Objective To compare the differences in evaluating readiness for hospital discharge between nurses and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patient-reported Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) and nurse-reported RHDS were delivered to 130 CRC patients and 40 nurses respectively. All patients were followed ERAS pathway during perioperative periods. The differences were compared in evaluating readiness for hospital discharge between nurses and CRC patients. Results This study investigated 130 CRC patients and 40 responsible nurses. The scores of RHDS from nurses and patients were 162.86±27.95 and 149.86±33.65 respectively. When evaluating whether patients were ready to go home after discharge, the consistency between nurses’ results and patients’ results was weak（κ=0.365, P<0.001）. Items in patients’ RHDS scoring ranking from high to low were expected support, coping ability, knowledge, and personal status. Items in nurses’ RHDS scoring ranking from high to low were expected support, knowledge, coping ability, and personal status. Besides the " social support” dimension, the scores of other 3 dimensions from nurses were significantly higher than those from patients (P<0.05). Conclusion There is a gap between the assessment of RHDS from nurses and patients, nurses overestimated patients’ discharge readiness level.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on intestinal flora in patients with colorectal cancer.MethodsBy convenient sampling method, 60 patients with colorectal cancer were selected from August 2018 to December 2019 in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and randomly divided into ERAS group and traditional treatment group (traditional group). Among them, the perioperative clinical management was carried out according to the ERAS management and traditional treatment process in the the ERAS group and in the traditional group, respectively. The fresh fecal samples were collected within 24 h after admission and the first natural defecation after operation. The bacterial 16 Sr DNA V3–V4 region was sequenced by Illumina MiSeq sequencer, and the results were analyzed by bioinformatics.ResultsA total of 60 patients with colorectal cancer were included, 30 cases in the traditional group and 27 cases in the ERAS group (3 people temporarily withdrew from the study). There were no significant differences in the basic informations between the two groups (P>0.05). ① Before or after operation, there were no significant differences in Shannon index and Simpson index between the two groups. The difference between preoperative and postoperative comparison in the same group was also not statistically significant (P>0.05). ② Beta diversity analysis showed that there was no significant difference in community composition between the traditional group and the ERAS group before operation, and there was a clear boundary between the traditional group and the ERAS group after operation. ③ At the phylum level, compared with the preoperative abundance, the postoperative abundance Firmicutes decreased by 26.5% and 5.5% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively; Bacteroidetes increased by 21.6% and 4.7% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively; Proteobacteria increased by 7.2% and 2.2% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively. At the genus level, compared with the preoperative abundance, the postoperative abundance of Bacteroides in the traditional group increased by 17.6% and in the ERAS group decreased by 1.6%; Bifidobacterium decreased by 1.8% and 1.3% in the traditional group and in the ERAS group, respectively.ConclusionsERAS does not affect species diversity of intestinal flora. Although ERAS has some damage to structure of intestinal flora, it is weaker than traditional process, so it is more conducive to reconstruction and restoration of intestinal microecological environment.
ObjectiveTo explore the correlation between readiness for hospital discharge and short-term quality of life among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) mode.MethodsSurveys of 127 CRC patients following ERAS mode were conducted in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale and EORTC QLQ-C30 Scale were issued at the discharge and 1 month after the operation, respectively.ResultsThe total score of RHDS was 149.43±33.25. The score of global quality of life was 66.80±18.84. Correlation analysis showed that the total score of RHDS was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life (r=0.220, P=0.013), and negatively correlated with the scores of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, loss of appetite (r=–0.304, P=0.001; r=–0.189, P=0.033; r=–0.257, P=0.004; r=–0.254, P=0.004). The score of personal status dimension were positively correlated with the score of global quality of life and emotional function (r=0.213, P=0.016; r=0.197, P=0.027), and negatively correlated with scores of fatigue, pain and insomnia (r=–0.311, P=0.000; r=–0.264, P=0.003; r=–0.257, P=0.004). The score of knowledge dimension was negatively correlated with nausea and vomiting, pain and loss of appetite (r=–0.212, P=0.017; r=–0.182, P=0.040; r=–0.239, P=0.007). The score of coping ability dimension was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life and physical function (r=0.204, P=0.021; r=0.204, P=0.021), while negatively correlated with scores of fatigue, pain, insomnia and loss of appetite (r=–0.349, P=0.000; r=–0.240, P=0.007; r=–0.202, P=0.022; r=–0.201, P=0.024). The score of expected support was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life (r=0.220, P=0.013), and negatively correlated with scores of fatigue and loss of appetite (r=–0.249, P=0.005; r=–0.227, P=0.010).ConclusionsThe short term quality of life among CRC patients following ERAS keeps at upper middle level, and positively correlated with the readiness for hospital discharge. It is suggested that discharge preparation service is of great significance to improve the quality of life of patients.
