ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of in situ fenestration combined with chimney technique in the treatment of aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery.MethodsFrom January 2012 to June 2019, 53 patients with aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery were selected. There were 21 patients in the test group, including 14 males and 7 females, with an average age of 57.2±11.2 years; there were 32 patients in the control group, including 20 males and 12 females, with an average age of 56.7±12.1 years. In the test group, the left subclavian branch was reconstructed by in situ fenestration and the left common carotid artery was reconstructed by chimney technique. In the control group, the left common carotid artery was reconstructed by hybrid operation. The clinical data of the patients were compared.ResultsThe operation time of the test group was significantly longer than that of the control group (151.8±35.2 min vs. 101.3±29.6 min, P=0.00). The patients in the two groups were followed up for 6-20 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pulmonary infection, stroke, steal blood syndrome, false lumen thrombosis or internal leakage between the two groups (P>0.05). The diameters of the distal and proximal ends of the true cavity in the test group increased significantly compared with those in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionIn situ fenestration combined with chimney technique is an effective method for the treatment of aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ObjectiveTo achieve a better early clinical result by modifying the total arch replacement and optimi-zing the procedure of operation. MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 38 patients patients with stanford a aortic dissection underwent the modifed total arch replacement in our hospital from September to December 2014. There were 26 males and 12 females with a mean age of 52.5 years ranging from 21-76 years. Three artery conduits were adopted during the surgical procedure. Right axillary artery and femoral artery cannulation were performed for cardiopulmonary bypass. The artificial graft and the left common carotid artery was anastomosed to provide simultaneous perfusion. Low rate bilateral brain perfusion began when circulation arrested at 26℃. Reperfusion restoration was obtained after the four-branch vascular graft anastomosed to the stent and aortic wall and completed the implantation of the elephant trunk. Then the aortic root and the vascular graft anastomosis were performed to reconstruct the ascending aorta. At last, the left subclavian artery and innominate artery were anastomosed to the branch of the vascular graft under the beating heart. ResultAll 38 operations were successful. The mean hypothermic circulatory time of the whole group was 18.8±4.2 min, the time of ascending aorta blocking was 86.1±14.2 min, the time of cardiopulmonary bypass was 178.4±71.4 min, the time of postoperative awakening was 4.7±2.0 h, the time of assisted mechanical ventilator was 38.7±19.9 h. One patient died because of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), 3 patients accepted the hemodialysis, 6 patients suffered from transient neurological dysfunction, 1 patient suffered from paraparesis. There was no further complication during the follow-up of 1-3 months. ConclusionThe modified total aortic arch replacement can shorten the circulatory arrest time, cardiac arrest time and cardiopulmonary time, provide effective organ perfusion, and reduce the neurological complication and visceral damage.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of modified total arch replacement by retrospectively analyzing the clinical outcome of surgical patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAD). Methods From June 2015 to December 2016, 39 consecutive patients with AAD were recruited to this study. This modified technique was preformed under general anesthesia and a 30℃ hypothermia circulatory arrest (HCA) with continual bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion. Different surgical approaches were applied according to the aortic root condition: Bentall procedure (4 patients), David procedure (2 patients), aortic valve plasty and ascending aortic replacement (25 patients) and Cabrol procedure (8 patients). Concomitant procedures included mitral valve plasty (1 patient) and tricuspid valve plasty (1 patient). Results The average cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic occlusion time (ACC), HCA and operation time was 218.5±42.2 min, 134.2±32.4 min, 4.9±2.3 min and 415.5±80.5 min respectively. Four patients required dialysis and 2 patients developed temporary neurological deficit. No permanent neurological deficit, postoperative paraplegia or in-hospital death occurred. Computed tomography examination was performed on all patients before discharge and 3 months after discharge. The follow-up result showed that 37 patients developed complete thrombosis in the false lumen and 2 patients developed partial thrombosis. Conclusion Modified total arch replacement is a safe and effective approach for AAD. It can greatly avoid postoperative complications and provide satisfactory short-term outcomes.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of in vitro fenestration on reconstruction of left subclavian artery in endovascular treatment of aortic dissection.MethodsA total of 89 patients with aortic dissection involving left subclavian artery were treated by endovascular treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from February 2017 to January 2020. There were 44 patients in the test group, including 36 males and 8 females, with an average age of 58.02±13.58 years. There were 45 patients in the control group, including 35 males and 10 females, with an average age of 54.10±12.32 years. The left subclavian artery was reconstructed by in vitro fenestration in the test group and by chimney technique in the control group. The clinical data were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operation time of the test group was longer than that of the control group (126.16±7.53 min vs. 96.49±6.52 min, P<0.01). The median follow-up time was 31 (13-48) months. The incidence of endoleak in the test group (4.7%) was lower than that in the control group (18.6%, P=0.04) during the follow-up. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, false lumen thrombosis, retrograde aortic dissection or left subclavian artery occlusion between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion In vitro fenestration for reconstructing left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic dissection is safe and feasible, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
