The therapeutic effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was determined by a number of factors. Comprehensive thorough analysis of clinical features, imaging results and treatment response can predict the potential efficacy and possible vision recovery for the patient, and also can optimize the treatment regime to make a personalized therapy plan. Precise medicine with data from genomics, proteomics and metabolomics study will provide more objective and accurate biology basis for individual precise treatment. The future research should focus on comprehensive assessment of factors affecting the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy, to achieve individualized precise diagnosis and treatment, to improve the therapeutic outcome of nAMD.
In the expert consensus published by the Pediatrics in 2013, it was first proposed that anti-VEGF drugs can be considered for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with stage 3, zone Ⅰ with plus disease. However, there are many problems worth the attention of ophthalmologists, including the advantages and disadvantages of anti-VEGF therapy compared with traditional laser therapy, systemic and ocular complications after anti-VEGF therapy, and what indicators are the end points of anti-VEGF therapy. Combined with this consensus and numerous research findings, we recommend that the first treatment for anti-VEGF or laser therapy should be considered from disease control effects. For the threshold and pre-threshold lesions, the effect of anti-VEGF therapy for zoneⅡ lesions is better than that for zone Ⅰ lesions and the single-time effective rate is high. So, it is suggested that anti-VEGF therapy should be preferred for the first treatment. The choice of repeat treatment should be considered from the final retinal structure and functional prognosis. Laser therapy is advisable for the abnormal vascular regression slower and abnormalities in the posterior pole. It can reduce the number of reexaminations and prolong the interval between re-examinations. However, the premature use of laser has an inevitable effect on peripheral vision field. Excluding the above problems, supplemental therapy can still choose anti-VEGF therapy again. Most of the children with twice anti-VEGF therapy are sufficient to control the disease. Anti-VEGF therapy should be terminated when there are signs such as plus regression, threshold or pre-threshold lesions controlled without recurrence, peripheral vascularization, etc.
Objective To observe the efficiency and safety of a single intravi treal injection of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients with diabetic macular edema. Methods Prospective, open label study of 18 eyes of 18 patients with diabetic macular edema which was diagnosed by examination of regular inspection, fundus fluorescein angiography(FFA) and optic coherence tomography(OCT). The patients without general or partial surgery contraindications, aged from 34-75 years with a mean age of 54plusmn;11 years. The best corrected visual acuity of logMAR was 1.023plusmn;0.45 and the retinal thickness of macular foveal was 486 mu;m before the treatment. The eyes have intravitreal injection with Bevacizumab at dose 1.5 mg (0. 06 ml). After the treatment, the follow-up period ranging from 12 to 20 weeks (m e an 16plusmn;4 weeks). The changes of visual acuity, intraocular pressure, OCT and FFA before and after the treatment were observed and analyzed. Results All 18 patients had a mean logMAR BCVA of 1.023plusmn;0.45 at baseline and at the follow-up weeks 1, 4, 12, the mean logMAR BCVA was significantly improved as 0.864plusmn;0.48 （P=0.001）, 0.739plusmn;0.51 (P=0.003), 0.792plusmn;0.50 (P=0.015) respectively, and the differences are statistically significant compared with before. Sixteen eyes (88.9%) had a improved or stable visual acuity, the BCVA increased 2 lines (0.2 logMAR vision) or better in 10 eyes (55.6%) and decreased in 2 eyes at 12 weeks after injection. OCT demonstrated that retinal thickness of macular foveal decreased from 486 mu;m to 413 mu;m at 4 weeks, decreased to 383mu;m at 12 weeks（P=0.002， P=0.001）, and the differences are statistically significant compared with before. There are remarkable resolution of central retinal edema in 13 eyes (72.2%) at 12 weeks after the injection. No local or systemic adverse events were observed in any patients. Conclusions The preliminary result in our observati on showed that int ravitreal injection of Bevacizumab therapy was well tolerated with a significant improvement in BCVA and decrease in macular edema for patients with diabetic macular edema. A randomly controlled multicenter clinical trial is necessary. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2008,24:172-175)
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a kind of demyelinating disease of central nervous system which mainly affect optic nerve and spinal cord. Because of its serious blindness and disability, how to effectively prevent relapse has become the focus of ophthalmologists. With the deep understanding of the pathogenesis and the progress of scientific and technological means, more and more monoclonal antibodies(mAb) continue to enter clinical trials. B cell surface antigen CD20 blocker, rituximab, has become a first-line drug for the treatment of NMOSD. CD19 blocker, inebilizumab, can reduce the recurrence and disability of NMOSD patients. The addition of interleukin 6 receptor blocker, satralizumab, and complement C5 inhibitor, eculizumab, reduce the recurrence. Some mAbs such as natalizumab and alemtuzumab may not be effective for the treatment of NMOSD. The expansion of mAb treatment indications and the launch of new drugs still require more clinical trials which are large-scale and international cooperation. At the same time, its potential adverse events and cost issues cannot be ignored.
