ObjectiveTo explore the mid-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in treatment of Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsBetween September 2009 and March 2014, a total of 49 patients (57 hips) who were diagnosed with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH were treated with THA and subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. Of the 49 patients, 7 were male and 42 were female with an average age of 44.6 years (range, 20-73 years). The preoperative Harris score was 44.68±3.39 and the preoperative leg length discrepancy was (5.27±0.55) cm.ResultsAll incisions healed primarily. All patients were followed up 32-87 months (mean, 52.1 months). At last follow-up, the Harris score was 85.67±2.89 and the leg length discrepancy was (1.12±0.48) cm, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative values (t=–69.53, P=0.00; t=42.94, P=0.00). X-ray films showed that bone union of the femoral osteotomy end at 6 months after operation. There was no loosening and subsidence of prosthesis at last follow-up.ConclusionThe subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy with THA in treatment of Crowe type Ⅳ DDH can obtain satisfactory mid-term effectiveness with low risk of peripheral vascular and nerve traction injuries.
Objective To evaluate early to medium-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with a history of hip preservation surgery with secondary severe osteoarthritis for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods The clinical data of 25 DDH patients (31 hips) who had severe osteoarthritis after hip preservation surgery and received THA between September 2009 and March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 1 male and 24 females; the age ranged from 18 to 65 years, with an average age of 43 years; 8 hips were classified into Crowe type Ⅰ, 9 hips were type Ⅱ, 3 hips were type Ⅲ, and 11 hips were type Ⅳ. The time between osteotomy and THA ranged from 31 to 51 years, with an average of 31.96 years. Preoperative hip flexion range of motion was (69.31±29.72)°, abduction range of motion was (24.00±14.79)°; and Harris hip score was 45.3±15.5. Postoperative Harris hip score, hip range of motion, complications, radiographic findings, and implant survival rate were analyzed. Results Patients in both groups were followed up 2-132 months, with an average of 51 months. During the follow-up, periprosthetic fracture occurred in 1 case; there was no complication such as dislocation, periprosthetic infection, nerve palsy, or deep vein thrombosis. At last follow-up, the hip flexion range of motion was (109.52±11.17)°, abduction range of motion was (41.25±5.59)°, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative values (t=8.260, P=0.000; t=6.524, P=0.000). The Harris hip score was 91.5±4.1, and the difference was significant when compared with preoperative score (t=11.696, P=0.000); among them, 13 cases were excellent and 12 cases were good. Radiographic evaluation showed that the center of acetabular rotation moved up 0-18 mm (mean, 6.35 mm). The cup abductor angle was 28°-49° (mean, 37.74°) and the coverage rate was 69.44%-98.33% (mean, 81.04%). All femoral stems were fixed in neutral position without varus or valgus. No osteolysis, radiolucent line, or implant migration was observed. By the end of follow-up, none of the patients underwent revision and the survival rate of prothesis was 100%. ConclusionTHA is still the gold standard for the treatment of DDH patients with secondary osteoarthritis after hip preservation surgery. The postoperative joint function can be rapidly restored, the patients’ quality of life can significantly improve, and the early to medium-term survival rate of the prosthesis is satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the morphological changes of the proximalfemur and their implication to the total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe Ⅱ/Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods The experimental gr oup was composed of 15 hips in 14 patients (Crowe Ⅱ, 9 hips; Crowe Ⅲ, 6 hips ) with osteoarthritis secondary to Crowe Ⅱ/Ⅲ DDH (2 males, 12 females; age, 35-61 years). None of the patients had accepted any osteotomy treatment. The control group was composed of 15 normal hips in 15 patients with unilateral DDH (3 males, 12 females; age, 35-57 years). Twelve hips came from the experimental group and the other 3 came from the patients with unilateral Crowe Ⅰ DDH. The femurswere examined with the CT scanning. The following parameters were measured: theheight of the center of the femoral head (HCFH), the isthmus position (IP), theneckshaft angle(NS), the anteversion angle, the canal flare index, and the canal width. Then, the analysis of the data was conducted. Results HCFH and IP in theexperimental group and the control group were 50.1±6.7 mm, 50.1±7.4 mm, and 107.4±21.5 mm, 108.7±18.1 mm，respectively, which had no significant differencebetween the two groups（Pgt;0.05）. In the experimental group and the control group, the NS were 138.3±10.0° and 126.7±5.7°，the anteversion angles were 36.5±15.9° and 18.8±5.4°, and the canal flare indexes were 4.47±0.40and 5.01±0.43. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the above 3 parameters （Plt;0.05）. As for the canal width of the femur, therewasa significant difference in the interior/exterior widths and the anterior/posterior widths at the level of 2 cm above the lesser trochanter and 4 cm belowthe lesser trochanter between the two groups （Plt;0.05）; however, there was nosignificant difference in the canal width of the femur at the isthmus between the two groups（P＞0.05）. Conclusion It is necessary to evaluate the morphology of the proximal femur before the total hip arthroplasty performed in patients with Crowe Ⅱ/Ⅲ DDH. The straight and smaller femoral prosthesis should be chosen and implanted in the proper anteversion position duringoperation.