During the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been controversy over whether emergency surgical management should be performed or not in the patients with COVID-19. Stanford type A aortic dissection is a very urgent life-threatening disease, and guidelines recommend surgical treatment for patients with type A aortic dissection in the first instance. However, intraoperative extracorporeal circulation can be fatal to patients recovering from COVID-19. During the pandemic, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has played an important role in supporting COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. This article reports a successful V-V ECMO treatment for a Stanford type A aortic dissection patient, who suffered respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 after emergency surgery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate whether long frozen elephant trunk (FET) increases the risk of spinal cord injury in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.MethodsFrom 2018 to 2019, 172 patients with acute type A aortic dissection were treated in Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital. They were divided into two groups according to the length of FET: patients treated with stents of 100 mm in length were enrolled into a short FET group, and those with stents of 150 mm in length into a long FET group. There were 124 patients in the short FET group, including 108 (87.1%) males and 16 (12.9%) females with a mean age of 51.8±7.9 years. There were 48 patients in the long FET group, including 44 (91.7%) males and 4 (8.3%) females with a mean age of 50.6±9.7 years. The clinical data and prognosis of the patients were analyzed.ResultsThe mean distal stent graft was at the level of T 8.5±0.7 in the long FET group, and at the level of T 6.8±0.6 in the short FET group (P=0.001). Sixteen patients died after operation in the two groups, including 13 (10.5%) in the short FET group and 3 (6.2%) in the long FET group (P=0.561). There were 7 patients of spinal cord injury in the two groups, including 6 (4.8%) in the short FET group and 1 (2.2%) in the long FET group (P=0.675). There was no statistical difference in other complications between the two groups. The follow-up time was 16.7 (1-30) months. During the follow-up, 2 patients died in the long FET group and 5 died in the short FET group. No new spinal cord injury or distal reintervention occurred during the follow-up.ConclusionLong FET does not increase the incidence of spinal cord injury in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.
Objective To analyze the reasons for the perioperative death of endovascular repair of acute aortic dissection （AD）. Methods The clinical data of 176 patients with acute AD and received endovascular repair from July 2001 to October 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Among 176 patients with acute AD， 8 patients died during perioperatively， received endovascular repair in 1-5 days after admission （mean 2.4 d）， and all of them admitted before 2008. Two cases were type A and 6 cases were type B. All cases with hypertension and 3 cases with pleural effusion. Three cases died on the day of operation， among them 2 cases occurred in 1 h after operation， the other 1 case occurred in 2 h after operation. Four cases died in 2 days after operation and 1 case died in 4 days after operation. Four cases died of rupture of the aortic dissection， 2 cases died of cerebral infarction， 1 case died of multiple organ failure， and 1 case died of gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusion To avoid performing endovascular repair during the acute phase and improving operation skills may help to avoid the occurrence of perioperative death.
Objective To study surgical indication, technique for treating acute Stanford type A aortic dissection involving repair of the aortic arch using Sun’s procedure with preservation of autologous brachiocephalic artery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 28 consecutive patients (23 males, 5 females) who underwent operations on acute Stanford type A aortic dissection using Sun’s procedure with preservation of autologous brachiocephalic artery in our hospital between August 2011 and October 2013. The mean age was 29-62 (47±8) years. There were 26 patients with hypertension and 2 patients with Mafan syndrome. Sun’s procedure with preservation of autologous brachiocephalic artery was performed in all patients, concomitant procedure included aortic root replacement (Bentall) in 4 patients, aortic root replacement (Bentall) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 1 patient, aortic valsalva sinus plasty in 6 patients. Results The cardiopulmonary bypass time was 167±37 min. The cross clamp time was 80±22 min. Selective cerebral perfusion time was 29±5 min. One patient died postoperatively from acute hepatic failure. Two patients suffered from transient neurologic deficit and recovered after treatment during follow-up. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of aorta was performed in each patient before discharged from the hospital. The patency of the anastomotic site at brachiocephalic artery was identified. Descending aortic true lumen was significantly expanded. There was only 2 patients with endoleak and total thrombosis of false lumen was found near stent graft with 25 patients. The 27 patients were followed up for 47 (36-62) months. One patient with descending thoracic aortic dilatation underwent thoracoabdoninal aortic replacement. One combined with acute endometrial tear underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Conclusion Sun’s procedure with preservation of autologous brachiocephalic artery is safe and effective in the treatment of acute Stanford type A dissection in patients without brachiocephalic artery involved. Low mortality and complication rate are achieved, but the long-term results need the further follow-up.
