Objective To observe the short-term effect of changing the sequence of PRP and MLP on the pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients with clinical significant macular edema (CSEM). Methods Sixty-three consecutive pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy outpatients (103 eyes) with clinical significant macular edema were selected and divided into two groups: 54 eyes in patients of group A accepted MLP one month prior to PRP and 49 eyes in patients of group B accepted the photocoagulative therapies in a contrary sequence. All the patients were followed up for 3 to 13 months and visual acuity. Light sensitivity of 5deg;macular threshold, and FFA were performed pre- and post-photocoagution. Results The improvement of visual acuity was found to be better in group A than that of group B (Plt;0.01) 2 months after the therapy, since then, there was no significant defference (Pgt;0.05) in both groups. Three and 4 months after the treatment, there was no significant difference in change of light sensitivity of 5deg;macular threshold in both groups. The macular leakages of 59 eyes, 32 ingroup A and 27 in group B, were well controlled. Conclusion Among the pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients with CSEM, visual acuity of those who accept MLP prior to PRP more rapidly than those who accept contrary sequence of photocoagulation, but the changing of therapeutic sequence might have no dramatic influence on light sensilivity of 5deg;macular threshold. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2000,16:150-152)
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) after vitrectomy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients. MethodsThree hundred and one patients (301 eyes) with PDR who underwent vitrectomy between January 2008 and December 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Risk factors for NVG after vitrectomy were identified by multivariate Logistic regression analysis. ResultsTwelve of 301 patients (4.0%) developed postoperative NVG in 2 to 18 months after vitrectomy. The incidence of postoperative NVG peaked in 2 to 6 months after vitrectomy (7 eyes, 58.3%). Logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative retinal detachment was a significant risk factor for postoperative NVG in eyes with PDR (P < 0.001). Eyes with postoperative retinal detachment were more likely to develop NVG after vitrectomy than those without postoperative retinal detachment (OR=17.826). Gender, age, duration of diabetes, preoperative serum creatinine levels, glycated hemoglobin levels, preoperative intraocular pressure, preoperative lens status, combined phacoemulsification surgery and tamponade were not associated with postoperative NVG (P > 0.05). ConclusionPostoperative retinal detachment is a major risk factor for NVG after vitrectomy in PDR.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of small-gauge vitrectomy (SGV) treatment for proliferative diabetic tractional (PDR) with retinal detachment (TRD). MethodsThe data of 42 patients (50 eyes) with PDR combined with TRD who had received SGV treatment were retrospectively analyzed. There were 22 males and 20 females, with an average age of (44.5±11.2) years. There were 16 eyes with TRD involving the macular area, 34 eyes without TRD involving the macular area. The eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or retinal hole were excluded. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was worse than finger counting in 18 eyes, worse than 0.1 in 15 eyes, 0.1-0.3 in 16 eyes and better than or equal to 0.3 in 1 eye. Post-operative tamponade was delivered for patients with iatrogenic retinal breaks, including 5 eyes with long-acting gas and 7 eyes with silicone oil. The mean follow-up time was 9.7 months. The visual outcome, rate of retinal reattachment and complications were analyzed. ResultsThe visual acuity improved in 34 eyes (68.0%), unchanged in 12 eyes (24.0%) and decreased in 4 eyes (8.0%). The difference of visual acuity before and after surgery was statistically significant (t=7.087, P<0.01).The total rate of retinal reattachment was 96%, and 84% of eyes achieved anatomic reattachment after single surgery. The rate of retinal reattachment was 89.5% (34/38) for these eyes without iatrogenic retinal breaks, 4/38 eyes without iatrogenic retinal breaks still had retinal detachment in 3 months after surgery and received tamponade of long-acting gas or silicone oil. The rate of retinal reattachment was 66.7% (8/12) for these eyes with iatrogenic retinal breaks and received post-operative tamponade. There were 17 eyes experienced postoperative vitreous hemorrhage, which were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies or vitreous cavity lavage. There were 9 eyes with transient ocular hypertension, and 4 eyes with neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Among 4 eyes with NVG, 2 of which were controlled through anti-VEGF treatment or laser treatment, and 2 eyes of 2 patients refused to have further treatment. ConclusionSGV is safe and effective treatment for PDR combined with TRD, and intraocular tamponade is not necessary in the absence of iatrogenic retinal break.
