目的：探讨阿托伐他汀治疗高脂血症患者的疗效分析。方法： 对70例确诊高脂血症的患者给予阿托伐他汀10 mg，每日一次，连服3个月，观察观察治疗前后的血脂、肝功能、肾功能,同时观察患者有无不良反应。结果：治疗3个月后,TC、TG、LDL-C均较治疗前显著下降(Plt;0.05),HDL-C较治疗前明显提高(Plt;0.05),TC、TG、LDL-C、HDL-C治疗3个月的总有效率分别是84.28%、74.6%、80%和62.26%,未见明显不良反应。结论：阿托伐他汀治疗高脂血症患者安全有效。
Objective To investigate the relationship between dyslipidemia and diabetic retinopathy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus（NIDDM） patients． Methods In 55 health controls，60 NIDDM patients with DR and 75 NIDDM patients without DR，the plasma total cholesterol（TC），triglycerides（TG），high-density lipoprotein（HDL）and HDL subfractions，fasting plasma glucose（FPG），fasting plasma insulin（FINS）and glycosylated hemogolbin（HbA 1C）were measured，and the plasma lowdensity lipoprotein （LDL） and very lowdensity lipoprotein（VLDL）were caculated． Results In NIDDM patients with DR，the TC，LDL，FPG，HbA 1C and duration of NIDDM were higher or longer than those in NIDDM patients without DR．Moreover，the TC，LDL，FPG、FINS、HbA 1C and dutation of NIDDM were increased or lengthened in NIDDM patients with proliferative DR as compared with those with backgroud DR．The correlation analysis showed the severity of DR was positively correlated with TC，LDL，HbA 1C and duration of NIDDM． Conclusion Dyslipidemia may play some role in the onset and development of DR． (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,1998,14:21-23)
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Xuezhikang capsule (XZK) for hyperlipidemia. Methods MEDIINE，EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CCTR), Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group data bank, and Chinese Biomedical Database(CBM), China Hospital Knowledge Database(CHKD) were searched，and the published/unpublished information was handsearched (updated to Dec., 2005) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCT of XZK versus statins or other lipid lowering drugs in treating hyperlipidemia patients. The quality evaluation, data extraction and analysis were conducted by the method recommended in Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.2.2. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (Version 4.2). Results Eleven trials (conducted in China) were identified, including 1 073 patients with hyperlipidemia met the inclusion criteria. All the included RCTs were graded as B or C. ① The effect of XZK in reducing TC: There were no significant differences between XZK and statins ( WMD 0.06, 95%CI-0.09 to 0.20 and RR1.02, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.12), XZK and fibrates (WMD 0.05, 95%CI -0.22 to 0.31) and XZK and probucol(WMD 0.42, 95%CI -0.01 to 0.85). XZK was superior to hexanicit (WMD 0.96, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.18). ② The effect of XZK in reducing TG: XZK had the same effect as statins (WMD 0.02, 95%CI -0.10 to 0.14 and RR 1.17, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.49) and hexanicit (WMD 0.28, 95%CI -0.17 to 0.73 ).Meanwhile, XZK was superior to probucol (WMD 0.71, 95%CI 0.22 to 1.20), but it was not as good as fibrates (WMD -0.81, 95%CI -1.40 to -0.23). ③ The effect of XZK in increasing HDL-C：XZK had the same effect as that of statins (WMD -0.03, 95%CI -0.10 to 0.04 and RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.33). The effect of XZK was better than that of hexanicit (WMD 0.15, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.29). XZK had the same effect of fibrates (WMD 0.03, 95%CI -0.08 to 0.15) and probucol (WMD 0.04, 95%CI -0.16 to 0.24). ④ The effect of XZK in reducing LDL-C：The effects of XZK and statins were the same (WMD -0.23, 95%CI -0.61 to 0.15 and RR 1.15, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.77). The effect of XZK was better than that of hexanicit (WMD 0.53, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.90). Meanwhile, XZK had the same effect as those of fibrates (WMD 0.19, 95%CI -0.12 to 0.50) and probucol (WMD 0.35, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.73). ⑤ The adverse reactions of XZK were mainly the gastrointestinal tract reaction, while liver function abnormality and myalgia were scarcely found. Conclusion Xuezhikang capsule have the same effects as those of statins in reducing the levels of TC, TG, LDL-C and raising HDL-C in patients with hyperlipidemia. No obvious adverse reactions are found during the short-term treatment. But further confirmation with clinical randomized controlled trials of high quality, large sample and long-term follow-up is needed.
