ObjectiveTo explore the factors that affect the drainage time of da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery, to analyze the coping strategies, and to provide a basis for shortening the drainage time of patients after surgery and speeding up the patients' recovery.MethodsThe clinical data of 131 patients who underwent da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from January 2019 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 68 were males and 63 were females, with an average age of 59.84±9.66 years. According to the postoperative thoracic drainage time, the patients were divided into two groups including a group A (drainage time≤ 5 days) and a group B (drainage time >5 days). Univariate analysis and logistic multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze the factors that may affect postoperative drainage time, and the correlation between different influencing factors and thoracic drainage time after da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery.ResultsLogistic multivariate analysis showed that age≥60 years (P=0.014), diabetes mellitus (P=0.035), operation time≥130 min (P=0.018), number of lymph node dissections≥15 (P=0.002), and preoperative albumin<38.45 g/L (P=0.010) were independent factors affecting the drainage time of da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery.ConclusionFor elderly patients with diabetes mellitus during the perioperative period, blood glucose should be actively controlled, reasonable surgical strategies should be formulated to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the operation, while reducing intraoperative damage and shortening the operation time. After the operation, patients should be guided to strengthen active coughing, expectoration and lung expansion. Thereby it can shorten drainage time and speed up the recovery of patients after operation.
Objective To investigate the clinical application of da Vinci surgical system in nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods Five cases of breast cancer who underwent NSM and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction were analyzed from March 2022 to April 2022. Evaluation endpoints included the key points of operation, duration of surgery, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Results Two patients underwent implant-based postpectoral breast reconstruction without mesh. Three patients received prepectoral reconstruction with biological mesh, 2 of which underwent bilateral breast reconstruction. Operating duration of 5 patients was 240–320 min, with an average of 291 min. The blood loss was 10–30 mL, with an average of 18 mL. No patient switched to open surgery due to the uncontrolled bleeding. The average drainage volume was 78 mL/d (60–100 mL/d) in the first 3 days and 38 mL/d (30–50 mL/d) in the 3 to 7 days after operation. The drainage tube was removed 10–18 days after operation, with an average of 13.2 days. No postoperative infections or nipple-areolar complex necrosis were observed. The inpatient stay was 1–3 days, with an average of 1.8 days. One month after operation, the BREAST-Q satisfaction score was 64–82, with an average of 76.20. The average cost for operation was 45 072 RMB (43 420–47 524 RMB). Conclusions The robotic NSM and immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction is a safe procedure with better clinical outcomes and favorable patients’ satisfaction. However, the robotic system has longer operation time and higher cost. It still needs to be personalized in the clinical practice.
Objective To summarize the clinical data about mediastinal lesions, then to analyze the treatment effect of da Vinci robot system in the surgical treatment of mediastinal lesions. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 49 patients with mediastinal lesions in our hospital between January 2016 and October 2017. These patients were divided into two groups including a da Vinci robot group and a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) group according to the selection of the treatments. There were 25 patients with 14 males and 11 females at age of 56.5±17.9 years in the da Vinci group and 24 patient with 15 males and 11 females at age of 53.0±17.8 years in the VATS group. Results There was no statistical difference in surgery time between the two groups (t=–0.365, P=0.681). Less intraoperative blood loss (t=–2.569, P<0.001), less postoperative drainage amount within three days after surgery (t=–6.325, P=0.045), shorter period of bearing drainage tubes after surgery (t=–1.687, P=0.024), shorter hospital stays (t=–3.689, P=0.021), lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of postoperative 48 hours (t=–7.214, P=0.014) with a statistical difference in the da Vinci robot group compared with the VATS group. Conclusion The da Vinci robot system is safe and efficient in the treatment of mediastinal lesions compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic approach.