ObjectiveTo measure and analyze the radiographic characteristics of the leg length discrepancy in adult patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsThe clinical data of 112 patients with unilateral DDH who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 16 males and 96 females with an age of 20-76 years (mean, 42.9 years). According to the Crowe classification, there were 25 hips of type Ⅰ, 26 hips of type Ⅱ, 15 hips of type Ⅲ, and 46 hips of type Ⅳ (26 hips of type ⅣA without secondary acetabular formation, and 20 hips of type ⅣB with secondary acetabular formation). Full-length X-ray films of the lower limbs in the standing position were used to measure the following parameters: greater trochanter leg length (GTLL), greater trochanter femoral length (GTFL), lesser trochanter leg length (LTLL), lesser trochanter femoral length (LTFL), tibial length (TL), and intertrochanteric distance (ITD). The above parameters on the healthy and affected sides were compared and the difference of each parameter between the healthy and affected sides was calculated. Taking the difference of 5 mm between the healthy side and the affected side as the threshold value, the number of cases with the healthy side was greater than 5 mm and the affected side was greater than 5 mm were counted respectively. The difference of the imaging parameters between the healthy side and the affected side were compared between different Crowe types and between type ⅣA and type ⅣB.ResultsThere was no significant difference in GTLL and LTFL between healthy and affected sides (P>0.05); LTLL and TL of affected side were longer than healthy side, GTFL and ITD were shorter than healthy side, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). The constituent ratio of long cases on the affected side of TL and LTLL was greater than the constituent ratio of long cases on the healthy side, while the constituent ratio of long cases on the healthy side of GTFL and ITD was greater than the constituent ratio of long cases on the affected side; there was no obvious difference in the constituent ratio of long cases on the healthy side or the affected side of GTLL and LTFL. The comparison between different Crowe types showed that only the difference in TL between type Ⅰ and type Ⅳ was significant (P<0.05), the difference of each imaging parameter among the other types showing no significant difference (P>0.05). Compared with type ⅣB, the differences of GTLL, TL, and ITD of type ⅣA were bigger, and the differences were significant (P<0.05); the differences of other parameters between type ⅣA and type ⅣB were not significant (P>0.05).ConclusionIn adult unilateral DDH patients, the leg length on the healthy side and the affected side is different, and the difference mainly comes from the TL and ITD, which should be paid attention to in preoperative planning.
Objective To summarize the biomechanical characteristics, diagnosis, and hip arthroscopic treatment of borderline developmental dysplasia of hip (BDDH) with Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (Cam FAI). Methods The literature on BDDH with Cam FAI at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results In patients with BDDH and Cam FAI, the femoral neck anteversion angle and femoral neck shaft angle increase, the pelvis tilts, and the acetabulum rotates, resulting in instability of the hip joint. In order to maintain the stability of the hip joint, the direction of biomechanical action of the hip joint has changed, which further affects the anatomical structures such as the proximal femur and acetabular morphology. BDDH with Cam FAI can be diagnosed clinically by combining lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, and acetabular index. BDDH with Cam FAI can be effectively treated through arthroscopic polishing of the edges of the acetabular proliferative bone, excision of Cam malformations, and minimally invasive repair of the glenoid lip and cartilage of the hip joint. Conclusion Currently, there is no unified standard for the diagnosis and treatment of BDDH with Cam FAI. Minimally invasive treatment of the hip under arthroscopy can achieve good early- and medium-term effectiveness, and has certain advantages in repairing and maintaining the integrity of the glenoid lip and suturing/compression joint capsule. However, the long-term effectiveness needs to be further followed up to determine. The timing of surgery, intraoperative bone edge depth polishing, and joint capsule suturing/compression techniques also need to be further explored.
