Photosensitive occipital lobe epilepsy (POLE) is a rare idiopathic reflex focal epilepsy that can occur in all age groups. It is characterized by occipital lobe seizures induced by flashing stimuli (flashing sunlight, video games, TV commercials and programs, etc.). Photoparoxysmal response on EEG is induced by intermittent photic stimulation; Ictal EEG shows rapid spike rhythms are originated from the occipital region. There are no obvious abnormalities in brain image. POLE responds well to anti-seizure medications and has a good prognosis. This article reviews the research progress on POLE in order to improve the clinician’s understanding and reduce the rates of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis.
Objective To investigate the characteristics of multifocal visual evoked potential (mf-VEP) in healthy individuals, and provide normal reference values for its clinical application. Methods The mf-VEP of 37 healthy individuals (70 eyes) were examined by VERIS ScienceTM4.0. The visual stimulus was adart board with patterns consisted of 60 patches spanning a 25°visual field. The length of m-sequence was 214-1. The results were recorded by bipolar occipital straddle. The signal was amplified 100 K and was put through a band-pass filter between 3 and 100 Hz. The first slice of the second order kernel was analyzed by VERIS software. The summed responses of fields with different stimulus were a nalyzed and compared according to different ages, genders and eyes.Results The latencies and response densities of amplitude had statistically significant differences both in dimidiate and quartered field（Plt;0.05）. The latencies in ≥50 year group were much more delayed in some sectors of the visual field than those in lt; 50 year group（Plt;0.05）. The latencies of women were shorter than those of men（Plt;0.05）. There was no obvious difference of latencies and response densities of amplitude in each field sectors between both eyes（Pgt;0.05）. Conclusions The mf-VEP of healthy individuals can reflect the VEP at different field ocations objectively with its specific physiological characteristics, which may provide normal reference values for its clinical application.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：269-332)
Visual evoked potential (VEP) is a commonly used technique in neurology and ophthalmology in the process of disease diagnosis and treatment, which refers to the electrical signal transmitted by the visual pathway and recorded in the skull or cortex after stimulating the retina. The effect of monitoring and protection of vision in surgery near the visual pathway has attracted more and more attention recently. This article summarizes the experience and problems of intraoperative monitoring of VEP in terms of anesthesiology and instrument development, monitoring technology, and application innovation, and proposes future research directions. The purpose is to provide a reference for clinical application and research of intraoperative VEP monitoring.
ObjectiveTo observe the changes of vision and visual evoked potentials (VEP) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) before and after gene therapy.MethodsA retrospective cohort study. From December 2017 to October 2018, 35 cases of 70 eyes of m11778G.A/MT-ND4 mutant LHON patients who were diagnosed in the Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology and received gene therapy were included in the study. There were 30 males (87.71%) and 5 females (12.29%), with the mean age of 23.31±6.72 years. The gene therapy method was intravitreal injection of rAAV2-ND4 (recombinant adeno-associated virus carrying NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit 4 gene) into one eye. The eye with poor visual acuity was chosen as the injection eye. If both eyes had the same visual acuity, the right eye was designated as the injection eye. Seventy eyes were divided into the injected eye group and the non-injected eye group, in which were both 35 eyes. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and pattern VEP (PVEP) examinations were performed in the injected eye group and the non-injected eye group before treatment (baseline), 1, 3, and 6 months after injection. Compare the changes of BCVA and PVEP between the injected eye group and the non-injected eye group at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after injection. Independent sample t test, paired sample t test or two independent sample nonparametric test were performed to compare the two groups.ResultsCompared with baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, the BCVA of the injected eye group (t=3.530, 4.962, 5.281; P=0.001, 0.000, 0.000) and the non-injected eye group (t=3.288, 2.620, 2.252; P= 0.002, 0.013, 0.031) increased, and the difference was statistically significant; there was no statistically significant difference between VEP IT (tinjected eye group=−0.158, 1.046, −1.134; Pinjected eye group = 0.875, 0.303, 0.190; tnon-injected eye group=0.773, −0.607, −0.944; Pnon-injected eye group= 0.445, 0.548, 0.352) and VEP A (Zinjected eye group=−0.504, −0.934, −1.065; Pinjected eye group= 0.614, 0.351, 0.287; Znon-injected eye group=−0.521, −0.115, −0.491; Pnon-injected eye group = 0.602, 0.909, 0.623).ConclusionAfter gene therapy, the visual acuity of the injected and non-injected eyes of LHON patients improved; PVEP did not change significantly, and remained stable compared with baseline.
Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) has been widely used in the research of brain-computer interface (BCI) system in recent years. The advantages of SSVEP-BCI system include high classification accuracy, fast information transform rate and strong anti-interference ability. Most of the traditional researches induce SSVEP responses in low and middle frequency bands as control signals. However, SSVEP in this frequency band may cause visual fatigue and even induce epilepsy in subjects. In contrast, high-frequency SSVEP-BCI provides a more comfortable and natural interaction despite its lower amplitude and weaker response. Therefore, it has been widely concerned by researchers in recent years. This paper summarized and analyzed the related research of high-frequency SSVEP-BCI in the past ten years from the aspects of paradigm and algorithm. Finally, the application prospect and development direction of high-frequency SSVEP were discussed and prospected.
