ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of cervical disc replacement for cervical myelopathy. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2008, 20 patients (26 segments) with cervical myelopathy underwent single-level (14 segments) or bi-level (6 segments) cervical disc replacement. There were 8 males and 12 females with an average age of 46 years (range, 26-65 years). The disease duration ranged 2-18 months (mean, 7 months). The effectiveness was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cervical range of motion (ROM), and the Odom et al. criteria. Heterotopic ossification (HO), osteophyte formation, and prosthesis loosening were observed. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention, with no severe complication. Twenty patients were followed up 30-48 months (mean, 34 months). At 28 months after operation, according to Odom et al. criteria, the results were excellent in 17 cases and good in 3 cases. The VAS scores of the neck, shoulder, and upper limb were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05). At 30 months after operation, X-ray films showed that 20 replaced segments were mobile and ROM was (10.6 ± 4.5)°, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) when compared with that of upper adjacent segment (10.8 ± 3.7)° and lower adjacent segment (7.5 ± 4.2)°. HO occurred in 10 cases (13 segments). No displacement, subsidence, or loosening occurred except 1 case of retrodisplacement of the prosthesis. ConclusionCervical disc replacement can obtain good effectiveness. It can maintain normal cervical ROM and physiological curvature. But it needs further long-term follow-up to evaluate the function and the influence on the adjacent segments.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of prophylactic C4, 5 foraminal dilatation in posterior cervical open-door surgery on postoperative C5 nerve root palsy syndrome.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (cervical spinal cord compression segments were more than 3) who met the selection criteria between March 2016 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 40 patients underwent prophylactic C4, 5 foraminal dilatation in posterior cervical open-door surgery (observation group) and 40 patients underwent simple posterior cervical open-door surgery (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, Nurick grade of spinal cord symptoms, and preoperative diameter of C4, 5 intervertebral foramen, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The occurrence of C5 nerve root paralysis syndrome was recorded and compared between the two groups, including incidence, paralysis time, recovery time, and spinal cord drift. VAS and JOA scores were used to evaluate the improvement of pain and function before operation and at 12 months after operation.ResultsThe incisions of the two groups healed by first intention, and there was no early postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Patients of both groups were followed up 12-23 months, with an average of 17.97 months. C5 nerve root paralysis syndrome occurred in 8 cases in the observation group (3 cases on the right and 5 cases on the left) and 2 cases in the control group (both on the right). There was significant difference of the incidence (20% vs. 5%) between the two groups (χ2=4.114, P=0.043). Except for 1 case in the observation group who developed C5 nerve root palsy syndrome at 5 days after operation, the rest patients all developed at 1 day after operation; the recovery time of the observation group and the control group were (3.87±2.85) months and (2.50±0.70) months respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (t=–0.649, P=0.104). At 12 months after operation, the JOA score and VAS score of cervical spine in the two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the difference of the cervical spine JOA score and VAS score between at 12 months after operation and before operation and the degree of spinal cord drift between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionProphylactic C4, 5 foraminal dilatation can not effectively prevent and reduce the occurrence of postoperative C5 root palsy, on the contrary, it may increase its incidence, so the clinical application of this procedure requires caution.
Objective To study the cl inical appl ication of Mobi-C prosthesis in treatment of anterior cervical discectomy and artificial disc replacement (ADR). Methods Between January 2009 and June 2009, 20 cases of degenerative cervical disease were treated with anterior discectomy and ADR by Mobi-C prosthesis, including 13 cases of cervical disc herniation and 7 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, and 25 Mobi-C prosthesis were implanted. There were 8 males and 12 females, aged 29-54 years (mean, 45.2 years). The disease duration was from 4 days to 5 years (mean, 1.2 years). Affected segments of process included C3, 4 in 1 case, C4, 5 in 2 cases, C5, 6 in 7 cases, C6, 7 in 5 cases, C4, 5 and C5, 6 in 2 cases, and C5, 6 and C6, 7 in 3 cases. Radiographs were taken regularly, and cervical range of motion (ROM) on segments of disc replacements were measured. The functions of cervical spinal cord were evaluated by “40 score” system (COA) preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at follow-up. The qual ity of l ife was evaluated by neck disabil ity index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Results All incisions healed by first intention. No perioperative compl ication was found. All cases were followed up 16.5 months on average (range, 14-18 months). There was no significant difference in cervical ROM of operatied segment between preoperation and follow-up duration (t=0.808，P=0.440). No heterotopic ossification was found at follow-up. COA score at last follow-up (38.20 ± 1.14) was significantly higher than preoperative one (32.10 ± 2.96) , (t=9.278，P=0.000) , and the improvement rate at last follow-up was 77.2% ± 5.4%. VAS score at last follow-up (3.20 ± 1.23) had significant difference when compared with preoperative one (5.10 ± 1.29), (t=10.585，P=0.000). NDI score at last follow-up (29.40 ± 4.55) had significant difference when compared with preoperative one (39.20 ± 3.80), (t=16.039, P=0.000). Conclusion A satisfactory short-term curative effect can be obtained by using Mobi-C prosthesis in treatment of anterior cervical discectomy and ADR.
