目的 探讨利用常规腹腔镜器械完成经脐单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的可能性和技术要点。方法 收集中国医科大学附属盛京医院微创外科于2009年4月至2010年1月期间施行的12例经脐单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的临床资料。阑尾炎8例，均为女性，平均年龄40岁； 回盲部肿物2例，均为女性，其中1例为回盲部淋巴水瘤（68岁），另1例为回盲部溃疡性结肠炎（47岁）； 乙状结肠息肉1例，女，55岁； 直肠癌1例，男，52岁。 12例均于脐部行2.5~3.0 cm长单切口，利用常规腹腔镜手术器械完成手术。结果 8例阑尾手术，手术时间20~50 min，出血量均少于10 ml； 2例回盲部切除术手术时间分别为60 min和90 min，出血量分别为10 ml和20 ml； 1例乙状结肠切除术用时120 min，术中出血约50 ml，术后4 d拔除引流管； 直肠癌手术时间210 min，术中出血少于200 ml，术后1周拔除引流管并出院。结论 利用常规腹腔镜手术器械完成经脐单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术安全可行。
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy. MethodsA total of 194 patients with low rectal cancer who received complete laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer combined with preventive ileostomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into non-stenosis group (n=136) and stenosis group (n=58) according to postoperative colon-anal anastomosis stenosis. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis, and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the importance of each factor. The risk prediction model of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed and evaluated. ResultsIn the stenosis group, the proportion of males, tumor diameter ＞3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, left colic artery not preserved, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were higher than those in the non-stenosis group (P<0.05). The results of univariate logistic analysis showed that female and preserving the left colonic artery were the protective factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05), and the tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the risk factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, tumor diameter, NRS 2002 score, anastomotic mode, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the top three factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis were NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Cox risk proportional model analysis showed that the multivariate model composed of NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage had a good consistency in the risk assessment of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis. Based on this, a risk prediction model for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed. The results of strong influence point analysis show that there are no data points in the modeling data that have a strong influence on the model parameter estimation (Cook distance <1). Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the model had good differentiation ability, the area under curve was 0.917, 95%CI was (0.891, 0.942). The calibration curve was approximately a diagonal line, showing that the model has good predictive power (Brier value was 0.097). The results of the clinical decision curve showed that better clinical benefits can be obtained by using the predictive model to identify the corresponding risk population and implement clinical intervention. ConclusionThe prediction model based on NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic fistula can effectively evaluate the risk of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis after preventive ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer under complete laparoscopy.
Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILSG) was first described in 2008, which could effectively control excess body weight and treat metabolic diseases relevant to obesity in a long term. Over more than a decade of refinement and technical advancement, precise and standardized surgical techniques have become critical for ensuring treatment efficacy and reducing the rate of postoperative complications. Thus, this review summarizes the evolution of SILSG, further understanding and emphasizing the importance of standardized and precise surgical procedures.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current common clinical laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods, and to provide reference for clinicians to choose reasonable localization methods. MethodThe domestic and foreign literatures related to laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe common localization methods for laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgery were imaging localization, preoperative endoscopic localization, intraoperative endoscopic localization and intraoperative fluorescence localization, among which abdominal enhanced CT and endoscopic-related localization methods were the most commonly used localization methods in clinical practice at present. ConclusionA variety of methods are available for surgeons to choose from, and the precise localization of tumors is better facilitated by combining multiple methods.
Objective?To approach feasibility, safety, and the application range of pure laparoscopic resection （PLR）, hand-assisted laparoscopic resection （HALR）, and robotic liver resection （RLR） in the minimally invasive liver resection （MILR）. Methods?The clinical data of 128 patients underwent MILR in the Surgical Department of the Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from September 2004 to January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different methods, the patients were divided into PLR group, HALR group, and RLR group. The intraoperative findings and postoperative recovery of patients in three groups were compared.?Results?There were 82 cases in PLR group, 3 cases of which were transferred to open surgery；the mean operating time was （145.4±54.4） minutes （range：40-290 minutes）；the mean blood loss was （249.3±255.7） ml （range：30-1 500 ml）；abdominal infection was found in 3 cases and biliary fistula in 5 cases after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment；the mean length of hospital stay was （7.1±3.8） days （range：2-34 days）. There were 35 cases in HALR group, 3 cases of which were transferred to open surgery；the mean operating time was （182.7±59.2） minutes （range：60-300 minutes）；the mean blood loss was （754.3±785.2） ml （range：50-3 000 ml）；abdominal infection was found in 1 case, biliary fistula in 2 cases, and operative incision infection in 2 cases after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment；the mean length of hospital stay was （15.4±3.7） days （range：12-30 days）. There were 11 cases in RLR group, 2 cases of which were transferred to open surgery； the mean operating time was （129.5±33.5） minutes （range：120-200 minutes）； the mean blood loss was （424.5±657.5） ml （range：50-5 000 ml）； abdominal infection was found in 1 case and biliary fistula in 1 case after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment； the mean length of hospital stay was （6.4±1.6） days （range：5-9 days）. The operating time （P=0.001） and length of hospital stay （P=0.000） of the RLR group were shortest and the blood loss （P=0.000） of the PLR group was least among three groups. Conclusions?Minimally invasive resection is a safe and feasible. Different surgical procedures should be chosen according to different cases. The robotic liver resection provides new development for treatment of liver tumor.
