ObjectiveTo compare the short-term efficacy of conbercept and ranibizumab for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO)and explore the relationship between the integrity of ellipsoidal zone and visual acuity. MethodsForty-four eyes of 44 patients with macular edema in CRVO were enrolled into this retrospective and comparative study. There were 15 eyes of 15 males, 29 eyes of 29 females; age ranged from 49-61 years old,with an average age of (54.65±3.10) years. All patients were examined with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), slit lamp, fundus photograph, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), optical coherence tomography(OCT). BCVA were examined with interactional visual chart and recorded with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution acuity. Twenty-three eyes were intravitreal injected with conbercept 0.5 mg (group A) and 21 eyes were intravitreal injected with ranibizumab 0.5 mg (group B). There was no statistical difference of age (t=-1.41), gender (χ2= 0.55),the percentage of hypertension patients (χ2=0.27), average BCVA (t=-2.06), IOP (t=-2.52), central macular thickness (CMT) (t=-1.96), number of different integrity of ellipsoidal zone patients (χ2=1.00) and number of different types of macular edema patients (χ2=1.03) among the two groups (P > 0.05). The change in BCVA and CMT at 3, 6 months between the two groups were compared. The relationship between BCVA at 6 months and BCVA, CMT at baseline were explored. The relationship between three groups of ellipsoidal zone and BCVA at baseline were evaluated. The change of BCVA after treatment between the three groups of ellipsoidal zone were Compared. The number of intravitreal injections between two groups was compared. ResultsDuring the 3, 6 months after treatment, the mean BCVA were all improved with statistically difference in group A (t=5.13, 7.39; P < 0.05) and group B (t=6.60, 11.52; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of BCVA at 3, 6 moths between group A and group B (t=-0.99, -0.40; P > 0.05). During the 3, 6 months after treatment, the mean CMT were all decreased with statistically difference in group A (t=11.58, 15.96; P < 0.05) and group B (t=18.77, 35.16; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of CMT at 3, 6 months between group A and group B (t=-1.52, -1.63; P > 0.05). In both groups,BCVA at 6 months was related to BCVA at baseline (r= 0.44, 0.62; P < 0.05), but not related to CMT at baseline (r=0.19, 0.01; P > 0.05). In the two groups, BCVA at baseline was related to the integrity of ellipsoidal zone (r=0.97, 0.70; P < 0.05). There was statistical difference of the number of intravitreal injections in the two groups (t=-6.88, P < 0.05). There was no systemic or ocular serious side effects during the follow up. ConclusionsComparing to ranibizumab, conbercept has the same effective to the treatment of macular edema in CRVO, but the number of intravitreal injections is less. The integrity of ellipsoidal zone is related to BCVA.
Objective To observe the change of diffusion upper limit of macromol ecules through pathological retina and the difference between the layers of retina. Methods Retinal edema was emulated by establishing branch retinal vein occlusion (RVO) model in miniature pig eyes under photodynamic method. Two days later, the retinas of both eyeballs were peeled off. The diffusion test apparatus was designed by ourselves. FITC-dextrans of various molecular weights (4.4, 9.3, 19.6, 38.9, 71.2 and 150 kDa) and Carboxyfluorescein (376 Da) were dissolved in RPMI1640 solutions and diffused through inner or outer surface of retina. The rate of transretinal diffusion was determined with a spectrophotometer. Theoretical maximum size of molecule (MSM) was calculated by extrapolating the trend-linear relationship with the diffusion rate. In separate experiments to determine the sites of barrier to diffusion, FITC-dextrans were applied to either the inner or outer retinal surface, processed as frozen sections, and viewed with a fluores cence microscope. Results FITC-dextrans applying to inner retinal surface, 4.4 kDa dextrans were largely blocked by inner nuclear layer (INL); 19.6,71.2 kDa dextrans were blocked by the nerve fiber layer (NFL) and inner plexiform layer; 15.0 kDa dextrans were blocked by NFL. FITC-dextrans applying to outer retinal surface, most dextrans with various molecular weights were blocked before outer nuclear layer (ONL). No matter applying to the inner or outer surface, Carboxyfluore scein can diffuse through the whole retina and aggregate at INL and ONL. After RVO, the inner part of retina became edema and cystoid, loosing the barrier function. Compared with the normal retina, the MSM in RVO tissues increased (6.5plusmn;0 39nm Vs 6.18plusmn;0.54nm, t=4.143, P=0.0001). Conclusions A fter RVO, the barrier function of inner part of retinal is destroyed and the upper limit of diffusion macromolecule size increased, which is nevertheless limited. ONL acts as bottle-neck barriers to diffusion, if the outer part of retina is damaged, the change of the diffusion upper limit will be prominent. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2008，24：197-201）