Objective To summarize the effectiveness of acetabulum reconstruction with autologous femoral head structural bone graft in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for Hartofilakidis type Ⅱ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods A clinical data of 24 patients (27 hips) with Hartofilakidis type Ⅱ DDH, who underwent acetabulum reconstruction with autologous femoral head structural bone graft in primary THA between October 2012 and October 2020, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 3 males and 21 females, with an average age of 40 years (range, 20-58 years). The body mass index was 19.5-35.0 kg/m² with an average of 25.0 kg/m². There were 21 cases of unilateral hip and 3 cases of bilateral hips. The hip Harris score was 51.1±10.0. The leg length discrepancy of unilateral hip patients was (19.90±6.24) mm. The intraoperative blood loss, wound healing, and complications were recorded. The postoperative bone union, coverage rates of acetabular prosthesis and bone graft, and aseptic loosening of the prosthesis were evaluated based on X-ray films, and the improvement of hip function was observed by Harris score. Results The intraoperative blood loss was 50-1000 mL (median, 350 mL). All incisions healed by first intention, and no fracture, hematoma, infection, or other complications occurred. Sciatic nerve injury occurred in 1 case (1 hip) and deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 case (1 hip). All patients were followed up 15-103 months (median, 40.5 months). At last follow-up, Harris score was 92.6±4.1 and the difference was significant when compared with preoperative value (t=−28.043, P=0.000). No hip prosthesis needed revision. X-ray films showed that the coverage rate of acetabular prosthesis was 91%-100% (mean, 97.8%), and the coverage rate of bone graft was 13%-46% (mean, 23.8%). The healing time of bone graft was 3-6 months (mean, 4.7 months). At last follow-up, all bone grafts completely healed without any signs of collapse. There was no graft resorption, ectopic ossification or osteolysis, or obvious aseptic loosening of the acetabular and femoral prostheses. The leg length discrepancy of unilateral hip patients was (2.86±2.18) mm, and the difference was significant when compared with preoperative value (t=17.028, P=0.000). Conclusion For Hartofilakidis type Ⅱ DDH patients, if the lateral acetabular prosthesis not covered by the host bone exceeds 5 mm in primary THA, autologous femoral head can be used for structural bone grafting, and the short- and mid-term effectiveness are favorable.
ObjectiveTo review the imaging evaluation, treatment progress, and controversy related to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in adolescents and adults. Methods The domestic and abroad hot issues related to adolescents and adults with DDH in recent years, including new imaging techniques for assessing cartilage, controversies over the diagnosis and treatment of borderline DDH (BDDH), and the improvement and prospect of peracetabular osteotomy (PAO) were summarized and analyzed. ResultsDDH is one of the main factors leading to hip osteoarthritis. As the understanding of the pathological changes of DDH continues to deepen, the use of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage can further evaluate the progress of osteoarthritis and predict the prognosis after hip preservation. There are still controversies about the diagnosis and treatment of BDDH. At the same time, PAO technology and concepts are still being improved. ConclusionCartilage injury and bony structure determine the choice of surgical methods and postoperative prognosis of hip preservation surgery. The hip preservation of adolescent and adult DDH patients will move towards the goal of individualization and accuracy.
Objective To summarize the characteristics and biomechanical research progress of common acetabular reconstruction techniques in patients with Crowe type Ⅱ and Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), and provide references for selecting appropriate acetabular reconstruction techniques for clinical treatment of Crowe type Ⅱ and Ⅲ DDH. Methods The domestic and foreign relevant literature on biomechanics of acetabular reconstruction with Crowe type Ⅱ and Ⅲ DDH was reviewed, and the research progress was summarized.Results At present, there are many acetabular reconstruction techniques in Crowe type Ⅱ and Ⅲ DDH patients undergoing THA, with their own characteristics due to structural and biomechanical differences. The acetabular roof reconstruction technique enables the acetabular cup prosthesis to obtain satisfactory initial stability, increases the acetabular bone reserve, and provides a bone mass basis for the possible secondary revision. The medial protrusio technique (MPT) reduces the stress in the weight-bearing area of the hip joint and the wear of the prosthesis, and increases the service life of the prosthesis. Small acetabulum cup technique enables shallow small acetabulum to match suitable acetabulum cup to obtain ideal cup coverage, but small acetabulum cup also increases the stress per unit area of acetabulum cup, which is not conducive to the long-term effectiveness. The rotation center up-shifting technique increases the initial stability of the cup. Conclusion Currently, there is no detailed standard guidance for the selection of acetabular reconstruction in THA with Crowe type Ⅱ and Ⅲ DDH, and the appropriate acetabular reconstruction technique should be selected according to the different types of DDH.
【Abstract】 Objective To explore the methods and appl ication value of surface shaded display (SSD) and multiplanarreconstruction (MPR) in the evaluation of acetabular morphology in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) before total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods From October 2003 to November 2006, 17 patients (3 males and 14 females, aging from 35 years to 61 years) with osteoarthritis secondary to DDH were scanned with spiral CT preoperatively. According to the Crowe standard, 19 dysplasia hips were classified as type I in 4 hips, type II in 9 hips, type III in 6 hips. The obtained hip CT data were developed with SSD and MPR to observe spational position and bone stock of the acetabula. Results The dislocated extent was 25%-89% in these dysplasia hips according to the Crowe method and their sharp angles all exceeded 45°. Bone defect occurred to each of the acetabula, among which it was located in anterosuperior acetabulum in 5 hips, in superolateral acetabulum in 11 hips and in posterosuperior acetabulum in 3 hips. The hip images made with MPR showed that the minimum thickness of the medial wall of acetabula ranged from 2.0 mm to 10.9 mm. Among 15 unilateral dysplasia patients, the opening difference anddepth difference between the dysplasia acetabulum and the contralateral one ranged from 2.7 mm to 19.1 mm and from 2.3 mm to 13.1 mm, respectively. Conclusion SSD and MPR of spiral CT are effective methods in evaluating acetabular morphology preoperation and contribute to intraoperative acetabular reconstruction in patients with DDH performed THA.