ObjectiveTo summary the effect of parenteral nutrition combined with enteral nutrition on patients with severe acute pancreatitis. MethodsThe clinical data of 200 patients with severe acute pancreatitis admitted in our hospital in recent 10 years were retrospectively analyzed. Of which 88 cases were treated by traditional nutritional support therapy (traditional nutrition group), the rest of 112 cases of patients with early parenteral nutrition to later period gradually combined with enteral nutrition comprehensive nutritional support strategy (comprehensive nutrition group). ResultsThe APACHEⅡscores and serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients in comprehensive nutrition group were significantly lower than patients in traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05), while the serum albumin level was significantly higher than that of traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05). In the incidence of complications and mortality, the average length of stay and total cost of comprehensive nutrition group were significantly lower than patients with traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05), the cure rate was significantly higher than that of traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe combination of parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition of nutrition support model not only can shorten the duration of symptoms but also alleviate the burden of patients and reduce complications and mortality.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the predictors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were searched to collect relevant observational studies from the inception to 6 August, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 18 studies were included, including 28 847 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that gender, age, severity of illness, hypo-albuminemia, length of stay, postpyloric feeding, mechanical ventilation and mechanical ventilation time, use of prokinetics, use of sedation drugs, use of vasoactive drugs and use of antibiotics were predictors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients, among which postpyloric feeding (OR=0.46, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.71, P<0.01) was a protective factor. ConclusionAccording to the influencing factors, the medical staff can formulate a targeted enteral nutrition program at the time of admission to the ICU to reduce the occurrence of feeding intolerance. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperation administration of enteral nutrition enriched ω-3 fatty acids for gastric cancer patients. MethodsA single center randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in 60 cases of gastric cancer in West China Hospital during January 2014 to June 2014, and cases were equally randomized divided into treatment group and control group. Cases of treatment group were given enteral nutrition enriched ω-3 fatty acids which was manufactured by Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH for 5 consecutive days before operation, and cases of control group were given an isocaloric and isonitrogenous homogenized diet for 5 consecutive days before operation. The laboratory indexes of nutritional status and imflammatory factors were observed and compared between 2 groups on admission, preoperative day 1, postoperative day 3, and postoperative day 5. Liver and kidney function indexes which as the safety indexes were detected on admission and preoperative day 1. Vomiting, diarrhea, and infectious complications were recorded in addition. ResultsOn 3 days after operation, levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and α-acid glycoprotein (AAG) of treatment group were both lower than those of control group (P<0.05); on 5 days after operation, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) of treatment group was lower than that of control group too (P<0.05); but at other time points, there were no significant differences in any index between the 2 groups (P>0.05). During the period of enteral nutrition, only 1 case suffered from bloating and 1 case suffered from diarrhea, both in treatment group, and the incidence of adverse reactions didn't differed between treatment group[6.7% (2/30)]and control group[0 (0/30)], P>0.05. Moreover, there were no significant differences between treatment group and control group in incidences of wound infection[3.3% (1/30) vs. 10.0% (3/30)], abdominal infection[0 (0/30) vs. 3.3% (1/30)], urinary infection[0 (0/30) vs. 3.3% (1/30)], and pulmonary infection[0 (0/30) vs. 6.7% (2/30)], but the total incidence of complication was lower in treatment group than that of control group[3.3% (1/30) vs. 23.3% (7/30)], P=0.026. ConclusionEnteral nutrition enriched ω-3 fatty acids can reduce the rate of infection-related complication for patients with gastric cancer, and has a sense of safety.
Methods Sixty-six postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes were divided into 3 groups according to the balanced principle. In the frist group (FD group), FD was the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the second group (fresubin group), fresubin and the ordinary insulin injection were the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the third group (TPN group), the nutrition preparation came from TPN and the ordinary insulin injection for 24 patients. FD, fresubin or TPN were given at 24 h after operation, the levels of blood glucose for empty stomach, after meal (enteral nutrition or TPN) and the common complications compared among 3 groups of postoperative patients. Results ① In FD group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition were stable with little fluctuation and no insulin was needed with 1 case of hyperglycemia (4.8%). In fresubin group and TPN group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition or TPN were unstable with big fluctuation, with 6 cases (28.6%) and 8 cases (33.3%) of hyperglycemia, 5 cases (23.8%) and 6 cases (25.0%) of hypoglycemia in fresubin group and TPN group, respectively. Compared with fresubin group and TPN group, the rate of pathoglycemia was lower in FD group, the difference had statistical significance separately (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between fresubin group and TPN group (Pgt;0.05). ② The rates of infection of incisional wound in FD group (4.8%) and fresubin group (23.8%) were lower than that of TPN group (33.3%), there was significant difference among 3 groups (Plt;0.05); The time of passage of gas by anus in FD group and fresubin group were shorter than that in TPN group (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between FD group and fresubin group (Pgt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the rates of abdominal distension or diarrhea among 3 groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Regarding postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes, in the early time field test group of the nutrition preparation, FD is better than fresubin or TPN, which does not increase the risk of the blood glucose change and have few complications.
