ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of butylphthalide soft capsule with routine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodsDatabases including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, EMbase, and The Cochrane Library were electronically searched from September 2002 to July 2018 to collect randomized controlled trials of butylphthalide soft capsule with routine treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. The trial was screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the methodological quality of the included trial was assessed. Meta-analysis was then performed by Revman 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 studies involving 576 patients were included. The butylphthalide soft capsule group included 283 patients and the control group included 293 patients. The result of meta-analysis showed that butylphthalide soft capsule with routine treatment (Donepezil hydrochloride or Memantine or EGb761) significantly improved the score of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) (MD=3.19, 95% CI 2.69 to 3.69, P<0.001) and clinical efficacy (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.53, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in number of adverse events between the butylphthalide group and the control group (RR=1.13, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.67, P=0.52).ConclusionsBased on the routine treatment, combining with butylphthalide soft capsule can further facilitate cognitive function of AD and improve clinical efficacy. At the same time, no increase in adverse reactions has been found. However, due to the low quality of the included studies, more high quality randomized controlled trials are required to verify the results.
This study aims to explore the diagnosis in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on magnetic resonance (MR) images, and to compare the differences of bilateral hippocampus in classification and recognition. MR images were obtained from 25 AD patients and 25 normal controls (NC) respectively. Three-dimensional texture features were extracted from bilateral hippocampus of each subject. The texture features that existed significant differences between AD and NC were used as the features in a classification procedure. Back propagation (BP) neural network model was built to classify AD patients from healthy controls. The classification accuracy of three methods, which were principal components analysis, linear discriminant analysis and non-linear discriminant analysis, was obtained and compared. The correlations between bilateral hippocampal texture parameters and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were calculated. The classification accuracy of nonlinear discriminant analysis with a neural network model was the highest, and the classification accuracy of right hippocampus was higher than that of the left. The bilateral hippocampal texture features were correlated to MMSE scores, and the relative of right hippocampus was higher than that of the left. The neural network model with three-dimensional texture features could recognize AD patients and NC, and right hippocampus might be more helpful to AD diagnosis.
ObjectiveTo obverse the changes of macular choroidal thickness (CT) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodsThis was a case-control study. Twenty-one patients with mild to moderate AD confirmed by Neurology Department of Jinhua Central Hospital from November 2016 to June 2018 and 21 age-matched control subjects were concluded in the study. There was no significant difference in age (t=0.128), intraocular pressure (t=0.440) and axial length (t=1.202) between the two groups (P＞0.05). There was significant difference in mini-mental state examination score (t=8.608, P＜0.05). CT was measured by OCT with enhanced depth imaging technique in the subfoveal choroid, at 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm from the center of the fovea nasal (NCT0.5, 1.0 mm), temporal (TCT0.5, 1.0 mm), superior (SCT0.5, 1 .0 mm), and inferior (ICT0.5, 1.0 mm). Independent-samples t test was used to compare the results obtained from these two groups.ResultsSFCT (t=2.431), NCT0.5, 1.0 mm (t=3.341, 2.640), TCT0.5, 1.0 mm (t=3.340, 2.899), SCT0.5, 1.0 mm (t=3.576, 3.751) and ICT0.5, 1.0 mm (t=2.897, 2.903) were significantly thinner in AD eyes than those in control eyes.ConclusionCompared with healthy subjects, patients with mild to moderate AD showed a significant reduction in CT.
ObjectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis comparing the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnostic systems based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) and structural MRI (sMRI) in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). MethodsOriginal studies dedicated to the development or validation of AI-assisted diagnostic systems based on 18F-FDG PET/CT or sMRI for AD diagnosis were retrieved from the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were collected, and the risk of bias and clinical applicability of the included studies were assessed using the PROBAST checklist. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. ResultsTwenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 38 2×2 contingency tables related to diagnostic performance. Specifically, 24 contingency tables were based on 18F-FDG PET/CT to distinguish AD patients from normal cognitive (NC) controls, and 14 contingency tables were based on sMRI for the same purpose. The meta-analysis results showed that for 18F-FDG PET/CT, the AI-assisted diagnostic systems had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and SROC-AUC of 89% (95%CI 88% to 91%), 93% (95%CI 91% to 94%), and 0.96 (95%CI 0.93 to 0.97), respectively. For sMRI, the AI-assisted diagnostic systems had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and SROC-AUC of 88% (95%CI 85% to 90%), 90% (95%CI 87% to 92%), and 0.94 (95%CI 0.92 to 0.96), respectively. ConclusionAI-assisted diagnostic systems based on either 18F-FDG PET/CT or sMRI demonstrated similar performance in the diagnosis of AD, with both showing high accuracy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the quality of life of family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to explore the related factors. MethodsTwenty family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease were surveyed with short form 36 health survey questionnaire between October 2013 and August 2014. ResultsThe subjects who were over 60 years old had lower scores in the dimensions of physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problem and role limitations due to emotional problem than those below 60 years old. Female subjects scored better than male subjects in the dimension of vitality. The sons and daughters had higher scores than the wives and husbands in the dimensions of physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problem and role limitations due to emotional problem. The subjects whose patients had medical insurance scored better than those whose patients with no insurance. The differences above were all statistically significant. The scores of caregivers with senior middle school edudation or above were higher than the caregivers with lower education level in the dimensions of mental health, vitality and general health perceptions. ConclusionThe quality of life of the family members of AD patients is obviously affected by many factors. It is very important to implement planned, targeted, reasonable and effective interventions to enhance the quality of life of these people.
