The therapeutic effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was determined by a number of factors. Comprehensive thorough analysis of clinical features, imaging results and treatment response can predict the potential efficacy and possible vision recovery for the patient, and also can optimize the treatment regime to make a personalized therapy plan. Precise medicine with data from genomics, proteomics and metabolomics study will provide more objective and accurate biology basis for individual precise treatment. The future research should focus on comprehensive assessment of factors affecting the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy, to achieve individualized precise diagnosis and treatment, to improve the therapeutic outcome of nAMD.
Objective To study and compare the clinical efficacy between intravitreal conbercept injection and (or) macular grid pattern photocoagulation in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods Ninety eyes of 90 patients diagnosed as macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO were enrolled in this study. Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were male and 42 patients (42 eyes) were female. The average age was (51.25±12.24) years and the course was 5–17 days. All patients were given best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp with preset lens, fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) and optic coherent tomography (OCT) examination. The patients were divided into conbercept and laser group (group Ⅰ), laser group (group Ⅱ) and conbercept group (group Ⅲ), with 30 eyes in each group. The BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) in the three groups at baseline were statistically no difference (F=0.072, 0.286;P=0.930, 0.752). Patients in group Ⅰ received intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of 10.00 mg/ml conbercept solution (conbercept 0.5 mg), and macular grid pattern photocoagulation 3 days later. Group Ⅱ patients were given macular grid pattern photocoagulation. Times of injection between group Ⅰ and Ⅲ, laser energy between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, changes of BCVA and CMT among 3 groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were compared. Results Patients in group Ⅰ and Ⅲ had received conbercept injections (1.20±0.41) and (2.23±1.04) times respectively, and 6 eyes (group Ⅰ) and 22 eyes (group Ⅲ) received 2-4 times re-injections. The difference of injection times between two groups was significant (P＜0.001). Patients in group Ⅱ had received photocoagulation (1.43±0.63) times, 9 eyes had received twice photocoagulation and 2 eyes had received 3 times of photocoagulation. The average laser energy was (96.05±2.34) μV in group Ⅰ and (117.41±6.85) μV in group Ⅱ, the difference was statistical significant (P=0.003). BCVA improved in all three groups at last follow-up. However, the final visual acuity in group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ were better than in group Ⅱ (t=4.607, –4.603;P＜0.001) and there is no statistical significant difference between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ (t=–0.802,P=0.429). The mean CMT reduced in all three groups after treating for 1 week and 1 month, comparing that before treatment (t=–11.855, –10.620, –10.254;P＜0.001). There was no statistical difference of CMT between group Ⅰand Ⅲ at each follow up (t=0.404, 1.723, –1.819, –1.755;P=0.689, 0.096, 0.079, 0.900). CMT reduction in group Ⅰ was more than that in group Ⅱ at 1 week and 1 month after treatments (t=–4.621, –3.230;P＜0.001, 0.003). The CMT in group Ⅲ at 3 month after treatment had increased slightly comparing that at 1 month, but the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.995,P=0.056). All patients had no treatment-related complications, such as endophthalmitis, rubeosis iridis and retinal detachment. Conclusions Intravitreal conbercept injection combined with macular grid pattern photocoagulation is better than macular grid pattern photocoagulation alone in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO. Combined therapy also reduced injection times comparing to treatment using conbercept injection without laser photocoagulation.
Diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) is one of the manifestation of diabetic retinopathy (DR). It could be associated with diabetic macular edema (DME), which may affect the vision of DR patients. FFA is the gold standard for the diagnosis of DMI, but with the advent of OCT angiography, a more convenient and diversified method for the evaluation of DMI has been developed, which makes more and more researchers start to study DMI. Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF has become the preferred treatment for DME. When treating with DME patients, ophthalmologists usually avoid DMI patients. But if intravitreal anti-VEGF should be the contradiction of DME is still unclear. To provide references to the research, this article summarized the risk factors, assessment methods and influence of DMI. This article also analyzed the existing studies, aiming to offer evidences to a more reasonable and effective treatment decision for DME individual.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of microincision vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) assisted with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) in severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treatment. MethodsThis is a prospective non-randomized controlled clinical study. A total of 60 patients (70 eyes) with severe PDR diagnosed were enrolled and divided into IVR group (31 patients, 35 eyes) and control group (29 patients, 35 eyes). IVR group patients received an intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml ranibizumab solution (10 mg/ml) first, and 3 or 4 days later they received 23G microincision VRS. Control group patients only received 23G microincision VRS. The follow-up time was 3 to 12 months with an average of (4.5±1.8) months. The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, the central retinal thickness (CRT) and retinal reattachment, and the incidence of postoperative complications were comparatively analyzed. ResultsThere was no topical and systemic adverse reactions associated with the drug after injection in IVR group. The incidence of post-operative vitreous hemorrhage (VH) in IVR group and control group was 8.6% and 28.6% at 1 week after surgery, 0.0% and 17.1% at 1 month after surgery, 0.0% and 8.6% at 3 month after surgery respectively. The differences were statistically significant for 1 week (χ2=4.63, P < 0.05) and 1 month (χ2=4.56, P < 0.05), but was not statistically significant for 3 months (χ2=0.24, P > 0.05). The mean post-operative logMAR BCVA of IVR group (0.81±0.40) and control group (1.05±0.42) have all improved than their pre-operative BCVA, the difference was statistically significant (t=12.78, 4.39; P < 0.05). The mean logMAR BCVA of IVR group is higher than BCVA of control group, the difference was statistically significant (t=-2.36, P < 0.05). The average post-operative CRT in IVR group was thinner than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (t=-2.53, P < 0.05). The incidence of a transient high intraocular pressure in IVR group (14.3%) was lower than that in control group (34.3%), the difference was statistically significant (t=4.79, P < 0.05). The incidence of retinal reattachment (t=0.35), epiretinal membrane (χ2=0.97), neovascular glaucoma (χ2=0.51) was no difference between these two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe minimally invasive VRS assisted by IVR treatment for severe PDR can effectively prevent postoperative VH, reduce CRT and improve visual acuity.
Objective To observe the baseline characteristics and visual outcomes after two years follow-up of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients treated with ranibizumb. Methods Forty-four eyes of 44 patients with exudative AMD were enrolled into this retrospective study, 19 were men and 25 were women. The mean age was 78 years (range 64 – 92 years). All patients were underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study), fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean BCVA was (50.36±14.43) letters, the mean central foveal thickness (CFT) was (291.95±82.19) μm, and the fluorescence leakage area of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) was (7.61±5.84) mm2. All patients received three initial intravitreous injection of ranibizumb (IVR) and were retreated with monthly IVR when needed. The mean follow up time was 25.6 months (range 24 – 29 months). On 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment, BCVA and OCT were repeated. On 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment, FFA and ICGA were repeated. The change of BCVA, CFT and fluorescence leakage area of CNV were observed. The association of baseline characteristics and two year visual outcomes were analyzed. Results On 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment, the BCVA were improved significantly (t= −1.89, −3.51, −4.61, −4.04, −5.77, −4.69;P＜0.05), the CFT were decreased significantly (t=1.51, 2.30, 3.40, 3.28, 3.54, 3.88, 3.73;P＜0.05). On 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment, the fluorescence leakage area of CNV were reduced significantly (t=2.12, 2.90, 3.51, 4.12, 4.06;P＜0.05). The lower baseline BCVA, the more improved after treatment. The BCVA improvement degree has a negative relationship with baseline BCVA and fluorescence leakage area of CNV (r=0.505, −0.550;P＜0.05), but no correlation with baseline CFT (r=0.210,P＞0.05). Conclusion Two year visual outcomes of exudative AMD patients treated with ranibizumb is negative correlated with baseline BCVA and fluorescence leakage area of CNV, but not correlated with baseline CFT.