ObjectiveTo further explore and discuss the value of laparoscopic appendectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of 200 patients underwent appendectomy in this hospital from April 2009 to December 2010 were collected. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative pain score, and surgical complications were compared between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy. ResultsThere were 8 cases conversion to the open approach in this series. The cost of laparoscopic appendectomy was higher than that of open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); the cases of chronic appendicitis, acute simple appendicitis, acute suppurative appendicitis within 36 h of onset treated by laparoscopic appendectomy had shorter operation time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, earlier postoperative anal exhaust time, and slighter postoperative pain than those treated by open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); the differences in postoperative hospital stay, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative pain of acute suppurative appendicitis more than 36 h of onset and acute gangrenous appendicitis treated by two types of surgery had no statistical significances (Pgt;0.05); the operation time of acute gangrenous appendicitis operated by laparoscopic surgery was longer than that by open appendectomy (Plt;0.05); incision infection rate of laparoscopic appendectomy was lower than that of open appendectomy (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsFor chronic appendicitis, acute simple appendicitis, and acute suppurative appendicitis within 36 h of onset, the outcome and advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy are outstanding, the value of application is clear; and for acute suppurative appendicitis more than 36 h of onset and acute gangrenous appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy is difficult and with high rate of conversion, no obvious advantages in recovery after surgery but an increase of medical costs, and the application value is not great.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and patient selection of T-tube free laparoscopic common bileduct exploration through mini-incision in confluence of common bile duct （CBD） and cystic duct. Methods The clinical data of 52 patients who underwent CBD exploration from January 2009 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. A 3-4mm longitudinal incision of anterior wall of CBD was made along the confluence of CBD and cystic duct， and then the choledochoscope was inserted into CBD through this mini-incision for the exploration and treatment by laparoscopy and choledochoscopy， the incision was sewed up by T-tube free primary suture. Results All 52 cases were cured and stone clearance rate was 100% as revealed by choledochoscopy and cholangiography. The time of operation， intraoperativecholangiography， removal of stones with help of choledochoscope， and removal drainage tube after operation was from 90 to 200 min with an average of 100min， 3 to 10min with an average of 6min， 5 to 15 min with an average of 8 min，and 3-5d with an average of 3.5d ， respectively. The drainage flow was 20-60mL/d with an average of 30mL/d. No biliary leakage， abdominal pain， and choloplania or infection of incision was observed following operation. The hospital stay was 5 to 12d with an average of 6.5d after operation. No calculus regeneration or bile duct stricture occurred during following-up of 3 to 40 months with an average of 20 months. Conclusion With proper patient selection， T-tube free laparoscopic CBD exploration through mini-incision in confluence of CBD and cystic duct is safe and feasible by proficient surgeons in laparoscopy and choledochoscopy.
Objective To investigate the impact of laparoscopic versus. open hepatic resection for liver cancer on clinical rehabilitation and humoral immune function in patients organism. Methods Forty-four patients of laparoscopic and open left-lateral sectionectomy from January 2010 to June 2012 were selected， including 22 patients of laparoscopy group and 22 patients of conventional laparotomy group. The levels of IgG， IgA， IgM， C3， C4， C reactive protein （CRP）， IL-2， IL-6， and TNF-α in peripheral blood of patients on the last day before operation， first day and 5th day after operation were determinated by using ELISA assay. At the same time， the operative time， intraoperative bleeding， hospitalization time， and complications after operation between two groups were compared. Results The postoperative analgesic using time， first time eating， and hospitalization time in laparoscopic group were （1.9±0.8） days， （2.2±0.5） days， and （6.3±1.3） days， respectively， they were shorter than that in conventional laparotomy group （P＜0.05）. The operative time， intraoperative bleeding， complication rate， and mortality in two groups were not significant differences（P＞0.05） . Compared with before operation， the levels of C3， C4， IgA， IgG， IgM， and IL-2 on the first day after oper-ation in two groups were obviusly reduced， the levels of CRP， IL-6， and TNF-α on the first day after operation in two groups were significantly increased. The levels of C3， C4， lgA， IgG， lgM， and IL-2 on the first day after operation in conventional laparotomy group were significantly decreased than that in laparoscopic group （P＜0.05）. On the 5th day after operation， the levels of C3， C4， lgA， IgG， lgM， and IL-2 of laparoscopy group increased， the levels of CRP， IL-6，and TNF-α were reduced，that were no difference compared with before operation. Compared with before operation，the levels of C3， C4， lgA， IgG， lgM， and IL-2 of conventional laparotomy group were still at a low level state， and the levels of CRP， IL-6， and TNF-α were still at a high level state on the 5th day after operation. Conclusions Laparoscopic resection of liver cancer after operation， the patients’ recovery are quickly， and the impact on humoral immune function of laparoscopic radical resection for liver cancer patients is significantly less than that conventional laparotomy.
ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of the treatment of unresectable late pancreatic cancer with laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy and gastric bypass. MethodsFrom June 2000 to December 2003, laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy and gastric bypass were successfully performed in 15 patients with unresectable late pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic nosobiliary drainage (ENBD) was performed before the operation. ResultsAll procedures were completed laparoscopically. Jaundice and hepatic function of the patients were obviously improved after the bypass. Oral nutrition was recovered after operation. The mean operative time was (100±26) min (range 70-200 min); the mean operative blood loss was (60±15) ml (range 30-120 ml); the bowel function recovery was on the 3rd-5th postoperative day; the average hospital stay was (8.1±0.7) days (range 6-13 days). Incision infection ocurred in one patient. No operative complications occurred in other patients. ConclusionTreatment of unresectable late carcinoma of the pancreas with laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy and gastric bypass aided by ENBD is a minimally invasive technique with less postoperative pain，shorter hospital stay, lower procedurerelated morbidity,and better oral nutrition. The life quality of patients with late pancreatic cancer can be obviously improved.
Objective To investigate the preventive measures for bleeding in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Methods The candidates for laparoscopic hepatectomy were 22 patients with live lesions， including 5 patients with primary liver cancer， 16 patients with liver hemangioma， and 1 patient with metastatic liver cancer. The tumors locatedthe left lateral lobe in 15 cases， caudate lobe in 1 case， segmentⅣin 2 cases， and segmentⅥ in 4 cases. The meandiameter of tumors was 4cm （2-10cm）. The surgical approaches included the left lateral lobectomy （15 cases）， leftlateral lobectomy of caudate （1 case）， and nonanatomic and wedge resection were performed in 6 cases. Results Twenty-two cases underwent laparoscopic liver resection， there were no conversion to open and operative death. The mean operative time was 115min （65-142min）， the mean blood loss was 450mL （270-780mL）， the mean length of hospital stay after operation was 6.5 days （3-11 days）. Conclusion Control liver section hemorrhage is a key technique in laparoscopic hepatectomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stone. MethodsThe eligible patients with gallbladder stones hospitalized in our department between January 2007 and December 2011 were included, and all of them received either laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy (observation group) or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (control group) minimally-invasive surgery. The operation time, bleeding volume, enterokinesia recovery time, hospital stay, post-operative complication and follow-up results were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 148 patients were included, with 68 patients in the observation group and 80 patients in the control group. In this cohort, the success rate of surgery for the observation group and the control group was 100.0% (68/68) and 98.8% (79/80), respectively; and the success rate of complete stone removal was 100% for both two groups. B-ultrasound examination after 2 weeks of treatment showed that gallbladder wall was normal and gallbladder contraction rate was more than 30% for all patients with laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy. The operation time was (49.6±5.2) minutes for the observation group and (50.5±6.2) minutes for the control group, and bleeding volume was (9.5±1.4) mL for the observation group and (50.2±8.1) mL for the control group; the difference in bleeding volume was significant between the two groups (P<0.05). The difference in enterokinesia recovery time[(33.9±2.2) and (34.4±2.6) minutes] or hospital stay[(3.4±1.0) and (3.6±1.2) days] between the observation group and the control group was not significant (both P >0.05). The post-operative complications of bleeding, bile leakage and wound infection were not observed in both two groups, and all patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months with no stone recurrence; and only 2.7% of patients (1/37) had stone recurrence after 3-year follow-up. ConclusionBoth laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures are safe and efficient. However, laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy not only reserves gallbladder but also has superiority of less bleeding volume.