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for cystoid macular edema (CME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).MethodsFourteen eyes of 14 patients with CME due to CRVO underwent intravitreous injection with 0.1 ml TA (40 mg/ml). Best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), slitlamp examinaion, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed on the patients before and after the injection. The follow-up period was 10-22.4 months, with the mean of 15.9 months.ResultsThe average visual acuity was 0.1 before the treatment; while 1 month and 3 months after the injection, the visual acuity of all of the patients improved, including ≥0.2 in 71.43% and 63.6% of the patients, respectively, and ≥0.5 in 429% and 27.3%, respectively. After then, the visual acuity of some patients decreased, and in the final visit, 4 eyes (28.6%) had a visual acuity of ≥0.2, and 1 eye (7.1%) of ≥0.5. Compared with that before the treatment, the visual acuity of 10 (71.4%) eyes improved and 4 (28.6%) eyes declined. One month after the treatment, the macular edema disappeared in 10 eyes (71.4%) and alleviated in 4 (28.6%). In the final visit, macular edema disappeared in 4 eyes, alleviated in 9, and aggravated in 1. In the follow-up duration, high IOP［22.3-40.1 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)］. In the final visit, posterior subcapsular cataract was found in 7 eyes.ConclusionIntravitreous injection with TA may be effective in reducing CME and enhancing the visual acuity in a short term with high IOP in some eyes. In the long-term follow-up period, the rate of recurrence of CME and incidence of posterior subcapsular cataract is high. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:213-216)
ObjectiveTo observe the short-term efficacy of posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) in the treatment of macular edema due to ischemic retinal vein occlusions (RVO). MethodsA retrospective clinical study. A total of 53 eyes of 53 patients with RVO macular edema diagnosed by fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were included in the study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected by the international standard visual acuity chart, and the results were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT. Among 53 eyes, there were 27 eyes with ischemic RVO macular edema (ischemic group) and 26 eyes with non-ischemic RVO macular edema (non-ischemic group). The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.82±0.37, mean CMT was (662.1±216.7) μm in ischemic group. The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.41±0.23, mean CMT was (548.0±161.9) μm. The differences of logMAR BCVA and CMT between the two groups were both statistically significant (t=4.745, 2.258; P<0.05). All eyes were treated with a single sub-Tenon injection of 0.4 ml triamcinolone acetonide suspension (100 mg/ml).The mean logMAR BCVA, CMT before and 1, 3 months after the treatment between the two groups were observed and compared. ResultsOn 1 and 3 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA in the non-ischemic group (0.32±0.25 and 0.27±0.29) were improved compared with ischemic group (0.76±0.37 and 0.41±0.79), the difference was statistically significant (t=5.052, 5.240; P<0.05). The mean logMAR BCVA before and after treatment had no statistically significant difference in ischemic group (F=0.516, P>0.05), but had a statistically significant difference in non-ischemic group (F=7.685, P<0.05). On 1 and 3 months after treatment, the mean CMT in the ischemic group were (534.7±223.4), (470.8±234.7) μm, which were lower (127.4±28.28), (191.4±34.55) μm before treatment. In the non-ischemic group, the average CMT was (426.2±188.8), (371.3±200.6) μm, which were lower (103.1±33.1), (164.9±49.6) μm. There were statistically significant differences in the mean CMT between the ischemic group and the non-ischemic group (F=17.040, 10.360; P<0.05). In non-ischemic group, CMT had a bigger reduction compared to the the ischemic group (t=2.056, 2.103; P<0.05). The difference of CMT decrease value between two groups was not statistically significant (t=0.560, 0.441; P>0.05). On 1 month after the treatment, there were 3 and 5 eyes had a higher intraocular pressure than 21 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) in ischemic and non-ischemic group, respectively; but all of them returned to normal after drug treatment. There were no drugs and ocular injection related complications. ConclusionPSTA of ischemic RVO macular edema can lower the CMT in the short term, but can't significant improve the visual acuity.