OBJECTIVE To manufacture adriamycin-porous tricalcium phosphate (A-PTCP) ceramic drug delivery system (DDS) as a possible method for bone defect treatment after bone tumor operation. METHODS A-PTCP DDS was made from putting adriamycin into PTCP. Thirty rabbits were divided randomly into group A(24 rabbits) and group B(6 rabbits). A-PTCP was implanted in the greater trochanter of the right femur in group A. Adriamycin were injected into veins in group B. Muscle around A-PTCP and plasma were taken out at different period. Adriamycin concentrations in muscle and plasma were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS A-PTCP could gradually release adriamycin over 10 weeks. Adriamycin concentrations in the muscle were higher than that in plasma. CONCLUSION A-PTCP may be a new method for repairing bone defects after bone tumor operation.
Objective To investigate the way to reconstruct bone scaffold afterremoval of giant benign bone tumor in extremities of children. Methods From June 1995 to October 2000, 6 cases of benign bone tumor were treated, aged 614 years. Of 6 cases, there were 4 cases of fibrous hyperplasia of bone, 1 case of aneurysmal bone cyst and 1 case of bone cyst; these tumors were located in humerus (2 cases), in radius (1 case), in femur (2 cases) and in tibia(1 case), respectively. All patients were given excision of subperiosteal affected bone fragment, autograft of subperiosteal free fibula(4-14 cm in length) and continuous suture of in situ periosteum; only in 2 cases, humerus was fixed with single Kirschner wire and external fixation of plaster. Results After followed up 18-78 months, all patients achieved bony union without tumor relapse. Fibula defect was repaired , and the function of ankle joint returned normal. ConclusionAutograft of subperiosteal free fibula is an optimal method to reconstruct bone scaffold after excision of giant benign bone tumor in extremities of children.
Objective To study the clinical feasibility of the prosthetic composites of the intercalary allograft and the segmental allograft in reconstruction of the skeletal defect after the limb tumor resection. Methods Between August 1999 and December 2003, 28 patients with skeletal defects after the limb tumor resection were treated with the intercalary allograft or the segmental allograft megaprosthesis composite for reconstruction of skeletal defects. The bone involvements were observed in 16 patients with osteosarcoma, 4 patients with parosteal osteosarcoma, 5 patients with Ewing sarcoma, and 3 patients with soft tissuesarcoma. Preoperative biopsy was performed on all the patients, and the pathological result was confirmed after surgery. According to the Enneking system, 5 patients were grouped in ⅠB and 23 patients in ⅡB. The patients with osteosarcomaor Ewing sarcoma received the standard chemotherapy before and after operation.Eighteen and ten patients received the segmental allograft prosthetic compositereplacement and the intercalary allograft with the interlocking intramedullary nail fixation, respectively. The functional outcome was evaluated by the MSTS score. Results According to the follow-up for 5-48 months (average, 24 months), local recurrence was observed in 1 patient who underwent amputation eventually. Of the 28 patients, 3 developed nonunion of the allografthost junction accompanied by severe resorption and 2 developed deep infection. No allograft fracture was seen in the patients. Most of the patients achieved a good functional result with an average MSTS score of 23.4. ConclusionThe prosthetic composite replacement of the intercalary allograft and the segamental allograft can be used n the skeletal defect reconstruction after the limb tumor resection. The stablecontact in the allografthost junction and the b intramedullary internal fixation can help to reduce the complication rate of the allograft.
