ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of open reduction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of knee joint with absorbable screws fixation and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation. Methods The clinical data of 26 patients with PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion who met the selection criteria between March 2015 and October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 14 patients were fixed with simple absorbable screw (group A), and 12 patients were fixed with absorbable screw combined with suture anchors (group B). All patients were confirmed by X-ray film, CT, or MRI preoperatively, and got positive results in preoperative posterior drawer tests. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side of affected limb, time from injury to operation, comorbidities, and preoperative Meyers & McKeever classification, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. At last follow-up, Lysholm score and IKDC score were used to evaluate the improvement of knee function. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication such as vascular and nerve injury or venous thrombosis occurred. All 26 patients were followed up 9-89 months, with an average of 55.3 months. The follow-up time of group A and group B was (55.7±23.2) and (56.8±29.3) months, respectively, with no significant difference (t=−0.106, P=0.916). Radiographs showed bone healing in both groups at 3 months after operation, and no complication such as infection and traumatic arthritis occurred. At last follow-up, the posterior drawer test was negative in both groups, and the Lysholm score and IKDC score significantly improved when compared with the pre-operative values (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement value between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of the knee joint, the open reduction and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation can achieve reliable fracture reduction and fixation, which is conducive to the early rehabilitation and functional exercise, and the postoperative functional recovery of the knee joint is satisfactory.
目的:探讨带线锚钉治疗急性创伤性髌骨脱位后髌骨内侧缘撕脱骨折伴内侧髌股韧带损伤的疗效。方法:自2003年9月至2008年7月共收治28例急性髌骨脱位后髌骨内侧缘撕脱骨折伴内侧髌股韧带损伤患者。对28例患者均采用开放手术下带线锚钉固定髌骨骨折及修复内侧髌股韧带损伤。术后1年进行术后的髌骨骨折Levack功能评分。结果:所有患者术后随访时间12~30个月,平均(16±3.50)个月。术后1年的髌骨骨折Levack功能评分标准优23例,可3例,差2例,优秀率达82.14%。无再次髌骨脱位或伴脱位患者。结论:开放手术下带线锚钉治疗对髌骨骨折固定及内侧髌股韧带修复可靠,是治疗急性创伤性髌骨脱位后髌骨内侧缘撕脱骨折伴内侧髌股韧带损伤的有效方法。
Objective A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled noninferiority study was used to evaluate the short-term safety and effectiveness of domestic polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) suture anchor for rotator cuff repair by comparing with the imported PEEK suture anchor commonly used in clinical practice. Methods A total of 59 patients with rotator cuff tears who were admitted between May 2019 and October 2019 were selected as the research objects. Among them, 3 patients were excluded because they did not meet the selection criteria, and 1 patient withdrew from the study because of serious adverse events. A total of 55 patients were included in the study. They were randomly divided into trial group (n=27) and control group (n=28). The trial group used PEEK suture anchors produced from REJOIN Company, and the control group used PEEK suture anchors from American Arthrex Company. Two patients in control group were lost to follow-up. Twenty-seven patients in trial group and 26 patients in control group were included in the final quantitative analysis. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, side and sizes of rotator cuff tears, composition ratio of patients with type 2 diabetes, and preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The patients were followed up regularly after operation. The postoperative follow-up included safety evaluation (complications, anchor position, and anchor bone reaction) and effectiveness evaluation (shoulder joint function and pain scores, rotator cuff integrity based on Sugaya classification criteria). Results The operations in both groups were successfully completed, and there was no complication related to the operation and suture anchor. All incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between trial group [(5.85±0.77) months] and control group [(5.96±0.72) months] (t=0.535, P=0.595). MRI examination indicated that the repaired tendons were fixed and the anchors did not get loose or torn. At 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after operation, there was no patient with grade 3-4 anchor bone reaction in the two groups, and there was no significant difference in the bone reaction grading between groups (P>0.05). After operation, the VAS scores of the two groups gradually decreased, and the ASES scores, Constant-Murley scores, and UCLA scores gradually increased, and there were significant differences between groups at each time point (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups at different time points (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in Sugaya classification of rotator cuff integrity at 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after operation between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The short-term safety and effectiveness of domestic PEEK suture anchors in rotator cuff tear repair are not significant different from those of imported PEEK suture anchors commonly used in clinical practice.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of transosseous suture in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) double bundle reconstruction. Methods The clinical data of 75 patients with recurrent patella dislocation who met the selection criteria between January 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were treated with MPFL double bundle reconstruction, and divided into study group (39 cases, using new transosseous suture technique) and control group (36 cases, using traditional suture anchor fixation) depending on the intraoperative fixation technique. