Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness of eight angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in order to provide evidence for adjustment of Essential Drug List in China. Method Collecting all clinical trials by searching Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Chinese Biomedical Database and conducting critical appraisal. High quality randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were included to assess the effectiveness of ACEIs. Non-randomized controlled trials were also included to evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness. Results New generation of ACEIs are better than enalapril and captopril in antihypertension and endurance. Meta-analysis showed that T/P ratio was less than 50% in prindopril, benazepril and captopril. Enalapril and captopril had the most adequate evidence in the treatment of chronic heart failure. The effects of lisinopril, prindopril, benazepril and cilazapril positive influence on heart failure were assessed by surrogates. Captopril, lisinopril could reduce the total death rate of acute period (during 36 hours of AMI). Enalapril, captopril, ramipril and prindopril had the effect of heart protection in late period of AMI (3 days after AMI). Only ramipril, lisinopril and prindopril had evidence to support the protective effect on cerebral vessels. The available evidence, though not adequate, showed all the ACEIs except benazepril could diminish proteinuria and delay the renal failure. The new generations of ACEIs were similar in adverse reactions to enalapril and captopril, while incidences were lower than enalapril and captopril. Few evidence on cost-effectiveness of ACEIs were identified. The available evidence showed enalapril was cost-effective in treating heart failure. However, it compromised to lisinopril. The studies on ethics were not available. Conclusions It was difficult to generally rank the eight ACEIs according to available evidence. Not all eight ACEIs had adequate evidence in organs protection. It was suggested that clinicians should select ACEIs with adequate evidence to treat patients on states.
The reporting checklist of health technology assessment (HTA) was a tool developed by the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) to be used to guide the reporting of HTA. Experiential evidence showed that the tool was effective to improve the reporting quality of HTA and also could be used as a reference in performing HTA and translating the research evidence into decision-making. This paper introduced the background, developing process and main contents of the checklist, so as to improve the reporting quality of HTA in China.
ObjectiveTo comprehensively review the status quo, contents, and problems of health technology assessments (HTAs) on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Chinese rural. MethodsThe CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM databases were searched for the HTAs on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Chinese rural up to October 31st, 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literatures and extracted data, and then the qualitative method was used to systematically analyze the literatures' information and results. ResultsA total of 34 studies were included. Of which, 23 were descriptive studies and 11 were experimental studies. The studied populations were patients and ordinary residents who had received the service of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases health technology in rural, as well as the grassroots medical technical personnel and promotion staffs who had developed the health technologies. HTAs on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in rural mainly included western medicine health technologies and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) health technologies. The contents of HTA of the included literatures mainly included:effectiveness, acceptability, requirements, economic characteristics, safety and technical specific property. The results of the included literatures showed that the type of diseases involved in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in rural were not widely enough, the fields involved in assessment contents were single, lack of rigorous and comprehensive study design. ConclusionWe need more HTAs of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in rural, we also need to strengthen early prevention, promote a wider range of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases health technology, strengthen promotion and application of both TCM health technologies and the combination of TCM and western medicine health technologies in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.
ObjectiveTo utilize a rapid health technology assessment to evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip device for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and the CRD databases were electronically searched to collect clinical evidence and economic evaluations on the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip device for patients with severe MR from inception to May 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, descriptive analyses and data summaries were performed. ResultsA total of 33 studies, involving 4 HTA reports, 3 RCTs, 16 systematic reviews or meta-analyses, and 10 economic evaluations were included. In the evidence comparing MitraClip and surgery, most of the literature showed that the MitraClip group had higher postoperative residual MR, fewer blood transfusion events, and fewer hospital days. We found no significant treatment effects on 30-day adverse events and mortality, and the 1-year and above survival rate. In the evidence of MitraClip versus medical therapy alone, all included studies showed that MitraClip benefited mid-term and long-term survival and reduced the incidence of subsequent cardiac hospitalizations. Economic evaluations showed that the clinical benefits were cost-effective in the setting of their health service systems. ConclusionThe available high-grade clinical evidence shows that MitraClip is effective and safe to some extent, and has cost-effectiveness compared with traditional treatment in other countries. However, the real-world effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip need to be tested in the Chinese population and health-care setting.
ObjectiveTo investigate the health technologies on diabetes prevention and management used in rural China and the assessment results of these health technologies, and to provide references for the selection and using of health technologies on diabetes prevention and management in rural China. MethodsWe searched VIP, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data to collect survey studies and assessment reports of health technologies on diabetes prevention and management in rural China. The search date was up to July 15th, 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature, and then the qualitative analysis was performed for the included studies. ResultsA total of 15 studies were included. The results of qualitative analysis showed that:the targeted populations were patients and ordinary villagers who had received the service or treatment of diabetes health technology in rural, as well as the grassroots medical technical personnel and promotion staffs who had developed the health technologies. Diabetes health technology studies in rural mainly included medical personnel health technology related knowledge training. The contents of health technology assessment involved effectiveness, acceptability, economic characteristics, requirements and technical specific property. ConclusionThere was limited researches on the investigation and analysis of health technologies on diabetes prevention and management in rural China, and evaluation content remains insufficient.