Objective To study the operative effect and complication of the prosthesis replacement of the proximal humerus with malignant tumor. Methods From October 1998 to August 2003, the prosthesis replacement was performed to treat the proximal femur with malignant tumor in 4 patients, including 2 patients with osteosarcoma (Enneking staging,ⅡA) and 2 patients with giancell tumor of the bone (ⅡA,ⅡB). By the International Society of Limb Salvage(ISOLS) criterion, the 2 cases of osteosarcoma were preoperatively scored as 4 and 5 points, and 2 cases of giant cell tumor of the bone were scored as 9 and 11 points. The patients’ psychological conditions as well as their limb pain, shape, locality, activity, and function werealso observed. Results The follow-up for 24-58 months (mean, 44 months) showed that there was no local recurrence or infection in all the patients except onepatient who had the loosening of the screws for the fixation 17 months after operation and had no treatment. After operation, all the patients had a better postoperative extention angle from 22° to 41°(mean, 25°), bending angle from 29° to 80°（mean, 35°）, abduction angle from 5° to 28°, and circumgyrate angle from 15° to 22° in their shoulder joints. However, the shoulder joint function was still unstable to some extent and the joints had a decreased strength. By the criterion formulated by the ISOLS, the postoperative score for assessing the 2 patientswith osteosarcoma was increased by 16 points when compared with the preoperative score; the score for the 2 patients with giant cell tumor of the bone was increased by 9.5 points.Conclusion The prosthesis replacement to treat the malignant tumor of the proximal humerus is the good method of choice and has a good therapeutic result; however, there are more complications and so the method should be cautiously employed in the clinical practice.
Objective To evaluate the shortterm efficacy of osteoarticular allografts in the limb salvage of the proximal tibia. Methods From 1998 to 2003, 15 patients (7 males, 8 females; aged 14-56 yr, average 33) with bone tumor of the proximal tibia underwent osteoarticular allografts, among whom 7 had progressive giant cell tumor without any previous chemotherapy; 8 had malignant tumor with previous chemotherapy, including 6 patients with osteosarocoma, 1 with spindle cell sarcoma, and 1 with malignant fibrous histiocytoma. According to the Enneking system, the patients were classified into ⅠB (7 patients), ⅡA (2 patients), and ⅡB (6 patients). All the patientsunderwent the marginal resection with an allograft (average length 12 cm, range6-16 cm) implanted. Results The follow-up for an average of 21 months (range,3-58 months) revealed that among the 8 patients with malignant tumor of the proximal tibia undergoing chemotherapy, 5 had union of the bone, 3 had no union of the bone; among the 3 patients, 2 had a complication of infection and 1 had a local recurrence. All the 3 patients underwent amputation at the lower part of the femur. According to the Mankin score, 2 patients had a perfect result, 2 good, 1 fair, and 3 poor, with a 50% effectiveness rate. Among the 7 patients with progressive giant cell tumor at the upper part of the tibia, none had infection or local recurrence, but 2 hadnonunion of the bone and 2 had joint instability, aided by the kneeaidingsystem. According to the Mankin score, 3 patients had a perfect result, 2 good,and 2 fair, with a 71% effectiveness rate. Conclusion The osteoarticular allograft of the proximal tibia has many advantages in spite of a relatively highrate of complications, and it is the limb salvage of choicefor the progressivebenign or malignant bone tumors of the proximal tibia.
Objective To analyze the causes and the reoperation therapies after salvage limb surgery with prosthesis for bone tumors. Methods The retrospective analysis was performed on 85 patients undergoing the limb salvage operation with prosthetic replacement for tumors from January 1994 to December 2004. Ofthe patients, 21 (13 males and 8 females, aged 18-58 years) underwent reoperations for various reasons. All the diagnoses were pathologically confirmed(10 patients with osteosarcoma, 4 with chondrosarcoma, 5 with giant cell tumor of the bone, 2 with osteofibrosarcoma). The distal femur was involved in 9 patients, proximal tibia in 8, proximal femur in 2, proximal humerus in 1, and acetabulum in 1. According to the Enneking surgical grading system, there were 5 patients in ⅠB and 16 in ⅡB. The time between the first operation and the reoperation was 2 weeks to 20 years. The common reasons for the reoperation were tumor recurrence in 8 patients, prosthetic loosening in 5, no healing of the incision in4,joint dislocation in 3, and implant fracture in 1. The amputation and the prosthesis revision were respectively performed on 6 patients, extensive resection ofthe tumor on 3, the myo-skin flap translocation on 4, internal hemipelvectomy without reconstruction on 1, and open reduction on 1.Results The follow-up in18 patients for 1-5 years (average, 3 years and 4 months) revealed that 