ObjectiveTo compare the effects of intravitreal tamponade of C3F8 with silicon oil on postoperative vitreous hemorrhage and visual prognosis after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsThe clinical data of 121 patients (127 eyes) who underwent primary vitrectomy due to PDR were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were divided into two groups according to different intravitreal tamponade, including C3F8 tamponade group (53 patients with 56 eyes) and silicone oil tamponade group (68 patients with 71 eyes). There was no difference of gender (χ2=0.956), age (t=1.122), duratiion of diabetes (t=0.627), fasting blood glucose (t=1.049), systolic pressure (t=1.056), diastolic pressure (t=0.517), history of hypertension (χ2=0.356), nephropathy (χ2=1.242), preoperative laser photocoagulation (χ2=1.225) and All the patients underwent three port pars plana vitrectomy. The mean follow-up was 2 years ranging from 6 months to 4 years. And then the incidence and onset time of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage and postoperative BCVA of the two groups were compared. ResultsPostoperative vitreous hemorrhage occurred in 14 of 56 eyes (25.00%) in C3F8 tamponade group. The average onset time of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage were (64.64±59.09) days ranging from 7-225 days and mostly were within 30-60 days (35.71%, 5/14). Postoperative vitreous hemorrhage also occurred in 7 of 71 eyes (9.89%) of silicone oil tamponade group after silicone oil removal with an average onset time of (25.29±20.46) days ranging from 3-65 days and were mostly within 15-30 days (42.86%, 3/7). There was a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage between the two groups (χ2=5.200, P<0.05). BCVA of the two groups was improved significantly after operation (Z=2.472, 3.114; P<0.05). Postoperative BCVA of silicone oil tamponade group was poorer than C3F8 tamponade group (Z=1.968, P<0.05). ConclusionBoth C3F8 and silicone oil tamponade can improve the visual acuity after vitrectomy for PDR. Compared with C3F8, silicone oil tamponade had lower incidence and late onset of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage after vitrectomy for PDR.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) combined with vitrectomy in treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsThis is a prospective non-randomized controlled clinical study. A total of 62 patients (70 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy for PDR were enrolled and divided into IVR group (30 patients, 34 eyes) and control group (32 patients, 36 eyes).IVR group patients received an intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml ranibizumab solution (10 mg/ml) 3 or 5 days before surgery. The follow-up time was 3 to 18 months with an average of (4.5±1.8) months. The surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, iatrogenic retinal breaks, use of silicone oil, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the incidence of postoperative complications were comparatively analyzed. ResultsThe difference of mean surgical time (t=6.136) and the number of endodiathermy during vitrectomy (t=6.128) between IVR group and control group was statistically significant (P=0.000, 0.036). The number of iatrogenic retinal break in IVR group is 8.8% and control group is 27.8%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.154, P=0.032). Use of silicone oil of IVR group is 14.7% and control group is 38.9%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.171, P=0.023). The incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in 3 month after surgery was 11.8% and 30.6% respectively in IVR group and control group. The differences were statistically significant (χ2=3.932, P=0.047). The 6 month postoperative mean BCVA of IVR group and control group have all improved than their preoperative BCVA, the difference was statistically significant (t=4.414, 8.234; P=0.000).But there was no difference between the mean postoperative BCVA of two groups (t=0.111, P=0.190). There was no topical and systemic adverse reactions associated with the drug after injection in IVR group. ConclusionsMicroincision vitreoretinal surgery assisted by IVR for PDR shorten surgical time, reduces the intraoperative bleeding and iatrogenic retinal breaks, reduces the use of silicon oil and the postoperative recurrent vitreous hemorrhage. But there was no significant relationship between vision improvement and IVR.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of preoperative intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) on the operation duration of vitrectomy and postoperative vision for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsA prospective study was carried out with the 90 PDR patients (90 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy. The 90 patients(90 eyes)were assigned to the vitrectomy only group(43 eyes) and the IVR combined with vitrectomy group (47 eyes). The IVR was performed 5-13 days prior to vitrectomy in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group. There were 15 eyes with fibrous proliferation PDR (FPDR), 16 eyes with advanced PDR (APDR) without involving the macular and 16 eyes with APDR involving the macular in the vitrectomy only group. There were 14 eyes with FPDR, 15 eyes with APDR without involving the macular and 14 eyes with APDR involving the macular patients in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group. All the eyes in the two groups were regularly operated by the same doctor to complete the vitrectomy. The start and end time of vitrectomy were recorded. The average follow-up time was 10 months. The changes of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe duration of operation of the FPDR type (t=-8.300) and the APDR involving the macular type (t=-2.418) in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group was shorter than vitrectomy only group (P < 0.05). The comparison of duration of operation of the APDR without involving the macular type in the two groups has no statistically significant difference (t=-1.685, P > 0.05). At 1 month after surgery, the comparison of BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group and the vitrectomy only group in APDR involving the macular type has no statistically significant difference (t=0.126, P > 0.05). At 3, 6 months after surgery, the BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group in APDR involving the macular type was significantly better than the BCVA of the vitrectomy only group (t=8.014, 7.808; P < 0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, the BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group in FPDR type (t=3.809, 1.831, 0.600) and APDR without involving the macular type (t=0.003, 1.092, 3.931) compared with pre-treatment, the difference were not statistically significant (P > 0.05); the BCVA in APDR without involving the macular type compared with pre-treatment, the difference was distinctly statistically significant (t=2.940, 4.162, 6.446; P < 0.05); the BCVA in APDR involving the macular type (t=0.953, 1.682, 1.835) compared with pre-treatment, the difference were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionPreoperative IVR of PDR can shorten the operation duration and improve the BCVA of APDR involving the macular type.