Objective To discuss the clinical application of totally laparoscopic surgery combined with intraoperative removed the specimen through the oral in treatment for gastric stromal tumor. Methods The clinical data of 20 patients diagnosed gastric stromal tumor and performed totally laparoscopic surgery combined with intraoperative removed the specimen through the oral in treatment for gastric stromal tumor from January 2007 to August 2009 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Results All the cases were performed successfully laparoscopic operation. The operation time was （110±35） min， intraoperative bleeding was （60±15） ml，postoperative hospital stay was （6.5±1.2） d. No postoperative complications occurred. There were 19 cases no relapse during 0.5-2.5 years with (1.8±0.2) years of follow-up. One patient with recurrence was performed the laparoscopic proximal subtotal gastrectomy. Conclusions Totally laparoscopic surgery combined with intraoperative removed the specimen through the oral in treatment for gastric stromal tumor is safe， feasible， and minimally invasive for patients due to its clearness of dissection， less bleeding， and removed the specimen through natural channel.
ObjectiveTo investigate indications,technical points,and outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in treatment for hepatic hemangioma. MethodThe clinical data of 78 patients with hepatic hemangioma underwent laparoscopic liver resection in our institute from January 2014 to December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsSeventy-seven patients were underwent laparoscopic liver resection successfully,1 patient was conversed to open procedure.Operation method:laparoscopic anatomical liver resections were performed in 35 patients including 23 patients with left lateral segmentectomy,4 patients with left hemihepatectomy,3 patients with right hemihepatectomy,1 patient with Ⅲ segmentectomy,1 patient with Ⅵ segmentectomy,2 patients with Ⅵ and Ⅶ segmentectomy,1 patient with left lateral segmentectomy combined with Ⅵ and Ⅶ segmentectomy.Laparoscopic non-anatomical liver resection were performed in 43 patients.The operation time was (163.6 ±62.3) min,the intraoperative blood loss was (273.6±282.4) mL.No operative death occurred.One patient with postoperative functional bowel obstruction and 3 patients with pleural effusion had been recorded.All the patients recovered well.The postoperative hospital stay was (7.2±2.5) d.The results of postoperative pathology confirmed that all the tumors were hepatic cavernous hemangiomas. ConclusionsLaparoscopic liver resection for hepatic cavernous hemangioma is a safe and feasible method with small trauma,rapid recovery,cosmetic incision.Key of this technology is to strictly select surgical indications,to transect liver parenchyma along right plane,effective control of hepatic blood inflow,and properly management of cutting surface of liver.
Objective To summarize the experiences in learning laparoscopic cholecystectomy （LC） and discuss young surgeons how to learn LC scientifically. Method The clinical data of 198 patients received LC by myself since I got the qualification of LC were analyzed retrospectively. Results LC was performed successfully in 187 patients with an average operation time of 68 min. Eleven patients were converted to laparotomy. In these 11 patients， 10 patients because of unclear anatomy in Calot triangle and 1 patient because of uncontrollable bleeding due to pathologic anatomy in Calot triangle caused by gallstone. All 198 patients did not suffer from complications such as severe hemorrhage or injury of biliary duct. Liquid therapy and antibiotics therapy were applied in patients with cholecystitis after LC. Food intake and ambulation were recovered at 12-24h after operation. All the patients were discharged from hospital with anaverage of 2.8d after LC. There was no complications related bile duct injury in all of the patients. Conclusion Managed by hierarchical operations management system， mastering regional physiological and variant anatomy， making use of other open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic simulative learning system well， complying with the learning curve， controlling the indications， contraindications and timing of conversion to laparotomy， young surgeons are able to master LC scientifically， safely， and solidly.
Objective To explore the effect of gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope.Methods The data of 60 cases of gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope （observation group） and carried out with the same period 61 cases of small incision gallbladder preserving surgery （control group） between June 2008 to January 2013 were retrospective analyzed. Results All patients were followed up for （18±2.4）months （6-36 months）. The intraoperative blood loss， postoperative gallbladder hemorrhage rate， gallbladder dysfunctionrate， postoperative hospitalization time， stone recurrence rate， and reoperation rate in observation group were less orlower or shorter than the control group （P＜0.05）. The operative time and hospital costs in observation group were longeror higher than that of the control group （P＜0.05）. The rest of the observation index of two groups were no significant differences （P＞0.05）. Conclusions The gallbladder preserving surgery with laparoscope and choledochoscope is safeand feasible in technique level， and the short-term effect after operation is better. But the operation indications must be controlled strictly. The long-term efficacy needs further accumulation of cases and collect enough evidence to verify.