ObjectiveTo understand risk factors of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture and the latest progress.MethodThe domestic and foreign related literatures on risk factors affecting AAA rupture were retrieved and reviewed.ResultsBesides some definite risk factors of AAA rupture, including age, gender, hypertension, smoking, family history, complications (such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, etc.), the biomechanical factor was the crucial factor of AAA rupture, including the aortic compliance, aortic wall peak value of pressure, aortic wall calcification, and hemodynamics. The latest imaging methods such as the high resolution ultrasound, function and molecular imaging, and phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging could provide technical supports for the prediction of AAA rupture.ConclusionsThere are many risk factors affecting AAA rupture. Clinicians might prevent and make individualize treatment for AAA rupture according to its risk factors, and risks of AAA rupture could be more accurately assessed with help of new medical imaging examination.
ObjectiveTo explore the progresses of diagnosis and treatment for endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). MethodsThe literatures on studying the classification, diagnosis and management, risk factor, and treatment for the endoleaks after EVAR were reviewed and analyzed. ResultsEndoleak was a common and particular complication after EVAR and its represented persistence meant failure of the EVAR treatment. Accurate detection and classification were essential for the proper management and the treatment method for the endoleak was determined by the different source. Type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ endoleak required urgent treatment， type Ⅱ and type Ⅴ were considered less urgently but may be observed continuously. A variety of techniques including extension endografts or cuff, balloon angioplasty, bare stents, and a combination of transvascular and direct sac puncture embolization techniques were allowed to treat the vast majority of these endoleaks. ConclusionsEndoleak after EVAR is still the main clinical problem to be solved. The characters of endoleak still are not fully revealed. The diagnosis and treatment remained equivocal, which requires further study.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of treating type Ⅱ endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms with coil embolization. Methods A retrospective review of patients with type Ⅱ endoleaks treated with coil embolization was performed. Data regarding the technical, clinical, and imaging outcomes during perioperation and followed-up were collected. Results The technical success rate and the initial clinical success rate of treating type Ⅱ endoleaks with coil embolization were 100% (14/14). The mean operating time was (124.3±11) min, a mean of (127±15) mL contrast agent and a mean of (7±2) coils were used. During perioperation, one patient suffered left limb paralysis, all the patients were discharged with no perioperative mortality. Twelve patients were followed-up. During the period of 3 to 57 months of followed-up (average: 17.3 months), Type Ⅱ endoleaks reoccurred in one patient with coil embolization of the feeding vessels alone and two patients with coil embolization of the aneurysm sac alone. Since the aneurysms did not enlarge during the followed-up, these 3 patients continued followed-up without reinterventions. Conclusion Treating type Ⅱ endoleaks with coil embolization appears to be safe, and it can prevent aneurysm sac enlargement effectively. Because of the high risk of reoccurrence, follow-up after embolization is important.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current advancement of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) participating in formation of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and to find out the potential treatment strategy of AAA. MethodsRelevant literatures about PPARs and formation of AAA were reviewed. ResultsAAA involved inflammation of all the layers of aorta, and the formation of AAA needed many kinds of inflammatory cells and cytokines. Many researches in vitro or in vivo had shown that PPARs could reduce the expression of inflammatory cytokines, to reduce formation of AAA. However, PPARγ was also confirmed to participate in the formation of AAA and the mechanism might be the transformation of macrophage from type 1 macrophage (M1) to type 2 macrophage (M2). According to the existing studies, the assumption could be that PPARγ can suppress the inflammatory function of M1 to reduce formation of AAA at the initiating stage, and promote formation of AAA by inducing the transform of macrophage to M2 at the late stage. ConclusionPPARs may be a potential targeting point for the prevention of AAA. More studies are needed to show the feasibility and to decide the application timing.