Objective To investigate the impact of different modes of cardiopulmonary bypass （CPB） and cerebral perfusion on cerebral protection in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection （AD）. Methods Clinical data of 117 patients with Stanford type A AD who underwent surgical therapy from April 2007 to March 2012 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into 3 groups according to different modes of CPB and cerebral perfusion they received. In group 1，45 patients received CPB perfusion through the femoral artery and unilateral or bilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion （ASCP） after circulatory arrest. In group 2，38 patients received CPB perfusion through the subclavian artery or innominate artery and unilateral or bilateral ASCP after circulatory arrest. In group 3，34 patients received antegrade and retrograde CPB perfusion through both subclavian artery or innominate artery and femoral artery，and unilateral or bilateral ASCP after circulatory arrest. Postoperative occurrence of transient neurological dysfunction （TND），permanent neurological dysfunction （PND） and influential factors were compared between the 3 groups. Results Incidence of postoperative cerebral complications of group 1 was significantly higher than those of group 2 and 3 （37.77% vs. 13.16% vs. 14.71%，P ＜0.05）. During CPB，cooling time of group 3 was significantly shorter than those of group 1 and 2 （35.56±4.35 vs. 40.00±5.63 and 39.58±6.03，P ＜0.05）. There was no statisticaldifference in other influential factors among the 3 groups （P ＞0.05）. Conclusion Antegrade and retrograde CPB perfusionin combination with ASCP has a smooth and quicker cooling rate，may provide better protection for the spinal cord，kidney and intraperitoneal organs and especially decrease the incidence of postoperative cerebral complications，therefore is proved current best method for organ protection.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate surgical strategies for the treatment of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection with involvement of the aortic root. Methods From January 2005 to December 2010, 62 consecutive patients underwent emergency surgical intervention for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection with involvement of the aortic root in Renji Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University. According to different methods for the management of proximal aortic dissection, these patients were divided into 3 groups: group A, aortic valve commissural suspension＋supracommissural replacement of the ascending aorta （SCR）,including 28 patients （20 males and 8 females，mean age 45.2±15.6 years）; group B, partial sinus remodeling+ascending aortic replacement, including 10 patients （7 males and 3 females，mean age 44.6±14.9 years）；group C, Bentall procedure,including 24 patients （17 males and 7 females，mean age 46.2±15.6 years）. Clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups. Results Six patients died peri-operatively and in-hospital mortality was 9.67% （6/62）. Fifty-four patients were followed up, and the mean follow-up time was 27.3±15.7 months. During follow up, 2 patients died, one for lung cancer and the other for unknown reason. One patient in group A underwent CT scan 6 months after surgery which showed aortic root pseudo-aneurysm. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time of group C were significantly longer than those of group A and group B （274±97 min vs. 194±65 min, 210±77 min, t=22.482, 30.419, P=0.002， 0.122；150±56 min vs. 97±33 min, 105±46 min, t=12.630, 17.089, P=0.000，0.034）. There was no statistical difference in mortality （t=1.352，P=0.516）, incidence of postoperative reexploration for bleeding, acute renal failure and neurological complication （t=0.855, 0.342, 2.281; P=0.652, 0.863, 0.320） among the three groups. Conclusion For patients with acute aortic dissection involving the aortic root, aortic valve commissural suspension+SCR，partial sinus remodeling＋ascending aortic replacement and Bentall procedure may be considered the surgical treatment of choice with respective advantages and disadvantages. Satisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieveed if surgical indications and procedures are properly employed.