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of intravitreal injection with bevacizumab (Avastin) (IVB)combined with extra panretinal photocoagulation (E-PRP) for highrisk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).Methods A total of 57 eyes of 53 patients with highrisk PDR underwent intravitreal injection combined with E-PRP. The examinations of vision acuity, intraocular pressure, iris fluorescein angiography (IFA),fundus photos and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were performed on all of the patients before and 1,2,3,and 6 months after the treatment; the results of the examinations before and after the treatment were compared and analyzed.The average follow up was 6 months.Results The mean visual acuity was (0.143plusmn;0.072) before the treatment and (0.218plusmn;0.128) 7 days after the tretment; the difference was significant (t=-7.940, Plt;0.05). The mean visual acuity 1,3,and 6 months after E-PRP (0.228plusmn;0.138, 0.223plusmn;0.125,0.220plusmn;0.134, respectively) differed much from that before IVB (Plt;0.05), but not so much from that after IVB (Pgt;0.05).The mean intraocular pressure of 21 eyes which had the neovascularization of pupil margin and iris surface before and 7 days after IVB was (26.632plusmn;2.629) and (19.316plusmn;3.092) mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), respectively; the difference was significant (t=12.838, Plt;0.05) . The mean intraocular pressure 1,3,and 6 months after E-PRP was (16.947plusmn;2.345),(16.474plusmn;1.611), and (16.421plusmn;4.702) mm Hg, respectively, which differed much from that before and after IVB (Plt;0.05). Neovascularization on the disc and the retinae of 57 eyes were subsided partly, and a significant reduction or disappeared of the area of retinal neovascularization and the blood vessel leakage were observed 7 days after IVB. The neovascularization of pupil margin and iris surface of 21 eyes disappeared, and the IFA leakage decreased. The results of FFA 2 months after E-PRP showed that the one-off efficiency of E-PRP was 68.4%;12 eyes (21.1%) needed an additional laser, in which 6 eyes (10.5%) underwent vitreous surgery. Conclusion IVB combined with E-PRP as a treatment for highrisk PDR may improve the regression of retinal neovascularization and the reduction of vascular permeability,and prevent or reduce the complications and improve the therapeutic effect.
Objective To study and compare the clinical efficacy between intravitreal conbercept injection and (or) macular grid pattern photocoagulation in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods Ninety eyes of 90 patients diagnosed as macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO were enrolled in this study. Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were male and 42 patients (42 eyes) were female. The average age was (51.25±12.24) years and the course was 5–17 days. All patients were given best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp with preset lens, fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) and optic coherent tomography (OCT) examination. The patients were divided into conbercept and laser group (group Ⅰ), laser group (group Ⅱ) and conbercept group (group Ⅲ), with 30 eyes in each group. The BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) in the three groups at baseline were statistically no difference (F=0.072, 0.286;P=0.930, 0.752). Patients in group Ⅰ received intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of 10.00 mg/ml conbercept solution (conbercept 0.5 mg), and macular grid pattern photocoagulation 3 days later. Group Ⅱ patients were given macular grid pattern photocoagulation. Times of injection between group Ⅰ and Ⅲ, laser energy between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, changes of BCVA and CMT among 3 groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were compared. Results Patients in group Ⅰ and Ⅲ had received conbercept injections (1.20±0.41) and (2.23±1.04) times respectively, and 6 eyes (group Ⅰ) and 22 eyes (group Ⅲ) received 2-4 times re-injections. The difference of injection times between two groups was significant (P＜0.001). Patients in group Ⅱ had received photocoagulation (1.43±0.63) times, 9 eyes had received twice photocoagulation and 2 eyes had received 3 times of photocoagulation. The average laser energy was (96.05±2.34) μV in group Ⅰ and (117.41±6.85) μV in group Ⅱ, the difference was statistical significant (P=0.003). BCVA improved in all three groups at last follow-up. However, the final visual acuity in group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ were better than in group Ⅱ (t=4.607, –4.603;P＜0.001) and there is no statistical significant difference between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ (t=–0.802,P=0.429). The mean CMT reduced in all three groups after treating for 1 week and 1 month, comparing that before treatment (t=–11.855, –10.620, –10.254;P＜0.001). There was no statistical difference of CMT between group Ⅰand Ⅲ at each follow up (t=0.404, 1.723, –1.819, –1.755;P=0.689, 0.096, 0.079, 0.900). CMT reduction in group Ⅰ was more than that in group Ⅱ at 1 week and 1 month after treatments (t=–4.621, –3.230;P＜0.001, 0.003). The CMT in group Ⅲ at 3 month after treatment had increased slightly comparing that at 1 month, but the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.995,P=0.056). All patients had no treatment-related complications, such as endophthalmitis, rubeosis iridis and retinal detachment. Conclusions Intravitreal conbercept injection combined with macular grid pattern photocoagulation is better than macular grid pattern photocoagulation alone in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO. Combined therapy also reduced injection times comparing to treatment using conbercept injection without laser photocoagulation.