Objective To study the clinical protective effect of hemoperfusion combined with hemofiltration on inflammatory reaction of hyperlipidemia severe acute pancreatitis (HLSAP). Methods Thirty-seven patients with HLSAP treated between January 2012 and December 2014 were selected and divided into three groups based on different treatments. Thirteen patients were allocated into hemoperfusion combined with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration group (HP+CVVH group) and treated with hemoperfusion combined with hemofiltration; 11 patients were allocated into continuous veno-venous hemofiltration group (CVVH group) and treated with hemofiltration; and all the other patients were allocated into control group and treated with conventional treatment. The levels of blood triglyceride, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE)Ⅱ score of the patients after treatment were observed. The hospital stay, organ dysfunction rate and mortality of the patients were measured. Results Compared with the control group, the levels of blood triglyceride, C-reactive protein, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and APACHE Ⅱ score of the patients in the HP+CVVH group and CVVH group were both significantly reduced 72 hours after therapy (P<0.05). However, the levels of blood triglyceride, C-reactive protein, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and APACHE Ⅱ score of the patients in the HP+CVVH group were significantly lower than those in the CVVH group at the same time point (P<0.05). The hospital stay of the patients in the HP+CVVH group and CVVH group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the CVVH group, the hospital stay of patients in the HP+CVVH group was significantly shorter (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in organ dysfunction rate and mortality among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Hemoperfusion combined with hemofiltration is an effective method for HLSAP by cleaning the inflammatory mediators availably and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory reaction.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of probucol for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) with hyperlipidemia. Methods Fifty-two patients (104 eyes) of NPDR with hyperlipidemia were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 26 patients (52 eyes) in each group. Both groups received diet and exercise guidance, oral hypoglycemic agents and (or) intensive insulin therapy. After blood sugar and blood pressure were controlled, the treatment group received probucol 0.5 g, two times per day; and the control group received atorvastatin of 10 mg, one time per day. The total course was 12 months. Before and after one, three, six and 12 months, all patients underwent vision, ophthalmoscope, fundus fluorescein angiography, blood and urine tested. Variations of visual acuity, fundus condition, macular edema, triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) and 8-0HdG were observed before and after treatment. Results The total effective rate of visual prognosis were 44.23% and 40.38% in the treatment group and the control group, the difference had no statistical significacy (Z=-0.335, P＞0.05). Retinal hemorrhages and microaneurysms alleviated after treatment in both groups.The total efficiency of fundus prognosis was 65.38% in the treatment group and 36.54% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.973,P＜0.05). Macular edema was in six and five eyes in the treatment group and the control group respectively, which were lower than before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (chi;2=4.833, 4.300;P＜0.05). Between the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant (chi;2=0.102,P＞0.05). Twelve months after treatment, TG, TC and LDLC were decreased in the treatment group (t=15.653, 7.634, 14.871) and control group (t=13.275, 7.415, 13.632), and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). HDLC showed no significant difference than before in the two groups (t=0.584, 0.275;P＞0.05). TG, TC, LDLC and HDLC showed no difference between the two groups (t=1.857, 0.133, 1.671, 0.875;P＞0.05). 8-0HdG decreased gradually during the one, three, six and 12 months in the treatment group (t=7.352,15.581, 27.324, 28.143) and control group (t=6.877, 8.672, 14.671, 14.855) after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). In the first month after treatment, 8-0HdG showed no difference between the two groups (t=0.513,P＞0.05). In the 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, the 8-0HdG was lower in the treatment group than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.434, 5.917, 5.226;P＜0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of NPDR with hyperlipidemia, probucol can reduce blood lipid, stable visual function and relieve macular edema.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect and safety of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) on patients with hyperlipidemic pancreatitis. MethodsDatabases including the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2014), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about CVVH on patients with hyperlipidemic pancreatitis till Feb. 12, 2014. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature was screened, data were extracted, and the methodological quality of included studies was also assessed. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 7 trials met eligibility criteria, involving 360 cases, including 183 cases of CVVH group and 177 cases of control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with only routine medical treatment, CVVH significantly reduced the levels of lipid (WMD=-4.63, 95%CI-5.98 to-3.27, P < 0.000 01), levels of IL-6 (WMD=-29.59, 95%CI-34.30 to-24.89, P < 0.000 01), overall mortality (RR=0.39, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.84, P=0.02), and APACHE II score (WMD=-3.34, 95%CI-5.12 to-1.56, P=0.000 2) after treatment. ConclusionCVVH is more effective for hyperlipidemic pancreatitis than only routine medical treatment. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, further high-quality, multicenter, large-scale RCTs are required to verify the above conclusion.
目的 探讨成都市高脂血症患病率及合并心血管危险因素的现状及城乡差异。 方法 2010年3月－11月随机抽样选取城市和农村社区，采用问卷、体格检查和实验室检查共调查35～70岁人群2 032例，其中城市社区1 015例，农村社区1 017例。进一步调查其中高脂血症患者合并的主要心血管危险因素。 结果 ① 成都市城乡高脂血症患病率为23.53%（474/2 032）。城市高于农村，分别为27.88%（283/1 015）和18.78%（283/1 017）；② 城市高脂血症人群中合并高血压、糖尿病和冠心病均高于农村。高脂血症合并高血压人群最多，城乡分别是51.95%（147/283）和31.94%（61/191），其次是合并“糖尿病”和“冠心病”人群；③ 城市高脂血症患者合并高血压人群无论男女均高于农村，但城市男性合并糖尿病者高于农村，城市女性合并冠心病者高于农村；④ 城乡高脂血症患者在合并饮酒、脑卒中史、腹型肥胖和肥胖之间差异无统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 高血压、糖尿病和冠心病是城市高脂血症患者干预的重点危险因素。其中城市男性的糖尿病和城市女性冠心病干预更为重要。