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injections of conbercept in choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia (PM). MethodsA retrospective case series of 37 eyes of 37 patients affected with CNV secondary to PM treated by intravitreal injections of Conbercept. All the patients were examined with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, central macular thickness (CMT) of optical coherence tomography (OCT)at baseline. The initial average letters of ETDRS BCVA was 49.86±8.87, CMT was (306.38±31.01) μm. All eyes were treated with intravitreal Conbercept 0.05 ml (10 mg/ml). Follow-up visits were performed monthly after injection. The mean follow-up time was 16.8 months. Injections were repeated according to the situation of BCVA, CMT, subretinal fluid and CNV leakage in follow-up. All eyes received an average of 4.8 injections. BCVA, CMT and ophthalmoscope examination were assessed monthly. The relationship of BCVA improvement and CMT reduction with the data at baseline and number of treatments were analyzed by Spearman Rho correlation respectively. ResultsDuring the 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, the mean BCVA were all improved with statistically significant difference (t=17.629, P < 0.01).At 12 months, 15 eyes (45.9%) had improvement of 15 letters or more, 32 eyes (86.5%) had improvement of 5 letters or more, and 1 eye (2.7%) had decreased more than 5 letters. During the 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, the mean CMT were all decreased with statistically significant difference (F=43.726, P < 0.01). At 12 months, the retinal fluid of 34 eyes (91.9%) were absorbed completely; 33 eyes (89.2%) had angiographic closure at that time. There was no significant relevance between BCVA improvement and sex, age and course of the disease (P > 0.05), but a significant negative correlation was found between the BCVA improvement and BCVA at baseline, injection times (P < 0.05). There was no significant relevance between CMT reduction and sex, age, course of the disease and injection times (P > 0.05), but a significant positive correlation was found between CMT reduction and CMT at baseline (P < 0.05). There were no systemic or ocular serious side effects during the follow up. ConclusionsIntravitreal injections of Conbercept showed BCVA improvement and CMT reduction. It appeared to be effective and safe for choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia. Intravitreal Conbercept for CNV secondary to PM showed BCVA improvement, CMT reduction and safety.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the macular visual function of patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (MCNV) before and after intravitreal injection of conbercept.MethodsA prospective, uncontrolled and non-randomized study. From April 2017 to April 2018, 21 eyes of 21 patients diagnosed as MCNV in Shanxi Eye Hospital and treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept were included in this study. There were 9 males (9 eyes, 42.86%) and 12 females (12 eyes, 57.14%), with the mean age of 35.1±13.2 years. The mean diopter was −11.30±2.35 D and the mean axial length was 28.93±5.68 mm. All patients were treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept 0.05 ml (1+PRN). Regular follow-up was performed before and after treatment, and BCVA and MAIA micro-field examination were performed at each follow-up. BCVA, macular integrity index (MI), mean sensitivity (MS) and fixation status changes before and after treatment were comparatively analyzed. The fixation status was divided into three types: stable fixation, relatively unstable fixation, and unstable fixation. The paired-sample t-test was used to compare BCVA, MI and MS before and after treatment. The x2 test was used to compare the fixation status before and after treatment.ResultsDuring the observation period, the average number of injections was 3.5. The logMAR BCVA of the eyes before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment were 0.87±0.32, 0.68±0.23, 0.52±0.17, and 0.61±0.57, respectively; MI were 89.38±21.34, 88.87±17.91, 70.59±30.02, and 86.76±15.09, respectively; MS were 15.32±7.19, 21.35±8.89, 23.98±11.12, 22.32±9.04 dB, respectively. Compared with before treatment, BCVA (t=15.32, 18.65, 17.38; P＜0.01) and MS (t=4.08, 3.50, 4.26; P＜0.01) were significantly increased in the eyes 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. There was no significant difference in the MI of the eyes before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment (t=0.60, 2.42, 2.58; P＞0.05). Before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, the proportion of stable fixation were 28.57%, 38.10%, 38.10%, 33.33%;the proportion of relatively unstable fixation were 47.62%, 47.62%, 52.38%, 57.14% and the proportion of unstable fixation were 23.81%, 14.28%, 9.52%, 9.52%, respectively. The proportion of stable fixation and relatively unstable fixation at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment were higher than that before treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (x2=1.82, 1.24, 1.69; P＞0.05).ConclusionBCVA and MS are significantly increased in patients with MCNV after intravitreal injection of conbercept.