The occurrence of high intraocular pressure (IOP) after vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy (DR) is related to many factors, including the type and stage of DR, macular detachment, surgical methods, and the type of ocular tamponade. Early high IOP occurred mainly due to laser photocoagulation, inflammatory response, improper ocular tamponade, residual viscoelastic agents and ciliary body dysfunction. In addition to the above reasons, early-middle stage high IOP is also related to tamponade gas expansion peak, encircling scleral buckle and hyphema. The major reason for middle-stage high IOP is hyphema and silicon oil in anterior chamber. The reasons for late-stage high IOP are glaucoma, silicone oil emulsification, long-term use of glucocorticoid, and iris incision closure. Most high IOP can be controlled by proper treatment such as stopping use of glucocorticoid, anti-glaucoma eye drops and surgeries. But there are still a small number of patients with unexplained refractory high IOP, the mechanism need to be further explored.
Objective To observe the short-term intraocular pressure after 25G+ pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and analyze the possible influencing factors in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) eyes. Methods This is a retrospective case-control study. A total of 160 patients (163 eyes) of RRD and PDR who underwent 25G+ PPV were enrolled in this study. There were 88 males (89 eyes) and 72 females (74 eyes), with the mean age of (50.37±13.24) years. There were 90 patients (92 eyes) with RRD (the RRD group) and 70 patients (74 eyes) with PDR (the PDR group). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were performed on all the patients. The BCVA was ranged from hand motion to 0.6. The average IOP was (12.61±4.91) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). There were significant differences in crystalline state (χ2=9.285, P=0.009), IOP (χ2=58.45, P=0.000), history of PPV (χ2=4.915, P=0.027) and hypertension (χ2=24.018, P=0.000), but no significant difference in sex (χ2=0.314, P=0.635) and age (χ2=5.682, P=0.056) between the two groups. A non-contact tonometer has been used to measure IOP on postoperative day 1 and 3. The postoperative IOP distribution has been divided into five groups: severe ocular hypotension (≤5 mmHg), mild ocular hypotension (6 - 9 mmHg), normal (10 - 21 mmHg), mild ocular hypertension (22 - 29 mmHg), severe ocular hypertension (≥30 mmHg). Logistic regression analysis has been used to analyze the risk and protective factors. Results On the first day after surgery, there were 21 eyes (12.9%) in mild ocular hypotension, 96 eyes (58.9%) in normal, 22 eyes (13.4%) in mild ocular hypertension and 24 eyes (14.7%) in severe ocular hypertension. On the first day after surgery, there were 18 eyes (11.0%) in mild ocular hypotension, 117 eyes (71.7%) in normal, 23 eyes (14.1%) in mild ocular hypertension and 5 eyes (3.1%) in severe ocular hypertension. There was no significant difference of IOP distribution between the two groups (Z=−1.235, −1.642; P=0.217, 0.101). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that silicone tamponade was a risk factor for ocular hypertension in PDR eyes on the first day after surgery [odds ratio (OR)=15.400, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.670 - 64.590; P＜0.001], while intraocular lens was the risk factor for ocular hypotension in PDR eyes on third day after surgery (OR=19.000, 95%CI 1.450 - 248.2; P=0.025). As for RRD eyes, the ocular hypotension before surgery was a risk factor for ocular hypertension on the third day after surgery (OR=3.755, 95%CI 1.088 - 12.955; P=0.036). For all eyes, silicone tamponade (OR=0.236, 95%CI 0.070 - 0.797), air tamponade (OR=0.214, 95%CI 0.050 - 0.911) and inert gas tamponade (OR=0.092, 95%CI 0.010 - 0.877) were protective factors for ocular hypotension on the first day after surgery (P=0.020, 0.037, 0.038); silicone tamponade was protective factor for ocular hypotension on the third day after surgery (OR=0.249, 95% CI 0.066 - 0.94, P=0.040); while aphakic eyes was the risk factor for ocular hypotension on third day after surgery (OR=7.765, 95% CI 1.377 - 43.794, P=0.020). The ocular hypotension before surgery was a risk factor for ocular hypertension on the third day after surgery (OR=4.034, 95% CI 1.475 - 11.033, P=0.007). Conclusions The abnormal IOP is common after 25G+ PPV with a rate from 28.3% to 31.1%. Silicone tamponade, air tamponade and inert gases tamponade are protective factors for postoperative ocular hypotension, aphakic eye is risk factor for postoperative ocular hypotension. Ocular hypotension before surgery and silicone oil tamponade are risk factors for postoperative ocular hypertension.