ObjectiveTo assess the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted surgery for treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsA total of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer were included between January 2014 and December 2018 were analyzed retroprospectively, the patients were divided into two groups: open surgery group (OS group, n=63) and laparoscopy-assisted surgery group (LAS group, n=52). Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters and postoperative items, and long-term efficacy were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data including gender, age and preoperative serum parameters between the two groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in the LAS group was significantly less than that in the OS group (P<0.05). In addition, the first feeding time after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the LAS group were significantly shorter than the OS group (P<0.05). Furthermore, numbers of white blood cells and neutrophils in the LAS group were fewer than that in the OS group at postoperative 2 days (P<0.05); the level of serum albumin in the LAS group was higher than that OS group (P<0.05). The number of lymph nodes detected during operation in the LAS group was more than that in the OS group (P<0.05). Operative time and occurrence of postoperative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05). One hundred and ten of 115 patients were followed- up, the follow-up rate was 95.7%. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 48 months, with a median follow-up time of 12.4 months. The disease-free survival time of the OS group was 12.2±6.5 months, while that of the LAS group was 13.5±7.4 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsLaparoscopic technique in treatment of advanced gastric cancer has the minimally invasive advantage, less intraoperative blood loss, less surgical trauma, and faster postoperative recovery in comparing to the traditional open surgery. Also the lymph node dissection is superior to open surgery. The curative effect is comparable to that of open surgery.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) on postoperative recurrence. MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2015), EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases from inception to Nov. 2015, to collect relevant clinical studies comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy for BOTs. Two reviewer independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of include studies by using NOS scale. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsNineteen cohort studies were included. The scores of NOS scale showed that 10 studies were < 7 points, while the other 9 studies were≥7 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the recurrence rate of tumor (OR=1.75, 95%CI 1.05 to 2.91, P=0.03) in the laparoscopy group was higher than that in the laparotomy group, but no significant differences were found in further subgroup analysis according to type of operations (conservative surgery: OR=1.22, 95%CI 0.71 to 2.08, P=0.47; non-conservative surgery: OR=4.38, 95% CI 0.85 to 22.68, P=0.08). The diameter of tumor in the laparoscopy group was significant smaller than that in the laparotomy group (MD=-6.88, 95% CI-8.15 to-5.61, P < 0.000 01), and the rate of rupture of tumor in the laparoscopy group was significant higher than that in the laparotomy group (OR=3.99, 95% CI 2.54 to 6.26, P < 0.000 01). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows, compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy has similar effect on postoperative recurrence and smaller diameter of tumor, but laparoscopy could increase the rate of rupture of tumor. Due to the limited quality and sample size of included studies, more high quality and large sample size studies are need to prove the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of myomectomy via transumbilical laparoendompic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) and traditional multiport laparoscopy.MethodsThe study was conducted at Chengdu Western Hospital from June 2019 to June 2020. Fifty patients underwent TU-LESS myomectomy (TU-LESS group), while another 50 patients underwent traditional multiport laparoscopic myomectmy (multiport laparoscopy group). The conditions of operation, extra analgetic usage, VAS grade, and patients’ satisfaction degree were compared between two groups.ResultsPatients in both groups had similar age, BMI, fibroma volume, operative time, expelling gas day, blood loss, complication rate, and hospitalized costs (P>0.05). Compared with traditional multiport laparoscopy, the TU-LESS group resulted in significantly shorter hospitalization day, lower VAS score of the 1st/3nd/7th days after surgery, less use of analgetic after surgery, and higher satisfaction degree.ConclusionsTU-LESS is safe and feasible for myomectomy, and it is associated with less pain, shorter hospitalization day, and higher satisfaction degree.