perianal infection, or urinary retention (P>0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that RAS significantly reduces the risk of postoperative enterocolitis and improves the rate of complication-free outcomes in children with HSCR but offers no advantages in intraoperative indicators or other complications. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective The survival data of patients with colon cancer who were treated by laparoscopic-assisted surgery and open surgery three years after operation were analyzed and contrasted, which provided data to support the future treatment. Methods The 217 patients who were cured by laparoscopic-assisted surgery and 193 patients who were cured by open surgery were followed up, and the rates of local recurrence, metastasis, implantative, and survival were contrasted and analyzed. Results Three years after laparoscopic-assisted surgery and open surgery, the disease-free survival rate was 86.2% （187/217） and 85.5% （165/193）, respectively, and the overall survival rate was 91.2% （198/217） and 92.7% （179/193）, respectively, the difference between the two groups was not statistic significance（P＞0.05）. The differences of the rates of local recurrence, metastasis, and implantative between the two groups were not statistic significance（P＞0.05）. Conclusions Laparoscopic-assisted surgery is similar with open surgery in the rates of local recurrence, forward metastasis, and overall survival. So laparoscopic-assisted surgery is a safe and radical curative surgery.