Objective To explore the diagnosis and treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm （RAAA）. Methods The clinical data of 20 patients with RAAA from January 2000 to December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively．Results There were 18 males and 2 females．The age was 31-82 years with an average 65.4 years．All the patients were abdominal pain and （or） back pain．Eleven cases had low blood pressure or shock．Seven cases had a history of abdominal aortic aneurysm．All the cases were accurately diagnosed by CTA，Doppler ultrasonography or operation．Nineteen cases were treated by conventional operation，1 by endovascular aortic repair．Survival of 16 cases recovered smoothly. Perioperative death occurred in 4 cases，mortality rate was 20% in 20 patients with RAAA．The causes of death included circulatory failure in 1 case and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in 3 cases．Conclusions Surgery treatment is an effective treatment for RAAA．Early diagnosis and urgent surgical repair are crucial to reduce the mortality of RAAA．
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular abdominal aortic repair have now become the first-line treatment options for aortic stenosis and abdominal aortic disease, respectively. For patients with both diseases, combined procedures have been reported in a few domestic and foreign publications. However, all the procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Here, we reported a case of simultaneous minimalist transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular repair of the abdominal aorta for a 78-year-old male patient with aortic stenosis and abdominal aortic ulcer, and the surgical results were satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo determine the influence of proximal aneurysm neck anatomy on typeⅠA endoleak follo-wing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. MethodsFrom September 2007 to February 2014, 111 consecutive patients with non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were treated with EVAR. The preoperative CTA of abdominal aortic was obtained by every patient, and the three-dimensional imaging was reconstructed and measured by software of Osorix. Then, the relation between the recurrence of typeⅠA endoleak and the concerned data measured by Osorix was analyzed by the statistical software. ResultsThe recurrence of typeⅠA endo-leak was related to the proximal neck angle of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, which weren't related to the proximal neck diameter and variation rates, the mural thrombas and calcification rate, and the maximum diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm by multivariate analysis. ConclusionsThe complicated proximal aneurysm neck anatomy is a major cause for the typeⅠA endoleak, the proximal neck angle of the abdominal aortic aneurysm is the independent factor. The applica-tion of EVAR depends largely on the shape of the proximal aneurysm neck.
Objective To explore the predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in peripheral blood for postoperative complications of elective endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods From August 2016 to November 2021, the clinical data of patients with AAA who received endovascular isolation repair for the first time in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Beijing Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including the basic information of the patients, comorbid diseases, and the largest diameter of AAA, preoperative blood labotry test, postoperative complications, long-term survival rate and other indicators. The optimal NLR in peripheral blood was determined, and the differences in postoperative complications and long-term survival rates between the high NLR group and the low NLR group were analysed. Results A total of 120 patients with AAA underwent endovascular isolation for the first time were included in this study, including 105 males and 15 females. The age ranged from 52 to 94 years, with an average of (73.3 ± 8.26) years. The largest diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm was 35 to 100 mm, with an average of (58.5 ± 12.48) mm. The best cut-off value of NLR for predicting postoperative complications of AAA was 2.45 by using Yoden index screening. Those with NLR ≥2.45 were in the high NLR group (n=66), and those with NLR <2.45 were in the low NLR group (n=54). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of overall complications and the incidence of sub-complications (P>0.05). The results of logistic regression analysis suggested that NLR was an independent risk factor for complications after endovascular repair of AAA (P<0.05). The median survival time of patients in the high NLR group and the low NLR group was 31.47 months and 35.28 months, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion NLR can be used as a reference predictor of complications after elective endovascular repair of AAA, but more research results are still needed to confirm.
目的 探讨大动脉炎所致肾动脉上腹主动脉闭塞的手术治疗方法。方法 回顾性分析1例肾动脉上腹主动脉闭塞行腹主动脉-双股动脉人工血管搭桥手术治疗的患者的临床资料,并进行文献复习。结果 术后患者头痛明显好转，血压由术前的220/110 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)降至160/100 mm Hg,双下肢踝肱指数由0.50升至1.19。术后2周复查CTA示人工血管通畅，术后3个月复查彩超示人工血管通畅，血压在(140～150)/(80～95) mm Hg间波动，双眼视力1.0左右，已恢复正常生活。结论 大动脉炎所致肾动脉上腹主动脉闭塞常会影响多个重要脏器的供血，病变复杂，手术时机及方法的正确选择及长期抗炎治疗可以提高患者的治疗效果。