Objective To explore the status of nutrition risk and its relative factors in patients of department of gastrointestinal surgery, and to observe the effectiveness of nutrition support on post-operative recovery of patients with gastric cancer. Methods A total of 1 048 cases of in-patients in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong University from January 2015 to January 2016 were collected prospectively, and then screened the nutrition risk of these patients by nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and evaluated the actual malnutrition situation when they left hospital. Then collected 52 gastric cancer patients whose NRS-2002 score ≥3, and divided them to control group and experimental group randomly. The patients of experimental group received extra standard medical nutrition support while the patients of control group did not. Compared the nutritional indexes as well as some postoperative recovery indexes, such as the postoperative exhaust time, postoperative defecation time, infusion stop time, length of hospital stay, and incidence of complications. Results ① Nutritional risk. Among the 1 048 cases, 230 cases (21.9%) had nutritional risk while 118 cases (11.3%) developed to malnutrition. Age and degree of cancer were all related with nutritional risk (P<0.05) while gender was irrelevant (P>0.05). Patients with age ≥60 years, advanced gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer in Ⅲ+Ⅳ staging, had higher rates of nutritional risk than patients with age <60 years, early gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer inⅠ+Ⅱstaging. Results of actual malnutrition was in good accordance with the screening result of NRS-2002 (κ=0.57). ② Influence of nutritional support on gastric cancer patients. Compared with control group, there was an improvement in albumin, pre-albumin, and weight of experimental group and the distinction had statistical significance (P<0.05). The distinction of postoperative exhaust time and incidence of complication between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05), but postoperative defecation time, infusion stop time, and the length of hospital stay of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusions The problem of malnutrition exists generally in the in-patients of department of gastrointestinal surgery. Applying the instrument of nutritional risk assessment to assess the risk as early as possible and giving appropriate nutrition support therapy positively, will make favorable influence to the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of the nutritional risks, the relationship between application of nutritional support and the clinical outcome of patients with gastrointestinal major surgery in the Frist People's Hospital of Shuangliu. MethodsGastrointestinal major surgery patients in Department of General Surgery in the Frist People's Hospital of Shuangliu from March 2010 to March 2014 were consecutively enrolled. Patients who provided informed consent were screened by NRS 2002, tracking nutrition support status and analysis the relationship between nutrition support and clinical outcome. In this study, the clinical outcome index included postoperative complications and hospitalization time. ResultsThere were totally 130 cases enrolled, 112 cases completed assessment by NRS 2002. The prevalence of nutritional risk was 75.9%(85/112), there were totally 57 patients(50.9%) received nutrition support, and all for parenteral nutrition. The prevalence of postoperative complication was 46.4%(52/112). The prevalence of postoperative complication in patients who had nutritional risk and received nutritional support was 41.7%(15/36), whereas, in patients who had nutritional risk but not received nutritional support was 73.5%(36/49), there was statistically significant difference between the 2 groups(P=0.002). In patients who not had nutritional risk, the postoperative complication rate was only 3.7%(1/27). ConclusionsBecause of noninvasive and easy to operate, NRS 2002 are adpted to hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal major surgery. Because of the specific of disease metabolism, the higher nutritional risk occurres in patients with gastrointestinal major surgery, appropriate nutritional support for this kinds of patients can reduce the incidence of postoperative complication, and improve the prognosis.
【摘要】 目的 调查胃癌患者的营养风险及营养支持应用现状。 方法 2009年9月-2010年1月，对某三甲医院普外科收治的120例胃癌住院患者营养情况进行营养风险筛查2002（nutritional risk screening 2002，NRS 2002）评估，并就营养支持应用方式进行分析。 结果 所有患者中营养不足和营养风险的发生率分别为11.7%和27.5%；在33例有营养风险患者中，有26例（78.8％）接受了营养支持；在无营养风险的87例患者中，有30例（34.5％）接受了营养支持。 结论 对有营养风险的患者进行必要的营养支持，对于减少患者住院期间感染性并发症或其他不良临床结局的发生有积极作用。NRS 2002的方法简便，适用于胃癌患者的营养风险筛查，但医护人员需要进一步加强对肠外、肠内营养指南的认识。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the clinical situation of nutritional risk screening for hospitalized patients with gastric cancer. Methods From September 2009 to January 2010, we applied nutrition risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) to investigate the nutritional status of 120 hospitalized gastric cancer patients in the surgery department of a tertiary hospital, and analyzed the way of nutritional support for these patients. Results Among all the patients, the incidences of undernutrtion and nutritional risk were respectively 11.7% and 27.5%. Twenty-six out of the 33 nutritional risk patients received nutrition support, and 30 out of the 87 patients without nutritional risk received nutrition support. Conclusions Nutritional support for patients with nutritional risk is important in decreasing the occurrence of in-hospital infectious complications and other bad clinical outcomes. NRS 2002 is a simple and easy tool for predicting the nutrition risk in hospitalized gastric cancer patients, but the guideline of enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition must be reinforced among doctors and nurses.
