Objective To develop a behavioral assessment scale for medication management plans in women of childbearing age with epilepsy and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, a pool of questionnaire items was initially drafted through literature review and focus group discussions. A two-round Delphi expert consultation was conducted with 15 experts to form a test version of the behavioral assessment scale for medication management plans in women of childbearing age with epilepsy (including 27 items and 5 dimensions). Convenience sampling was used to conduct surveys among women of childbearing age with epilepsy in some tertiary hospitals in Chuxiong, Shenzhen and Wuhan from February to May 2024 (the first time) and from June to October 2024 (the second time). ResultsThe effective recovery rates of the two rounds of questionnaires were 95.5% and 94.6%, respectively. The final scale included 24 items and 5 dimensions, with good reliability and validity: the content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.934, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.876, split-half reliability was 0.819, and test-retest reliability was 0.901; exploratory factor analysis extracted 5 factors (cumulative variance explained rate 73.97%, item load 0.42~0.85), and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model had good fit (χ2/df=1.849, RMSEA=0.075, CFI, GFI, AGFI, IFI, TLI all>0.85). Conclusion The scale meets the reliability and validity standards and can be used to assess the medication management plans and behaviors of women of childbearing age with epilepsy.
In order to accurately evaluate the similarity of motions during daily rehabilitation training for stroke patients, this paper proposed a novel quantitative assessment method based on dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm. Firstly, the raw accelerometer signals were preprocessed to eliminate the noise. Secondly, the similarity between the accelerometer signals and four standard task templates was calculated respectively, and then the motion was recognized based on the similarity measurements. Finally, the corresponding quantitative assessment model was used to compute the result. The clinical experimental results showed that there were significant differences in the shortest path distance (R value) of DTW between different tasks, and the classification accuracy could be up to 91% when the R value was selected as the classification feature. Additionally, with the process of rehabilitation, the R value decreased gradually, which means that the R value can be taken as the assessment index to evaluate the quality of designated tasks for stroke patients. It also indicated that the R value could be applied into the scene of automatic prescription generation and interactive gaming to determine whether it is needed to change the rehabilitation plan or adjust the game difficulty level, so as to implement the individualized rehabilitation services.
The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes released by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) is one of the most important guidelines for clinicians. Based on the latest evidence of clinical studies, the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes is annually updated by ADA. The statements of ADA on diagnosis, assessment, and management in diabetes are recommended for clinicians, patients, and researchers. The latest edition of Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes was published in a supplementary issue of Diabetes Care in January 2018. This interpretation will focus on the updated contents and their best evidence and clinical importance in this guideline.
This paper, focusing on vascular cognitive impairment, summarizes the current situation of cognitive impairment rehabilitation at home and abroad, and makes a comprehensive and systematic introduction and review on the concept, assessment, and treatment of cognitive impairment, and so on. This paper raises people’s awareness of cognitive impairment and guides people to make appropriate choices about assessment and treatment methods according to different conditions, in order to improve the diagnosis rate of cognitive impairment, and to comprehensively adopt various rehabilitation treatment methods to improve cognitive rehabilitation efficacy. At the same time, it points out the weak points and future development trend of cognitive impairment rehabilitation in order to help the future work.
Objective To retrospectively analyze the clinical and imaging features of multi-segmental lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion and its treatment with the limited recessive decompression operation. Methods Twenty two patients (14 males and 8 females, aged 49-68 years) were admitted to hospital from March 1999 to March 2004. They suffered from multisegmental lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion that involved L1S1 and were treated with the limited recessive decompression operation. Results The follow-up for 4-21 months showed that 16 of the patients had an excellent outcome, 5 had a good outcome, and 1 had fair outcome. There were nosuch operative complications as nerve root lesions and putamen lesions. Conclusion The limited recessive decompression operation is one of the available good treatments for multi-segmental lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. It solves problems of herniation and stenosis and maintains stability ofthe spine.
