Objective To formulate an evidence-based treatment plan for a patient with hepatitis C after kidney transplantation with combination of interferon-α and ribavirin. Methods Based on an adequate assessment of the patient’ s condition and using the principle of PICO, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2009), PubMed (1995 to March 2009), and CHKD (1995 to 2008.12). Results Eighteen studies were identified including 17 in English (5 case reports, 11 cohort studies, and 1 meta–analysis) and 1 in Chinese. According to the current evidence as well as the patient’ s clinical condition and preference, PEG-IFNα-2b 50 µg /week plus ribavirin 600 mg/day was given to the patient for 6 months. Conclusion Evidence-based approaches help us to prepare the anti-viral therapy plan and will improve the assessment of the efficacy and safety in kidney transplantation.
目的 研究无创通气(NIPPV)治疗对肾移植术后巨细胞病毒(CMV)肺炎患者的疗效。方法 1998年1月~2005年12月间入住中山大学附属第一医院内科重症监护病房(MICU)的78例肾移植术后CMV肺炎患者，根据是否接受无创通气治疗而分为非NIPPV组和NIPPV组，比较两组患者在接受有创机械通气比例、病死率、住院时间及并发症等方面的差异。对52例NIPPV组患者，比较无创通气治疗前后生命体征及血气分析指标的变化。结果 NIPPV组与非NIPPV组相比，接受有创机械通气比例(30.8％ 比80.8％)、医院获得性肺炎发生率（32.7％ 比61.5％)及病死率(30.8％ 比57.7％)较低，两组比较均有显著性差异(P均lt;0.05)；而住院时间、气压伤发生率无显著差异。NIPPV组患者无创通气治疗后患者呼吸频率有所减慢，动脉血pH值逐渐降低，PaCO2水平缓慢上升，PaO2、PaO2 ／FiO2及SaO2明显升高，两组比较均有显著差异(P均lt;0.05)。而无创通气治疗前后心率、血压的变化则无明显规律。结论 NIPPV治疗能够改善肾移植术后CMV肺炎患者的低氧血症，缓解呼吸窘迫症状，降低有创机械通气治疗比例及医院获得性肺炎的发生率，从而降低病死率。用无创通气治疗巨细胞病毒肺炎值得在临床上推广使用。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose cyclosporine immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, SCI, CBM and The Cochrane Library from the establishment to December 2009 to screen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of low-dose versus standard-dose cyclosporine immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Quality assessment and meta-analyses were performed for the included studies. Results A total of 6 RCTs involving 1551 patients were identified, among which 4 RCTs were graded A and two were graded B. The meta-analyses indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups at the end of 6-month and 12-month follow-up in the acute rejection rate at a RR 1.07, 95%CI 0.69 to 1.65 and a RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.57, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups at the end of 6-month and 12-month follow-up in the patients’ death rate at a RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.20 to 2.03 and a RR 0.61, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.24, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in renal function and safety. Conclusion Based on the current evidence, compared with standard-dose CsA, low-dose CsA has the same effect and safety for the short-term results, but the long-term results need to be further studied.
ObjectiveTo examine the characteristics of Rhodococcus equi (R. equi) infection for better awareness of this disease.MethodsThe clinical data of a patient with pulmonary abscess caused by R. equi after renal transplantation were reported. We also reviewed the reports of infections caused by R. equi.ResultsThe clinical manifestations and laboratory examination of the patient were consistent with the characteristics of R. equi infection. The growth of R. equi was found in sputum and blood culture. The follow-up data showed that the treatment was effective. Literature search identified 23 similar patients. In all the 24 patients (containing this one), the time of infection after renal transplantation ranged from 4 months to 11 years. There were 21 patients with cumulative pulmonary infection, and 10 patients had a clear epidemiological history of direct or indirect contact with horses. Eighteen patients improved after regular antibacterial treatment or surgical treatment.ConclusionsOpportunistic infections caused by R. equi mainly affect transplant recipients and other patients with lower immunity. Infections caused by R. equi may affect many organ systems with various manifestations. The optimal therapy is not established due to the rarity of this infection. Clinicians should select antibiotic agents rationally based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and treatment response of patients.
