ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of bundle strategies on the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care unit (ICU), in order to effectively prevent and control the severe situation of multiple drug-resistant bacteria in ICU.MethodsWe selected patients who admitted into the ICU from January 2016 to December 2017 as study subjects, and monitored 6 types of MDROs. Basic information was surveyed and collected from January to December 2016 (before intervention), while bundle strategies on MDROs were implemented from January to December 2017 (after intervention), including issusing isolation orders, hanging isolation marks, wearing isolation clothes, using medical articles exclusively, cleaning and disinfecting environment, implementing hand hygiene, etc. Then we compared the MDRO detection rate, nosocomial infection rate, MDRO nosocomial infection rate, and compliance rates of interventions between the two periods.ResultsThe MDRO detection rate before intervention was 77.10%, and that after intervention was 49.12%, the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=69.834, P<0.001). The nosocomial infection rate of ICU decreased from 23.51% before intervention to 15.23% after intervention, the MDRO nosocomial infection rate decreased from 13.70% before intervention to 5.84% after intervention, and the differences between the two periods were statistically significant (χ2=8.594, P=0.003; χ2=13.722, P<0.001). The compliance rates of doctor’s isolation orders, hanging isolation marks, wearing isolation clothes, using medical articles exclusively, cleaning and disinfecting environment, and hand hygiene, as well as the correct rate of hand hygiene after intervention (92.12%, 93.55%, 81.77%, 84.24%, 82.90%, 77.39%, and 96.37%) were significantly higher than those before intervention (31.94%, 52.00%, 23.43%, 48.18%, 67.16%, 59.46%, and 88.64%), and the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.001).ConclusionThe implementation of the above bundle strategies on the prevention and control of MDROs can decrease the MDRO detection rate and MDRO nosocomial infection rate.
【摘要】 目的 探讨甲型H1N1流感危重症患者的抢救疗效。 方法 2009年10月－2010年1月，对我院ICU收治5例甲型H1N1流感危重症患者采用集束化治疗方案进行救治，并就患者的器官功能变化进行评价。 结果 5例患者平均住院天数为（11.8±5.59）d，4 例存活，1例死亡。存活患者在治疗过程中急性生理和既往健康 （APACHE）Ⅱ、多器官功能障碍综合征评分（MODS）、全身性感染相关的器官衰竭评分 （SOFA）总体呈逐渐下降趋势。死亡者APACHEⅡ、SOFA评分均呈逐渐升高趋势。 结论 对甲型H1N1流感危重症患者采取集束化救治疗效良好。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effect of bundle therapy on severe patients with influenza A (H1N1). Methods Bundle therapy were used in 5 severe patients with influenza A from October 2009 to January 2010. The patients’ organ dysfunction were observed for. Results The average in-hospital duration was (11.80±5.59) days. Four patients survived and one died with the survival ratio of 80%. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) score and sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score gradually decreased in 4 survived patients, while gradually increased in the died patient. Conclusion Bundle therapy is effective on patients with severe influenza A.
目的 探讨危重症手足口病的集束化综合救护的护理方案。 方法 通过比较儿科使用集束化综合护理方案后1年（2009年5月－2010年4月）的26例危重症手足口病并发症的发生率，确定预防危重症手足口病的集束化综合护理方案的有效性。 结果 使用集束化综合护理方案后，26例患儿均治愈出院，其中仅3例有后遗症。 结论 集束化综合护理救治作为主动预防措施比传统的被动预防更有针对性和有效。
Objective To explore whether bundled care for anesthesia management can reduce the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Methods The data of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients admitted to the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University between July and November 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a bundled care group and a control group based on whether anesthesia management was implemented according to the bundled care. The demographic characteristics, intraoperative anesthesia management methods, postoperative conditions, and incidence of PONV between the two groups of patients were analyzed and compared. Results A total of 314 patients were included. Among them, there were 124 cases in the bundled care group and 190 cases in the control group; PONV occurred in 52 cases, the incidence of PONV was 16.6% (52/314). Except for surgical time and postoperative incision infiltration (P>0.05), there were statistically significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, anesthesia time, airway establishment, and postoperative analgesic use between the two groups of patients (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of PONV between the bundled care group and the control group (17 vs. 35 cases; χ2=1.205, P>0.05). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that PONV was correlated with gender [odds ratio=0.107, 95% confidence interval (0.030, 0.375), P<0.001], and using bundled care [odds ratio=0.388, 95% confidence interval (0.169, 0.894), P=0.026]. Conclusions Women are at high risk of PONV among patients undergoing day laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The risk of PONV is lower when using bundled care.
In recent years, the widespread use of medical devices has led to the increasing frequency of device related pressure injuries (DRPI), which seriously affects the quality of life of patients and increases the burden on the healthcare system. The management model of DRPI has become an effective means of coping. This article reviews the application status of the care bundles model, SSKIN clinical management model, SECURE clinical management model in the prevention of DRPI. According to the characteristics of different management models, the key steps of implementation are given, aiming to provide a reference for exploring the prevention and management model of DRPI suitable for China’s national conditions.
