ObjectiveTo select the key questions of the reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis. MethodsA question pool about reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis was conducted by preliminary literature research and qualitative systematic review. A correspondence questionnaire was designed and the selection of key questions was carried out through two rounds of expert consultation using the Delphi method. ResultsA total of 21 key questions were selected for the network meta-analysis report standard of acupuncture, including whether to report details of acupuncture interventions (e.g., needle type, acupoints used, number of needles inserted, depth of needle insertion, retention time, needling techniques, and treatment duration), diagnostic criteria for diseases or traditional Chinese medicine syndromes, and qualifications of acupuncture practitioners. Of these, the only three key questions answered by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) were summary, protocol and registration, and source of funding, while the remaining 19 were specific to acupuncture-related report standards. ConclusionThe conducted key question on reporting guideline of acupuncture network meta-analysis can improve the standardization and rigor of relevant research and better utilize its academic and clinical value.
Objective To construct a sensitive indicator system for the quality of ambulatory chemotherapy nursing, and provide reference basis for the evaluation and scientific management of ambulatory chemotherapy nursing quality. Method Based on Donabedian’s three-dimensional quality structure model of “structure process result”, through literature review, a preliminary quality indicator system for ambulatory chemotherapy nursing was formulated. The Delphi method was used for two rounds of expert inquiry to determine the sensitive treatment indicator system for ambulatory chemotherapy nursing. The weight of the indicators was calculated using the hierarchical analysis method. Result Fifteen expert inquiry questionnaires were distributed through two rounds of inquiry, and the response rates of the two rounds of expert inquiry questionnaires were all 100%, with expert positivity coefficients of 100% and authority coefficients of 0.90 and 0.94, respectively. The second round of expert inquiry questionnaires Kendall’s coefficient of concordance were between 0.573 and 0.769 (P<0.01). The final constructed quality sensitive indicator system for ambulatory chemotherapy nursing included 3 primary indicators, 8 secondary indicators, and 27 tertiary indicators. The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient for the second round of inquiry questionnaires was 0.853, while the Cronbach’s α coefficients for structural indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators were 0.879, 0.921, and 0.857, respectively. Conclusions The sensitive indicator system for nursing quality in ambulatory chemotherapy wards constructed has high systematicity, sensitivity, and scientificity, and the weight distribution is reasonable. This indicator system can provide a reference basis for objective evaluation and standardized management of nursing quality in ambulatory chemotherapy.
ObjectiveTo construct a health in all policies (HiAP) evaluation index system for earthquake-stricken areas based on national health policies.MethodsFrom April to December 2020, this study combined the methods of comprehensive review of relevant literature, on the foundation of the evaluation indicators pool was preliminarily constructed. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were adopted to construct the evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas and analyzed the weights of indicators.ResultsA total of 5 first-level indicators (investment, action, short-term effect, medium-term effect, long-term effect), 15 second-level indicators, and 44 third-level indicators with satisfactory logical consistency of HiAP evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas had been constructed.ConclusionsThe HiAP evaluation indicators system constructed in this study can be used to comprehensively evaluate the implementation of HiAP earthquake-stricken areas.
As an important auxiliary means of pharmacoeconomics evaluation, budget impact analysis can effectively measure the affordability of medical insurance fund, and plays a significant role in the process of medical insurance access negotiation, adjustment of medical insurance reimbursement directory and establishment of payment price. The quality of budget impact analysis data has a great impact on the analysis results and the scientific decision-making. When the existing data cannot meet the requirements of the paper, relevant software is needed to carry out Delphi method to ensure the data accuracy. Infopoll is a powerful, easy-to-use application that designs consultation questionnaires by providing multiple question choices and multiple forms of answer settings, as well as detailed statistical charts for results analysis. This paper introduces how to obtain the data of budget impact analysis based on Delphi method using Infopoll software, and analyzes the main results in detail.
Objectives To construct patient trust evaluation index system based on the background of hierarchical medical system, and to provide reference for the evaluation of the degree of patient trust on medical institutions and offer guidence to the implementation and further improvement of the hierarchical medical policy in China. Methods Based on literature review, the modified Delphi method was used to carry out 2 rounds of expert consultations from 11 experts in different fields to determine the indicators of patient trust evaluation index system. Results Questionnaire recovery rates of 2 rounds were 100.00% and 90.91%, the expert authority coefficient was greater than 0.75, the coefficient of variation of each index was less than 0.25, and the coordination coefficient of experts in the total index were 0.236 and 0.424 (P<0.001). Patient trust evaluation index system was preliminary constructed including medical environment, service trust, technical skills, pharmaceutical and equipment, the overall trust 5 first-level indexes and 20 level two indexes. Conclusions The patient trust evaluation index system can be used to evaluate patients' trust in different levels of medical institutions under the hierarchical medical system.