Objective To summarize the assessment methods of anal function after low/ultralow rectal anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer. Methods Domestic and international publications on the study of evaluation of anal function after low/ultralow rectal anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer were collected and reviewed. Results Anal function of patients with rectal cancer was usually evaluated by feeling of discharge, continence, perceptual function of rectum, defecate frequency, and defecation time, anal manometry and three-dimensional vector manometry were used as well. Recovery of anal function in patients with rectal cancer after low/ultralow rectal anastomosis depended on the integrity of anal canal, length of remaining rectum, level of anastomosis, and integrity of mucosa. Conclusions Subjective assessment methods and auxiliary measuring instruments are the common means to evaluate the rectal-anal function. Subjective assessment method is simple and direct, but its accuracy is low; Auxiliary measuring instruments have high accuracy, while their examination costs are high and that of costs are not popular, the new assessment methods are needed for further research.
Objective we want to construct a rating scale for the key technique using the inhaler device for patients with chronic airway disorder and to provide a reference tool for the scientific evaluation of patients’ techniques in the use of inhaler devices. MethodsThrough literature review and Delphi expert consultation, the items of the rating scale were determined, and the weights and assignments of the items were determined through the analytic hierarchy process. The resulting evaluation form was used for clinical assessment of patients, and the differentiation of each item was tested by the critical ratio method.ResultsAfter the two rounds of consultation, the positive coefficients of experts were 95.24% and 100%, the expert authority coefficients were 0.988 and 0.990, and the Kendall-W coefficients were 0.371 (P<0.001) and 0.654 (P<0.001), respectively. The final form, consisting of 10 operational items for evaluating key inhaler techniques for patients with chronic airway disorder, was finalized. The results of the hierarchical analysis showed that the consistency ratio CR was 0.088<0.10, which satisfied the consistency test. The top 5 key operational steps were medication preparation, exhalation, holding the mouthpiece, inhalation, and breathholding. Used for clinical patient assessment showed better discrimination of items (t ≥ 3, P<0.05).ConclusionThe rating scale for the technique using the inhaler device for chronic airway disorder constructed in this study is scientifically reliable, convenient, and practical, which can be used as an objective evaluation tool to assess patients’ skill in inhaler device use.
With the high incidence of neurological diseases such as stroke and mental illness, rehabilitation treatments for neurological disorders have received widespread attention. Electroencephalography (EEG) technology, despite its excellent temporal resolution, has historically been limited in application due to its insufficient spatial resolution, and is mainly confined to preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring, and epilepsy detection. However, traditional constraints of EEG technology are being overcome with the popularization of EEG technology with high-density over 64-lead, the application of innovative analysis techniques and the integration of multimodal techniques, which are significantly broadening its applications in clinical settings. These advancements have not only reinforced the irreplaceable role of EEG technology in neurorehabilitation assessment, but also expanded its therapeutic potential through its combined use with technologies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial electrical stimulation and brain-computer interfaces. This article reviewed the applications, advancements, and future prospects of EEG technology in neurorehabilitation assessment and treatment. Advancements in technology and interdisciplinary collaboration are expected to drive new applications and innovations in EEG technology within the neurorehabilitation field, providing patients with more precise and personalized rehabilitation strategies.
In recent years, the application of qualitative evidence synthesis results in health and social care policy has increased, and assessment of the limitations of qualitative research methodologies is critical in ensuring the credibility of qualitative evidence synthesis results. However, currently commonly used assessment tools are not designed specifically for Cochrane systematic reviews or qualitative evidence synthesis, and most lack evidence-based development background. To address this gap, the Cochrane qualitative methodological limitations tool (CAMELOT) was created to provide authors with a standardized tool specifically designed to assess the limitations of qualitative research methodologies. Based on the operation guide of evidence-based evaluation tool and Delphi consensus survey method, this paper introduces the development process of CAMELOT and expounds its field contents in detail.
Guideline implementation with decision support checklist (GUIDES) aims to assist the self-reflection of evidence-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) related professionals to enhance the process monitor and continuous improvement of evidence-based CDSS. This paper interpreted the development process, target user, and assessment method of GUIDES, analyzed the practical value of GUIDES through a typical example, and then reflected on the GUIDES and current studies on evidence-based CDSS in China. It is expected to provide references for future studies.