目的 了解血液科护士在对患者抗肿瘤药物治疗护理过程中的防护现状。 方法 2009年12月－2010年3月对血液科一、二病区和骨髓移植层流病房的护理人员,采用便利抽样方式进行问卷调查。 结果 血液科化学疗法防护现状与国际水平有差距，护理人员虽有一定的防护意识，但仍较薄弱。 结论 加强护理人员化学治疗药物毒性及防护知识的教育，提高防范意识，并制定严格的防护措施及管理制度是确保护理人员职业安全的根本与途径。
目的 了解医院内血源性职业暴露高风险人群，有针对性采取防护措施，降低血源性职业暴露的发生率。 方法 对2008年1月－2011年12月四川省妇幼保健院52例血源性职业暴露医务人员，按照暴露人群、暴露方式、暴露病种、暴露地点的不同进行调查分析。 结果 52例职业暴露人群中护士27例（占51.9%）；产房和手术室为高发职业暴露场所，共32例，分别为17例（占32.7%）和15例（占28.8%）；职业暴露病种主要为乙型肝炎，共27例（占51.9%）；暴露方式主要为针刺伤，共37例（占71.2%）。 结论 提高医务人员职业防护意识，规范操作流程，加强自身防护是减少职业暴露的根本所在。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated treatments with low-dose rituximab for relapsing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Methods A perspective study. 21 patients who were diagnosed with NMOSD one year ago were recruited for rituximab treatment. Of 21 patients, one was male, 20 were females. Onset age was 10 - 51 years, the mean onset age was (26.2±12.0) years. Duration of disease was 2.3 - 25.8 years, the mean duration was (9.2±5.9) years. Best corrected vision activity (BCVA), expanded disability status scale (EDSS), annualized relapsing rate (ARR) were valued to investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated treatments with low-dose rituximab. The BCVA was examined using Snellen chart, and converted to logMAR. The mean BCVA was 1.13±1.09, the mean BCVA in better eyes was 0.4±0.68, the mean BCVA in latter eyes was 1.87±0.90. The mean EDSS was 3.09±0.70. The mean ARR was 1.04±0.65. All patients underwent two cycles of RTX treatment. The annually induction treatment was RTX 100 mg per week for 4 weeks. Of 21 patients, 12 patients had treatment within one month after attack. The mean follow-up period was (28.4±4.9) months. The side effects were recorded, BCVA, EDSS, ARR were valued to investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated treatments with low-dose rituximab. Paired t test, independent sample t test and Chi-squared test were used. Results The mean BCVA at last follow-up was 0.62±0.91, the mean BCVA in better eye was 0.62±0.91, the BCVA in latter eye was 1.0±1.01. The mean EDSS was 2.26±1.07. The mean ARR was 0.21 ± 0.3. After the treatment, patient had significant improvement on BCVA in worst eye (t=4.256), ARR (t=2.900), EDSS (t=4.620) with the significant differences (P＜0.05).Thirteen relapses in 9 patients were observed. B lymph cells were more than 0.01% in all relapses. There was no significant difference on the BCVA in better eye (t=1.840, P＞0.05). There were 9 patients had relapse, 13 times in total. Of 13 relapses, B lymph cell count was performed in 12 relapses, and the counts were 0.01% - 0.14%. There were no significant difference between relapsed patients and non-relapsed patients on onset age (t=0.67, P=0.51), whether underwent plasma exchange treatment (χ2=1.61, P＞0.05), with/without auto-immune antibody ratio (χ2=1.61, P＞0.05). Of 21 patients, 8 patients had side effects, including 5 patients with infection, 4 patients with chest congestion, 3 patients with hair losing, 2 patients with skin rashes, headache and short of breath, 1 patient with tinnitus, palpitation and fatigue. Four patients had more than one symptom. Of all patients who had side effects, slowing down the infusion speed of RTX or infusing 5 mg of dexamethasone could relieve the discomfort. Conclusion Lose-dose rituximab reduces the frequency of NMOSD relapses and is well tolerated.
【Abstract】 Objective To summarize the application and research status of the hip protector (HP) and to discuss the current problems and further research direction. Methods HP related literature in recent years was reviewed and analyzed. Results Biomechanics experiment studies have shown that HP could protect hip joint from fractures caused by falling, however, the protective effect of HP has not shown clinically. Conclusion HP biomechanical experiments show better protective effect, which may be related with the lower impact energy; in clinical application, poor compliance of HP is considered as the main reason of weak protective effect.