ObjectiveTo analyze the influencing factors on clinical response to conbercept for diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsA total of 51 patients (51 eyes) with DME who underwent intravitreal injection of conbercept were included in this retrospective study. The general information (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, drinking history), blood glucose indicators (duration of diabetes, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c), blood pressure indicators (history of hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure), lipid indicators [total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), apolipoprotein A (APOA)], biochemical indicators [neutrophil concentration, hemoglobin (HB), serum creatinine (Scr)] were collected. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular central macular thickness (CMT) before and after treatment were comparatively analyzed. CMT reduced not less than 20% and BCVA increased by 2 lines as effective standards. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the factors affecting the efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept in patients with DME.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that diastolic blood pressure, HDL, serum neutrophil concentration, baseline CMT and baseline BCVA were associated with edema regression (P＜0.05); HbA1c was associated with vision improvement (P＜0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was a history of smoking (OR=0.122, 95% CI 0.017 − 0.887), low diastolic blood pressure (OR=0.850, 95%CI0.748 − 0.966), low HDL (OR=0.007, 95%CI 0.000 1 − 0.440), thin baseline CMT (OR=0.986, 95%CI0.977 − 0.995) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of edema regression (P＜0.05); long duration of diabetes (OR=1.191, 95%CI 1.011 − 1.404), high APOA (OR=1.007, 95% CI 1.000 − 1.013) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of vision improvement. Age, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, TC, HB, Scr and other indicators had no effect on the efficacy of edema regression and vision improvement after treatment (P＞0.05).ConclusionsSmoking history, long duration of diabetes, low diastolic blood pressure, low HDL level, high APOA level and thin baseline CMT are independent risk factors for the treatment of DME with intravitreal injection of conbercept.
Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab(Lucentis) on exudative age－related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods To analyze retrospectively the clinical data of 56 patients with exudative AMD, which was diagnosed by examination of ETDRS charts, color fundus photograph, fluorescein angiography(FFA) or indocyanine green angiography(ICGA) and optical coherence tomography(OCT), were underwent intravitreal injection Lucentis 0.5 mg. Before the treatment, the ETDRS charts letter of 56 eyes was 25.1; choroidal neovascularization(CNA) was leaky which examined by FFA and ICGA; the average thickness of retina was 303.45 mu;m. Ranibizumab injection therapeutic times were 2.8, the average therapeutic times were 3.1. Follow－up time was 6－12 months (mean 8.7 months). Visual acuity (ETDRS charts letter), retinal thickness, leakage of CNV and operative complications before and after the treatment were analyzed. Results At the end of the follow－up period, the mean letter of ETDRS charts was 38.5, increased 13.4 letters (P＜0.01), the ETDRS charts improved 15 or more letters in 22 eyes (39.3%), decreased more than 15 letters in 2 eyes (3.6%); the foveal thickness on OCT images were 303.45 mu;m before treatment and 191.35 mu;m a fter treatment, decreased significantly (P＜0.00); FFA and/ or ICGA showed CNV complete closure in 12 eyes (21.4%), partial closure in 33 eyes (58.9%), no change in 9 eyes (16.1%) and new CNV in 1 eye (1.8%); Slight complications after operation disappeared during one week. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab for exudative AMD was well tolerated, with an improvement in VA, FFA or ICGA , and OCT. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2008,24:160-163)
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, including monoclonal antibodies (such as bevacizumab and ranibizumab) and fusion protein agents (such as aflibercept and conbercept) have been clinically proven to be effective to treat exudative age-related macular degeneration AMD). However, there are still some patients do not or poorly respond to the initial anti-VEGF agents, usually after several injections, ophthalmologists may switch to another anti-VEGF agent. In general, switching of anti-VEGF agent is considered for recurrent AMD, AMD resistance to anti-VEGF treatments. Current switching protocols include the replacement of monoclonal antibodies with fusion protein agents, the replacement of fusion protein agents with monoclonal antibodies, the substitution of one monoclonal antibody with another one, and the replacement of monoclonal antibodies with fusion protein agents and switching back with monoclonal antibodies. However, current researches on the switching of anti-VEGF drugs for exudative AMD are mostly retrospective and single-arm studies, and there are some differences in the results of different studies. Therefore, for patients with exudative AMD who do not respond to or respond poorly to anti-VEGF drugs, the efficacy of switching of anti-VEGF drugs is uncertain right now. Switching of anti-VEGF agents may improve the retinal anatomical outcome of the affected eye but may not necessarily improve visual acuity. Thus it is an option in the clinical practice to treat AMD. To determine the benefits of above mentioned switching regimens, randomized controlled clinical trials with large sample number and long study period will be needed.