Objective To evaluate the short and long term effectiveness and safety of rapamycin-based immunosuppression regimes with CsA preserving versus CsA withdrawal. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CNKI from Jan. 1995 to Dec. 2005. We identified randomized controlled trials of rapamycin-hased immunosuppression regimes with CsA preserving versus CsA withdrawal for renal transplantation patients. The quality of included trials was evaluated by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted on homogeneous studies. Results Ten studies （1 121 patients） undergoing renal transplantation were included. All included studies were graded in term of randomization, allocation concealment and bhnding. Six studies were graded A and the other 4 were graded B. Meta-analysis results showed CsA withdrawal in sirolimus-based therapy in renal transplantation patients survival rate OR.（95% CI ） values were 0,77（0.17, 3.52）, 1.24（0.48, 3.16）, 1.32（0.57, 3.08）, 1.21（0.60, 2.41） at the end of 6, 12, 24, 36 months respectively; renal allografts survival rate OR. （95% CI） values were 1.79 （0.63, 5.06）, 1.15 （ 0.56, 2.36） , 1.39 （0.68, 2.85）, 1.80（0.99, 3.29）, 2. 13（1.16, 3.89）, 2.01（1.15, 3.51） at the end of 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 54 months respectively; and acute rejection OP,（95% CI） values were 0.92（0.48, 1.78）, 1.90（1.25, 2.89）, 2. 01 （0.94,4.27）, 1.93（0.93, 4.00）, 1.52（0.77, 3.02） at the end of6, 12, 24, 36, 48 months respectively. Conclusions Available evidence shows that compared with CsA preserving, CsA withdrawal in rapamycin-based immunosuppression regimes can lead to higher incidence rates of acute rejection at the end of one year while there is no statistical difference to survival rate of patients/renal allograft in cases with stabilized renal function post-transplantation. And CsA withdrawal is of benefit to allografts for long term survival rate and is helpful to recovery of renal function. Owing to high possibility of selection bias and measurement bias in included studies, there must be a negative impact on evidence intensity of our results. We expect best evidence from with high quality double blind randomized control trials.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal from target-of-rapamycin-inhibitor(TOR-I)-based immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, SCI, CBM and The Cochrane Library to screen randomized controlled trials (RCT) of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal from target-of-rapamycin-inhibitor-(TOR-I)-based immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. The search was updated in Semptember 2009. The quality of the included trials was assessed. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results A total of 14 reports from 10 RCTs were identified. Five RCTs were graded A and five graded B. The meta-analyses indicated: RR (95%CI) values of the 1, 2, 4-year acute rejection rates were 1.64 (1.19, 2.27), 1.53 (1.06, 2.22) and 1.21 (0.73, 1.98), respectively; RD (95%CI) values of 1, 2, 4-year patient survival rates were – 0.01 (– 0.02, 0.01), – 0.00 (– 0.03, 0.02) and 0.03 (– 0.01, 0.08), respectively; RD (95%CI) values of 1, 2, 4-year graft survival rates were 0.00 (– 0.02, 0.02), 0.00 (– 0.03, 0.04) and 0.07 (0.01, 0.12), respectively; and glomerular filtration rate WMD was 9.50 and 95%CI 2.96 to 16.03. Conclusion Based on the current evidence, compared to CNI, CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation could be advantageous for renal function. One-year acute rejection rate and 4-year graft survival rate increase. One-year patient/graft survival and fouryear acute rejection rate remain virtually unvariable. The long-term results need further confirmation.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients after kidney transplantation underwent immunosuppression therapy. Methods Clinical data of 6 patients (including 4 males and 2 females aged from 27 to 66 years) undergoing cardiac surgery after kidney transplantation with immunosuppression between January 2011 and October 2013 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Two patients underwent off pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 3 patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 1 patient underwent mitral valve replacement. The interval between kidney transplantation and cardiac operation was 8.5±1.7 years (range, 6-10 years). ResultsAll the operations were performed successfully without in-hospital death and complications. Operation time was 237.0±93.0 min. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 101.3±16.7 min. Aortic cross-clamping time was 75.6±9.7 min. in-hospital stay was 17±6 d. There was a statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative left ventricle ejection fraction (63.5%±4.5% vs. 56.5%±5.8%, P < 0.05), as well as preoperative and postoperative left ventricular enddiastolic diameter (54.5±8.5 mm vs. 43.7±6.8 mm, P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels (103.7±15.1μmol/L vs. 106.6±34.7μmol/L, P > 0.05). The mean follow-up time of the 6 patients was 4-15 months. The follow-up rate was 100%. All the patients were in cardiac function NYHA classⅠ-Ⅱ. And the quality of life was improved. ConclusionCardiac operations for kidney transplant recipients undergoing immunosuppressive treatment are effective and safe as long as appropriate perioperative treatment are taken.
Objective To approach the questions of donation after cardiac death （DCD） and transplantation through analyzing the DCD cases in this hospital. Methods The organs were obtained from 4 DCD from 2010 to 2011 in this hospital， the clinical data of DCD were analyzed retrospectively. Results Seven renal transplantations and 3 liver transplantations were performed. Donor warm ischemic time was 10-40 min. The liver and left kidney of the first DCD donator （Maastricht categoryⅣ） were eliminated through biopsy. One patient exhibited delayed graft function of kidney from the first DCD，the nephrectomy had to be done on day 7 after operation due to renal allograft rupture. Nine patients received 3 livers and 6 kidneys from the other 3 DCD donators （Maastricht categoryⅢ），whose patients were alive with excellent graft function. Conclusions The use of controlled DCD （Maastricht categoryⅢ） might be an effective way to increase the number of organs available for transplantation because that it might obtain satisfactory transplant outcomes and acceptable postoperative complications. The widespread implementation of controlled DCD in China should be encouraged.
ObjectivesTo establish statistical analysis and result reporting model for evaluation of the applicability of the clinical guidelines. We conducted empirical study for clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of renal transplantation rejection in China.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted to select 16 medical institutions in China which had carried out kidney transplantations. In each medical institution, 6 to 8 clinicians from the kidney transplantation department or related departments were selected to complete the questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was carried out for characteristics of evaluators, scores of each dimension, access to guidelines and factors affecting implementation. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Nemenyi test were used for multi-group comparison and pairwise comparison. Multiple linear regression with stepwise strategy were used to screen out the association factors.ResultsIn this survey, 128 questionnaires were distributed, in which 105 valid questionnaires were collected, and the recovery rate was 82.03%. The subjects of this survey were all kidney transplant clinicians from public tertiary hospitals, with an average 10.95 years of working time. The results showed the accessibility score was lowest and the acceptability score was highest. The results of multi-group comparison and multiple linear regression analysis showed that familiarity with the guidelines was the influencing factor of each score (P<0.05). The guidelines were primarily obtained from biomedical literature database (73.3%), academic journals (55.2%) and academic conferences (55.2%). Among the evaluators, 44 (41.9%) believed that there were implementation obstacles in the guidelines, among which 40 (38.1%) believed that implementation obstacles were environmental factors.ConclusionsThe applicability of clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of renal transplantation rejection in China is adequate. However, the publicity of the guideline requires improvement. As the guideline is updated, consideration should be given to including access to the guideline, adding free public information promotion, and familiarizing clinicians with the guidelines through training programs to promote application of the guideline.