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the factors that may influence the possibility of early hemorrhage after vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).MethodsSixty-seven eyes of 60 patients of PDR who received vitrectomy and silicon oil filled in Department of Ophthalmology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital during January 2014 and May 2017 were included in this study. There were 34 males and 26 females, with the mean age of 51.3±12.5 years. Groups were divided depending on the degree of postoperative hemorrhage in 3 days: non-hemorrhage group (NH group) and hemorrhage Group (H group) composed of two sub-group that were called slight hemorrhage (SH) and massive hemorrhage (MH) group. The treatment was conventional 25G or 27G pars plana vitrectomy combined with silicon oil tamponade. Forty eyes received phacoemulsification. The follow-up ranged from 8 to 16 months, with the mean follow-up of 11.2±5.6 months. The possible related factors of early hemorrhage after vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade were analyzed. Independent t test, χ2 test and Fisher test were used in this study.Results55 eyes of 48 patients were in the NH group, while 12 eyes of 12 patients were in the H Group. There were statistical significances on the difference of age (t=−3.552, P=0.001), gender (P=0.052), hypertension (P=0.021), HbA1c (t=2.187, P=0.033) and presence of neovascularization of iris (χ2= 6.414, P=0.011), but there was no difference on diabetes duration (t=−0.451, P=0.654). Of the 12 patients in the H group, 7 were in the SH group and 5 were in the MH group. The MH group had a significantly higher HbA1c level (7.8±1.1)% compared with the SH Group (9.7±0.7)%, the difference was statistical significant (t=−3.256, P=0.009). Higher systolic blood pressure of MH group 186±7 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) acquired during operation was observed compared with SH Group 153±18 mmHg, the difference was statistical significant (t=−3.894, P=0.003). There was no statistical significances on the difference of age (t=1.954), gender, hypertension duration (t=−1.787), diabetes duration (t=−1.079), fasting blood-glucose (t=−0.361), diastolic blood pressure during operation (t=−0.811) between the two groups (P＞0.05).ConclusionsYounger age, history of hypertension, presence of neovascularization of iris, higher level of HbA1c may predict greater possibility to cause early hemorrhage after vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade for PDR. The patients with high level of HbA1c and high systolic pressure during the operation are more likely to undergo massive hemorrhage and secondary glaucoma.
Objective To observe and analyze the causes and prognosis of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage (PVH) after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods A total of 160 PDR patients (171 eyes) were enrolled in this retrospective study. There were 85 males and 75 females. The patients aged from 33 to 73 years, with the mean age of (56.40±8.97) years. All the patients were performed 25G pars plana vitrectomy by the same doctor. Fibrovascular membrane peeling and panretinal photocoagulation were performed during the operation. Combined phacoemulsification was performed in one hundred and five patients. Vitreous tamponade was used at the end of surgery, including silicone oil (43 eyes), C3F8 (63 eyes), air or fluid (65 eyes). The follow-up ranged from 6 to 22 months, with the mean follow-up of (9.34±6.97) months. The features of PVH were observed. The difference of age, HbA1c, creatinine level, the severity of the fundus lesions, whether received treatment of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), whether received combined cataract phacoemulsification were analyzed to find out the cause and prognosis of PVH. Results The corrected vision of all the patients after the primary PPV at the latest follow up was finger counting/1 meter. PVH occurred in 15 eyes of 15 patients, the incidence was 8.77%. The PVH occurred 2 weeks to 6 months after surgery. There were significant difference in age (t=2.551), proportion with tractional retinal detachment (χ2=7.431), progressive fibrovascular proliferation (χ2=4.987) and using anti-VEGF (χ2=9.742) between the patients with and without PVH (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in HbA1c (t=0.501), creatinine level (t=1.529), and the proportion of cataract phacoemulsification (χ2=0.452) between the patients with and without PVH (P＞0.05). During follow-up, neovascularization of iris (NVI) occurred in 1 eye and neovascular glaucoma (NVG) occurred in 4 eyes. Seven eyes underwent reoperation, 7 eyes were spontaneous recovered, 1 eye with NVG give up treatment. Fibrovascular membrane was the major cause of recurrent hemorrhage. At the end of follow-up, hemorrhage was absorbed in all the 14 eyes which were treated, 12 eyes had same visual acuity compared to that before postoperative hemorrhage, 2 eyes with NVG had decreased vision. There was significant difference in the corrected vision between the patients with and without NVI or NVG (P=0.022). Conclusions PVH after PPV for PDR is closely related to the severity of diabetic retinopathy, fibrovascular membrane is the major cause of recurrent hemorrhage. NVG is an important factor related to vision acuity prognosis.