【摘要】目的 探讨腹部手术后功能性胃排空障碍的营养支持。方法 对我院1997年1月至2004年2月收治的27例腹部手术后胃排空障碍患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 单纯肠内营养支持8例（29.6%），肠内、肠外联合营养支持10例（37.0%），单纯肠外营养支持9例（33.3%），分别于术后平均15、20及23 d恢复胃动力。结论 肠内营养在功能性胃排空障碍的治疗中具有重要作用。
【摘要】 目的 研究全身麻醉腹部手术患者术前焦虑对术后疼痛、镇痛药用量及对术后镇痛满意度的影响。 方法 选取2009年8月-2010年4月68例ASAⅠ～Ⅱ级，拟行气管插管全身麻醉的腹部手术患者，术前采用状态-特质焦虑量表和抑郁评分量表进行焦虑程度的测评，术后观察VAS疼痛评分、总的镇痛药用量以及患者对镇痛的满意度，分析术前焦虑与术后VAS评分、镇痛药用量及镇痛满意度的相关性。 结果 68例受试者术前STAI为50±13，BDI为16±13，术后VAS评分为4.0±2.1，术后24 h镇痛药芬太尼的用量为（0.80±0.21） mg；术后镇痛药用量、患者镇痛满意度评分与术前STAI明显相关（r=0.68和r=-0.88，Plt;0.01）。术后VAS评分与术前STAI及BDI也有一定的相关（r=0.35和r=0.3）。 结论 术前焦虑程度可以影响腹部手术患者对镇痛治疗的满意度， 显著增加镇痛药用量。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative pain, amount of analgesics and satisfaction of postoperative pain relief for patients undergoing abdominal surgery with general anesthesia. Methods A total of 68 patients undergoing abdominal surgery with general anesthesia from August 2009 to April 2010 were selected (ASA I-II). Preoperational anxiety levels were evaluated using State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and postoperative VAS pain score, the total amount of analgesics used and satisfaction of pain relief were observed. The relationship between preoperative anxiety and post-operative VAS score, and total amount of analgesics used and satisfaction of pain relief were analyzed. Results The mean STAI and BDI of 68 samples were 50±13 and 16±13, respectively; the mean postoperative VAS was 4.0±2.1, and the mean amount of analgesics fentanyl used in 24 hours after the operation was (0.80±0.21) mg; the amount of post-operative analgesics used and the satisfaction of pain relief of the patients were found to be highly related to pre-operative STAI (r=0.68, -0.88; Plt;0.01). Post-operative VAS score was also related to preoperational STAI and BDI (r=0.35, 0.3). Conclusion Preoperative anxiety is closely related to the postoperative analgesics and satisfaction of pain relief for patients who had abdominal operation. Severe preoperative anxiety can significantly increase the amount of postoperative analgesics used and dissatisfaction of pain relief.
目的 探讨上腹部手术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的可能性及手术方法与技巧。方法 回顾性分析我院2005～2009年期间对有上腹部手术史行LC的23例患者的临床资料。结果 23例患者中慢性结石性胆囊炎18例，胆囊息肉5例。既往均有上腹部手术史，其中胃大部切除术后19例,胃平滑肌瘤切除术后2例,脾破裂修补术后2例。采用闭合法穿刺建立气腹，分离粘连，暴露胆囊全貌及Calot三角，顺行或逆行切除胆囊。23例中LC成功21例; 因粘连致密，胆囊管无法辨认，中转开腹2例。手术时间45～140 min，平均67 min。全组无明显出血、内脏损伤、胆管损伤、胆汁漏等并发症发生。结论 部分上腹部手术后胆囊良性疾病行LC术可行。
ObjectiveTo research the effect of different surgical sutures on abdominal surgical incision healing quality, and provide a novel theory basis for promoting the healing of incision of abdominal wall. MethodsTotally 341 patients who underwent laparotomy were collected from general surgery of Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, and they were randomly divided into three groups: the including polydioxanoneⅡ(PDSⅡ) suture group, abdominal wall incision except the skin was successively sutured with PDSⅡsuture; the Vicryl group, abdominal wall incision except the skin was successively suture with antibacterial Vicryl; and the common silk thread group, abdominal wall incision was performed layering intermittent silk suture. ResultsIn terms of suture time, the PDSⅡsuture group [(11.23±1.62) min〕was significantly lower than the Vicryl group [(14.04±1.20) min〕, P < 0.05, and also both were significantly lower than the ordinary silk thread group [(21.95±1.95) min〕, P < 0.05. In respect of rejection reaction, incision infection and incision split, the PDSⅡsuture group and the Vicryl group were significantly lower than the ordinary silk thread group (P < 0.05), but compared the PDSⅡsuture group with the Vicryl group, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Regarding post operation hospitalization duration, fat liquefaction and effusion, compared the differences between the three groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionFull fascia is successively suture with PDSⅡsutures and antibacterial Vicryl suture that can significantly shorten the suture time, reduce the incidence of rejection incision, wound infection and wound dehiscence and promote the postoperative recovery of the patients.