目的探讨术后综合干预在达芬奇机器人手术系统行纵隔肿瘤切除术患者预后上的优势。 方法选取2013年10月至2015年2月沈阳军区总医院行达芬奇机器人手术系统纵隔肿瘤切除术94例，随机分为干预组和对照组，每组各47例。对照组按胸外科一般常规予围手术期治疗与护理，干预组在此基础上实施针对此手术制定的综合术后干预策略。分析比较两组患者临床效果指标及生活质量。 结果干预组和对照组术后监护时间[（27.83±6.64）d vs.（55.85±14.97）d，P=0.000]、术后留置引流管时间[2（0～6）d vs.5（0～9）d，P=0.000]、术后疼痛评分（0.89±0.70 vs.2.83±0.92，P=0.000）、术后住院时间[（4.85±1.49）d vs.（8.11±1.94）d，P=0.000]、SAS评分（48.43±3.82 vs.57.66±3.42，P=0.000）、生活质量评分（38.06±3.24 vs.31.83±2.44，P=0.000）差异均有统计学意义。 结论术后综合干预加速了达芬奇机器人手术系统行纵隔肿瘤切除术术后患者的康复，提高了患者的生活质量。
ObjectiveTo summarize the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical approaches in thyroidectomy using the da Vinci robotic surgical system. MethodThe relevant to articles about da Vinci robotic thyroidectomy via different surgical approaches at home and abroad were retrieved and reviewed. ResultsThe robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy had a definite curative effect and was a mature technology. The bilateral axillary-breast approach thyroidectomy had a wide range of applications and was suitable for beginners. The robotic retroauricular approach thyroidectomy had great advantages in the dissection of lateral cervical lymph nodes. The transoral robotic thyroidectomy was a surgical approach that conformed to the minimally invasive concept. Conclusions Da Vinci robotic thyroidectomy via different surgical approaches has its corresponding application scope and advantages. Clinical surgeons should choose an optimal surgical approach according to the tumor location, size and number of patients and the advantages of the operator, so as to achieve the therapeutic effect of radical cure of tumors and reduction of injury.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of da Vinci robotic surgical system-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 456 patients who received radical resection of rectal cancer by the da Vinci robotic surgical system at the Southwest Hospital from March 2010 to March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Operative time, operative blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, hospital stay, and morbidity were evaluated. Resultsda Vinci robotic surgical system-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer were successfully carried out in 445 patients, and other 11 patients were converted to open surgery (2.4%). Of 456 patients, 322 patients underwent anterior resection of rectum procedure (70.6%), 126 patients underwent abdominoperineal excision procedure (27.6%), 8 patients underwent Hartmann procedure (1.8%). The mean operative time was (192±60) min, the mean operative blood loss was (110±93) mL, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes were 19±6, the mean length between distal resection margin and tumor were (3.5±1.8) cm, the mean time for patients taking normal activity was (2.9±1.5) d, the mean time of passage of the first flatus was (2.7±1.7) d, the mean hospital stay was (7.1±1.6) d. Surgical complications occurred in 40 patients (8.8%), and all the patients were recovery before leaving hospital. The mean follow-up time was 29.1-month (3-75 months). There were 70 patients suffered from occurrence or metastasis (16.2%), and 60 patients died (13.9%). Conclusionda Vinci robotic surgical system-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer is a feasible and safe surgical procedure with the minimal trauma, fast recovery, and satisfactory clinical efficacy.
ObjectiveTo compare the the effectiveness of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), in stageⅠ lung adenocarcinoma.MethodsFrom January 2012 to December 2018, 291 patients were included. The patients were allocated into two groups including a RATS group with 125 patients and a VATS group with 166 patients. Two cohorts (RATS, VATS ) of clinical stageⅠ lung adenocarcinoma patients were matched by propensity score. Then there were 114 patients in each group (228 patients in total). There were 45 males and 69 females at age of 62±9 years in the RATS group; 44 males, 70 females at age of 62±8 years in the VATS group. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the outcomes.Results Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group got less blood loss (P<0.05) and postoperative drainage (P<0.05) with a statistical difference. There was no statistical difference in drainage time (P>0.05) or postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05) between the two groups. The RATS group harvested more stations and number of the lymph nodes with a statistical difference (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS and mean survival time (P>0.05). While there was a statistical difference in DFS between the two groups (1-year DFS: 94.1% vs. 95.6%; 3-year DFS: 92.6% vs. 75.2%; 5-year DFS: 92.6% vs. 68.4%, P<0.05; mean DFS time: 78 months vs. 63 months, P<0.05) between the two groups. The univariate analysis found that the number of the lymph nodes dissection was the prognostic factor for OS, and tumor diameter, surgical approach, stations and number of the lymph nodes dissection were the prognostic factors for DFS. However, multivariate analysis found that there was no independent risk factor for OS, but the tumor diameter and surgical approach were independently associated with DFS.ConclusionThere is no statistical difference in OS between the two groups, but the RATS group gets better DFS.