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, affected knee side, preoperative tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, Insall-Salvati ratio, knee range of motion, Kujala score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, congruence angle, and tilt angle between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Kujala score, IKDC score, and knee range of motion were used to evaluate the functional improvement of patients before and after operation. The congruence angle and tilt angle were measured on X-ray films. Results There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 24-36 months, with an average of 29.4 months. There was no complication such as incision infection, fat liquefaction, patellar redislocation, and prepatellar pain during follow-up. At last follow-up, the Kujala score, IKDC score, knee range of motion, congruence angle, and tilt angle of two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe application of suture anchor or transosseous suture to complete MPFL double bundle reconstruction can restore patellar stability, and there is no significant difference in the short-term effectiveness between them.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of a single threaded anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy in the treatment of fresh bony Bankart injury. Methods Between January 2017 and May 2021, 12 patients with fresh bony Bankart injury caused by trauma were treated with a single threaded anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy. There were 10 males and 2 females with an average age of 38.8 years (range, 21-64 years). The time between injury and operation ranged from 7 to 30 days (mean, 15.8 days). Preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 44.9±17.4, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score was 13.1±5.5; the forward supination, lateral external rotation, and lateral internal rotation of shoulder were (130.8±11.8)°, (25.0±7.9)°, and 9.2±1.6, respectively. CT scan and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction showed that the fracture fragment area was less than 1/4 of the glenoid area in 10 cases, and 1/4-1/2 in 2 cases. The operation time was recorded. During follow-up, ASES score, UCLA score, Rowes score, and shoulder range of motion were used to evaluate the effectiveness, and shoulder CT scan and 3D reconstruction were used to evaluate the fracture position and healing. Results The operation time ranged from 50 to 150 minutes (mean, 85.5 minutes). All patients were followed up 3-18 months (mean, 9.1 months). There was no serious adverse effect such as infection, re-dislocation, or thrombosis. Three patients had shoulder adhesions after operation. At last follow-up, the forward supination of shoulder [(162.1±30.3)°], lateral external rotation [(37.5±11.2)°], and lateral internal rotation (9.2±1.6) significantly improved when compared with those before operation (t=3.331, P=0.003; t=3.153, P=0.005; t=2.716, P=0.013). The ASES score was 89.7±11.8 and the UCLA score was 32.8±2.4, which significantly increased when compared with those before operation (t=7.368, P<0.001; t=11.370, P<0.001). The Rowes score ranged from 75 to 100 (mean, 92.9). Among them, 9 cases were excellent and 3 cases were good, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. CT re-examination showed that the fracture line disappeared in 11 cases, and the fracture alignment was good; the alignment of the fracture fragment was poor in 1 case whose fracture fragment area was between 1/4 and 1/2 of the glenoid area. Conclusion For the fracture fragment area not exceeding 1/4 of the glenoid, the labrum-capsule complex at the lower end of the bone fragment intact, and the non-comminuted fresh bony Bankart injury, a single threaded anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy can achieve better effectiveness, has the advantages of less trauma and faster postoperative recovery.
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty (ELP) with anchor fixation on flurosis cervical stenosis (FCS). Methods From February 2005 to February 2006, 20 patients with FCS underwent ELP using anchor fixation (group A) and 24 patients with FCS received ELP using conventional silk thread fixation (group B). In group A, there were 11 males and 9 females aged (58.0 ± 11.2) years old, the course of disease ranged from 6 months to 5 years, and the stenosis involved 3 vertebral levels in 3 cases, 4 levels in 8 cases, and 5 levels in 9 cases, andthe sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal was (7.30 ± 5.23) mm. While in group B, there were 11 males and 13 females aged (61.0 ± 9.1) years old, the course of disease ranged from 5 months to 5 years, the stenosis involved 3 vertebral levels in 5 cases, 4 levels in 10 cases, and 5 levels in 9 cases, and the sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal was (7.11 ± 4.92) mm. No significant differences were evident between two groups in terms of the general information (P gt; 0.05). Before operation and at 24 months after operation, the nerve function was assessed by JOA score, the axial symptom (AS) was evaluated using Chiba 12-point method, and the changes of cervical lordosis index (CLI) and cervical range of motion (CRM) were detected by imaging examination. Results All wounds healed by first intention. All patients were followed up for 24 months. JOA score: in group A, it was improved from 7.4 ± 1.5 before operation to 14.6 ± 2.1 at 24 months after operation with an improvement rate of 61% ± 3%; in group B, the score was increased from 7.1 ± 2.2 to 12.6 ± 2.5 with an improvement rate of 52% ± 5%; significant differences were evident in two groups between