ObjectiveTo study changes in choroidal thickness(CT) with intravitreal injections of ranibizumab treatment. MethodsThis is a prospective, uncontrolled, open-label study. A total of 31 eyes of 31 patients diagnosed with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and 33 eyes of 33 patients diagnosed with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathological myopia (PM) were included in the study. All affected eyes were treated with intravitreal ranibizumab 0.05 ml (10 mg/ml) and followed up monthly until 6 months. Enhanced depth imaging on Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to measure the CT. The initial CT was compared with the data at 1, 3 and 6 month after treatment, and the correlation between of the decrease of CT at the 6 month and the number of injection times was analyzed. ResultsIn AMD group, the average CT respectively decreased by (9.68±11.02), (12.58±11.04), (13.84±11.67)μm at 1, 3 and 6 month, and the differences were significant(t=4.89, 6.34, 6.60;P < 0.001). In PM group, the average CT respectively decreased by (2.06±10.92), (3.64±8.78), (3.27±7.20)μm at 1, 3 and 6 month. The difference at 1 month was not significant (t=1.08, P=0.287). While after 3 months and 6 months, the differences were significant(t=2.38, 2.61;P=0.024, 0.014). The injection times were not correlated with the CT decreases at 6 month in both groups(r=0.04, 0.30;P=0.815, 0.099). ConclusionIntravitreal injections of ranibizumab can induce choroidal thickness reduction for wet age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia.
ObjectiveTo discuss the relationship between antinuclear antibody (ANA) fluorescence pattern detected by indirect immunity fluorescence (IIF) and antinuclear antibody profiles (including anti-dsDNA, RNP, Sm, SSa, SSb, Scl-70, Jo-1 and rib-P) in human serum. MethodsA total of 7385 cases of ANA pattern and ANA profiles were retrospectively analyzed from January 2010 to December 2013. ANA was detected by IIF substrated as HEp-2 cells, anti-dsDNA by IIF substrated as crithidia, and the other 7 antibodies by enzyme immunoblot with purified antigen. ResultsGranular pattern mostly presented as anti-RNP, anti-Sm, anti-SSa and anti-SSb (P < 0.001); homogeneous pattern was anti-dsDNA and anti-SSa (P < 0.001); nucleolus, centromere, and mixed pattern was anti-SSa (P < 0.05); cytoplasm pattern was anti-rib-P and anti-SSa (P < 0.05). But few above antibodies could be detected in Golgi, dots, rim, actin, actotropomyosin, prolifevating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and vementin pattern. Homogeneous pattern was shown up to 77.91% in only anti-dsDNA positive serum; granular was 96.84%, 52.01%, and 82.35% respectively in only anti-RNP or anti-SSa or anti-Sm positive. Homogeneous and nucleolus mix pattern was up to 30.53% in only anti-Scl-70 positive. Cytoplasm pattern was 50.00% and 61.54% respectively in only anti-rib-P or anti-Jo-1 positive. But no fixed relationship was found between ANA pattern and anti-SSb. ConclusionsThere is a certain relationship between ANA and antinuclear antibody profiles. Granular, homogeneous and cytoplasm pattern often can be detected more than one autoantibodies. Eight kinds of specific autoantibodies often are negative when ANA patterns are centromere, Golgi, dots, rim, actin, tropomyosin, PCNA, and vimentin. Anti-dsDNA is mainly corresponding to homogeneous, anti-RNP, anti-SSa and anti-Sm to granular, anti-Scl-70 to homogeneous and nucleoli, anti-rib-P and anti-Jo-1 to cytoplasm. The study can give suggestions for further tests application and lab result checking.
Diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) is one of the manifestation of diabetic retinopathy (DR). It could be associated with diabetic macular edema (DME), which may affect the vision of DR patients. FFA is the gold standard for the diagnosis of DMI, but with the advent of OCT angiography, a more convenient and diversified method for the evaluation of DMI has been developed, which makes more and more researchers start to study DMI. Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF has become the preferred treatment for DME. When treating with DME patients, ophthalmologists usually avoid DMI patients. But if intravitreal anti-VEGF should be the contradiction of DME is still unclear. To provide references to the research, this article summarized the risk factors, assessment methods and influence of DMI. This article also analyzed the existing studies, aiming to offer evidences to a more reasonable and effective treatment decision for DME individual.