With the popularization of digestive endoscopy in children, colonoscopy has been widely used. As the basis of digestive endoscopy, bowel preparation directly affects the diagnosis and treatment results of colonoscopy. Compared with adults, the functioning of important organs of children is immature, and their ability of cognition, communication and tolerance are weak. Their structure of the digestive tract is also significantly different in different ages. However, there have been no existing evidence-based guidelines on bowel preparation for digestive endoscopy of Chinese children. Therefore, it is important to develop evidence-based guidelines for bowel preparation combined with the clinical practice in China. In order to provide guidance and decision-making basis for Chinese pediatricians, we collaborated with multidisciplinary experts, based on existing evidence, adopted the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach, followed the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) to develop this guideline for bowel preparation related to the diagnosis and treatment of children's digestive endoscopy.
OBJECTIVE To confirm membrane-guided tissue regeneration in the healing course of segmental bone defects and study the mechanism. METHODS Segmental, 1 cm osteoperiosteal defects were produced in both radii of 12 rabbits. One side was covered with hydroxyapatite/polylactic acid(HA/PLA) membrane encapsulated as a tube. The contralateral side served as an untreated control. Healing courses were detected by radiographic and histologic examinations. RESULTS All control sides showed nonunion, whereas there were consistent healing pattern in test sides. CONCLUSION Membrane technique can promote bone regeneration.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the methodological quality of guidelines concerning attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents, and to compare differences and similarities of the drugs recommended, in order to provide guidance for clinical practice. MethodsGuidelines concerning ADHD were electronically retrieved in PubMed, EMbase, VIP, WanFang Data, CNKI, NGC (National Guideline Clearinghouse), GIN (Guidelines International Network), NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) from inception to December 2013. The methodological quality of included guidelines were evaluated according to the AGREE Ⅱ instrument, and the differences between recommendations were compared. ResultsA total of 9 guidelines concerning ADHD in children and adolescents were included, with development time ranging from 2004 to 2012. Among 9 guidelines, 4 were made by the USA, 3 in Europe and 2 by UK. The levels of recommendations were Level A for 2 guidelines, and Level B for 7 guidelines. The scores of guidelines according to the domains of AGREE Ⅱ decreased from "clarity of presentations", "scope and purpose", "participants", "applicability", "rigour of development" and "editorial independence". Three evidence-based guidelines scored the top three in the domain of "rigour of development". There were slightly differences in the recommendations of different guidelines. ConclusionThe overall methodological quality of ADHD guidelines is suboptimal in different countries or regions. The 6 domains involving 23 items in AGREE Ⅱ vary with scores, while the scores of evidence-base guidelines are higher than those of non-evidence-based guidelines. The guidelines on ADHD in children and adolescents should be improved in "rigour of development" and "applicability" in future. Conflicts of interest should be addressed. And the guidelines are recommended to be developed on the basis of methods of evidence-based medicine, and best evidence is recommended.
With the publication of a vast amount of clinical research on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the National Health Commission of China have all updated their diagnostic and treatment guidelines for HCC. There are no differences in the definition of HCC risk populations among the AASLD 2023, NCCN 2024, and China Liver Cancer Staging and Treatment Guideline (CNLC) 2024. Notably, CNLC 2024 has updated its guidance on high-risk factors and prospective surveillance for HCC based on the characteristics of HCC patients in China. The four guidelines have seen significant updates in the areas of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, local treatments, and systemic treatments for HCC. CNLC 2024 refines the indications for local treatment, improves systemic treatment, and introduces new first-line therapy, including camrelizumab combined with rivoceranib or tislelizumab. The second-line therapy nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced HCC are recommended by AASLD 2023, NCCN 2024, and ASCO 2024, which may become a new first-line therapeutic option for patients with advanced HCC. We compare and interpret these four guidelines in this paper.
ObjectiveThe guideline is formulated to standardize the principles, procedures and methods of developing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) guidelines and to promote open, transparent, scientific and credibility of the TDM guidelines.MethodsDivision of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Chinese Pharmacological Society established guideline working groups, declared and managed conflict of interest. The guideline working groups used the Delphi method to formulate the purpose and scope of the guideline and questions in PICO format, searched and synthesized evidence, integrated with Chinese actual situation and TDM characteristics to preliminarily develop recommendations for the guideline for TDM guideline development in China. Through internal discussion of the guideline working groups and external peer review, the content has been improved, and we eventually formulated the guideline suitable for guiding TDM related guidelines development.ResultsThe guideline provide suggestions for problems to be identified and solved in the planning, development, publishing and updating stages of TDM guidelines including forming guideline wording groups, planning guidelines, declaration and management of interests, formulating questions and selecting outcomes, preparing the planning proposal, retrieval and synthesis evidence, evaluating evidence, developing recommendations, drafting guidelines, external review, publishing and spreading guidelines, evaluating guidelines, and updating guidelines.ConclusionsThis guideline can provide methodological guidance and reference for the development of TDM guidelines.