Objective To summary the early experience of Dixon procedures with Da Vinci robotics surgical system for rectal cancer. Methods Eleven patients with rectal cancer underwent the combination of laparoscope and Da Vinci robotics surgical system with 4 trocars in our hospital from May. 2011 to Jan. 2012. Laparoscopy was firstly used to identify the possibility of the surgical procedure， then placed the 4 trocars， and maked sure the suspension of the sigmoid colon and the uterus. Transections of rectum were performed by a conventional laparoscopic method， and endoscopic separations were performed by Da Vinci robotics surgical system. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed and the experience was summarized. Results The Da Vinci robotics-assisted Dixon procedures were successfully performed in 11 patients and no one turned to laparotomy. The operating time was 210-330min （mean 288.6min）；the blood loss was 20-100ml （mean 40ml）； The number of lymph nodes dissected was 12-21 per case （mean 13.9 per case）；the duration of bowel movement and hospital stay were 18-26h （mean 22h） and 7-16d （mean 11.5d）， respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications related to the use of robotics， and no residual cancer cells at resection margin. Conclusions Da Vinci robotics-assisted Dixion procedure with 4 trocars and suspension of sigmoid colon are safe and feasible， and it is beneficial to the recovery of patients
目的 总结达芬奇机器人手术系统在胸外科的应用体验。 方法 回顾性分析 2016 年 1～11 月我院胸外科行肺叶切除和纵隔肿瘤切除 33 例患者的临床资料，其中男 24 例、女 9 例，年龄 51.3（22～76）岁。肺叶切除 18 例，肺楔形切除+肺段切除 11 例，纵隔肿瘤切除 4 例。分别对患者手术时间、淋巴结清扫数、中转开胸数、严重并发症（包括特发性急性肺损伤、呼吸衰竭、支气管胸膜瘘）、术中死亡人数等指标进行数据处理分析。 结果 33 例患者肺叶切除 18 例，术后病理证实为恶性肿瘤 9 例，肺结核 5 例，支气管扩张症 4 例；肺楔形切除+肺段切除 11 例，术后病理证实为结核球 8 例，良性结节 3 例。肺部疾病手术时间 90～210（130.7±50.6）min，淋巴结清扫 6～28（18.0±12.2）枚，纵隔肿瘤手术时间 60～90（78.3±32.9）min。所有患者均顺利完成手术，无严重并发症（特发性急性肺损伤、呼吸衰竭、支气管胸膜瘘），无中转开胸。 结论 达芬奇 Si 系统使微创技术有了新的生命力，为微创手术技术的进一步发展提供了可能。
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness, safety and ethics of Da Vinci Surigcal System (dVSS)in the field of cardiothoracic surgery, and provide evidence for its clinical application. MethodsWe searched VIP, CNKI, WanFang Database, CBM, official website of National Health and Family Planning Commission of People's Republic of China, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, WHO ICTRP search portal, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center, Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry and ISRCTN to collect clinical trials of dVSS for thoracic and cardiovascular diseases to evaluate its effectiveness, safety and ethics. The search time was from the establishment of each database to January 2014. The quality of included literatures was evaluated by Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). ResultsA total of 31 studies were identified including 4 case control studies and 27 retrospective studies involving 1 037 patients. The quality of included literatures was all very low. dVSS had been widely used in cardiothoracic surgery including coronary artery bypass grafting, valvuloplasty or valve replacement, thoracic tumor resection, etc. Compared with conventional surgery and thoracoscopy, the safety and effectiveness of dVSS was good, while its economic burden was heavier for the patients. dVSS could benefit patients and improve clinical level of cardiothoracic surgery. The disciplines and qualification of dVSS application was legal, but the maturity of its clinical use needed improvement, and relevant measures were required. The ethics in the research, introduction and application of dVSS had some problems which deserved more attention. ConclusionsClinical use of dVSS in cardiothoracic surgery is relatively safe and effective, but research quality needs to be improved. More studies on the economics and ethics of dVSS are needed in the field of cardiothoracic surgery. Relevant measures of precaution, accountability and patient protection are required to further improve clinical application of dVSS in cardiothoracic surgery, and whole-process ethical supervision should be conducted with the help of existing clinical ethical review platform.