4 patients died of osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastasis. The other 14 patients had no tumor recurrence or loosening of the prosthesis, and the incisions healed well. The assessment on the joint function was performed on 13 of the 18 patients and the results were as follows: excellent in 2 patients, good in 5, fair in 4, and poor in 2, with a satisfaction rate of the reoperation with limb salvage of 84.6%and an excellent-good rate of 53.8%. Conclusion Tumor recurrence is the most common reason for the reoperation after the limb salvage with prosthesis for tumors, and loosening of the prosthesis is an important reason, too. By therules of the bone tumor limb savage, the limb salvage operations can also beperformed, which can achieve a satisfactory result of the limb function.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical outcome of application of joint prosthesis in limb salvage treatment of mildmalignant tumor at the articular ends of femurs, with severe osteolysis. Methods The treatment of 15 cases of mildmalignant tumor at the articular ends of femurs with severe bone destruction, from 1978 to 1999, was reviewed. There were 10 cases of giant-cell bone tumor and 5 cases of chondrosarcoma, among which there were 5 cases at the stage ofⅠA, 9 cases at ⅠB, and 1 case at ⅡA, with 4 cases at the proximal end and 11cases at the distal end. The tumor was totally removed, with a massive bone defect left at the foci, and then the prosthesis replacement was performed to reconstruct the articular joint. All of the 15 patients were followed up for 9 monthsto 20 years, 4 years and 3 months on average, before clinical evaluation. Results All of the wound healed well, with primary healing. Local relapse occurred in one case and the patient died of lung metastasis; the amputation of the replaced knee joint was performed in one case due to severe infection after trauma; radiograph showed there was slight sunk of the prosthesis in 2 cases after replacement. The other 11 cases recovered well with satisfactory function. Conclusion The limb salvage treatment of mildmalignant tumor at the articular ends of femurswould be available, especially for those with massive bone destruction, when the tumor is removed by whole and rationally marginal resection, followed by properlyutilization of prosthesis and general post-operative exercise.
In order to restore the function of shoulder joint in patient with tumor of upper end of humerus, artificial humeral head replacement was performed. The materials included resinene, nylon-6 and large molecular polyethylene from 1978 to 1993, 14 patients were treated. The tumors involved in this group were giant cell tumor, synviosarcoma, bone cyst, osteochondroma, osteoblastoma, osteofibrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, parosteosarcoma and malignant giant cell tumor. After resection of the tumor, the artificial prosthesis was implanted with bone cement. After 1 to 16 years follow-up, functions of the shoulder joint were reserved in 86% of the patients.
Objective To compare the long-term results of vascularised fibulargraft and simple autologous fibular graft for reconstruction of wrist after distal bone tumor resection.Methods From January 1979 to September2002, 15 patients with wrist defects due to distal bone tumor resection were treated with vascularised fibular graft or simple autologous fibular graft and followed up 1 year. The results were graded with Enneking’s system and evaluated radiographicallyaccording to the “International Symposium on Limb Salvage”. The grade system included limb function, radiological examination and the function of ankle. Results The limb function of 8 patients with vascularised fibular graft restored to 80% of normal function and the bone union was achieved within 6 months. The limbfunction of 6 patients with simple autologous fibular graft restored to 67% of normal function. The bony union was achieved within 6 months in 4 cases with thebone graft less than 5 cm and in the 13th and 16th months in 2 cases with the bone graft more than 12 cm. Conclusion It is suitable to use the headof fibular boneas a substitute for the distal radius. The healing of vascularised fibular graft is very quick and haven’t the bone resorption. So in the procedure for reconstruction and limb salvage after bone tumor resection of distal radius, the free vascularised fibular graft with fibular head is an ideal substitute.
【Abstract】 Objective To review the progress in the treatment of bone defect by porous tantalum implant. Methods Recent l iterature was extensively reviewed and summarized, concerning the treatment method of bonedefect by porous tantalum implant. Results By right of their unique properties, porous tantalum implants have achievedvery good results in the treatment of certain types of bone defects. Conclusion Porous tantalum implants have their ownadvantages and disadvantages. If the case is meet to its indications, this method can obtain a good effect. Porous tantalum implants provide a new way for the cl inical treatment of bone defects.