Malnutrition is associated with many adverse clinical outcomes, including increased deaths and complications in perioperative period. The immunonutrition support plays an important role in the recovery process of patients with nutritional risk. Reasonable support can efficiently improve the condition of these cases and strongly suppress the inflammatory response. The immuno-nutrients include glutamine, ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, arginine, nucleotides and so on. More and more evidences show that different kinds of immuno-nutrients play a regulatory role in metabolism and inflammatory response in patients with different disease stages and courses, and affect clinical outcomes and prognosis. Nowadays, there is an urgent need to standardize immunonutrition support in clinical work. In this paper, the related literatures about immunonutrition in recent years were reviewed. Our goal is to reduce the number of irregularities in the nutrition support practice, and to help nutritional risk patients achieve better clinical outcomes.
Objective To study effects of enteral immunonutrition and econutrition on intestinal mucosa barrier function in wounded rats. Methods Forty Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups, with ten rats in each group 〔ie.control group, enteral nutrition (EN) group, enteral immunonutrition (EIN) group and enteral econutrition (EEN) group〕. After gastrostomy, rats in each group were treated with the isocaloric and isonitrogenous nutritional formulas for 7 days, respectively. The morphology of ileum membrane was studied, and the quantities of IgA+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells (each HP) of ileum membrane were determined. Results The villus height, crypt depth, mucosal thickness (except EN group) and villus surface area of ileum were increased in EN, EIN and EEN group compared with control group (P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference among the former three groups (Pgt;0.05). The numbers of IgA+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells were increased in EN, EIN and EEN group compared with control group (P＜0.05), and those numbers in EN group were lower than those in EIN and EEN group (P＜0.05). Conclusion EIN and EEN may improve intestine mechanical barrier function and promote restoration of small intestine mucous membrane barrier function in rats. EIN and EEN also improve intestine immune barrier function and strengthen its immune function.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and security of early enteral nutrition (EN) on patients with gastric cancer after radical operation. MethodsSeventy cases who treated in Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from Dec. 2008 to Apr. 2013 were randomly divided into EN group (n=35) and parenteral nutrition (PN) group (n=35), analysis and comparison of nutrition indicators and recovery indicators between 2 groups were performed. ResultsThere were no significant differences on levels of count of white blood cell (WBC), serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and transferring (TRF) before operation between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). On 3 and 7 days after operation, the levels of ALB, PA, and TRF were all higher in EN group (P < 0.05) besides level of count of WBC. In addition, hospital stay and hospitalization cost were both lower in EN group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference on postoperative exhaust time and complication incidence (P > 0.05). ConclusionsEN is a safe, effective, and economical method of nutritional supplements, and it is a preferred method of nutritional support for patients with advanced gastric cancer after operation at prophase, which is worthy to apply widely in clinical.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo generally analyze the current situations of clinical research and applications in early enteral nutrition (EEN) after abdominal surgery. MethodsThe published papers about the current situations of clinical research and applications in EEN after abdominal surgery were reviewed. ResultsEEN after abdominal surgery seems to be safe and effective, produces a positive nitrogen balance, keeps the integrality of structure and function of the apparatus, protects gut barrier, and reduces or prevents septic complications. ConclusionEEN may be of more benefits and will be one of the best methods of nutrition support after abdominal surgery.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus parenteral nutrition (PN) for esophagus cancer patients after esophagectomy. MethodsThe following electronic databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2016), Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched from inception to June 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparing early EN and PN for esophagus cancer patients after esophagectomy. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 14 RCTs involving 2 275 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the PN group, the early EN group could improve postoperative levels of albumin (MD=1.12, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.20, P=0.04) and transferrin (MD=10.08, 95%CI 5.41 to 14.76, P<0.000 1), decrease the incidences of pulmonary infection (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.53, P<0.000 01) and anastomotic leakage (OR=0.57, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.92, P=0.02), but there was no significant difference in postoperative level of prealbumin between two groups (MD=10.04, 95%CI -0.31 to 20.39, P=0.06). ConclusionThe early EN could improve the postoperative levels of albumin and transferrin, decrease the incidences of pulmonary infection and anastomotic leakage, but could not improve the postoperative prealbumin level.
Objective To investigate the safety and efficiency of a blood glucose control method in diabetic patients with gastrointestinal neoplasm who were subjected to postoperative early enteral nutrition (EEN). Methods Thirty-seven diabetic patients with gastrointestinal neoplasm received enteral nutriment——Glucerna SR through nasojejunal tubes 24 hours after operation. The blood glucose level was safely controlled through injecting insulin intravenously and subcutaneously. Meanwhile, any change of blood and urine glucose level was monitored and the indexes representing the levels of nutrition, biochemistry and immunity were measured before the implementation of EN, 5 d and 8 d of EN after operation, respectively. Results All the patients were able to bear EEN and there was no severe complications occurred. Significant increase of serum levels of albumin, prealbumin and transferrin were observed after EEN support （P＜0.05）, as well as the serum levels of IgG， IgA and IgM （P＜0.01）. However, body weight， HGB and the serum levels of ALT and TBIL showed no significant changes （Pgt;0.05）. There were 81.1%（30/37） of patients whose blood glucose levels were controlled steadily within the range of (7.8±1.1) mmol/L. Conclusion Injecting insulin intravenously and subcutaneously after operation may be a safe and effective method to control blood glucose level. And the postoperative implementation of EEN can be considered as the first choice of nutrition support for diabetic patients with gastrointestinal neoplasm.