【摘要】 目的 了解学生对医院感染职业防护的基础知识的认知程度和学习需求。 方法 2010年3月采用自行设计问卷，对参加《医院感染与职业防护》课程学习的医学学生进行摸底调查。 结果 92.73%不知道标准预防措施和锐器伤后的正确处理方法及补救措施；27.27%不知道抽血时应戴手套；25.45%不清楚医务人员“六步洗手法”；90.91%不知晓工作服应交医院统一洗涤。 结论 学生防护知识薄弱，防护行为不全面、不规范。教学应重点帮助学生树立标准预防观念，掌握正确职业防护知识，在临床工作中以避免和减少各种危险因素的侵袭。【Abstract】 Objective To examine and evaluate the students’ knowledge and needs in studying hospital infection control and occupational protection. Methods Using a self-designed questionnaire in March 2010, we did a survey on students who attended the course of hospital infection control and occupational protection. Results Among all the students, 92.73% did not know standard prevention measures, and the correct treatment and remedial measures for sharp injuries; 27.27% did not know gloves should be worn at the time of blood drawing; 25.45% did not know the "six-step" hand-washing; and less than one out of ten students used hospital laundry to wash their uniform. Conclusions The students have a low level of relevant knowledge on occupational protection, and their protection behaviors were not complete or standard. Therefore, the teaching should help and support students to have a concept of standard prevention, and acquire sound knowledge and behavior of occupational protection in order to avoid and reduce the risk factors from their future clinical practices.
ObjectiveTo estimate the radiation dose (RD) to the general public and nuclear medicine technicians from patients undergoing 99mTc-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) myocardial perfusion imaging. MethodsFrom January to June 2015, 55 patients including 30 males and 25 females aged between 25 and 87 years[averaging (63.6±15.1)years] ready to undergo myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with 99mTc-MIBI were prospectively recruited in this study. Approximately at hour 1.5 after injection of 99mTc-MIBI, whole-body dose-equivalent rate was measured with a radiation-survey meter at 0.3 meter and 1.0 meter from the patients. On the basis of human 99mTc-MIBI metabolic rate proposed by the International Commission of Radiological Protection and human social contact model proposed by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, the RDs to the general public from patients who had completed 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging and left nuclear medicine department were calculated. On the assumption that a nuclear medicine technician typically spent 5 minutes at a distance of 0.3 meter for positioning the patient, the technician's RD was also estimated. ResultsThe RD to a family member sleeping with the patient at night was predicted to be 42.88-160.55 μSv, to a family member contacting the patient at daytime 7.50-29.38 μSv, to a colleague 9.89-38.78 μSv and to a nearby passenger 124.48-466.06 μSv. The RD to a technician per 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging procedure was predicted to be 1.72-6.44 μSv. ConclusionThe predicted RDs to the general public and technicians from exposure of patients undergoing 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging are significantly lower than the regulatory dose limits.
Objective To survey the current situation of the sharp injury in medical workers, and to provide scientific evidence for the prevention and protection of sharp injury. Methods Through applying the questionnaire of sharp injuries designed by Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Fudan University, 10% of the workers in all departments of West China Hospital of Sichuan University were selected as respondents according to their job categories. The main contents of the survey included the general information of respondents, reporting after sharp injuries, training participation, and the exposure sources, operations, premises and equipments related to sharp injuries over the past one year.Results Of 840 questionnaires distributed, 100% were valid. The ratio of male was 23% while the female was 72%. There were 50.20% of all respondents who once got injured, and 75% of the respondents having the history of sharp injury worked less than 10 years. The nurses, house keepers and physicians were in the top three positions of suffering from sharp injury; and the operating room was ranked as the highest risk department for sharp injuries. The known haematogenous exposure sources were 69 cases of hepatitis B, 19 syphilis, 6 hepatitis C, and 3 HIV. There were 62% of the respondents who had ever attended related training, and only 11.61% of the injured respondents reported their sharp injuries. Conclusion The incidence rate of the sharp injury is high, but the report rate is low. The operating room is the high risk department, and nurses, house keepers, and physicians are the high risk population for sharp injuries. The prevention and protection and training for sharp injury in target departments and population should be strengthened.