Objective To evaluate the results of laminoplasty and foraminotomy in treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Methods Of 29 patients, there were 16 males and 13 females,aged 38 to 72 years with an average of 59 years. The reasons of intervertebral foramen stenosis were：prolapse of intervertebral disc, osteophyte formation of Luschka joint, spinal canal stenosis combined with thicknessof flavum ligmentum and facet joint hypertrophy. The most frequently affected intervertebral foramen were C5,6 and C6,7. The mostsignifcant symptoms after impairment of nerve root were reduced sensation, muscle weakness and diminished reflexes. On the basis of laminoplasty, theforaminotomy was performed on the stenotic foramen, including grade Ⅰ decompression on 13 occasions, degree Ⅱ on 21 occasions; and double level decompressions were performed on 5 patients.Results After operation, reduced sensation was recovered most significantly andquickly, and the recovery of muscle weakness followed, while the recovery of diminished reflexes was the slowest and worst. In the followed-up patients, the percentage of excellent and good results was 97%.Conclusion In the cervical spondylotic patients who also have foraminar stenosis, performing laminoplasty with foraminotomy can getgood results. If the indication are chosen properly, it can be used widely in clinic.
ObjectiveTo assesse the effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone in treating multi-level cervical degenerative disease. MethodsBetween August 2010 and August 2012, 62 eligible patients with multi-level cervical degenerative disease were treated, and the clinical data were reviewed. Of 62 patients, 32 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone (group A), and 30 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation (group B). Both groups showed no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, lesion types, and affected segments (P>0.05), it had comparability. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score; the fused segment height, subsidence rates of Cages, global cervical lordosis, and fusion rates were also compared. ResultsThe operation time of group B[(109.7±11.2) minutes] was significantly more than group A[(87.8±6.9) minutes] (t=-2.259, P=0.037). Primary healing of incisions was obtained in all patients of 2 groups. All patients were followed up; the follow-up period ranged from 8 to 27 months (mean, 15.8 months) in group A, and from 9 to 28 months (mean, 16.4 months) in group B. There was no complication and internal fixation failure. The JOA score and VAS score were significantly improved at last follow-up when compared with preoperative scores in 2 groups (P<0.05). According to Robinson standard for axial symptom severity, the results were excellent in 20 cases, good in 9, fair in 2, and poor in 1, with an excellent and good rate of 90.63% in group A; the results were excellent in 19 cases, good in 7, fair in 3, and poor in 1, with an excellent and good rate of 86.67% in group B; and no significant difference was found between 2 groups (χ2=0.765, P=0.382). The fused segment height at immediate after operation and at last follow-up and global cervical lordosis at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between groups A and B in the Cage subsidence height[(1.4±0.9) mm vs. (1.2±1.6) mm], Cage subsidence rate[9.52% (8/84) vs. 7.59% (6/79)], and fusion rate[95.24% (80/84) vs. 96.20% (76/79)]. ConclusionAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone can obtain good clinical results and radiologic indexes, avoid plate-related complications and reduce operation time. It is a safe and effective surgical option in the treatment of multi-level cervical degenerative disease.