Objective To evaluate the effects of a preoperative pain education program on patients’ knowledge of postoperative pain management, measures taken for such pain management and the actual postoperative pain. Methods A total of 84 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were non-randomly divided into two groups, 42 in each group. Patients in group A received routine preoperative care and 30 minutes of education about pain management, while patients in group B received routine preoperative care only. All patients completed the Postoperative Pain Management Questionnaire on the second postoperative day. Results Patients in group A achieved higher scores for their knowledge about postoperative pain management than those in group B (Plt;0.05). More patients in group A took non-medical pain relief methods after surgery (Plt;0.05); and patients in group A were able to use the PCA pump more correctly than those in group B (Plt;0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the frequency of asking for analgesics or their pain score when they requested analgesics (Pgt;0.05). The average score for postoperative pain was lower for group A compared to group B (Plt;0.05). Conclusions A program of preoperative pain education can improve patients’ knowledge of postoperative pain management and encourage them to participate actively in such pain management, so as to further relieve the postoperative pain.
【摘要】 目的 探讨腹部手术史对急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）的影响。 方法 2005年1月-2010年9月，将既往有腹部手术史并行LA的111例患者纳入观察组，同期随机抽取无腹部手术史行LA的220例患者纳入对照组。入选患者排除多次手术史、免疫功能低下、肝肾功能不全及血液病。比较两组中转开腹率、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症及住院时间的差异。 结果 两组均未出现术中并发症及死亡，两组患者的中转开腹率、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症及住院时间比较，差异均无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。 结论 即往腹部手术史对急性阑尾炎LA没有明显影响。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of previous abdominal surgery on appendectomy under laparoscope for acute appendicitis. Methods From January 2005 to September 2010, 111 patients with a history of abdominal surgery who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy due to acute appendicitis were in the observe group and 220 patients selected randomly from the patients without a history of previous abdominal surgery who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy were in the control group. The patients with a history of multiple operations, immunodeficiency, liver and kidney dysfunction, and hematopathy were excluded. The data were collected retrospectively and the differences of conversion rate, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital staying were compared between the two groups. Results There were no death or intraoperative complications in both of the two groups. The differences in the conversion rate, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complication rates, and hospital staying between the two groups were not significant (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Previous abdominal surgery has no significant effect on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.
Objective To evaluate whether to defer abdomen surgery in patients having poorly controlled or untreated hypertension before operation. MethodsThe perioperative clinical data of 531 patients with hypertension in our hospital from January 1997 to December 1998 was retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe modility of perioperative hypertensive events was not significantly different, between controlled and uncontrolled patients with grade one and grade two（Pgt;0.05）. In grade three and systolic hypertension, certain complications in patients with poorly controlled hypertension were higher than in those with wellcontrolled hypertension（P＜0.05）. Conclusion The patients with grade one and grade two hypertension are not at increased operative risk. In patients with grade three and systolic hypertension, perioperative complications are increased and elective surgery should be postponed until their blood pressure is brought under 24/14.7 kPa （180/110 mm Hg） over 1 to 2 weeks.