Objective To evaluate quality and current status of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) guidelines and consensus, and to promote the improvements in the quality of guidelines and consensus. Methods A systematic collection of TCM guidelines and consensus published in medical journals in 2022 was conducted. We used scientific, transparent, and applicable ranking tools (STAR) for evaluation, analyzed the scoring rates (%), and assessed the quality level and influencing factors of guidelines and consensus through methods such as comparison and stratification. Results A total of 130 TCM guidelines and consensus were included. Guideline areas with higher scores included recommendations (65.3%), evidence (55.9%), and guideline development groups (54.2%). In the case of consensus, higher scores were observed in recommendations (38.7%), guideline development groups (37.0%), and funding (30.0%). The total score rate of TCM guidelines exceeded that of national guidelines, while the consensus rate was lower. Stratified analysis revealed statistical differences in guideline score rates among journals and issuing institutions, as well as significant differences in consensus score rates among journals, formulation institutions, subjects, and funding categories. Conclusion The quantity and quality of TCM guidelines and consensus are on a positive trajectory, with higher quality levels in guidelines than in consensus. The overall quality of TCM guidelines surpasses that of national guidelines, particularly emphasizing the scientificity of guideline formulation. However, the overall quality of consensus remains lower than that of the national consensus. Factors such as journals, formulation institutions, subjects, and funding categories are identified as potential influences on the quality of TCM guidelines and consensus.
Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are essential tools based on prior assumptions, capable of clearly depicting causal relationships between variables, aiding in the identification of confounders and assessment of bias. They have been widely applied in the field of epidemiology. However, the construction of DAGs is prone to the subjectivity of researchers. This paper interprets the DAGs construction and application guidelines from the BMJ and elaborates on the seven steps for building DAGs: clarifying the research question and target population, identifying relevant variables, reaching consensus and pre-registering, determining data collection or datasets based on the consensus graph, selecting analysis methods and variable measurement, conducting sensitivity analysis, and reporting the DAGs. By following these steps, researchers can construct DAGs more scientifically, identify the minimal sufficient adjustment set, and enhance the scientific validity and reliability of their studies. Despite its advantages, DAGs have limitations. For instance, failure to consider all relevant factors may lead to unexplained disturbances in the analysis results or incorrect causal inferences, thus failing to verify other key assumptions in causal reasoning. Therefore, it is recommended to integrate DAGs with data-driven methods to maximize their strengths and compensate for their shortcomings.
With the development of computer and digital technology, the application of computer-aided technology has become a new trend in the field of oral implant. Computer-guided oral implant surgery has the advantages of being safer and more accurate than traditional implant surgery, and it can truly realize the concept of restoration-oriented implant. However, computer-guided oral implant surgery has various steps which cause deviations accumulation, so that some clinicians remain sceptical about the accuracy of the technology. Currently, due to the lack of a quantitative system for evaluating the accuracy of computer-guided oral implantation, the implant deviation in each step is still inconclusively in the stage of research and debate. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages, research progress, accuracy and influencing factors of computer-guided oral implantation, aiming to provide a reference for improving implant accuracy and guiding clinical design and surgery.
As an essential tool for clinical practice, the clinical practice guidelines have been continuously completed and the quality of the guidelines has been improved. However, there are still issues in updating the guidelines and recommendations. This article introduces the living guideline formulation method, through dynamic monitoring, timely inclusion of new evidence, and living update of recommendations, etc. to improve the timeliness of clinical guidelines. The article aims to provide methodological references for the timely transformation of evidence and the update of guidelines.
For the purposes of promoting the effect of secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, and improving the compliance with myocardial infarction (MI) secondary prevention, a guideline for strengthening patients self-management on non-pharmacological secondary prevention was produced by an multidiscipline team leaded by Chinese Association of Integrative Medicine clinical cardiovascular branch, Lanzhou University Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Peking University School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. This is the first version of patient guideline in China. This paper introduces the main methods, processes and characteristics of the patient guideline development. It will provide reference to future researchers to the development of the patient guideline.