ObjectiveTo construct the occupational therapy core items oriented by life return for stroke patients, and provide a reliable tool to promote the comprehensive rehabilitation and successful return for stroke patients.MethodsFrom January to February 2020, the primary items were summarized through literature analysis and research group discussion, and then Delphi method was used to determine which items should be included by two rounds of experts consultation.ResultsA total of 22 experts were selected. After two rounds of experts consultation, 60 items in 6 domains were included. The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of experts consultation were both 100%, the mean expert authority coefficient was 0.87±0.54. In the two rounds of experts consultation, the importance scores of consulted items were 7.60±0.97 and 8.06±0.35, respectively; the variation coefficients were 0.14±0.05 and 0.11±0.03, respectively; the Kendall coefficients of concordance were 0.522 (P<0.001) and 0.578 (P<0.001), respectively.ConclusionThrough the Delphi method, the core items oriented by life return are identified with high recognition and consistency from experts, which can be used as a guideline tool for stroke patients in in-hospital occupational therapy, discharge guidance, and community/home rehabilitation.
ObjectiveTo construct the terminology standard of hospital quality and safety. MethodsThe draft terminology standard was constructed through group discussions, and the final draft terminology standard was formed after one round of Delphi expert consultation and two rounds of expert consensus meetings. ResultsThe recovery rate of the questionnaire was 100%, and the authority coefficient of experts was 0.87. A total of 15 experts were invited to two rounds of expert consensus meetings. The terminology standard for hospital quality and safety (TCHAS 10-1-1-4—2022) was finally released, including 4 first-level categories, 20 second-level categories, and 370 terms in total. ConclusionThe terminology standard of hospital quality and safety developed in this study is scientific and reliable, which can be used as a tool to assist medical institutions in carrying out standardized management.
Objective To establish an evaluation index system for the quality and safety of day surgery, and provide standard and professional quantitative bases for monitoring and management of day surgery quality. Methods From December 2021 to May 2022, based on the frame work of the three-dimensional “structure-process-outcome” quality model, two rounds of Delphi method interviews were conducted with 15 day surgery-related management experts, and analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weight of each index. Results The effective questionnaire recovery rates of the two rounds of surveys were both 100%; the expert authority coefficients were 0.94 and 0.98, respectively; the variation coefficients were 0.00-0.30 and 0.00-0.24, respectively; the Kendall coordination coefficients were 0.382 (P<0.05) and 0.266 (P<0.05), respectively; and the consistency ratios of all levels were less than 0.1. The final day surgery quality and safety evaluation index system included 3 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators, and 43 third-level indicators. Conclusions The quality and safety evaluation index system of day surgery is scientific, reasonable and comprehensive. It can provide a reference for the quality and safety evaluation of day surgery and solidly promote the high-quality development of public hospitals.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the application status of Delphi method in clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect original research and methodological research on Delphi method in TCM from inception to August 30th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and then, descriptive analysis was performed by using qualitative methods.ResultsA total of 612 articles involving 573 original studies and 39 methodological studies were included, which involved 167 types of diseases. The primary research purposes were disease diagnosis and treatment, syndrome research, scale development, evaluation research, index research, clinical investigation, methodology research, and other 8 categories. 487 papers reported the implementation process and results of Delphi method in varying degrees.ConclusionsDelphi method is widely used in clinical research of TCM, however, there are deficiencies in the specific implementation process.
ObjectivesTo use the Delphi method to preliminarily perfect the comprehensive evaluation index system which had been initially constructed by systematic review processes of diabetes food for special medical purposes (FSMP).MethodsThree rounds of expert consultation by Delphi method were compared to define indices held in the evidence-based comprehensive evaluation index system of diabetes FSMP and ways to distinguish effects.ResultsThe preliminary perfect index system after 3 rounds of expert consultation contained 4 primary directory indicators, 15 secondary directory indicators, and 20 tertiary indicators. Among them, the end index which could directly be used for evaluation contained a total of 27 indicators.ConclusionsThe index system is categorized into 4 segments of parameters, which are medical, nutritional, safety and other indices, which has addressed the problem posed by CFDA documents on how to scientifically validate the medical effect and safety of FSMP. It provides great significance to assess and supervise FSMP prior to and after it goes to public, assess characteristics and advantages of MNT, and improves nutrition economy and its social benefits.