Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) plus hemoperfusion (HP) on patients with diabetes and uremic encephalopathy. Methods Fifty-five patients with diabetes and uremic encephalopathy from January 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected in this study and divided into CRRT plus HP (CRRT+HP) group (n=28) and hemodialysis (HD) plus HP (HD+HP) group (n=27). The changes of vital signs, related biochemical indicators before and after treatment and curative effects were compared between the two groups. Results The two groups were comparable in general. No significant differences were found in blood pressure or heart rate before and after treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of hypotension events in CRRT+HP group was significantly lower than that in HD+HP group (P<0.05), and the effective rate of cardiac function improvement in CRRT+HP group was significantly higher than that in HD+HP group (P<0.05). After treatment, the blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, parathyroid hormone, β2-microglobulin, phosphorus, C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide in the two groups were significantly decreased than those before treatment (P<0.05). Parathyroid hormone, β2-microglobulin, C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide were significantly decreased in CRRT+HP group as compared with those in HD+HP group (P<0.05). The remission rate of uremic encephalopathy in CRRT+HP group was significantly higher than that in HD+HP group (P<0.05). Conclusions As compared with HD+HP pattern, CRRT+HP pattern is more stable in the hemodynamics, and more effective in the improvement of heart failure and the clearance of inflammatory mediators, middle molecular and macromolecular substances associated with uremic encephalopathy. CRRT+HP pattern is suitable for the treatment of patients with diabetes and uremic encephalopathy.
Rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury (RIAKI) is a serious clinical disease in intensive care unit, characterized by high mortality and low cure rate. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a common form of treatment for RIAKI. There are currently no guidelines to guide the application of CRRT in RIAKI. To solve this problem, this article reviews the advantages and limitations of CRRT in the treatment of RIAKI, as well as new viewpoints and research progress in the selection of treatment timing, treatment mode, treatment dose and filtration membrane, with the aim of providing theoretical guidance for the treatment of CRRT in RIAKI patients.
After more than 10 years of development and construction, the continuous renal replacement therapy subspecialty of the Department of Nephrology of West China Hospital of Sichuan University has made outstanding achievements in the aspect of continuing education. This article discusses and summarizes the current training measures for continuous renal replacement therapy subspecialized refresher physicians in the Department of Nephrology of West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and introduces the training goals, training measures and training results. The purpose is to provide a summary of experience for the continuing education of continuous renal replacement therapy subspecialized refresher physicians, provide a reference for hospitals that plan to develop continuous renal replacement therapy subspecialized refresher physicians training, and assists in promoting the development of continuous renal replacement therapy subspecialized continuing education in China.
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a term of blood purification technique that can continuously remove the body's solute and water for 24 hours without any interruption throughout each day. It has several advantages such as hemodynamic stability, accurate capacity control, stable internal environment, and inflammatory regulation, which is especially suitable for patients with severe hemodynamic instability. In clinical practice, critically ill patients treated with CRRT are often associated with different types of acidosis, including metabolic acidosis, lactic acidosis, citrate acidosis, ketoacidosis and hypercapnic acidosis. Different types of acidosis can be treated in different ways. This paper reviews the CRRT for special types of acidosis.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in hospitalized individuals, associated with adverse outcomes and increased cost. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is used to treat critically ill patients with AKI, of which the cost in acute phase is higher than that of intermittent renal replacement therapy (IRRT). However, if treatment for subsequent chronic kidney disease or dialysis dependency following AKI is also considered, CRRT might be more cost-effective than IRRT. In this editorial, the cost and health economic evaluation of CRRT for critically ill patients is discussed.
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the treatment of choice for critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability who require renal replacement therapy. This review summarizes the impact of CRRT treatment on nutritional support in critically ill patients, including: energy increase caused by citrate-based anticoagulants, energy loss caused by glucose-free replacement fluid and dialysate, a large amount of amino acids loss in the effluent, and the influences on the way of lipid emulsion administration, capacity, electrolyte, vitamins, and trace elements. It is hoped that the intensive care unit doctors, nephrologists, and nutritionists can fully cooperate to determine the CRRT prescription and the nutritional support prescription.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) presents as a sharp decline in renal function caused by a variety of reasons. It is a severe clinical challenge affecting multiple organs and multiple systems, with high mortality. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) plays an important role in the treatment of AKI. Limited by the lack of evidence, the timing of CRRT for AKI remains ambiguous. This article reviews the definition and grading of AKI, the indication and the timing of initiation/termination of CRRT for AKI .
With chronic kidney disease becoming a public health problem in the world, dialysis treatment model has also become the focus of attention from all walks of life. Sustained low-efficiency dialysis, which adopts the mode of low blood flow and low dialysis volume, is a kind of hybrid renal replacement therapy combining continuous renal replacement therapy and intermittent hemodialysis. It has unique advantages in the treatment of patients with acute and severe renal injury, as well as the dialysis duration, patient activity range and cost. It is the most widely used hybrid renal replacement therapy too. This review summarizes the clinical application and nursing points of sustained low-efficiency dialysis to provide guidance for clinical practice.
Objective To compare the clinical effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) in the treatment of severe acute renal failure (ARF). Methods A hundred patients with severe ARF treated between May 2011 and December 2014 were chosen to be the study subjects. According to the order of admission, they were divided into control group and observation group with 50 patients in each. Patients of the control group underwent IHD, while those in the observation group underwent CRRT. Serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), endogenous creatinine clearance rate (Ccr), treatment effective rate and survival rate were compared between the two groups before and after the treatment. Results Scr, BUN and Ccr were all improved after treatment in both the two groups. However, Scr, BUN and Ccr in the observation group [(225.1±162.7) μmol/L, (14.2±9.3) mmol/L, (23.4±10.5) mL/min] were significantly better than those in the control group [(588.4±183.6) μmol/L, (29.1±10.4) mmol/L, (15.9±8.2) mL/min]. The treatment effective rate and patients’ survival rate in the observation group were respectively 60% and 70%, both significantly higher than those in the control group (40% and 52%) All the differences were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion CRRT is superior in the treatment of severe ARF with a higher survival rate of the patients, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of pipeline blood sampling test of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) when arteriovenous reversal connection occurs, and to explore the influence of pipeline blood sampling test on the results of CRRT when arteriovenous reversal connection occurs under different anticoagulation methods.MethodsSelected patients with arteriovenous reversals treated by CRRT in a third-class A hospital was selected from June 2018 to May 2019. Blood samples were collected from the front end of the CRRT pipeline (0-, 3-, and 5-min after the cease). Blood samples collected from the catheterization site were compared with those from the body vein for acid and alkali, respectively. The electrolyte and other results were analyzed and compared.ResultsA total of 80 patients were enrolled, including 40 with low molecular weight heparin and non-heparin, and 40 with citric acid. Under the anticoagulation condition of low molecular weight heparin and non-heparin, there was no difference in acid-base or electrolyte between body venous blood samples and pipeline blood samples (P>0.05). Under the anticoagulation condition of citric acid, 0-, 3-, and 5-min after the cease, the difference in free calcium between body venous blood samples and pipeline blood samples was significant (F=7.866, 6.691, 5.590, P<0.001). There was no difference in other acid-base or electrolyte results (P>0.05).ConclusionsLow molecular weight heparin and heparin-free anticoagulation can be tested by collecting blood samples from the front end of the pipeline without suspension of treatment in the case of arteriovenous reversal in CRRT. There was a difference between free calcium and body venous blood in anticoagulation with citric acid. It is not recommended to collect blood from pipes for examination Under the anticoagulationcondition of citric acid.