ObjectiveTo study the efficacy of anterior cervical Vectra-t dynamic plate and titanium mesh for cervical spondylosis. MethodsA retrospectively analysis involving 20 cases (44 sections) from June 2010 to October 2012 was performed in the department of orthopaedic in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. All patients received the operation of anterior cervical vertebral resection decompression, titanium mesh and bone graft, and Vectra-T plate. The data of the JOA scores, cervical curvature, the conditions of vertebral body fusion after bone graft and the situation of titanium mesh subsidence were all collected. Statistical analysis were performed using SPSS 19.0 software. Resultsa) All the 20 cases received a 12-to 30-month follow-up. The results of statistical analysis showed that:the JOA scores were as follows:7.68±1.66 for preoperative, 10.91±1.97 for after surgery and 12.74±1.27 for the endpoint of follow-up, and significant differences were found between these scores (P < 0.05). b) There was no loose of screw or plate. The local cervical angle and regional cervical angle were improved after surgery. In the 44 segments of fusion, 43 segments fused within 6 months, one of the segment delayed to fuse 12 months after surgery. c) The subsidence of titanium mesh were 2.7±2.7 mm on average in 3 months after surgery, 3.6±1.0 mm on average in 6 months after surgery, 3.9±1.2 mm on average in 12 months after surgery and 4.0±1.2 mm on average in last follow-up. Titanium mesh subsidence mainly concentrated in the postoperative period of 6 months. After six months of titanium mesh subsidence was no longer apparent. ConclusionThe application of Vectra-T dynamic plate can effectively improve the curvature of the cerical sagittal position, prevent protrusion deformity, reduce the related complications after bone graft, effectively avoid the stress shelter in the static plate, andspromote the fusion between the cervical vertebral bodies. However, the long-term curative effects are still needed to be assessed by large sample randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up.
Objective To compare the outcomes of two operative methods, the anterior decompression in subsection and the anterior decompression in one section, which were used to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods Data of multilevel CSM undergoing the anterior decompression in subsection (33 cases, the subsection group) and the anterior decompression in one section (19 cases, the one section group) from July 1999 to January 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. The- incidence of perioperative complications and the rate of fusion were evaluated by the postoperative X-ray and MRI examinations, and improvement of the neurological function was evaluated by the JOA score.Results The incidence of perioperative complications was 36.8%in the one section group, mainly including immigration of the plate and grafts,which was settled by the revision surgery; while the incidence of perioperative compilcations was 12.1% in the subsection group, mainly including the immigration of the titanium mesh. There was a significant difference between the two groups (Plt;0.05). 84.2％ of the patients in the one section group and 81.8％ of the patients in the subsection group developed bony fusion by the end of the follow-up (9-31 mon, averaged 112 mon), and there was no significant differencebetween the two groups (Pgt;0.05). According to the JOA score, the ratio of the improvement in the neurological function was 70.4% in the subsection group and 64.4% in the one section group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The anterior decompression in subsection is more rational for the surgical treatment on the multilevel CSM than the anterior decompression in one section. It can provide an equal decompressive effect but a more stable local mechanical environment right after the surgery and can maintain it well, which is critical for the bony fusion.
Objective To assess the mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods A retrospective study was made on 48 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent anterior decompression and fusion with n-HA/PA66 cage between August 2008 and January 2010. There were 33 males and 15 females with an average age of 54.5 years (range, 42-72 years). The disease duration was 3-12 months (mean, 6 months). The affected segments included 35 cases of single segment (C3, 4 in 7, C4, 5 in 18, and C5, 6 in 10) and 13 cases of double segments (C3-5 in 7 and C4-6 in 6). Of 48 patients, 28 was diagnosed as having intervertebral disc protrusion, 12 as having ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, and 8 as having vertebral osteophyte; 35 patients underwent single segmental anterior corpectomy and fusion, and 13 patients underwent single segmental anterior discectomy and fusion. The pre- and post-operative radiographs (cervical anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and three-dimensional CT scans) were taken to measure the segmental height and lordosis angle. Brantigan et al assessment standard and visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate the graft fusion and the improvement of clinical symptoms, respectively. Results All patients were followed up for 46 months on average (range, 36-54 months). No cage breaking, displacement, or sliding was found. At last follow-up, 36 cases were rated as Brantigan grade E, 10 cases as grade D, and 2 cases as grade C; the fusion rate was 96%. Both segmental height and lordosis angle were corrected significantly at immediate and 6 months after operation and last follow-up than those before operation (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found among different time points after operation (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, the cage subsidence was (1.3 ± 1.0) mm. The VAS and JOA scores at 6 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05), and the scores at last follow-up were superior to ones at 6 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with the n-HA/PA66 cage in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy is satisfactory because it can effectively restore and maintain segmental height and lordosis angle and promote osseous fusion.