Alzheimer’ s disease is the most common kind of dementia without effective treatment. Via early diagnosis, early intervention after diagnosis is the most effective way to handle this disease. However, the early diagnosis method remains to be studied. Neuroimaging data can provide a convenient measurement for the brain function and structure. Brain structure network is a good reflection of the fiber structural connectivity patterns between different brain cortical regions, which is the basis of brain’s normal psychology function. In the paper, a brain structure network based on pattern recognition analysis was provided to realize an automatic diagnosis research of Alzheimer’s disease and gray matter based on structure information. With the feature selection in pattern recognition, this method can provide the abnormal regions of brain structural network. The research in this paper analyzed the patterns of abnormal structural network in Alzheimer’s disease from the aspects of connectivity and node, which was expected to provide updated information for the research about the pathological mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive and irreversible neurodegenerative disease. Neuroimaging based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most intuitive and reliable methods to perform AD screening and diagnosis. Clinical head MRI detection generates multimodal image data, and to solve the problem of multimodal MRI processing and information fusion, this paper proposes a structural and functional MRI feature extraction and fusion method based on generalized convolutional neural networks (gCNN). The method includes a three-dimensional residual U-shaped network based on hybrid attention mechanism (3D HA-ResUNet) for feature representation and classification for structural MRI, and a U-shaped graph convolutional neural network (U-GCN) for node feature representation and classification of brain functional networks for functional MRI. Based on the fusion of the two types of image features, the optimal feature subset is selected based on discrete binary particle swarm optimization, and the prediction results are output by a machine learning classifier. The validation results of multimodal dataset from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) open-source database show that the proposed models have superior performance in their respective data domains. The gCNN framework combines the advantages of these two models and further improves the performance of the methods using single-modal MRI, improving the classification accuracy and sensitivity by 5.56% and 11.11%, respectively. In conclusion, the gCNN-based multimodal MRI classification method proposed in this paper can provide a technical basis for the auxiliary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.
Objective To investigate the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on sleep disorder and neuropsychological characteristics in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) combined with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods A total of forty-two early AD patients with OSAHS were randomly divided into a CPAP combined treatment group (20 cases) and a simple medicine treatment group (22 cases). The changes of neurocognitive function were assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised (HVLT). Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) was used to evaluate the depression mood changes. The sleep characteristics and respiratory parameters were evaluated by polysomnography. The changes of the patients’ sleep status were assessed by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The changes of sleep status, cognitive function and mood in the CPAP combined treatment group were compared before and three months after CPAP treatment, and with the simple medicine treatment group. Results After three months of CPAP treatment, the ESS, PSQI and PHQ9 scores in the CPAP combined treatment group were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment, whereas MoCA, MMSE and HVLT (total scores and recall ) in the CPAP combined treatment group were increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). After CPAP treatment, the respiratory parameters apnea hypopnea index in the CPAP combined treatment group was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), and the minimum blood oxygen saturation was significantly higher than that before treatment (P<0.05). However, the sleep characteristics and parameters did not show statistically significant changes compared with those before treatment (P>0.05). The ESS, PSQI and PHQ9 scores were significantly reduced in the CPAP combined treatment group compared with the simple medicine treatment group (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant changes of cognitive scores between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The degree of low ventilation and hypoxia is alleviated, and the daytime sleepiness and depression is improved in early AD patients with OSAHS after three-month continuous CPAP treatment. Cognitive function is significantly improved, whereas there is no significant change in sleep structure disorder.
【摘要】 目的 探讨3分法画钟测验（clock drawing test，CDT）对阿尔茨海默病患者（Alzheimer disease，AD）与血管性痴呆患者（vascular dementia，VD）的鉴别作用。 方法 收集四川大学华西医院神经内科门诊及住院部2009年9月-2010年6月就诊的认知功能障碍患者150例，进行病史采集及神经心理测试量表，筛选出AD患者57例及VD患者43例，共计纳入100例。在两者间进行CDT，分析两者间CDT有无差别、CDT与中文版简易智能量表（Chinese version of the mini-mental state examination，MMSE）及临床痴呆评定量表（clinical dementia rating scale，CDR）的相关性。 结果 AD患者及VD患者间CDT差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）；CDT与MMSE及CDR有相关性，Spearman相关系数分别为0.573和-0.542（Plt;0.001）。 结论 3分法画钟测验无法准确区分AD和VD，但对粗略判断AD及VD程度可能有一定效果。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the differential function of the three-point scoring system for the clock drawing test (CDT) between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VD). Methods We analyzed the clinical data of 150 patients with cognitive impairment treated in the neurology and inpatient departments of our hospital from September 2009 to July 2010. Medical history of the subjects were collected. Through the assessment by neurological and psychological rating scale, we picked out 57 patients with AD and 43 with VD and tested them with CDT. The difference of CDT results between the two groups, and the correlation of CDT with Chinese version of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) were analyzed. Results There was no statistical difference of CDT results between AD and VD patients (Pgt;0.005). CDT had a correlations with MMSE and CDR, the Spearman correlation coefficient being 0.573 and -0.542 respectively (Plt;0.001). Conclusion The three-point scoring system for the clock drawing test cannot differentiate exactly between Alzheimer Disease and Vascular Dementia, but it can make a gross judgment of the degree of AD and VD.