ObjectiveTo understand the current situation of unplanned readmission of colorectal cancer patients within 30 days after discharge under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) mode, and to explore the influencing factors.MethodsFrom May 7, 2018 to May 29, 2020, 315 patients with colorectal cancer treated by Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and managed by ERAS process during perioperative period were prospectively selected as the research objects. The general data, clinical disease data and discharge readiness of patients were obtained by questionnaire and electronic medical record. Telephone follow-up was used to find out whether the patient had unplanned readmission 30 days after discharge and logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of unplanned readmission within 30 days after discharge.ResultsWithin 30 days after discharge, 37 patients were admitted to hospital again, the unplanned readmission rate was 11.7%. The primary cause of readmission was wound infection. Logistic regression analysis showed that the body mass decreased by more than 10% in recent half a year (OR=2.611, P=0.031), tumor location in rectum (OR=3.739, P=0.026), operative time ≤3 hours (OR=0.292, P=0.004), and discharge readiness (OR=0.967, P<0.001) were independent predictors of unplanned readmission.ConclusionsUnder the ERAS mode, the readmission rate of colorectal cancer patients within 30 days after discharge is not optimistic. Attention should be focused on patients with significant weight loss, rectal cancer, more than 3 hours of operative time, and low readiness for discharge. Among them, the patient’s body weight and discharge readiness are the factors that can be easily improved by clinical intervention. It can be considered as a new way to reduce the rate of unplanned readmission by improving the patients’ physical quality and carrying out discharge care program.
【摘要】 目的 观察针刺法在治疗痔瘘术后疼痛的临床疗效。 方法 2009年1-6月，将符合纳入标准的93例痔瘘术后中度疼痛患者，随机分为治疗组49例与对照组44例。治疗组采用针刺治疗术后疼痛；对照组采用口服莫比可治疗术后疼痛，观察两组患者疼痛的消除程度。 结果 消除疼痛有效率治疗组为91.83%，对照组为68.18%，治疗组镇痛效果与对照组比较，差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。 结论 痔瘘术后应用针刺法止痛效果好，有良好的临床应用前景。【Abstract】 Objective To determine the effect of acupuncture on the treatment of pain after hemorrhoids and fistula operation. Methods Ninety-three participants who suffered from moderate pain after hemorrhoids and fistula operation in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January to June 2008 were enrolled prospectively and randomly assigned into treatment group (n=49) and control group (n=44). The treatment group was treated with acupuncture for postoperative pain relief, whilst Mobic was given orally to the control group. Relief degrees of pain in both groups were observed. Results Efficient power of pain relief was significantly higher in the treatment group compared with the control group (91.83% vs. 68.18%,Plt;0.05). Conclusion Application procedure of acupuncture can significantly relieve postoperative pain after hemorrhoids and fistula operation, which has a good prospect in clinical application.
ObjectiveTo summarize research progress of quality of life in patients after colorectal cancer surgery.MethodsThe literatures about quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer surgery in recent years are reviewed.ResultsQuality of life had became an important criterion for evaluating the therapeutic effect and prognosis of cancer. At present, the assessment tools for the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients mainly included the universal scale [such as Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)], the applicable scales for cancer patients [such as European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: quality of life questionaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: quality of life questionaire-CR38 (EORTC QLQ-CR38)], and the special scales for stoma patients represented by City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire (COH-QOL-OQ), Stoma Quality Of Life (Stoma-QOL), Stoma Quality Of Life Scale (SQOLS), and so on. The short-term quality of life of colorectal cancer patients was lower at 1 month after operation and recovered at 3 months after operation. Five years after surgery, attention should also be paid to the long-term quality of life. Besides, postoperative quality of life of colorectal cancer patients was affected by age, occupational status, economy, preoperative physical activity level, psychological and social factor, personality, surgical method, co-morbidity, complication, stoma, and so on.ConclusionsUnderstand the longitudinal changes and influencing factors of patients’ quality of life after operation, grasp the time point of effective intervention, and select appropriate assessment tools are necessary for medical staff. It is of great significance to further optimize the clinical management pathway and improve the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer after operation.
ObjectiveTo understand the current situation and factors affecting tube blockage (non-mechanical) during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with malignant tumors who underwent HIPEC in the Department of Gastroenterology of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from May 2019 to May 2021 were retrospectively gathered. The information about the patient and the occurrence of occlusion during HIPEC were obtained by consulting electronic medical records and perfusion records. The logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors influencing non-mechanical tube blockage during HIPEC. ResultsA total of 240 patients with malignant tumors were gathered. During HIPEC, the non-mechanical tube blockage occurred in 88 patients with malignant tumors, with the incidence of 36.7%. The multivariate analysis results by logistic regression showed that the probabilities of non-mechanical tube blockage during HIPEC were higher in the patients with age≥65 years (OR=2.142, P=0.016), diabetes mellitus (OR=2.326, P=0.007), perfusion speed of 300–450 mL/min (OR=2.778, P=0.001), ascites (OR=2.192, P=0.020), and PCI ≥20 points (OR=4.380, P<0.001). ConclusionsPatients with malignant tumors treated with HIPEC are prone to non-mechanical tube blockage. The patients with middle-aged and elderly, diabetes, low perfusion speed, ascites, and high PCI score need to be of great concern, so as to prevent and deal with tube blockage in time.