ObjectiveTo understand the impact of preoperative nutritional status on the postoperative complications for patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer undergoing extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. MethodsThe patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected using the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA), and then who were assigned into a nutritional risk group (the score was low than 3 by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002) and non-nutritional risk group (the score was 3 or more by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002). The postoperative complications and survival were analyzed for the patients with or without nutritional risk. The postoperative complications were defined as early-term (complications occurring within 30 d after surgery), middle-term (complications occurring during 30–180 d after surgery), and long-term (complications occurring at 180 d and more after surgery). The survival indicators included overall survival and disease-specific survival. ResultsA total of 680 patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study were retrieved from the DACCA database. Among them, there were 500 (73.5%) patients without nutritional risk and 180 (26.5%) patients with nutritional risk. The postoperative follow-up time was 0–152 months (with average 48.9 months). Five hundreds and forty-three survived, including 471 (86.7%) patients with free-tumors survival and 72 (13.3%) patients with tumors survival. There were 137 deaths, including 122 (89.1%) patients with cancer related deaths and 15 (10.9%) patients with non-cancer related deaths. There were 48 (7.1%) cases of early-term postoperative complications, 51 (7.5%) cases of middle-term complications, and 17 (2.5%) cases of long-term complications. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of overall complications between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.749, P=0.053; χ2=2.205, P=0.138; χ2=310, P=0.578). The specific complications at different stages after surgery (excluding the anastomotic leakage complications in the patients with nutritional risk was higher in patients without nutritional risk, P=0.034) had no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The survival curves (overall survival and disease-specific survival) using the Kaplan-Meier method had no statistical differences between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.316, P=0.069; χ2=3.712, P=0.054). ConclusionsFrom the analysis results of this study, for the rectal cancer patients who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, the patients with preoperative nutritional risk are more prone to anastomotic leakage within 30 d after surgery. Although other postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes have no statistical differences between patients with and without nutritional risk, preoperative nutritional management for them cannot be ignored.
ObjectiveTo investigate the nutritional risk, incidence of malnutrition, and clinical application of nutrition support in hospitalized patients with gastric cancer by the nutritional risk screening (NRS) 2002 score summary table. MethodsFrom June 2009 to February 2010, nutritional risk screen and application of clinical nutritional support were carried out in the hospitalized patients with gastric cancer in this hospital. Nutritional risk was assessed case-by-case according to the severity of illness, nutritional status 〔including body mass index (BMI), recent changes in body weight and eating〕 and patients age. NRS ≥3 was accepted as nutritionally at-risk, while NRS lt;3 no nutritional risk; BMI lt;18.5 kg/m2 (or albumin lt;30 g/L) combined with clinical conditions was judged to be malnourished. Results Three hundreds and eighty-six patients were included, 329 of which completed the NRS2002 screening. One hundred and sixty-five patients (50.15%) were at nutritional risk, while another 164 (49.85%) were no nutritional risk. Malnutrition was found in 57 patients (17.33%). By gender, male malnourished patients and nutritionally at-risk patients were accounting for 16.45% (38/231) and 48.05% (111/231) respectively, while female nutritionally at-risk patients and malnourished patients were accounting for 55.1% (54/98) and 19.39% (19/98) respectively, 72.04% (237/329) of the screened patients accepted clinical nutrition support, among which, 115 patients were at nutritional risk, accounting for 69.70% in that group, and 122 patients were no nutritional risk, accounting for 74.39% in that group. ConclusionsThe incidences of malnutrition and nutritionally at-risk in hospitalized gastric cancer patients are high. And irrationality of clinical nutrition support exists. Evidence-based guidelines are required to improve the nutritional status of support.
ObjectiveBy mining data from the Database of Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, this study aims to evaluate the relationship between nutritional risk screening (NRS) 2002 scores at initial diagnosis and long-term survival in patients. MethodsThe DACCA database version from November 24, 2023, was selected to compare the clinicopathological data of patients with NRS2002 scores <3 and ≥3, and to explore the impact of NRS2002 scores on survival. ResultsA total of 723 patients were screened, with 585 (80.9%) had NRS2002 scores <3 and 138 (19.1%) had NRS2002 scores ≥3. All 723 patients were followed up, with a follow-up period ranging from 1 to 78 months and a median follow-up time of 34 months. The median survival time for patients with NRS2002 scores <3 was 35 months, while it was 31 months for those with NRS scores ≥3. During the follow-up period, 589 patients (81.5%) survived, including 515 (71.2%) tumor-free survivors and 74 (10.2%) survivors with tumors. There were 134 deaths (18.5%), including 126 cancer-related deaths (17.4%) and 8 non-cancer-related deaths (1.1%). Multivariate logistic regression results showed that after controlling for 6 factors including age, radical surgery, adjuvant therapy, hypertension, differentation, and TNM staging, NRS2002 score was not a factor affecting the survival of colorectal cancer patients (RR=0.98, P=0.875). ConclusionNRS2002 score is not a predictive factor for the survival of colorectal cancer patients, possibly because although patients may have nutritional risks preoperatively, the long-term impact on survival is minimal following surgery and postoperative recovery.