Objective To investigate the effect of a real-time compliance dashboard to help reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia ( VAP) with ventilator bundle. Methods 240 patients who were admitted into the intensive care unit ( ICU) of Shougang Hospital of Peking University and had received mechanical ventilation ( MV) for over 48 hours, between January 2010 and November 2011, were studied prospectively. The patients were divided into two groups by random number table, ie. a dashboard group ( n = 120) with implementation of a real-time compliance dashboard to help reduce VAP with ventilator bundle, and a control group ( n=120) with implementation of usually routine order to help reduce VAP with ventilator bundle. The success rate of ventilator bundle implementation, incidence of VAP, duration of MV, duration within ICU, mortality within 28 days, cost within ICU were compared between two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the success rate of ventilator bundle implementation obviously increased ( 81.6% vs. 52.5%) , incidence of VAP ( 14. 5/1000 days of MV vs. 36.2 /1000 days of MV) , duration of MV [ 5( 4,7) days vs. 8( 6,11) days] , duration within ICU [ 8( 6,12) days vs. 13( 8,16) days] , mortality of 28 days ( 12.6% vs. 28.6% ) , and cost within ICU ( 36,437 vs. 58,942) in the dashboard group obviously reduced ( Plt;0.05) . Conclusions Implementation of a real time compliance dashboard to help reduce VAP with ventilator bundle can obviously improve medical personnel compliance and reduce incidence of VAP, duration of MV, duration within ICU, mortality and cost in ICU than those of routine medical order to help reduce VAP with ventilator bundle.
【摘要】 目的 总结2例特重烧伤患者在ICU的救治经验和体会，旨在进一步提高特重烧伤患者的救治水平。 方法 回顾分析2009年6月2例重症烧伤患者的诊治经过程和临床资料。 结果 1例患者病情好转，转出ICU继续治疗，1例患者伤后37 d因消化道出血死亡。 结论 特重烧伤患者的治疗需要整体计划和多科协作。【Abstract】 Objective To summarize the experiences of the management of two patients with severe burn, so as to improve the treatment of severe burn patients. Method Treating processes and clinical data of two patients with severe burn in June 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Result After prompt treatments, one patient died of severe bleeding in the digestive tract 37 days after the burn and the other patient recovered and left ICU for further treatment. Conclusion Bundle treatment and multi-subject cooperation are important for treating patients with severe burn.
ObjectiveTo observe the effects of cluster therapy combined with anisodamine, dexamethasone and ambroxol on arterial blood gas, inflammatory cytokines and pulmonary pathological changes by making an early (<48 h) primary blast lung injury model in rats. MethodsEighty Wistar rats were randomly divided into six groups, ie. a control group (n=5), an injury group (n=15), an ambroxol treatment group (n=15), a dexamethasone treatment group, a scopolamine treatment group (n=15), a combination of ambroxol, dexamethasone and anisodamine group (n=15). The treatment groups were injected intraperitoneally with ambroxol 46.7 mg/kg (three times a day) or (and) dexamethasone at 5 mg·kg–1·d–1 or (and) anisodamine at a dose of 3.33 mg/kg (three times a day). The rats in the injury group were injected intraperitoneally with an equal volume of normal saline. Respiratory rate and weight change were observed before and after injury. Five rats were sacrificed at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after injury in each experimental group. Arterial blood gas analysis, Yelverton pathological score, lung tissue wet/dry weight ratio, serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured. The lung histopathology was observed. ResultsAfter lung blast injury, the rats in the injury group showed progressive respiratory acidosis, and hypoxemia increased with the increase of IL-6 and TNF-α in a time-dependent manner. The PaO2 decreased in the groups with ambroxol, dexamethasone and anisodamine alone or in combination with anisodamine, and the contents of serum IL-6 and TNF-α decreased. Pathological edema and inflammatory infiltration of lung tissue were alleviated significantly. ConclusionsAfter treatment with dexamethasone, anisodamine and ambroxol after lung blast injury, blood gas analysis is improved, inflammatory factor level is decreased and lung injury is alleviated, indicating that the three drugs can treat lung detonation injury in rats. The cluster therapy is superior to the single drug therapy.
ObjectiveTo study the effect of new bundle interventions on medical staff’s cognition of occupational exposure protection and exposure rate, and provide evidence for reducing medical staff’s occupational exposure.MethodsThe 1 435 medical practitioners in 37 clinical/technical departments of Nanchong Central Hospital were selected as the research objects. Bundle intervention strategies about occupational exposure for whole population and high risk population were implemented, and the medical staff’s cognition of occupational exposure, occurrence of occupational exposure, and post-exposure reporting in 2017 (before intervention) and 2018 (after intervention) were investigated and compared to evaluate the intervention effects.ResultsThe numbers of valid survey forms collected before intervention and after intervention were 1 160 and 1 421, respectively. The total awareness rate increased from 91.10% before intervention to 96.10% after intervention (P<0.001). The exposure rate and average rank of exposure frequency after intervention were lower than those before intervention (10.98% vs. 17.50%, 1 250.74 vs. 1 340.32), the reporting rate of initial exposure after intervention (69.23%) was higher than that before intervention (57.64%), and the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionThrough gradually implementing the new bundle interventions, medical staff can improve the cognition of occupational exposure, reduce the occurrence of occupational exposure, improve the enthusiasm of reporting, and create a safe atmosphere.