Objective According to health technology assessment (HTA) methodology, to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of metoprolol in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Based on the principles of HTA, we searched some important medical databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CMCC, as well as several national special heart disease databases and side effect centers. We selected eligible studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and critically assessed their quality. Results Intravenous metoprolol 10 mg - 15 mg could control rapid ventricular rate in patients with chronic AF. On either rest or exercise, oral metoprolol 150 mg/d had a better control of rapid ventricular rate than 50 mg/d in patients with chronic AF. For preventing postoperative AF (POAF), the intravenous metoprolol 20 mg group and the 30 mg group could decrease the incidence of POAF compared to the 10 mg group. Oral metoprolol 150 mg/d was more effective than 100 mg/d in preventing POAF. In addition, intravenous metoprolol therapy was well-tolerated and more effective than oral metoprolol therapy in preventing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Results from several national side effect centers demonstrated that the incidence of adverse reactions associated with metoprolol was low. Conclusion Present evidence showed that high dose of metoprolol was superior to low dose in treating AF, however, the evidence available is insufficient. It is suggested that adequate evidence through further studies are needed. The safety profile of different doses of metoprolol is similar.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of health technology permission (HTP) for widely used, high cost and risk technologies based on evidence of health technology assessment (HTA) from the perspective of Ministry of Health (MOH). Method With reference to experiences of HTA and evidence-based health administration in developed countries, four HTA and EBM entities have been established in China, which promoted and disseminated HTA. Three technologies-Bank of Haematopoietic Stem Cell from Umbilical Cord, Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and Sperm Bank-were piloted to assess, which provided quality evidence to assist MOH in formulating the Regulation for Permission on Health Technology. Results A set of technologies such as medical equipment, clinical techniques and screening technology for disease prevention and control have been assessed. Several regulations for permission on individual health technologies have been prepared to guide certification of professionals and health institutes. These include Regulation of Bank of Haematopoietic Stem Cell from Umbilical Cord, Regulation of Assisted Repreduction Technology and Management of Human Sperm Bank. Conclusions Although we have possessed a pre-requisite to establish a set of managing system for evidence-based permission of health technologies, an efficient infrastructure to run this system should be established and improved.
Health technological innovation has helped to improve health care delivery and patient outcomes. However, the proliferation of health care technology has accompanied burgeoning health care costs and evoked social, ethical, legal, and political concerns. Health technology assessment (HTA) is the systematic evaluation of properties, effects and/or other impacts of health care technology. The main purpose of HTA is to inform persons of technology-related policy making in health care. There is great variation in the scope, selection of methods and level of detail in the practice of HTA. This paper will introduce the basic concepts and methods of HTA in order to help those who are interested in conducting HTA.
Objective To systematically review published methodological guidelines for health technology assessment (HTA) at home and abroad. Methods Common electronic databases, guideline databases, international networks of HTA agencies/organizations, representative national HTA networks and official websites of governmental health departments were extensively searched and screened to identify guidelines for conducting or reporting HTA from inception to April 24, 2023. Basic information on guidelines, HTA processes, assessment indicators, reporting checklists and other information was extracted, analyzed and described using a systematic review methodology. Results A total of 41 guidelines were included in this study, published from January 2002 to January 2023; the publishing institutions involved 23 countries/international organizations, and 6 languages; the assessments were mainly for all health technologies (n=23), pharmaceuticals (n=4), diagnostic/testing technologies (n=4), non-pharmaceutical health technologies (n=3), medical devices/equipment (n=3), hospital health technologies (n=2), medical and surgical interventions (n=1), and screening technologies (n=1); the assessment perspectives were mainly health system perspectives (n=16), societal perspectives (n=12), and hospital perspectives (n=3), while the rest did not provide information on the perspectives; 28 guidelines described the detailed HTA assessment process, involving 11 steps; there were 39 guidelines described the assessment domains and related assessment indicators in detail, ranging from 2 to 9 assessment domains and involving 10 first-level assessment indicators; a checklist for HTA reports listed in 10 guidelines, involving 18 report entries; 17 guidelines reported conflicts of interest, mostly no conflicts of interest (n=10), and 3 of the remaining 7 guidelines did not indicate a specific conflict of interest, while 4 guidelines in which possible sources of conflict of interest were indicated. Conclusion The development of HTA has formed a relatively perfect assessment system, but there is a need to unify the criteria for classification of health technologies and reporting checklist, improve the specificity indicators for different types of health technologies, and clarify the assessment perspectives. Combined with the current situation of HTA development in China, contextualized guidelines for HTA implementation and reporting should be formulated to provide scientific information and methodological basis for decision-making on rational allocation of health resources.
ObjectivesThe primary objectives of this rapid health technology assessment (RHTA) were to assess the safety and effectiveness of Da Vinci surgical system compared with traditional e surgeries, so as to provide the currently-available best evidence for health decision makers and clinical workers. MethodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases (EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data) and relevant professional HTA websites were conducted from inceptionto October 9, 2012. Two reviews independently screen literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assess the quality of included studies. The data based on secondary studies were reported, and a final recommendation and its level was made based on assessment outcome. ResultsA total of 21 studies were included, encompassing 7 HTAs and 14 systematic reviews/metaanalyses. The included studies involved radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, nephrectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, and gastric fundoplication. Though the included HTAs and systematic reviews/meta-analyses focus on different diseases, the outcomes showed significant differences existed between Da Vinci surgical system and other routine surgery in clinical effectiveness and safety of different diseases. Compared with routine surgery, Da Vinci surgical system shortened hospital stay; decreased operation conversion rates, blood loss and blood transfusion rates during surgery; but it increased operative time. Besides, compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, Da Vinci surgical system shortened operation time and hospital stay, and decreased operation conversion rates, blood loss and blood transfusion rates during surgery. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of Da Vinci surgical system differ in diseases. Currently, most included HTAs and systematic reviews/meta-analyses are based on observational studies, relevant prospective randomized controlled trials lack, and the evidence is graded as low quality, health decision makers are suggested to apply this evidence with caution on the basis of comprehensive consideration.