Objective To investigate the impact of nutritional risk on unplanned readmissions in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to provide evidence for clinical nutrition support intervention. Methods Elderly patients with COPD meeting the inclusive criteria and admitted between June 2014 and May 2015 were recruited and investigated with nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and unplanned readmission scale. Meanwhile, the patients’ body height and body weight were measured for calculating body mass index (BMI). Results The average score of nutritional risk screening of the elderly COPD patients was 4.65±1.33. There were 456 (40.07%) patients who had no nutritional risk and 682 (59.93%) patients who had nutritional risk. There were 47 (4.13%) patients with unplanned readmissions within 15 days, 155 (13.62%) patients within 30 days, 265 (23.28%) patients within 60 days, 336 (29.53%) patients within 180 days, and 705 (61.95%) patients within one year. The patients with nutritional risk had significantly higher possibilities of unplanned readmissions within 60 days, 180 days and one year than the patients with no nutritional risk (all P<0.05). The nutritional risk, age and severity of disease influenced unplanned readmissions of the elderly patients with COPD (all P<0.05). Conclusions There is a close correlation between nutritional risk and unplanned readmissions in elderly patients with COPD. Doctors and nurses should take some measures to reduce the nutritional risk so as to decrease the unplanned readmissions to some degree.
ObjectiveTo investigate the association between the preoperative nutritional risk and anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for the rectal cancer. MethodsA total of 321 patients with rectal cancer underwent anterior resection in our hospital between January 2008 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative nutritional status was evaluated using NRS 2002. Correlation of clinicopathologic characteristics with postoperative anastomotic leakage was evaluated using single factor analysis and Logistic regression model. ResultsAmong the 321 patients, the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage was 5.6% (18/321). Single factor analysis showed that the NRS2002 score≥3, clinicalpathologic stage (Ⅲ-Ⅳstage) and distance of tumor from the anal verge were the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after anterior leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the NRS2002 score (OR=4.125, 95% CI=2.062-7.004), clinicalpathologic stage (OR=3.334, 95% CI=2.062-7.004) and the distance of tumor from the anal verge (OR=2.341, 95% CI=2.559-15.838) were the independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Conciusions Preoperative NRS2002 score is helpful to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Nutrition education should be strengthened to decrease the morbidity of the anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for the patients who's NRS2002 score≥3.
ObjectiveTo evaluate nutritional risk of patients with esophagus cancer before operation using nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002), and explore the relationship between nutritional risk score and postoperative results. MethodsWe prospectively evaluated the nutritional risk of 225 patients with esophagus carcinoma patients who were admitted in Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine between March 2012 and March 2013 using NRS2002, in accordance with disease severity score, nutritional status score and age score(age≥70 years old score was 1 point, < 70 years old for 0 point). There were 136 males and 89 females with age of 64.0±8.2 years (ranged from 41 to 85 years). Postoperative results include postoperative complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay. ResultsThe number of patients with preoperative score≥3 points was 75 (33.3%), < 3 points was 150 (66.7%). The incidence rate of postoperative complications was 26.7% in the patients with NRS2002 score≥3 points, and was 12.0% in those with NRS2002 score < 3 points(P < 0.05). And the total hospital stay time was longer in the patients with NRS2002 score≥3 points than that with NRS2002 score < 3 points(29.80±7.94 d vs. 15.30±2.05 d, P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative NRS2002, the underlying diseases, and surgical method were risk factors for postoperative complications. ConclusionsPreoperative NRS2002 score≥3 points can predict more postoperative complications and longer hospital stay time in patients with esophagus carcinoma. It indicates that scientific nutrition support is necessary for esophagus carcinoma patients with NRS2002 score≥3 points. NRS2002 can be used as a predictive index of nutritional risk after operation of esophagus carcinoma.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of using alanyl-glutamine dipeptide on clinical outcome for gastric cancer patients with nutritional risk after total gastrectomy. MethodsThis study was carried out in the period from March to August 2015. The nutritional risk was screened by continuous sampling method in the new hospitalized patients with gastric cancer who would undergo total gastrectomy. The patients were grouped randomly. Alanyl-glutamine was given to the experimental group patients. The clinical data of the two groups were analyzed, such as the laboratory parame-ters of nutritional status and hepatorenal function, complications of surgery, the nutrition-related hospitalization day, etc. ResultsThe preoperative data were consistent in the two groups of the included 40 cases. The results showed, in the third and seventh days after surgery, the level of plasma albumin was higher in the experimental group than in the control group〔(33.9±5.6) g/L vs. (30.8±4.0) g/L and (36.6±3.9) g/L vs. (33.9±4.2) g/L, respectively). Also, the CD4+/CD8+ cells immune index was significantly improved in the experimental group after surgery (1.7±0.7 vs. 1.2±0.3, P < 0.05). The recovery time of intestinal function〔(65.7±5.3) h vs. (71.6±7.2)h, P < 0.01)〕and nutrition-related hospitalization day〔(10.1±1.8) d vs. (11.7±1.9)d, P < 0.01)〕in alanyl-glutamine dipeptide group were shorted than that in the control group. No serious adverse drug reactions were found in the patients during the treatment period. ConclusionApplication alanyl-glutamine to the patients with nutritional risk after total gastrectomy could partly improve clinical outcome indicators.