Objective To investigate the characteristic of the multifocal visual evoked potentials(MVEP)and the visual function across the visual field in anisometropic amblyopes and isometropic amblyopes. Methods MVEP from 32 anisometropic amblyopic eyes and 31 control eyes were tested. Results In anisometropic amblyopic eyes,the latencies of MVEP were significantly prolonged．The amplitudes of MVEP were significantly attenuated in the central region of the visual field,and these phenomena gradually reduced with the increase of the eccentricity． Conclusion The visual function of anisometropic amblyopic eyes is reduced more significantly in the central region than in the peripheral region of the visual field. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,20000,16:27-29)
Objective To observe the functional state of the optic nerve and discover the injury of visual pathway function in time under general ane sthesia. The flash visual evoked potential (F-VEP) was used to monitor visual function during orbital surgery. Methods A total of 252 out of 282 patients undergoing orbital surgery under general anesthesia were successfully monitored by F-VEP during the surgery. All patients were monitored by this method under the following conditions:consious state before operation, under general anaesthesia, during and after dissection of orbital tumor and at the end of operation. Results ①There was no significant difference of wave amplitude and latency under general anesthesia and consciousness condition. ②The amplitude and latency of F-VEP were normal in the orbital surgery withou toptic nerve injury. ③Pulling and oppression of optic nerve could cause temporary wave loss, but the wave recovered after removal of the pull and oppression. ④ The wave loss of F-VEP would occur immedicately when optic nerve was severe injured and its blood supply was deficient. Since the application of the visual function monitoring, 24 cases were treated in time during disturbance of visual function and no patient has unexpected visual loss during orbital surgery. Conclusion The intraoperative monitoring of F-VEP during orbital surgery can decrease the proportion of permanent visual loss caused by orbit al surgery, and help the surgical procedures go to function-anatomy stage from experience-anatomy stage. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2001,17:260-263)
Purpose To investigate the influence of ametropia on stereopsis and its mechanism by using the disparity evoked potential testing. Methods A new set of static random dot stereograms was utilized as a stimulation to elicit the disparity evoked potentials in 21 ametropes and 40 stereo normal subjects. Rezults The P250 wave,which was related to stereoscopic stimulation in ametropes,was recorded in both the ametropes and emetropic stereo normal persons in this series,and the characteristic changes of P250 wave with increasing visual disparity in ametropes were similar to those in normal subjects.The differences of mean amplitudes and latencies of P250 waves between myopes and hyperopes were not significant. Conclusion Ametropia in full correction dose not significanly affect the function of stereopsis. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,1998,14:225-227)
ObjectiveTo study whether the pattern visual evoked potential (P-VEP) under different spatial frequency in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is different from normal people. MethodsP-VEP examination under high (15') and low (60') spatial frequency was performed on 18 MS patients (36 eyes) treated in our department from September 2011 to April 2012 and 20 normal volunteers (40 eyes). Then, we analyzed the difference between the two groups under the above-mentioned two kinds of spatial frequency. ResultsThe latency of P100 of P-VEP under high spatial frequency in MS patients was (120.50±13.04) ms which was significantly different from (109.21±5.38) ms of normal volunteers (P < 0.05). The latency of P100 of P-VEP under low spatial frequency in MS patients was (109.57±12.87) ms, which was also significantly different from (103.31±5.45) ms of normal volunteers (P < 0.05). The amplitude of P100 of P-VEP under high spatial frequency in MS patients was (9.17±5.69)μV and it was significantly lower than that[(15.69±8.45)μv] of normal volunteers (P < 0.05). The amplitude of P100 of P-VEP under low spatial frequency in MS patients was (11.93±16.75)μV and it was not significantly different from normal volunteers[(13.47±9.24μV)]. Based on different corrected vision, the MS patients were divided into two groups (vision≥1.0 and vision < 1.0). For patients with vision≥1.0, the latency of P100 and the amplitude of P100 of P-VEP under high spatial frequency was (113.43±8.28) ms and (12.94±5.46)μV; the latency of P100 and the amplitude of P100 of P-VEP under low spatial frequency was (111.13±11.50) ms and (11.57±5.60)μV. For patients with vision < 1.0, the latency of P100 and the amplitude of P100 of P-VEP under high spatial frequency was (126.69±13.49) ms and (5.87±3.43)μV; the latency of P100 and the amplitude of P100 of P-VEP under low spatial frequency was (108.26±14.11) ms and (12.24±5.82)μV. There was no significant difference in the latency and amplitude of P100 under low spatial frequency between the two groups with different corrected vision (P > 0.05), but the latency and amplitude of P100 under high spatial frequency were both significantly different between those two groups (P < 0.05). ConclusionsCompared with normal people, MS patients feature latency delay and amplitude reduction of the P-VEP, which was more severe under high spatial frequency. P-VEP under high spatial frequency may become an important evidence to evaluate visual function of MS patients.