before and after operation, and between two groups in terms of the improvement rate (P lt; 0.05). AS score: in group A, it was improved from 6.2 ± 2.1 before operation to 10.8 ± 0.3 at 24 months after operation with an improvement rate of 74% ± 4%; in group B, the score was increased from 6.3 ± 1.9 to 8.8 ± 0.5 with an improvement rate of 39% ± 3%; significant differences were evident in two groups between before and after operation, and between two groups in terms of improvement rate (P lt; 0.05). X-ray films and CT scan at 24 months after operation displayed that there was no occurrence of “breakage of door spindle” or “re-close of door” in two groups, there was no occurrence of anchor loosing in group A, and the molding of the spinal canal was satisfactory in two groups. Preoperatively, the CLI was 11.9 ± 1.9 in group A and 11.3 ± 2.2 in group B and the CRM was (39.5 ± 2.4)° in group A and (40.2 ± 1.8)° in group B. While at 24 months after operation, the CLI was 9.5 ± 2.2 in group A and 8.2 ± 2.8 in group B, and the CRM was (30.6 ± 2.0)° in group A and (28.7 ± 2.4)° in group B, suggesting there was a significant decrease when compared with the preoperative value and group A was superior to group B (P lt; 0.05). The saggital diameter of the cervical spinal canal 24 months after operation was (13.17 ± 2.12) mm in group A and (12.89 ± 3.21) mm in group B, indicating there was a significant difference when compared with the preoperative value (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion Compared with conventional silk thread fixation, ELP using anchor fixation brings more stabil ity to vertebral lamina, less invasion to the posterior muscular-skeletal structure of the cervical spine, sl ight postoperative neck AS, andsatisfactory cl inical outcomes.
ObjectiveTo observe the characteristics of acetabular labrum injury in Pipkin fractures and the effectiveness of repairing the labrum with suture anchor. MethodsBetween July 2010 and July 2013, 10 cases of Pipkin fractures accompanied by acetabular labrum injury were treated. There were 7 males and 3 females with an average age of 32.5 years (range, 24-56 years). The causes of injury included traffic accident in 8 cases and falling from height in 2 cases. According to the Pipkin classification criteria, there were 6 cases of type Ⅱ, 2 cases of type Ⅲ, and 2 cases of type Ⅳ. The average interval from injury to operation was 8 days (range, 6-14 days). All the patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation through transtrochanteric approach with trochanteric osteotomy, and repair the labrum with suture anchor. The effectiveness was evaluated according to the Thompson & Epstein scoring scales after operation. ResultsAll incisions healed primarily without early complication of deep infection or deep vein thrombosis of lower limb. All the cases were followed up 22 months on average (range, 12-48 months). X-ray films showed that all osteotomies and acetabular fractures healed within 3-4 months, femoral head and femoral neck fracture healed within 6-11 months. MRI examinations showed that all repaired acetabular labrums well healed. One case had necrosis of the femoral head at 12 months after operation, and was treated by total hip arthroplasty. According to the Thompson & Epstein scoring scales at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 3 cases, fair in 1 case and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 80%. ConclusionThe diagnosis of acetabular labrum injury can be easily missed during Pipkin fracture, preoperative diagnosis should be combined with hip MRI. Trochanteric osteotomy through transtrochanteric approach, and repairing the labrum with suture anchor can restore the hip function effectively.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the channel-assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR) technique combined with flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer in the treatment of Achilles tendon sleeve avulsion. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 patients with Achilles tendon sleeve avulsion who underwent CAMIR technique combined with FHL transfer between January 2019 and January 2023. The cohort comprised 13 males and 4 females, aged 32 to 65 years (mean, 49.7 years). Etiologies included sports-related injuries in 15 cases and blunt trauma in 2 cases. The interval from injury to surgery ranged from 4 to 368 days (median, 15 days). All patients exhibited calcification at the Achilles tendon insertion site, with 7 cases complicated by Haglund deformity. Postoperative complications were meticulously monitored, and tendon healing was assessed via MRI. Clinical outcome were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, Tegner activity level rating scale, ankle activity score (AAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score, and subjective clinical scoring systems preoperatively and at last follow-up. Results The operation time was 50-62 minutes (mean, 56 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 5-50 mL (mean, 19.7 mL). All patients were followed up 12-67 months (mean, 38 months). No postoperative complication, such as Achilles tendon re-rupture, incision infection, deep vein thrombosis, heel raise insufficiency, or sural nerve injury, was observed. At last follow-up, MRI examination confirmed satisfactory tendon healing in all cases. Significant improvements were noted in VAS scores, Tegner activity level rating scale, AAS scores, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores, and VISA-A scores compared to preoperative ones (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the subjective clinical score ranged from 6 to 10 (median, 9).ConclusionThe CAMIR technique combined with FHL tendon transfer is a good treatment for repair of Achilles tendon sleeve avulsion, with good recovery of ankle function and few complications.