ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between liver transplantation procedure with or without preservation of retrohepatic vena cava and postoperative reinfection of hepatitis B virus.MethodsHepatitis B virus makers of 15 retrohepatic vena cava samples from hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients was detected using immunohistochemistry stain LSAB and HBV DNA hybridization in situ. Hepatitis B virus reinfection rate and survival rate after transplantation in classic group (20 cases) and piggyback group (7 cases) was analyzed retrospectively. ResultsHepatitis B virus makers including HBsAg and HBcAg and HBV DNA of all 15 retrohepatic vena cava samples, 10 from classic group and 5 from piggyback group, was negative. In classic group, 20 recipients were followedup 6-30 months, mean 18 months, only one case of hepatitis B recurrence was confirmed 22 months after operation; In piggyback group,7 recipients were followedup 5-12 months, mean 8 months, none of hepatitis B virus reinfection was encountered. Recurrence rate in classic group and piggyback group was 5.0%(1/20) and 0(0/7), respectively.ConclusionThis preliminary study indicated that the retrohepatic vena cava of hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients don’t have the residence and replication of hepatitis B virus particle. Orthotopic liver transplantation procedure with preservation of retrohepatic vena cava appears not to increase the hepatitis B virus reinfection rate in hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients after transplantation.
Objective To study the relationship of hepatitis B virus （HBV） to spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC-SR） and its mechanism. Method The related literatures about theory of HCC-SR were consulted and reviewed. Results The injury of small arteries was usually followed in patients with HCC-SR， which was related to vascular autoimmune injury caused by the HBV infection. The small arteries in which immune complex deposited were readily injured， as a result HCC-SR happened while vascular load increased. Conclusion The HBV infection resulted in vascular autoimmune injury maybe a important factor in the pathogenesis of HCC-SR.
The infection of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can result in severe consequences, including chronic hepatitis, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even liver cancer. Effective antiviral treatment has the potential to slow down the progression of the disease. HBV serum biomarkers play a crucial role in the dynamic management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. However, the conventional hepatitis B virus markers, such as hepatitis B serologic testing and HBV DNA, are insufficient to meet the clinical requirements. This review provided a comprehensive overview of the current research on the quantification of HBsAg and anti-HBc, HBV RNA and HBV core-associated antigen, which summarized the crucial role these markers play in the administration of antiviral medications, predicting the efficacy of treatment and anticipating the likelihood of virologic rebound following drug cessation, as well as assessing disease progression in CHB patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of lamivudine combined with low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin to prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation. MethodsThe clinical data of 76 cases of HBV-related liver disease after liver transplantation using lamivudine combined with low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin to prevent HBV re-infection were retrospectively analyzed, and the HBV re-infection risk factors were analyzed. ResultsSeventy-six patients' HBsAg became negative after liver transplantation, HBV re-infect in 9 cases.The re-infection rate was 9.2% (7/76) and 11.8% (9/76), respectively, in 1-year and 2-year after liver transplantation. ConclusionsLamivudine combined with low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin after liver transplantation can be effective preventing re-infection with HBV.HBeAg positive and HBV-DNA positive before liver transplantation is risk factors of HBV re-infection.
ObjectiveTo analyze the influencing factors for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection screening in lymphoma patients prior to chemotherapy with a focus on HBV reactivation after chemotherapy. MethodsThe HBV infection screening data of 449 patients with lymphoma treated by chemotherapy between June 2010 and July 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsAmong the 449 patients, 387 (86.2%) were screened for HBV before initiation of chemotherapy, and patients with elevated aminotransferase levels were more likely to receive pre-chemotherapy HBV testing (OR=2.509, P=0.040). HBV reactivation was observed in 16.1% (9/56) of the HBsAg-positive patients after chemotherapy, and it was more likely to occur in patients with the use of rituximab (29.2% vs. 6.3%; P=0.030). Prophylactic antiviral therapy can significantly reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation (12.0% vs. 50.0%; P=0.046). Two cases of reactivation occurred in patients who were HBsAg negative and hepatitis B core antibody positive. ConclusionHBV reactivation, especially for people with the use of rituximab, is a common complication in patients with HBV infection. HBV infection testing should be considered for lymphoma patients who were planned for chemotherapy. Prophylactic antiviral therapy can greatly decrease the incidence of HBV reactivation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of different nucleosides (acids) in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients. MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different nucleosides (acids) to prevent HBV reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients from inception to June 7th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 43 RCTs involving 3 269 patients were included. There were 7 interventions, namely entecavir (ETV), lamivudine (LAM), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), telbivudine (LdT), tenofovir dipivoxil (TDF), lamivudine combined with entecavir (LAM+ETV), and lamivudine combined with adefovir dipivoxil (LAM+ADV). The results of network meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of reducing the reactivation rate of ETV, LAM, ADV, LdT, TDF, LAM+ETV, LAM+ADV were superior than the control group. The ETV, LAM and ADV were not as effective as LAM+ETV. The leading drug combinations were LAM+ETV (94.8%), LdT (81.5%) and LA+ADV (58.0%). ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that LAM+ETV, LdT, and LA+ADV are more effective in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
Hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) has the characteristics of rapid progress and high mortality. Artificial liver support system (ALSS) is far superior to standard drug therapy in the treatment of such patients, and is widely used in emergency. ALSS is the use of external mechanical or biological devices to replace a part of the damaged liver function, divided into bioartificial, non-bioartificial liver and a combination of the two. At present, there is no unified sensitive prognostic index and recognized prognostic model for HBV-ACLF in artificial liver treatment. This paper reviews the research progress of prognosis evaluation of ALSS in the treatment of HBV-ACLF, in order to provide reference for clinicians and researchers
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiviral drugs for hepatitis B with YMDD motif variant. Methods We electronically searched MEDLINE (1989-April, 2004), EMBASE (1989-April, 2004), CBMdisc (expand) (1989-April, 2004), and handsearched unpublished Chinese conference proceedings. Randomized and quasi-randomized trials in patients with chronic hepatitis B with YMDD motif variant correlative to lamivudine were collected. Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of literature independently. The data were then analyzed by RevMan 4.2 software. Results Five studies involving 6 trials and 284 patients were included. According to the results of meta-analysis, antiviral therapy with adefovir plus lamivudine showed significantly better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg and normalization of ALT than that of lamivudine alone (RR 16.61, 95%CI 2.29 to 120.71; RR 6.66, 95%CI 1.23 to 35.88 and RR 6.26, 95%CI 2.29 to 17.12 respectively); also, oxymatrine plus thymothin showed obviously better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg (RR 2.96, 95%CI 1.26 to 6.93 and RR 2.51, 95%CI 1.05 to 5.98 respectively).But adefovir alone showed no better effects on clearance of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg than that of lamivudine alone (RR 11.00, 95%CI 0.65 to 186.02 and RR 7.00, 95%CI 0.39 to 126.92 respectively); interferon plus lamivudine showed no better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA, HBeAg and the normalization of ALT (RR 3.50, 95%CI 0.90 to 13.58; RR 4.90, 95%CI 0.70 to 35.10 and RR 2.80, 95%CI 0.91 to 8.12 respectively). Chinese herbs plus lamivudine showed no better effects on the clearance of serum HBV-DNA (RR 1.16, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.51). There were no significant side effects in the groups, except flu like symptom in the interferon group, slight kidney impairment in the adefovir group, and aggravation of rare cases in lamivudine group. Conclusions Antiviral therapy with adefovir plus lamivudine, or oxymatrine plus thymothin, shows better effects than with lamivudine alone in terms of antiviral therapy and clinical outcome improvement. However, the evidence is too weak to draw a definite conclusion in this systematic review. Larger sample size and rigorously designed randomized, double blind, placebo control trials are required for future study.
Drugs may induce hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBV-R). Here we have reviewed the definition and harm of HBV-R, the risk drugs and their underlying mechanism, the influence factors, as well as the early intervention measures. It is shown that multiple drugs, including chemotherapy drugs, immunotherapy drugs, directly acting antivirals, cell therapy, etc., can induce HBV-R by affecting host immunity or directly activating HBV transcription factors. HBV-R could cause severe liver damage, even interruption of treatment of original diseases, affecting the prognosis of patients. Through precisely identifying risk drugs, monitoring the influence factors, and prescribing preventive anti-HBV regimen if necessary, the incidence of HBV-R can be significantly reduced. It is also suggested that clinical physicians should not only pay attention to the early identification and intervention of HBV-R, but also further study the mechanism of HBV-R in depth, especially the underlying mechanism between host, HBV and risk factors. This will help to promote the discovery of more valuable markers for risk prediction and targets for early intervention, and to further reduce the risk of HBV-R and improve the prognosis of patients.
Objective To investigate the prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation on HBV-related diseases． Methods Published papers were collected and reviewed． Results HBV-related diseases were the main indications of liver transplantation．The prevention for HBV reinfection affects the survivals remarkably. Nowadays, a lot of medication have been used in the prevention of HBV reinfection， and the therapeutic regimens were different from each other. Conclusion Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for HBV-related disease． Appropriate prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation is important for the survivals of patients．